Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus EXTREME Regimen as First-Line Treatment for Recurrent/Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: The Final Results of CheckMate 651

PURPOSE

CheckMate 651 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02741570) evaluated first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus EXTREME (cetuximab plus cisplatin/carboplatin plus fluorouracil ≤ six cycles, then cetuximab maintenance) in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).

METHODS

Patients without prior systemic therapy for R/M SCCHN were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab or EXTREME. Primary end points were overall survival (OS) in the all randomly assigned and programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 20 populations. Secondary end points included OS in the programmed death-ligand 1 CPS ≥ 1 population, and progression-free survival, objective response rate, and duration of response in the all randomly assigned and CPS ≥ 20 populations.

RESULTS

Among 947 patients randomly assigned, 38.3% had CPS ≥ 20. There were no statistically significant differences in OS with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus EXTREME in the all randomly assigned (median: 13.9 v 13.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 97.9% CI, 0.80 to 1.13; P = .4951) and CPS ≥ 20 (median: 17.6 v 14.6 months; HR, 0.78; 97.51% CI, 0.59 to 1.03; P = .0469) populations. In patients with CPS ≥ 1, the median OS was 15.7 versus 13.2 months (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.97). Among patients with CPS ≥ 20, the median progression-free survival was 5.4 months (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) versus 7.0 months (EXTREME), objective response rate was 34.1% versus 36.0%, and median duration of response was 32.6 versus 7.0 months. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 28.2% of patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 70.7% treated with EXTREME.

CONCLUSION

CheckMate 651 did not meet its primary end points of OS in the all randomly assigned or CPS ≥ 20 populations. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed a favorable safety profile compared with EXTREME. There continues to be a need for new therapies in patients with R/M SCCHN.

Abiraterone and Olaparib for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Abiraterone and Olaparib for Metastatic Prostate CancerPatients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, regardless of homologous recombination repair gene mutation status, received either abiraterone and olaparib or abiraterone and placebo in the first-line setting. Imaging-based progression-free survival was 24.8 months for patients treated with abiraterone and olaparib versus 16.6 months for those receiving abiraterone alone.

Sotorasib for previously treated colorectal cancers with KRASG12C mutation (CodeBreaK100): a prespecified analysis of a single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Sotorasib, a specific, irreversible KRAS^G12C protein inhibitor, has shown monotherapy clinical activity in KRAS^G12C-mutated solid tumours, including colorectal cancer, in the CodeBreaK100 phase 1 trial. We aimed to investigate the activity and safety of sotorasib in phase 2 of the trial.

METHODS

In this single-arm, phase 2 trial, adult patients with KRAS^G12C-mutated advanced solid tumours were enrolled, from 59 medical centres in 11 countries, if they were aged 18 years or older, had at least one measurable lesion according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or lower. Only data for patients with colorectal cancer, enrolled at 33 medical centres in nine countries, are presented from this basket trial. To be enrolled, the patients had to have progressed after receiving fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan treatment. These patients were administered 960 mg sotorasib orally once per day until disease progression, development of unacceptable side-effects, withdrawal of consent, or death. The primary endpoint was objective response (complete or partial response) as assessed by blinded independent central review. Response was evaluated in patients who received at least one dose of sotorasib and had at least one measurable lesion at baseline; safety was evaluated in patients who received at least one dose of sotorasib. This analysis is a prespecified analysis triggered by the phase 2 colorectal cancer cohort. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03600883, and is active but no longer recruiting.

FINDINGS

On March 1, 2021, at data cutoff, 62 patients with KRAS^G12C-mutant colorectal cancer had been enrolled between Aug 14, 2019, and May 21, 2020, and had received at least one dose of sotorasib monotherapy. Objective response was observed in six (9·7%, 95% CI 3·6-19·9) of 62 patients, all with partial response. Treatment-related adverse events at grade 3 occurred in six (10%) patients, the most common of which was diarrhoea (two [3%] of 62 patients), and at grade 4 occurred in one (2%) patient (blood creatine phosphokinase increase); no fatal events were recorded. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in two (3%) patients (back pain and acute kidney injury).

INTERPRETATION

Although the 9·7% overall response rate did not reach the benchmark, oral administration of sotorasib once per day showed modest anti-tumour activity and manageable safety in these heavily pretreated chemorefractory patients. Sotorasib is under evaluation in combination with other therapeutics to increase potential activity and overcome potential resistance mechanisms.

FUNDING

Amgen.

Tumor Response and Symptom Palliation from RAINBOW, a Phase III Trial of Ramucirumab Plus Paclitaxel in Previously Treated Advanced Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population of the RAINBOW study, objective response rate (ORR) was 28% and 16% in the ramucirumab and control arms, respectively. To further characterize tumor response, we present details on timing and extent of tumor shrinkage, as well as associations with symptom palliation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tumor response was assessed with RECIST v1.1, and quality of life (QoL) was assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) v3.0. Prespecified and post hoc analyses were conducted in the ITT population, patients with measurable disease, or responders, and included best overall response (BOR), ORR, disease control rate (DCR), duration of response, time to response (TtR), change in tumor size, and associations of QoL with tumor shrinkage and BOR.

RESULTS

In both treatment arms, median TtR was 1.5 months. Responses were more durable in the ramucirumab versus control arm (median 4.4 vs. 2.8 months). In patients with measurable disease (78% of ITT), ORR was 36% versus 20%; DCR was 81% versus 61% in the ramucirumab versus control arms. Waterfall plots demonstrated more tumor shrinkage in the ramucirumab versus control arm. Regardless of treatment, tumor response and stable disease were associated with improved or stable QoL, with more tumor shrinkage associated with greater symptom palliation.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel yielded the highest ORR reported to date for patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Additional details demonstrate robustness of tumor response results. The extent of tumor shrinkage is directly associated with symptom palliation and should be considered when evaluating patient needs and treatment selection. Clinical trial identification number. NCT01170663.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel is a recognized standard of care as it improves survival for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who have been previously treated with recommended first-line therapy. These additional data on tumor response demonstrate a positive association between tumor shrinkage and symptom palliation in a patient population that is often symptomatic. These observations included patients with nonmeasurable disease, a group of patients often underrepresented in clinical trials. This knowledge can inform treatment decisions, which align individual patient characteristics and needs with demonstrated benefits.

Abstract PS13-25: Management of abemaciclib associated diarrhea in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: Analysis of the MONARCH plus study

Background:

In the phase III MONARCH plus study (NCT02763566) the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4&6 inhibitor abemaciclib in combination with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI) or with fulvestrant compared with placebo demonstrated its efficacy and acceptable safety profile at interim analysis in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) locoregionally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. One of the most common treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was diarrhea, typically low grade and of early onset. We will further characterize abemaciclib-associated diarrhea and describe its management in MONARCH plus trial.

Methods:

MONARCH plus study included two cohorts of patients. Cohort A enrolled patients with initial treatment of endocrine therapy, received abemaciclib or placebo plus NSAI (anastrozole or letrozole); Cohort B enrolled patients who progressed on prior endocrine therapy, receiving abemaciclib or placebo plus fulvestrant. The relative dose intensity was defined as the percentage of actual dose received relative to the planned dose. The severity of diarrhea was reported by investigators and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAE v4.0). Further analysis on diarrhea included time to onset, duration, supportive medication and dose modifications. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from randomization to death or progression (RECIST v1.1), and a stratified Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) between study intervention arm and placebo arm.

Results:

The median relative dose intensity of abemaciclib in abemaciclib plus NSAI arm and abemaciclib plus fulvestrant arm were 96.77% and 96.30% respectively. In abemaciclib plus NSAI arm and abemaciclib plus fulvestrant arm, the median time to onset of first reported diarrhea was 7 and 6 days and majority of diarrhea events occurred early (66.3% and 71.2% of patients reported diarrhea in Cycle 1 respectively). Diarrhea was typically of low grade (3.9% and 1.9% of patients reported Grade 3 in abemaciclib plus NSAI arm and abemaciclib plus fulvestrant arm, no Grade 4 diarrhea was reported in either arm). Median duration of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea was 2.5 and 3.5 days. Diarrhea was managed by dose adjustments and/or supportive medication (Table 1). Dose reductions were present in 2.0% and 2.9% of patients, and anti-diarrhea therapy was received in 30.2% and 32.7% of patients with abemaciclib plus NSAI and abemaciclib plus fulvestrant arm, respectively. As data cutoff, most diarrhea events were reported as resolved, and the incidence dropped below 10% (Grade 2) and 1% (Grade 3) by Cycle 2 in both arms and kept low incidence over time. Compared to the placebo arm, patients treated with abemaciclib combination who reported diarrhea within the first 7 days (abemaciclib + NSAI, HR [95% CI]: 0.289 [0.166, 0.502]; abemaciclib + fulvestrant, HR [95% CI]: 0.371 [0.213, 0.647]) had significant improvement in PFS.

Conclusion:

Majority of diarrhea events were of low grade in severity and well managed by anti-diarrheal medications, dose omissions or/and dose reductions in MONARCH plus patients.

Table 1. Summary of dose adjustments and supportive medications in patients experiencing diarrheaCohort ACohort BAbemaciclib + NSAIAbemaciclib + FulvestrantN = 205N = 104Diarrhea (any grade), n (%)164 (80.0)82 (78.8)1105 (51.2)52 (50.0)251 (24.9)28 (26.9)38 (3.9)2 (1.9)Outcome, number of events, n796333Recovered/resolved, n (%)757 (95.1)318 (95.5)Not recovered/resolved, n (%)17 (2.1)7 (2.1)Treatment change, n (%)Dose reduction4 (2.0)3 (2.9)Dose omission3 (1.5)3 (2.9)Treatment discontinuation00Anti-diarrhea therapies, n (%)62 (30.2)34 (32.7)loperamide48 (23.4)21 (20.2)berberine6 (2.9)6 (5.8)

Citation Format: Zefei Jiang, Xichun Hu, Qingyuan Zhang, Tao Sun, Yongmei Yin, Huiping Li, Min Yan, Zhongsheng Tong, Christina Pimentel Oppermann, Yunpeng Liu, Romulo Costa, Man Li, Xi Chen, Ying Cheng, Quchang Ouyang, Ning Liao, Xiaojia Wang, Xinhong Wu, Jifeng Feng, Roberto Hegg, Govindbabu Kanaka Setty, Amit Agarwal, Jyoti Bajpai, Jing Cheng, Gustavo Girotto, Chanchal Goswami, Wenjing Hu, Jian Huang, MA Coccia Portugal, Jin Yang, Rongsheng Zheng, Fabio Andre Franke, Qiang Liu, Yunjiang Liu, Yongkui Lu, Cristiano Souza, Shiying Yu, Nalini Kilara, Harsha Panchal, Ashish Singh, Shona Nag, Jian Liu, Bernardo Rapoport, Neonyana Keorapetse Rebecca Tabane, Hongxia Wang, Ning Wang, Rubing Han, Wanli Zhang. Management of abemaciclib associated diarrhea in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: Analysis of the MONARCH plus study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS13-25.

Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-181 Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced esophageal cancer have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options after first-line chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this open-label, phase III study, we randomly assigned (1:1) 628 patients with advanced/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, that progressed after one prior therapy, to pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 2 years or chemotherapy (investigator's choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan). Primary end points were overall survival (OS) in patients with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10, in patients with squamous cell carcinoma, and in all patients (one-sided α 0.9%, 0.8%, and 0.8%, respectively).

RESULTS

At final analysis, conducted 16 months after the last patient was randomly assigned, OS was prolonged with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for patients with CPS ≥ 10 (median, 9.3 v 6.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.93]; P = .0074). Estimated 12-month OS rate was 43% (95% CI, 33.5% to 52.1%) with pembrolizumab versus 20% (95% CI, 13.5% to 28.3%) with chemotherapy. Median OS was 8.2 months versus 7.1 months (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.96]; P = .0095) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and 7.1 months versus 7.1 months (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.05]; P = .0560) in all patients. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18.2% of patients with pembrolizumab versus 40.9% in those who underwent chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab prolonged OS versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal cancer in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10, with fewer treatment-related adverse events.

Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-181 Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced esophageal cancer have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options after first-line chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this open-label, phase III study, we randomly assigned (1:1) 628 patients with advanced/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, that progressed after one prior therapy, to pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 2 years or chemotherapy (investigator's choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan). Primary end points were overall survival (OS) in patients with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10, in patients with squamous cell carcinoma, and in all patients (one-sided α 0.9%, 0.8%, and 0.8%, respectively).

RESULTS

At final analysis, conducted 16 months after the last patient was randomly assigned, OS was prolonged with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for patients with CPS ≥ 10 (median, 9.3 v 6.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.93]; P = .0074). Estimated 12-month OS rate was 43% (95% CI, 33.5% to 52.1%) with pembrolizumab versus 20% (95% CI, 13.5% to 28.3%) with chemotherapy. Median OS was 8.2 months versus 7.1 months (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.96]; P = .0095) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and 7.1 months versus 7.1 months (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.05]; P = .0560) in all patients. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18.2% of patients with pembrolizumab versus 40.9% in those who underwent chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab prolonged OS versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal cancer in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10, with fewer treatment-related adverse events.

New age-related hearing loss candidate genes in humans: an ongoing challenge

Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) is the most frequent sensory disorder in the elderly, affecting approximately one-third of people aged more than 65 years. Despite a large number of people affected, ARHL is still an area of unmet clinical needs, and only a few ARHL susceptibility genes have been detected so far. In order to further investigate the genetics of ARHL, we analyzed a series of 46 ARHL candidate genes, selected according to previous Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) data, literature updates and animal models, in a large cohort of 464 Italian ARHL patients. We have filtered the variants according to a) pathogenicity prediction, b) allele frequency in public databases, c) allele frequency in an internal cohort of 113 healthy matched controls, and 81 healthy semi-supercentenarians. After data analysis, all the variants of interest have been tested by functional "in silico" or "in vitro" experiments (i.e., molecular dynamics simulations and protein translation analysis) to assess their pathogenic role, and the expression of the mutated genes have been checked in mouse or zebrafish inner ear. This multi-step approach led to the characterization of a series of ultra-rare likely pathogenic variants in DCLK1, SLC28A3, CEP104, and PCDH20 genes, contributing to describe the first association of these genes with ARHL in humans. These results provide essential insights on the understanding of the molecular bases of such a complex, heterogeneous and frequent disorder, unveiling new possible targets for the future development of innovative therapeutic and preventive approaches that could improve the quality of life of the millions of people affected worldwide.

SELECT-2: a phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of selumetinib plus docetaxel as a second-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

Combination of selumetinib plus docetaxel provided clinical benefit in a previous phase II trial for patients with KRAS-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The phase II SELECT-2 trial investigated safety and efficacy of selumetinib plus docetaxel for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

Patients and methods

Patients who had disease progression after first-line anti-cancer therapy were randomized (2 : 2 : 1) to selumetinib 75 mg b.i.d. plus docetaxel 60 or 75 mg/m² (SEL + DOC 60; SEL + DOC 75), or placebo plus docetaxel 75 mg/m² (PBO + DOC 75). Patients were initially enrolled independently of KRAS mutation status, but the protocol was amended to include only patients with centrally confirmed KRAS wild-type NSCLC. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST 1.1); statistical analyses compared each selumetinib group with PBO + DOC 75 for KRAS wild-type and overall (KRAS mutant or wild-type) populations.

Results

A total of 212 patients were randomized; 69% were KRAS wild-type. There were no statistically significant improvements in PFS or overall survival for overall or KRAS wild-type populations in either selumetinib group compared with PBO + DOC 75. Overall population median PFS for SEL + DOC 60, SEL + DOC 75 compared with PBO + DOC 75 was 3.0, 4.2, and 4.3 months, HRs: 1.12 (90% CI: 0.8, 1.61) and 0.92 (90% CI: 0.65, 1.31), respectively. In the overall population, a higher objective response rate (ORR; investigator assessed) was observed for SEL + DOC 75 (33%) compared with PBO + DOC 75 (14%); odds ratio: 3.26 (90% CI: 1.47, 7.95). Overall the tolerability profile of SEL + DOC was consistent with historical data, without new or unexpected safety concerns identified.

Conclusion

The primary end point (PFS) was not met. The higher ORR with SEL + DOC 75 did not translate into prolonged PFS for the overall or KRAS wild-type patient populations. No clinical benefit was observed with SEL + DOC in KRAS wild-type patients compared with docetaxel alone. No unexpected safety concerns were reported.

Trial identifier

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01750281.

Usher syndrome: an effective sequencing approach to establish a genetic and clinical diagnosis

Usher syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by retinitis pigmentosa, sensorineural hearing loss and, in some cases, vestibular dysfunction. The disorder is clinically and genetically heterogeneous and, to date, mutations in 11 genes have been described. This finding makes difficult to get a precise molecular diagnosis and offer patients accurate genetic counselling. To overcome this problem and to increase our knowledge of the molecular basis of Usher syndrome, we designed a targeted resequencing custom panel. In a first validation step a series of 16 Italian patients with known molecular diagnosis were analysed and 31 out of 32 alleles were detected (97% of accuracy). After this step, 31 patients without a molecular diagnosis were enrolled in the study. Three out of them with an uncertain Usher diagnosis were excluded. One causative allele was detected in 24 out 28 patients (86%) while the presence of both causative alleles characterized 19 patients out 28 (68%). Sixteen novel and 27 known alleles were found in the following genes: USH2A (50%), MYO7A (7%), CDH23 (11%), PCDH15 (7%) and USH1G (2%). Overall, on the 44 patients the protocol was able to characterize 74 alleles out of 88 (84%). These results suggest that our panel is an effective approach for the genetic diagnosis of Usher syndrome leading to: 1) an accurate molecular diagnosis, 2) better genetic counselling, 3) more precise molecular epidemiology data fundamental for future interventional plans.

GJB2 and GJB6 genes and the A1555G mitochondrial mutation are only minor causes of nonsyndromic hearing loss in the Qatari population

OBJECTIVE

This study reports results from the first survey of the genetic causes of nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss (NSHHL) in the Qatari population. DESIGN AND STUDY SAMPLES: Data were collected from 126 Qatari patients (58 males and 68 females) belonging to inbred families (56%), showing an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance (96%). Fifty-three patients were less than 10 years old, 55 in the age range of 10 to 20 years, while 18 were aged between 20 and 30 years. All subjects had moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss and were screened for GJB2 mutations, GJB6 deletion, and for A1555G mitochondrial mutation.

RESULTS

Four patients were homozygous and one was heterozygous for c.35delG; five were homozygous for the IVS1 + 1G < A, and two were heterozygous for c.229 T > C. Only 8.3% of the pathogenic alleles were detected. No patients were positive for GJB6 deletion or for A1555G .

CONCLUSIONS

These findings: (1) demonstrate that GJB2, GJB6 deletion and A1555G mutation account for a minor proportion of NSHHL in the Qatari population, (2) further strengthen the need to search for causative genes, (3) clearly contribute to establishing preventive strategies for NSHHL in Qatar and in the Gulf area.

Estrógenos em água: otimização da extração em fase sólida utilizando ferramentas quimiométricas

Muitos métodos analíticos estão sendo desenvolvidos visando à determinação de contaminantes orgânicos, especialmente alteradores endócrinos. Tais métodos baseiam-se geralmente na extração em fase sólida (SPE) seguida por determinação cromatográfica (CG ou HPLC). No presente trabalho utilizou-se ferramentas quimiométricas no processo de SPE para avaliar os principais fatores que influenciam tal processo e as interações entre os mesmos. Foram analisadas matrizes de água subterrânea fortificada com hormônios (17 b estradiol, estrona e 17 b etinilestradiol) e a determinação analítica foi feita por HPLC/Fluorescência. Um planejamento fatorial completo foi utilizado. Os fatores escolhidos incluíram: condicionamento da fase sólida, concentração dos analitos, volume da amostra e solvente de eluição. As melhores condições obtidas foram: 500 mL da amostra, condicionamento da fase sólida (C18) com acetona (4mL), metanol (6 mL) e água pH 3(10 mL), e eluição dos analitos com 4 mL de acetona.