Effects of medial amygdala inactivation on a panic-related behavior

In the last years, the role played by the medial nucleus of the amygdala (MeA) in the modulation of fear- and anxiety-related behaviors has been increasingly investigated. This nucleus plays an important role in the processing of predator odor-induced defensive reactions, i.e. freezing and risk-assessment behaviors. Immunohistochemical evidence also indicates that the MeA may be involved in the regulation of escape, a defensive behavior related to panic attacks. In this study, we further addressed this question by investigating the effects of the reversible inactivation of the nucleus on escape behavior generated in male Wistar rats by two different aversive stimuli, electrical stimulation of the dorsal periaqueductal gray matter (dPAG) and exposure to one of the open arms of the elevated T-maze. Results showed that intra-MeA administration of either the reversible sodium channel blocker lidocaine (34 nmol/0.2 microl) or the GABA(A) receptor agonist muscimol (0.22 nmol/0.2 microl) raised the threshold of aversive electrical stimulation, increasing the amount of current that applied to the dPAG evokes escape, an antiaversive effect. Local microinjection of muscimol (0.22 nmol/0.2 microl) inhibited escape behavior in the elevated T-maze, also suggesting an antiaversive effect. In this latter test, muscimol did not affect inhibitory avoidance, a behavior associated with generalized anxiety disorder. Muscimol effect in the elevated T-maze was independent of changes in general exploratory activity as measured in an open-field. Taken together, our data corroborate previous evidences suggesting that the MeA is involved in the modulation of escape. Dysfunction of this regulatory mechanism may be of relevance in the genesis/maintenance of panic disorder.

Inhibitory avoidance memory retention in the elevated T-maze is impaired after perivascular manipulation of the common carotid arteries

Perivascular manipulation promoted by the positioning of a silicone collar around the common carotid arteries causes local inflammation and has been suggested as an animal model of atherosclerosis. This manipulation induces biochemical and morphological changes that are similar to those observed in the early stage of atherosclerosis in humans. Based on evidences showing that atherosclerosis is associated with cognitive deficits in humans, we presently investigated the temporal consequences of the bilateral positioning of silicone collars around the common carotid arteries (n = 15) on inhibitory avoidance memory retention in male Wistar rats tested in the elevated T-maze. The effects of this procedure were compared to those observed in sham-operated animals (n = 15) and to those observed in animals submitted to permanent bilateral occlusion of the common carotid arteries (n = 16). Additionally we studied the effects of the pretreatment with the non-selective anti-inflammatory drug indomethacin (n = 13) or the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib (n = 12) and compared the effects to those of the pretreatment with vehicle (n = 11). The results showed that the silicone collar implants induced deficits in memory retention when animals were tested 2 and 4, but not 15 or 30, days after surgery. Permanent bilateral occlusion of the common carotid arteries impaired avoidance retention up to 30 days after surgery. Pretreatment with indomethacin (2 mg/kg/day) or celecoxib (5 mg/kg/day) post surgery and up to 3 days thereafter did not prevent memory deficits caused by silicone collar implants. Our data suggest that the prostanoids that participate in the inflammatory process triggered by the placement of the silicone collar do not seem responsible for the deficit in memory retention observed during the first days after collar placement.