1
|
Lozano-Calderón SA, Albergo JI, Groot OQ, Merchan NA, El Abiad JM, Salinas V, Gomez Mier LC, Montoya CS, Ferrone ML, Ready JE, Linares FJ, Levin AS, Peleteiro Pensado M, Pozo Kreilinger JJ, Ruiz IB, Ortiz-Cruz EJ, Gebhardt MC, Cote GM, Choy E, Spentzos D, Hung YP, Deshpande V, Chebib IA, McCulloch RA, Farfalli G, Aponte Tinao L, Morris CD, Petur Nielsen G, Anderson ME, Jeys LM. Complete tumor necrosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy defines good responders in patients with Ewing sarcoma. Cancer 2023; 129:60-70. [PMID: 36305090 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival in patients who have Ewing sarcoma is correlated with postchemotherapy response (tumor necrosis). This treatment response has been categorized as the response rate, similar to what has been used in osteosarcoma. There is controversy regarding whether this is appropriate or whether it should be a dichotomy of complete versus incomplete response, given how important a complete response is for in overall survival of patients with Ewing sarcoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact that the amount of chemotherapy-induced necrosis has on (1) overall survival, (2) local recurrence-free survival, (3) metastasis-free survival, and (4) event-free survival in patients with Ewing sarcoma. METHODS In total, 427 patients who had Ewing sarcoma or tumors in the Ewing sarcoma family and received treatment with preoperative chemotherapy and surgery at 10 international institutions were included. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analyses were used to assess the associations between tumor necrosis and all four outcomes while controlling for clinical factors identified in bivariate analysis, including age, tumor volume, location, surgical margins, metastatic disease at presentation, and preoperative radiotherapy. RESULTS Patients who had a complete (100%) tumor response to chemotherapy had increased overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14-0.48; p < .01), recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.82; p = .01), metastasis-free survival (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.15-0.46; p ≤ .01), and event-free survival (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.16-0.41; p ≤ .01) compared with patients who had a partial (0%-99%) response. CONCLUSIONS Complete tumor necrosis should be the index parameter to grade response to treatment as satisfactory in patients with Ewing sarcoma. Any viable tumor in these patients after neoadjuvant treatment should be of oncologic concern. These findings can affect the design of new clinical trials and the risk-stratified application of conventional or novel treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago A Lozano-Calderón
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jose Ignacio Albergo
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Olivier Q Groot
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nelson A Merchan
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jad M El Abiad
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Vanessa Salinas
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Luis Carlos Gomez Mier
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Camilo Soto Montoya
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Marco L Ferrone
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John E Ready
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Francisco J Linares
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Adam S Levin
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Manuel Peleteiro Pensado
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Juan Pozo Kreilinger
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Irene Barrientos Ruiz
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eduardo J Ortiz-Cruz
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mark C Gebhardt
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gregory M Cote
- Division of Sarcoma and Connective Tissue Oncology, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Edwin Choy
- Division of Sarcoma and Connective Tissue Oncology, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dimitrios Spentzos
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yin P Hung
- Division of Bone and Soft Tissue Pathology, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Vikram Deshpande
- Division of Bone and Soft Tissue Pathology, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ivan A Chebib
- Division of Bone and Soft Tissue Pathology, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert Allan McCulloch
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Royal Orthopedic Hospital National Health Service Trust, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Germán Farfalli
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Luis Aponte Tinao
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Carol D Morris
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Gunnlaugur Petur Nielsen
- Division of Bone and Soft Tissue Pathology, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Megan E Anderson
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lee M Jeys
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Royal Orthopedic Hospital National Health Service Trust, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Landriel F, Albergo JI, Farfalli G, Yampolsky C, Ayerza M, Aponte-Tinao L, Teixeira W, Ritacco L, Hem S. Navigated multiplanar osteotomies for spinal primary bone tumors. Surg Neurol Int 2022; 13:58. [PMID: 35242424 PMCID: PMC8888310 DOI: 10.25259/sni_1232_2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Establishing the proper diagnosis and rendering appropriate treatment of spinal primary bone tumors (SPBT) can result in definitive cures. Notably, malignant, or benign SPBT (i.e., with aggressive local behavior) generally require en bloc resection. Osteotomies of the vertebral body in more than 1 plane may avoid critical structures, preserve nerve functions, and reduce the volume of healthy bone resected. Here, our objective was to report how we planned and performed navigated multiplanar osteotomies for en bloc resection of 14 SPBT. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 14 patients with malignant or locally aggressive benign SPBT operated on consecutively between 2014 and 2019 utilizing preoperative 3D planning/navigation. Tumors were resected in an en bloc fashion utilizing multiplanar osteotomies. Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 postoperative months. Results: Diagnoses included three benign but locally aggressive bone tumors (i.e., all osteoblastomas) and 11 primary sarcomas (i.e., six chordomas and five chondrosarcomas). Eleven tumors involved the sacrum and the other three, the thoracic spine. In 12 patients, the en bloc margins were classified as marginal (<1 cm), and in two patients, as wide (>1 cm). Intraoperative navigation facilitated the performance of 40 osteotomies in 14 patients (median = 2.9, range = 2–6). Conclusion: Navigated multiplanar osteotomies increased the precision and safety of en bloc resections for 14 primary spinal bone tumors SPBT that included 11 malignant and three benign/locally aggressive lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Landriel
- Department of Neurosurgical, Spine Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires,
| | - José Ignacio Albergo
- Department of Orthopedic, Oncology Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina,
| | - Germán Farfalli
- Department of Orthopedic, Oncology Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina,
| | - Claudio Yampolsky
- Department of Neurosurgical, Spine Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires,
| | - Miguel Ayerza
- Department of Orthopedic, Oncology Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina,
| | - Luis Aponte-Tinao
- Department of Orthopedic, Oncology Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina,
| | - William Teixeira
- Department of Orthopedic, Spine Surgery Division, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil,
| | - Lucas Ritacco
- Department of Health Informatics, Virtual Planning and Navigation Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Santiago Hem
- Department of Neurosurgical, Spine Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cabas-Geat AE, Bruchmann MG, Albergo JI, Ayerza MA, Farfalli G, Aponte-Tinao LA, Muscolo LD. Modular prosthesis reconstruction after tumour resection, evaluation of failures and survival. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed) 2019; 63:173-180. [PMID: 30922597 DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2019.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Revised: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze a series of patients with bone tumours reconstructed with modular prostheses and to evaluate: 1) Survival of the implant. 2) Causes of failure. 3) Complication rates. 4) Limb salvage overall survival. 5) Functional results and full weight bearing. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study from longitudinally maintained oncology databases was undertaken. All patients with bone tumours reconstructed with endoprosthesis were analysed. A toal of 106patients matched the inclusion criteria. They were divided into groups: group 1, primary bone tumours; group 2, bone metastasis; group 3, osteoarticular allograft reconstruction revisions. The type of failures were classified according to Henderson et al. (2014) and functional results assessed by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS). Demographic analysis, survival and the differences between groups were recorded. RESULT The mean follow-up of the patients was 68 months. Mean age was 43 years. Overall implant survival was 86.4% at 2 years (95% CI: 79-94) and 73% at 5 years (95% CI: 60-80). Nineteen patients (18%) developed a prosthetic failure. The limb salvage overall survival was 96% at 5 years (95% CI: 91-99). The mean functional results according to the MSTS was 24 and mean time to full weight bearing was 2.3 weeks. CONCLUSIONS Limb conservation surgery and endosprosthetic reconstruction is a valid option for patients with bone tumours with failure rates similar to other reconstruction methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A E Cabas-Geat
- Servicio de Ortopedia Oncológica y Trasplantes Óseos, Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - M G Bruchmann
- Servicio de Ortopedia Oncológica y Trasplantes Óseos, Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - J I Albergo
- Servicio de Ortopedia Oncológica y Trasplantes Óseos, Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - M A Ayerza
- Servicio de Ortopedia Oncológica y Trasplantes Óseos, Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - G Farfalli
- Servicio de Ortopedia Oncológica y Trasplantes Óseos, Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - L A Aponte-Tinao
- Servicio de Ortopedia Oncológica y Trasplantes Óseos, Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - L D Muscolo
- Servicio de Ortopedia Oncológica y Trasplantes Óseos, Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ferraris J, Rodriguez PE, Albergo JI, Alonso L, Bauque S, Farfalli G, Aponte-Tinao L. Analysis of the order-implantation relationship for musculoskeletal tissue transplantation. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed) 2018; 62:318-321. [PMID: 29884515 DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2018.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Revised: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 04/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze orders requested from a musculoskeletal tissue bank and to evaluate the percentage of tissue implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two hundred and sixty-five orders for musculoskeletal tissue were analyzed over the course of a year. EXCLUSIONS 5 duplications and 5 orders for which there was no availability to cover the need. We analyzed the number of surgeries in which the graft was finally used. RESULTS Of a total of 255 orders, the graft was used in 178 (70%), and the graft was not used in 77 (30%). Of the 178 used, there was a partial refund in 23 (10%). Of the 77 orders not used, surgery was performed in 32 (13%) without the use of bank tissue, while surgery was discontinued in the remaining 45 (17%). DISCUSSION A non-utilization rate of 30% was identified, of which 17% was from surgery that was not performed and 13% from surgery that was performed, but the tissue was returned to the tissue bank, because it was not required. In a further 10% there was partial return of the tissue. Based on this analysis, we consider that it is important to have direct confirmation of the surgery to avoid sending tissue for discontinued surgeries, since in addition to the economic impact, the bank must ensure adequate temperature maintenance during transportation and storage in the transplantation centre, to avoid discarding said tissue if it is returned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Ferraris
- Unidad de Procuración de Órganos y Tejidos para Trasplantes, Banco de Tejidos, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - P E Rodriguez
- Unidad de Procuración de Órganos y Tejidos para Trasplantes, Banco de Tejidos, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - J I Albergo
- Unidad de Procuración de Órganos y Tejidos para Trasplantes, Banco de Tejidos, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - L Alonso
- Unidad de Procuración de Órganos y Tejidos para Trasplantes, Banco de Tejidos, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - S Bauque
- Unidad de Procuración de Órganos y Tejidos para Trasplantes, Banco de Tejidos, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - G Farfalli
- Unidad de Procuración de Órganos y Tejidos para Trasplantes, Banco de Tejidos, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - L Aponte-Tinao
- Unidad de Procuración de Órganos y Tejidos para Trasplantes, Banco de Tejidos, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|