Surfactant improves irrigant penetration into unoperated sinuses

BACKGROUND

Saline irrigations are proving to be a valuable intervention in the treatment of chronic sinusitis. The use of surfactants is a well established additive to topical treatments known to reduce surface tension and may prove to be a simple, nonoperative intervention to improve intrasinus douching penetration.

METHODS

Six 30-mL, flat-bottomed medicine cups with circular holes cut through the bottom center and varying in diameter from 1 to 6 mm were created with punch biopsies. Water, saline, saline/dye, and saline/dye/surfactant were compared for maximum holding pressure via these modeled ostia. Holding pressures also were determined for cups with septal mucosa fused to the bottom with holes ranging from 1 to 6 mm. In addition, analysis was carried out with blood and blood/surfactant. Finally, five thawed, fresh-frozen cadaver heads were evaluated before any sinus surgery with water/dye and water/dye/surfactant for intrasinus penetration.

RESULTS

Surfactant significantly improved the ability of all solutions to penetrate ostia in both the plastic cup and fused septal mucosa model. All nonsurfactant-containing solutions were not statistically different from one another, nor did surfactant change the ostial penetration of blood. Surfactant significantly improved the ability of sinus irrigant to penetrate unoperated sinus cavities (3.12 vs 3.5, p = .021).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of surfactant to saline irrigation improves ostial penetration in undissected and undiseased cadavers. This has practical implications for unoperated patients seeking care for sinus-related symptoms in that we have now described a method for improving topical treatment of target sinus mucosa prior to surgical intervention.

Ulnar head implant arthroplasty: an intermediate term review of 1 surgeon's experience

Ulnar head arthroplasty has been an emerging alternative for salvage of resection arthroplasty at the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) since the early 1990s. Recently, it has been offered for initially treating painful arthrosis or instability of the DRUJ. This follow-up study reports a surgeon's experience treating DRUJ disorders with ulnar head arthroplasty. Twenty-two wrists in 20 patients (11 females, 9 males), 6 with no prior wrist procedures were treated between 1995 and 2006 for painful DRUJ disorders with either Herbert-Martin (Martin Medizin-Technik, Tuttingen, Germany) or Avanta (Small Bone Innovations, New York, NY) head prosthesis. Follow-up averaged 54.3 months. A standardized telephone survey determined preoperative /postoperative verbal analog pain scores and a modified Mayo Wrist Score (delineating poor, fair, good, or excellent outcomes). Data suggest that ulnar head implant arthroplasty is a reasonable treatment option for DRUJ-related pain, loss of function, or salvage of failed distal ulna resection procedures. The analog pain score statistically significant decreased by 1.68 points when comparing preoperative to postoperative scores. Average Modified Mayo Wrist Scores were good, independent of whether the procedure was primary or salvaged. No significant difference was seen between the primary or salvage group modified Mayo Wrist Scores. Whereas averaged modified Mayo scores for both the primary and salvage groups were in the good category, prostheses used as primary procedures may be associated with fewer poor or fair outcomes. Two good and 1 excellent outcome of 3 wrists requiring revision procedures suggest that even with revision of the implant arthroplasty, satisfactory results may be expected.