Detailed characterisation of circulatory nitric oxide and free radical indices--is there evidence for abnormal cardiovascular homeostasis in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome?

OBJECTIVE

To assess circulating biochemical indices of endothelial function and nitro-oxidative stress in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

DESIGN

Case-control study.

POPULATION

Seventeen women with PCOS and eighteen age- and body mass index-matched healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Nitric oxide (NO) metabolite levels were assessed by chemiluminescence. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy with spin trapping was used to assess oxidative stress ex vivo and in vitro. Antioxidant capacity was measured using oxygen radical absorbance.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Biochemical indices of endothelial function, including NO metabolites, lipid-derived radicals and antioxidant capacity.

RESULTS

Plasma NO metabolites were similar in the two groups (nitrite: 257±116 nmol/l [PCOS], 261±135 nmol/l [controls] P=0.93; nitrate: 27±7 μmol/l [PCOS], 26±6 μmol/l [controls] P=0.89). Alkoxyl free radicals (lipid-derived) were detected as the dominant species, but levels were not different between women with PCOS and controls whether measured directly ex vivo (median 7.2 [range 0.17-16.73]e6 arbitrary units [a.u.] and 7.2 [1.7-11.9]e6 a.u., respectively, P=0.57) or when stimulated in vitro to test radical generation capacity (1.23 [0.3-5.62]e7 a.u. and 1.1 [0.48-15.7]e7 a.u. respectively, P=0.71). In regression analysis, visceral fat area was independently associated with in vitro oxidative potential (β=0.6, P=0.002). Total plasma antioxidant capacity (94±30% [PCOS], 79±24% [controls], P=0.09) and plasma hydroperoxides (7.5±4 μmol/l [PCOS], 6.7±5 μmol/l [controls], P=0.21) were not different between groups. However, lipophilic antioxidant capacity was lower in women with PCOS compared with controls (92±32 and 125±48%, respectively, P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Young overweight women with PCOS display a reduced lipophilic antioxidant capacity compared with healthy volunteers, but no change in circulating free radicals or nitro-oxidative stress.

Can abdominal bioelectrical impedance refine the determination of visceral fat from waist circumference?

Ryo et al (2005 Diabetes Care 28 451-3) reported a new method for measuring the visceral fat area (VFA) by combining abdominal bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with measurement of waist circumference (WC), but very few methodological details were provided. Furthermore, the study did not test the use of WC alone as an indicator of VFA even though others had previously reported a strong correlation. We sought to determine the optimal measurement technique and analysis for measuring VFA by abdominal BIA and WC. 18 volunteers (age 23-64 years) underwent measurement of WC, abdominal impedance (Bodystat 500 four-electrode system) and a single cross-sectional CT scan at the umbilicus. VFA derived using WC(3) and measurements of abdominal impedance from electrode pairs sited at the flank predicted the value of VFA measured by CT with correlation r = 0.904 (p < 0.0001); the optimizing power of WC was 3.3 (r = 0.905). However, the use of WC(1.9) alone, without involving BIA at all, provided a similar correlation (r = 0.923). Our small preliminary study shows that abdominal BIA is potentially a practicable non-invasive technique for measurement of VFA but casts doubt on whether it adds any value to the use of WC alone. Larger studies are now required to test this finding.