Prognostic and predictive role of ESR1 status for postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer in the Danish cohort of the BIG 1-98 trial

BACKGROUND

Estrogen Receptor 1 (ESR1) aberrations may be associated with expression of estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) or Ki-67 labeling index and prognosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ESR1 was assessed in 1129 (81%) of 1396 postmenopausal Danish women with early breast cancer randomly assigned to receive 5 years of letrozole, tamoxifen or a sequence of these agents in the Breast International Group 1-98 trial and who had ER ≥ 1% after central review.

RESULTS

By FISH, 13.6% of patients had an ESR1-to-Centromere-6 (CEN-6) ratio ≥ 2 (amplified), and 4.2% had ESR1-to-CEN-6 ratio <0.8 (deleted). Deletion of ESR1 was associated with significantly lower levels of ER (P < 0.0001) and PgR (P = 0.02) and more frequent HER2 amplification. ESR1 deletion or amplification was associated with higher-Ki-67 than ESR1-normal tumors. Overall, there was no evidence of heterogeneity of disease-free survival (DFS) or in treatment effect according to ESR1 status. However, significant differences in DFS were observed for subsets based on a combination of ESR1 and HER2 status (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

ESR1 aberrations were associated with HER2 status, Ki-67 labeling index and ER and PgR levels. When combined with HER2, ESR1 may be prognostic but should not be used for endocrine treatment selection in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer.

Which patients benefit most from adjuvant aromatase inhibitors? Results using a composite measure of prognostic risk in the BIG 1-98 randomized trial

BACKGROUND

On average, aromatase inhibitors are better than tamoxifen when used as initial or sequential therapy for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer. Because there may be contraindications to their use based on side-effects or cost, we investigated subgroups in which aromatase inhibitors may be more or less important.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Breast International Group 1-98 trial randomized 6182 women among four groups comparing letrozole and tamoxifen with sequences of each agent; 5177 (84%) had centrally confirmed estrogen receptor (ER) positivity. We assessed whether centrally determined ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and Ki-67 labeling index, alone or in combination with other prognostic features, predicted the magnitude of letrozole effectiveness compared with either sequence or tamoxifen monotherapy.

RESULTS

Individually, none of the markers significantly predicted differential treatment effects. Subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot analysis of a composite measure of prognostic risk revealed three patterns. Estimated 5-year disease-free survival for letrozole monotherapy, letrozole→tamoxifen, tamoxifen→letrozole, and tamoxifen monotherapy were 96%, 94%, 93%, and 94%, respectively, for patients at lowest risk; 90%, 91%, 93%, and 86%, respectively, for patients at intermediate risk; and 80%, 76%, 74%, and 69%, respectively, for patients at highest risk.

CONCLUSION

A composite measure of risk informs treatment selection better than individual biomarkers and supports the choice of 5 years of letrozole for patients at highest risk for recurrence.

Abstract P4-07-04: Preoperative Plasma Concentration of MMP-9/TIMP-1 Complexes Is Not Associated with Disease Outcome in Primary Breast Cancer (N=483)

Background: Plasma levels of Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) have been reported as predictors of poor prognosis. Indeed, in a previous study of 519 primary breast cancer patients we reported that high levels of TIMP-1 were associated with a poor prognosis (Würtz et al, 2008). In our previous study we quantified total levels of TIMP-1 in plasma; however, TIMP-1 is present in plasma in a non-complexed form and bound to various proteins. Thus, studying the different fractions might refine prognostic stratification and provide further insight into the role of TIMP-1 in tumor biology. Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) is an important TIMP-1 binding partner and MMP-9 has previously been suggested as a breast cancer biomarker (Li et al, 2004; Somiari et al, 2006). Aim: The aim of the study was to analyze the concentration of MMP-9/TIMP-1 complexes in plasma from our previously studied primary breast cancer patients and evaluate whether these levels are associated with disease outcome.

Materials and methods: Plasma concentrations of MMP-9/TIMP-1 complexes were measured using the human MMP-9/TIMP-1 Complex DuoSet® ELISA Development System (R&D Systems, Inc.) The ELISA was thoroughly validated for measurements of MMP-9/TIMP-1 complexes in EDTA plasma. Samples included preoperatively obtained EDTA plasma from consecutively enrolled patients with primary breast cancer. Of the previously studied 519 patients, 483 had plasma samples available for analysis and follow-up data registered by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and were included in the present study. The median follow-up time was 5.1 years. The relationship between MMP-9/TIMP-1 complexes and classical prognostic parameters was analyzed and the association with recurrence-free survival (RFS; includes breast cancer relapse, contralateral breast cancer, other malignant disease, and death without a previous relapse) was studied.

Results: The ELISA was validated with acceptable results. The median TIMP-1 concentration was 2.06 ng/mL. For analysis, patients were grouped in quartiles of increasing MMP-9/TIMP-1 plasma concentrations. MMP-9/TIMP-1 complex levels were associated with menopausal status and with hormone receptor status; no significant associations with other clinico-pathological parameters (tumor size, nodal status, malignancy grade, age) were found. No statistically significant difference in survival was observed among TIMP-1 high and low groups (quartiles, log-rank analysis p=0.96). In a Cox multivariable analysis (including tumor size, nodal status, hormone receptor status, malignancy grade, menopausal status, age), only age (&gt; 70 years) and hormone receptor status contributed significantly to the model for RFS (P&lt;0.001). MMP-9/TIMP-1 complex concentration was not associated with RFS in this model.

Conclusions: In this group of primary breast cancer patients we did notfind any association between MMP-9/TIMP-1 complex levels in plasma and RFS. Total TIMP-1 levels have previously been shown to correlate with prognosis in this patient cohort. Accordingly, our current results point to other TIMP-1 fractions, i.e. the fraction of free TIMP-1 or TIMP-1 in complex with other plasma proteins, as potential indicators of poor prognosis.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-04.

Polysomy of Chromosome 17 in Breast Cancer

Purpose: Polysomy of chromosome 17 is frequently described in breast cancer, but firm definition of polysomy is lacking. We have used normal breast tissue to define the ploidy levels in the truncated nuclei of cut sections based on standard cytogenetic definition of ploidy in whole nuclei. Data from patients with invasive breast cancer enrolled in a randomized clinical trial was used to investigate the effect of polysomy of centromere 17 on patient survival. (Ejlertsen B et al., Eur J Cancer 2007:43:877-84).Material and methods: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with TOP2A/CEN-17 was performed on 120 normal breast specimens. Centromere 17 (CEN-17) measurements from matching HER2/CEN-17 and TOP2A/CEN-17 FISH data was available from 649 patients from a previously published biomarker study (Knoop A et. al., J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7483-90).Results: Two thirds of the tumors had an average number of CEN-17 signals below two and 10% had more than three average CEN-17 signals. Monosomy (&lt;1.25 CEN-17/nucleus) of centromere 17 was observed in 8% of the tumors, 60% of the samples were diploid (1.26-2.09 CEN-17/nucleus), 22% triploid (2.10-2.93 CEN-17/nucleus), 5% tetraploid (2.94-3.77 CEN-17/nucleus) and 5% of the tumors had higher ploidy level (&gt;3.78 CEN-17/nucleus). In the aneuploid tumors and especially in the highly polyploidy tumors, amplification is the most frequent event in the HER2 assay whereas deletions increased with the ploidy level in TOP2A assay. Increasing ploidy was associated with decreased overall survival (P=0.0001), but multivariate analysis showed that polyploidy was not an independent prognostic factor neither predictive for treatment outcome.Conclusion: Polysomy 17 is a rare event in tumor samples from patients, but correlate to HER2 amplification and TOP2A deletion. However, inclusion of a reference probe is necessary if deletions are to be revealed and to avoid false positive amplified cases with a high proportion of dividing cells or a doubling of the DNA content. Very high polyploidy is associated with poor survival but is not an independent prognostic factor when other prognostic factor are included in a multivariate analysis. In this large clinical study, polysomy 17 was neither an independent prognostic nor predictive marker.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 4035.

Bone fractures among postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer treated with 5 years of letrozole or tamoxifen in the BIG 1-98 trial

BACKGROUND

To compare the incidence and timing of bone fractures in postmenopausal women treated with 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen or letrozole for endocrine-responsive early breast cancer in the Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 trial.

METHODS

We evaluated 4895 patients allocated to 5 years of letrozole or tamoxifen in the BIG 1-98 trial who received at least some study medication (median follow-up 60.3 months). Bone fracture information (grade, cause, site) was collected every 6 months during trial treatment.

RESULTS

The incidence of bone fractures was higher among patients treated with letrozole [228 of 2448 women (9.3%)] versus tamoxifen [160 of 2447 women (6.5%)]. The wrist was the most common site of fracture in both treatment groups. Statistically significant risk factors for bone fractures during treatment included age, smoking history, osteoporosis at baseline, previous bone fracture, and previous hormone replacement therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with other trials comparing aromatase inhibitors to tamoxifen, letrozole was associated with an increase in bone fractures. Benefits of superior disease control associated with letrozole and lower incidence of fracture with tamoxifen should be considered with the risk profile for individual patients.

Prediction of responsiveness to adjuvant anthracyclines in high-risk breast cancer patients

597

Background: HER-2, TOP2A, and TIMP-1 have shown predictive properties regarding benefit from anthracyclines in patients with breast cancer. In the present study, TIMP-1 IHC was integrated with TOP2A FISH and HER-2 status in two separate profiles. Methods: The DBCG 89-D trial randomized 980 high-risk Danish breast cancer patients to nine series of CMF or CEF. CEF was superior to CMF in terms of DFS and OS (Ejlertsen et al, EJC 2007). HER-2 status and TOP2A copy number changes were determined as described previously (Knoop et al, J Clin Oncol. 2005). TMA s were constructed and analyzed centrally for TIMP-1 expression by IHC (± tumor cell immunoreactivity). TIMP-1 was combined with HER-2 into a joint HT marker (HT-non-responsive (HT-NR): HER-2 normal and TIMP-1 positive or HT-responsive (HT-R): HER-2 positive and/or TIMP-1 negative) and with TOP2A into a joint 2T marker (2T-NR: TOP2A normal and TIMP-1 positive or 2T-R: TOP2A abnormal and/or TIMP-1 negative). Relationships between IDFS, OS and the HT/2Tprofiles were analyzed using multivariate regression analysis. Results: Among patients with a HT-R profile CEF was superior to CMF in terms of both invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.45–0.86; p = 0.004) and overall survival (OS) (HR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45–0.87; p = 0.005). In patients with a HT-NR profile, no significant differences between CEF and CMF were demonstrated for IDFS or OS. A significant HT profile (HT-R or HT-NR) versus treatment (CEF or CMF) interaction was detected by the Wald-test for both IDFS (p = 0.036) and OS (p = 0.047). An even more pronounced separation was observed regarding the 2T profile, and in patients with a 2T-R profile treatment with CEF was superior to CMF in terms of IDFS (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.34–0.69; p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38–0.77; p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in patients with a 2T-NR profile. A highly significant 2T profile versus treatment interaction was detected for IDFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.004). Conclusions: Profiles created by joining TIMP-1 with either HER-2 status or TOP2A gene status seems advantageous compared to the use of a single marker.

[Table: see text]

Lack of TIMP-1 tumor cell immunoreactivity predicts effect of adjuvant anthracycline based chemotherapy in patients (n=647) with primary breast cancer

Abstract #6042

Background: Randomized trials have in general demonstrated that anthracycline-based chemotherapy prolongs disease-free and overall survival as compared to CMF-based regimens. In the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) 89D randomised trial a 21% improvement in overall survival was observed from substitution of methotrexate in the CMF combination with epirubicin. This suggests that the additional effect of anthracyclines is confined to a subset of the patients. We have previously shown that in vitro grown cancer cells devoid of Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) are more sensitive towards chemotherapy than cells expressing TIMP-1 (Davidsen et al., Br J Cancer, 2005). In addition, we have recently published (Schrohl et al., Clin Cancer Res., 2006), that patients with metastatic breast cancer and high levels of TIMP-1 in their primary tumor tissues, have a significantly reduced likelihood of obtaining an objective response to chemotherapy.&#x2028; Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate if Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinses-1 (TIMP-1) tumor cell immunoreactivity could be used to identify a subset of patients who benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy.&#x2028; Patients and Methods: Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue micro arrays from 647 patients who were enrolled in the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group randomized trial 89D comparing adjuvant CMF versus adjuvant CEF were analysed for tumor cell TIMP-1 immunoreactivity. The primary end-point was invasive disease free survival (IDFS). Immunohistochemistry was performed using the anti-TIMP-1 monoclonal antibody VT7 as described previously (Sørensen et al., J. Hist. Cytochem., 2006) and the slides were scored as + or – for positive immunoreactivity.&#x2028; Results: Tumor cell TIMP-1 immunoreactivity was found in 75% of the tumor samples. In the CEF treated patients, individuals with TIMP-1 negative tumors had a significant longer IDFS than patients with TIMP-1 positive tumors (p=0.047). The multivariate Cox regression analysis of IDFS showed that CEF was superior to CMF among patients with TIMP-1 negative tumors (HR: 0.51; 95%CI: 0.31 to 0.84, p=0.008), while no significant difference could be demonstrated among patients with TIMP-1 positive tumors (HR: 0.86; 95%CI: 0.66 to 1.11, p=0.24). However, only a non-significanct trend could be demonstrated between TIMP-1 status and CEF versus CMF (p=0.07 for interaction).&#x2028; Conclusion: Lack of TIMP-1 tumor cell immunoreactivity seems to predict a favourable effect of epirubicin containing adjuvant therapy in primary breast cancer. However, an independent study is awaited to validate the potential predictive value of TIMP-1 immunoreactivity.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6042.

Validation of the predictive value of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 for the response to first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer

Abstract #6057

*Würtz SØ and Klintman M contributed equally, Malström P and Brünner N shares the senior authorship.&#x2028; Background. Predictive markers are scarcely represented in breast cancer. TIMP-1 has in a previous study (n = 173) performed in our laboratory been shown to carry predictive information for the response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer as high tumor tissue levels of TIMP-1 were significantly associated with a low objective response rate to treatment with the most frequently used chemotherapeutic drugs (CMF or anthracyclines). The purpose of the present study was to validate these previous results with a new independent patient population.&#x2028; Methods. The TIMP-1 level was measured using a validated ELISA in 168 primary tumor extracts from patients with metastatic breast cancer and levels were associated with the objective response to CMF and anthracyclines. Patients were included in the study provided that they had received chemotherapy for their metastatic disease and that frozen tumor tissue as well as data on their objective response to chemotherapy was available.&#x2028; Results. The median TIMP-1 level in responders was 17.3 (2.9 – 75.8) ng TIMP-1/mg protein and in non-responders it was 19.6 (0-190.3) ng TIMP-1/mg protein. When analysed as a continuous log-transformed variable, increasing tumor levels of TIMP-1 were associated with a decreasing probability of objective response to CMF or anthracyclines (OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 0.97 – 2.62, p = 0.07). This is very similar to the original study and thus supporting previous data. Next, we used a more clinically relevant approach for analysing the data from the validation study. For this analysis, objective response was scored as complete or partial response versus stable disease lasting at least six months (clinical benefit) versus progressive disease (non-response). This analysis showed that increasing levels of TIMP-1 were associated with a poor clinical benefit rate from chemotherapy (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 0.98 - 2.51, p=0.06). The original study has not previously been analysed using this endpoint. When performing this analysis, similar results were found (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.06 - 2.48, p = 0.02). Combining the new population and the original population in a pooled analysis (n = 341) using a random effects model showed that high levels of TIMP-1 were highly significantly associated with a poor clinical benefit rate from chemotherapy compared with patients with low levels (OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.16 - 2.18, p=0.003).&#x2028; Conclusion. The present validation study supports previous findings that primary tumor tissue levels of TIMP-1 carries predictive information in metastatic breast cancer treated with chemotherapy.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6057.

Treatment of anthracycline extravasation with dexrazoxane: Pharmacokinetics and update on efficacy and safety from three multicenter trials

2555

Background: Dexrazoxane prevented tissue necrosis in 98% of patients (pts) with biopsy proven anthracycline extravasation (AEV) in two international multicenter studies, TT01 and TT02 (Mouridsen HT et al Ann Onc Advance Access Dec 21, 2006). However, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of IV dexrazoxane in the three-day schedule is not established. Study TT04 was initiated to investigate PK. Patients and methods: TT04 is a prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter studies in pts with AEV. Consecutive pts with AEV are treated with a three-day schedule of IV dexrazoxane (1,000, 1,000, and 500 mg/m2) starting within 6 hr of AEV. Primary objective: Establish PK of IV dexrazoxane in the three-day schedule. Secondary objectives: obtaining additional efficacy and safety data. Plasma samples at 0, 1, 2, 4 and 24 hr day 1–3 are analyzed by HPLC-MS. PK parameters were calculated by a non compartmental method. TT01 and TT02 were open-label, single-arm, multicenter studies enrolling pts with biopsy proven AEV from 24 EU centers. Primary objective was to avoid tissue necrosis leading to surgery. Secondary objectives were to minimize delay of planned chemotherapy, reduce hospitalization, and avoid long term sequelae. Results: Six pts have entered the PK study. The average elimination was T½ ± SD of 127 ± 23, 144 ± 21, and 107 ± 29 min, day 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Pre-dose concentrations day 2 and 3 are = LOQ. Average AUC 0-t ± SD are 193 ± 93 (t= 24 hr), 196 ± 101 (t= 24 hr), and 46 ± 24 μg hr/ml (t= 4 hr), on day 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Cumulative data from the 3 studies: Surgery was avoided in 59/60 pts (98.3%). No delay in planned chemotherapy in 71%. 41% were hospitalized (median 3 days) due to the EV or its treatment. Mild pain (19%) and mild sensory disturbances (17%) were the most frequent sequelae: Reversible CTC grade 3–4 leucopenia/neutropenia in 45%, thrombocytopenia in 21% of the pts. Conclusion: There was no accumulation of dexrazoxane during the three-day schedule. Dexrazoxane was well tolerated and highly effective against anthracycline extravasation. Updated results will be presented.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Aromatase inhibitors (AI) for elderly patients: Efficacy, compliance and safety according to patient age in the BIG 1–98 trial

9033

Background: Because elderly patients (pts) are under-represented in clinical trials, care should be taken in extending overall results to that patient group. We compared letrozole (L) with tamoxifen (T) with respect to disease-free survival, treatment compliance, and adverse events (AEs) according to age in the continuous therapy arms of the BIG 1–98 trial. Methods: Between March 1998 and May 2003, 8,028 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer were enrolled in the BIG 1–98 trial. This report includes the 4,922 pts allocated to continuous therapy with either T or L for 5 years. Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plots (STEPP) were used to look at the patterns of differences in disease-free survival and incidences of AEs according to age. In addition, three categorical age groups were defined: “younger postmenopausal” < 65, “older” 65–74, and “elderly” = 75. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare T and L according to time to first AE, adjusting for relevant pre-existing risk factors. The median follow-up was 40.4 months. Results: STEPP analysis showed the L provided consistent benefit compared with T irrespective of age. Pts 75 and older were less likely to complete trial treatment, but similarly in the two treatment groups. Adjusted treatment comparisons of AEs according to age groups are given below. (T,L: significantly more AEs on T,L; NS: no significant difference) Conclusion: Adjuvant treatment with L had superior efficacy compared with T in all age groups. Physicians should base clinical decisions on the individual patient profile with respect to reduction of risk of recurrence from L as well as existing comorbidities.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Cardiovascular adverse events during adjuvant endocrine therapy for early breast cancer using letrozole or tamoxifen: Updated safety analysis of trial BIG 1–98

521

Background: Studies of aromatase inhibitors (AI) vs. tamoxifen (T) including the BIG 1–98 study have suggested a small numerical excess of cardiac adverse events (AEs) and increased incidence of hypercholesterolemia on AIs, and significantly higher incidence of thromboembolic AEs on T. Methods: 8,028 postmenopausal women with receptor-positive early breast cancer were randomized (double-blind) between March 1998 and May 2003 to receive 5 years letrozole (L), T, or a sequence of these agents. 7,963 patients who actually received therapy are included. AEs were recorded through 30 days after therapy completion or after switch on the sequential arms. Cardiovascular AEs were prospectively collected and graded. Cholesterol measurements were analyzed for percent change in total cholesterol from baseline by follow-up visit. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare T and L according to time to first cardiovascular AE, adjusting for hypercholesterolemia at baseline or prior to the event, age, BMI, and history of smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and cardiac morbidity. The median follow-up was 30.1 months. Results: Baseline co-morbidities were balanced. Cox model results for time to first grade 3–5 cardiovascular AE are below. Cholesterol values decreased over time on both treatments, but to a greater extent and earlier on T. Conclusion: Taken together, cardiovascular AEs were relatively rare, and any excess of cardiac events on L seems to be outweighed by the superior control of recurrence afforded by L compared to T. An understanding of the nature, frequency and mechanism of such AEs is important to the optimization of the therapeutic ratio in adjuvant endocrine therapy with AIs.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Predictors of early relapse in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in the BIG 1-98 trial

BACKGROUND

Aromatase inhibitors are considered standard adjuvant endocrine treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, but it remains uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors should be given upfront or sequentially with tamoxifen. Awaiting results from ongoing randomized trials, we examined prognostic factors of an early relapse among patients in the BIG 1-98 trial to aid in treatment choices.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Analyses included all 7707 eligible patients treated on BIG 1-98. The median follow-up was 2 years, and the primary end point was breast cancer relapse. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighty-five patients (3.7%) had an early relapse (3.1% on letrozole, 4.4% on tamoxifen). Predictive factors for early relapse were node positivity (P < 0.001), absence of both receptors being positive (P < 0.001), high tumor grade (P < 0.001), HER-2 overexpression/amplification (P < 0.001), large tumor size (P = 0.001), treatment with tamoxifen (P = 0.002), and vascular invasion (P = 0.02). There were no significant interactions between treatment and the covariates, though letrozole appeared to provide a greater than average reduction in the risk of early relapse in patients with many involved lymph nodes, large tumors, and vascular invasion present.

CONCLUSION

Upfront letrozole resulted in significantly fewer early relapses than tamoxifen, even after adjusting for significant prognostic factors.

Continuous versus intermittent tamoxifen versus intermittent/alternated tamoxifen and medroxyprogesterone acetate as first line endocrine treatment in advanced breast cancer: an EORTC phase III study (10863)

BACKGROUND

Continuous ligand depletion of endocrine responsive tumours may enhance resistance to therapy. Intermittent treatment with tamoxifen (T) was considered to mimic (incomplete) ligand depletion and reintroduction. Furthermore it was postulated that alternating tamoxifen with a non-cross resistant endocrine modality could (further) postpone hormone resistance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer who did not progress after 4 months of first line T therapy were randomised to continue T (40 mg daily) or to 2 monthly intermittent T or intermittent/alternated T and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA, 300 mg daily). At progression during break or during MPA, T should be reintroduced. Endpoints of the study were progression free survival (PFS), time to resistance to tamoxifen and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 593 registered patients, 276 were randomised. After 8 years follow-up the median PFS for continuous T, intermittent T and intermittent/alternated T and MPA was 11.0 (8.1-15.2), 8.0 (6.2-12.4) and 10.8 (7.1-16.7) months, respectively (NS). Resistance to tamoxifen was established only in 84%, 70% and 55% of patients in the three treatment arms, respectively. The median times from randomisation to resistance to tamoxifen were 12.5 (9.1-21.1), 13.2 (8.8-19.8) and 24.0 (16.9-60.9) months, respectively (p<0.001), without translation in differences in survival times.

CONCLUSION

Intermittent T or intermittent/alternated T and MPA had no impact on PFS or OS as compared with classical continuous T in patients with advanced breast cancer. Intermittent/alternated T and MPA resulted in prolonged time to resistance to T, but this might partly be due to bias by omittance of the proof of tamoxifen resistance in a high proportion of the patients in this treatment arm.

TOP2A aberrations as predictive and prognostic marker in high-risk breast cancer patients. A randomized DBCG Trial (DBCG89D)

532

Background: The primary objective of the study was to evaluate TOP2A as predictive marker for adjuvant treatment with epirubicin in high-risk breast cancer patients. As a secondary objective the prognostic characteristics of TOP2A gene aberrations was investigated. The data presented on the predictive properties is a follow-up to the data previously published (Knoop et al, J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 7483–90). Methods: 962 pre- and postmenopausal high-risk Danish patients were enrolled in the DBCG89D protocol. The patients were randomly allocated to either 9 × CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-flurouracil) (n=495) or 9 × CEF (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, 5-flurouracil) (n=467) every 3 weeks. Tumor-tissue was available from 806 patients (84%). The tumors were analyzed for TOP2A copy number changes with the TOP2A FISH pharmDx Kit (Dako, Glostrup). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was used as primary end-point. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to assess the predictive and prognostic properties of the TOP2A gene aberrations. Results: The TOP2A test was successful in 96% of the patients. Ninety-two (12.0%) patients were found to have TOP2A amplified tumors, and 86 (11.1%) to have TOP2A deleted tumors. For the primary study endpoint (RFS) a significant predictive value of TOP2A gene amplifications was found (HR=0.39; CI: 0.22–0.70; p=0.0017). A similar trend was seen with respect to TOP2A deletions (HR=0.61; CI: 0.35–1.07; p=0.082). TOP2A gene aberrations were significantly associated with several established prognostic factors and had independent prognostic value, associated with a significant worse prognosis both for RFS (p=0.036) and overall survival (p=0.012). Conclusions: The DBCG89D study has shown that TOP2A amplifications are associated with a favorable outcome of adjuvant treatment with epirubicin in primary breast cancer. Further, TOP2A aberrations demonstrated an independent prognostic value.

[Table: see text]

The Head to Head trial: Letrozole vs anastrozole as adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal patients with node positive breast cancer

10672

Introduction: Aromatase Inhibitors (AIs) have demonstrated both efficacy and safety advantages over tamoxifen (T) in all treatment settings in breast cancer (BC) and are becoming the new standard of care as endocrine therapy for postmenopausal patients (PM) with BC. Rationale: Cumulative evidence suggests that all AIs may not be the same, raising the question of whether there is a superior AI, and whether any specific patient populations derive differing degrees of benefit from a particular AI. In the ATAC trial, evaluating anastrozole (A) in PM patients with early breast cancer (EBC), at 33 months median follow up the risk of recurrence in the hormone receptor positive (HR+) population was reduced by 22%.The BIG 1–98 Trial, evaluating letrozole (L) in PM women with EBC, showed a significant benefit in favor of L over T at a median follow up of 26 months, with a 19% reduction in the risk of recurrence; in subgroup analyses, L significantly decreased the risk of recurrence in LN+ patients and in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. This study is a head to head comparison of L and A in HR+, LN+ PM patients with EBC and aims to compare L vs A in the adjuvant treatment of these patients. Design and Methods: This is a Phase IIIb open-label, randomized, multicentre study including 4000 PM patients from up to 250 international sites. PM patients with HR+, LN+ BC who have recently undergone surgery for primary BC will be randomized to either receive L 2.5 mg or A 1 mg daily. Treatment will commence following completion of standard chemotherapy (if given) and concurrently with radiotherapy (if given)Patients will receive treatment until disease recurrence/relapse for up to 5 years. Patients will be stratified by number of LN and HER2 status. The primary objective is disease free survival at 5 years for L and A. Secondary objectives include safety, overall survival, time to distant metastases and time to contralateral breast cancer. Data analysis will be conducted by an independent group of investigators. Summary: Updated patient accrual figures, including any available early safety data, will be presented at the meeting.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Quality-adjusted survival in a crossover trial of letrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Results from a phase III study of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer demonstrated longer time to disease progression for patients taking letrozole versus tamoxifen. This analysis compares the trade-offs between progression-free survival and toxicity.

DESIGN

Quality-adjusted survival was calculated using Q-TWiST (quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity). Survival curves were partitioned into three health states: toxicity (TOX), disease progression (PROG) and periods without toxicity or disease progression (TWiST). The utility-weighted sum of the health state durations was derived and compared.

RESULTS

There was not a significant difference in mean duration of serious adverse events prior to progression between the letrozole (n=453) and tamoxifen (n=454) groups (2.2 and 2 months, respectively). For TWiST, the mean duration for letrozole was 11.5 months, versus 8.5 months for tamoxifen (P <0.001). The mean duration of PROG was 11.5 months for letrozole and 12.7 months for tamoxifen (P=0.047). Using utility weights of 0.5 for TOX and PROG resulted in a 2.5-month difference in quality-adjusted survival favoring letrozole (P <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The longer time to disease progression with letrozole versus tamoxifen was achieved without increased time with adverse events and resulted in more quality-adjusted survival for patients on letrozole.

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 in breast cancer

Whether patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer are offered adjuvant systemic therapy following surgical removal of the tumor is based on prognosis. Prognosis is estimated in every patient using established prognostic variables. Unfortunately, when using the currently available prognostic parameters a significant proportion of patients are over-treated. Thus, in order to improve stratification of breast cancer patients, additional prognostic factors need to be identified. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) is one of the promising candidates for new prognostic markers in breast cancer, as a number of studies have demonstrated an association between high tumor-tissue levels of TIMP-1 mRNA as well as TIMP-1 protein and a poor prognosis of breast cancer patients. TIMP-1 is a member of the TIMP family, currently comprising four members (TIMP-1-4), and its main function is inhibition of the activity of various matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). The association between high levels of protease inhibitor and poor prognosis may be somewhat surprising, as proteolytic activity plays a pivotal role in cancer cell invasion and metastasis. However, the recent discovery of other biological functions of TIMP-1 such as growth-stimulating functions, as well as anti-apoptotic and pro-angiogenetic effects, may in part explain this paradox. The purpose of this review is to give an update on the current status of TIMP-1 in breast cancer, emphasizing the prognostic utility of the inhibitor. In addition, the suggested tumor-stimulatory roles of TIMP-1 will be outlined.

Efficacy of First‐Line Letrozole Versus Tamoxifen as a Function of Age in Postmenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy, in regard to time to progression (TTP) and objective response rate (ORR), of letrozole (Femara; Novartis Pharma AG; Basel Switzerland), an oral aromatase inhibitor, with that of tamoxifen (Tamofen; Leiras OY; Turku, Finland) as first-line therapy in younger (<70 years) and older (>/=70 years) postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine hundred seven patients with advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive 2.5 mg letrozole (n = 453) or 20 mg tamoxifen (n = 454) once daily in a double-blind, multicenter, international trial. Among the prospectively planned analyses were analyses of TTP and ORR by age (<70 and >/=70 years). The results of these prospectively planned analyses are reported here.

RESULTS

Letrozole was as effective in older postmenopausal women (>/=70 years of age) as it was in younger postmenopausal women (<70 years of age). The overall ORR in the older subgroup was significantly higher in patients treated with letrozole (38%) than in patients treated with tamoxifen (18%). In the younger subgroup of postmenopausal patients, the ORRs were not significantly different (letrozole, 26%; tamoxifen, 22%). TTP was significantly longer for letrozole than for tamoxifen in both age groups (younger: letrozole median TTP, 8.8 months; tamoxifen, 6.0 months; older: letrozole median TTP, 12.2 months; tamoxifen, 5.8 months). Although age was independently prognostic of TTP, there was no significant effect of age on ORR in the presence of other factors.

CONCLUSION

The data show that letrozole, 2.5 mg once daily, is as effective in older, postmenopausal women as it is in younger postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. In addition, letrozole was more effective than tamoxifen in both younger and older patients.

Superiority of Letrozole to Tamoxifen in the First‐Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer: Evidence from Metastatic Subgroups and a Test of Functional Ability

PURPOSE

The letrozole study 025 is a large (n = 907), international, double-blind, randomized, phase III trial in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. This subanalysis compares the efficacies of letrozole and tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausual women with advanced breast cancer according to site of metastatic lesions and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine hundred seven patients with advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned to once-daily oral letrozole (2.5 mg; Femara; Novartis Pharma AG; Basel, Switzerland) or tamoxifen (20 mg; Tamofen; Leiras OY; Turku, Finland). Time to progression (TTP) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Treatments were compared by Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

Letrozole treatment significantly prolonged TTP in all subsets of patients: those with nonvisceral metastases, those with visceral metastases without liver involvement, and those with liver metastases. The reduction in risk of progression ranged from 25%, for patients with nonvisceral metastases, to 36%, for patients with liver metastases. The distributions of baseline KPS scores for both treatment groups were similar (57% had KPS scores >/=90). Time to worsening of 20 points or more in KPS score was significantly longer with letrozole than with tamoxifen, but modest numbers of patients experienced such deterioration (letrozole, 20%, tamoxifen, 22%, in patients without visceral metastases; 23%-24% in patients with liver metastases; and letrozole, 14%, tamoxifen, 30%, in patients with visceral metastases without liver involvement).

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate the consistent superiority of letrozole over tamoxifen and support the use of letrozole as a new standard of endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

Monitoring different stages of breast cancer using tumour markers CA 15-3, CEA and TPA

The ability of the tumour markers Cancer Antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA), and Tissue Polypeptide Antigen (TPA) to signal progression in breast cancer patients was investigated in this study. Marker interpretation considered the analytical variation, intra-individual biological variation, and the rate of increase. Patient cohorts were as follows: (A) 90 stage II breast cancer patients who were monitored postoperatively, (B) 204 recurrent breast cancer patients who were monitored during first-line chemotherapy, and (C) 112 patients who were monitored during the time period after first-line chemotherapy. The sensitivity for progression was 44% (cohort A), 69% (cohort B), and 68% (cohort C) without any false progression signals. Marker lead-times exceeded 3 months in 20% (cohort A) and 27% (cohort C) of patients. Marker lead-times were 1-6 months among 33% of the patients receiving first-line chemotherapy (cohort B). Trials are necessary to determine whether tumour marker-guided therapy has any prognostic impact. The data suggest that tumour marker information may be used to stop ineffective treatments and reduce unnecessary adverse effects.

Prognostic value of quality of life scores for time to progression (TTP) and overall survival time (OS) in advanced breast cancer

The purpose of the study was to investigate whether baseline quality of life (QoL) and changes in QoL scores from baseline are prognostic for time to progression (TTP) and/or overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced breast cancer receiving docetaxel (T) or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF). QoL was assessed at baseline and before each treatment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Survival curves and probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for both the univariate and multivariate analyses to explore relationships between baseline QoL variables and TTP, as well as OS. In the univariate analysis, more severe pain and fatigue at baseline were predictive for a shorter OS; global QoL, physical functioning and appetite loss had a borderline significance (P=0.0130 for global QoL; P=0.0256 for physical functioning: P=0.0149 for appetite loss). World Health Organization (WHO) performance status was significantly predictive for OS. In the multivariate analysis, more severe pain at baseline was predictive for a shorter OS. In contrast, baseline QoL had no prognostic value for the duration of TTP. QoL change scores from baseline QoL predicted neither OS nor TTP. Our findings suggest that while QoL measurements are important in evaluating patients' QoL, they have no great importance in predicting primary clinical endpoints such as TTP or OS in advanced breast cancer patients.

[The significance of reproductive history for prognosis of primary breast cancer]

The aetiological impact of a woman's reproductive history on breast cancer is well established, whereas the prognostic influence of the reproductive pattern is less well described. A literature search with focus on three Danish studies is described. Status as parous/nulliparous and number of births appear to have no prognostic influence. Women who have their first child at an early age have a lower survival than women who have postponed their first childbirth. This may eventually be explained by selection, i.e. that women with an early first full-term pregnancy represent a group with a more malignant disease. Women diagnosed in the first two years after childbirth have a significantly lower survival, probably because the cancer, being subclinical during pregnancy, is affected by the high oestrogen concentrations with aggressive growth as the outcome. Pregnancy after treatment of breast cancer does not appear to have a negative influence on the prognosis.

Timing of quality of life (QoL) assessments as a source of error in oncological trials

AIM OF THE STUDY

To produce an empirical estimate of the nature and magnitude of the error produced by incorrect timing quality of life (QoL) measurements in patients receiving chemotherapy.

DESIGN

In a multicentre trial, 283 patients were randomized to receive either docetaxel (T) or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF). The QoL was assessed at baseline and before each treatment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The study design was retrospective. Data were analysed using t-tests.

RESULTS

Erroneous timing affected the QoL findings in both treatment arms. At baseline, there were statistically significant differences in the MF group on the nausea/vomiting scale, with ill-timed assessment showing more symptoms, and in the T group on the physical functioning scale with ill-timed assessments indicating better QoL. The mean scores of correct vs. incorrect timings over the first 14 cycles showed statistically significant differences on several scales. In the MF group, ill-timed assessments indicated significantly worse physical functioning and global QoL, and significantly more of the following symptoms: fatigue, nausea/vomiting, insomnia, appetite loss, and constipation. In the T group, ill-timed assessment showed better physical functioning, less dyspnoea and more insomnia than correctly timed assessments. The reasons for erroneous timing were not always detectable retrospectively. However, in some cases the MF group, being in standard treatment, seemed to have followed a clinical routine not involving the active participation of the study nurse responsible, whereas patients in the experimental T group were more consistently taken care of by the study nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorrect timing of QoL assessments in oncological trials jeopardises both the reliability of the QoL findings within treatment and the validity of QoL outcome comparisons between treatments. This issue should be emphasized in the planning of both the study design and clinical routines.

Superior efficacy of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III study of the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tamoxifen with that of letrozole, an oral aromatase inhibitor, with tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Nine hundred seven patients were randomly assigned letrozole 2.5 mg once daily (453 patients) or tamoxifen 20 mg once daily (454 patients). Patients had estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive tumors, or both receptors were unknown. Recurrence during adjuvant antiestrogen therapy or within the following 12 months or prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease precluded enrollment. One prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease was allowed. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). Secondary end points included overall objective response rate (ORR), its duration, rate and duration of clinical benefit, time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival, and tolerability.

RESULTS

TTP was significantly longer for letrozole than for tamoxifen (median, 41 v 26 weeks). Treatment with letrozole reduced the risk of progression by 30% (hazards ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.82, P =.0001). TTP was significantly longer for letrozole irrespective of dominant site of disease, receptor status, or prior adjuvant antiestrogen therapy. Similarly, TTF was significantly longer for letrozole (median, 40 v 25 weeks). ORR was higher for letrozole (30% v 20%; P =.0006), as was the rate of clinical benefit (49% v 38%; P =.001). Survival data are currently immature and not reported here. Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Letrozole was significantly superior to tamoxifen in TTP, TTF, ORR, and clinical benefit rate. Our results support its use as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

A phase II trial of recombinant interferon alpha-2b and cisplatin in metastatic melanoma

In this phase II study 37 patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 every three weeks and interferon alpha-2b 10 MU subcutaneously three times weekly; 125 cycles were administered. Thirty-four patients were evaluable for response and all 37 patients were assessable for toxicity. Four patients stopped treatment with cisplatin because of severe nephrotoxicity, and six patients stopped therapy because of other toxicities. Response rate was 6/34 = 18% (95%) CI (confidence interval): 7%-35%). One patient reached complete response lasting 27+ months. Five patients obtained partial responses with a median duration of response of 7 months (range 5-15+ ). Median time to progression was 2.3 months (range 1-27+). Median survival was 5 months (range 1-27+). We conclude that the combination of high-dose cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and interferon alpha-2b is associated with unacceptable toxicity. Haematological toxicity and nephrotoxicity were pronounced and the response rate was meagre and not encouraging.

Quality of life in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving either docetaxel or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil. A multicentre randomised phase III trial by the Scandinavian breast group

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of two alternative chemotherapy regimes on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with advanced breast cancer. In a multicentre trial, 283 patients were randomised to receive either docetaxel (T) or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF). QoL was assessed at baseline and before each treatment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Initial compliance in the QoL study was 96% and the overall compliance 82%. QoL data were available for 245 patients (T 130 and 115 MF). Both treatment groups showed some improvement in emotional functioning during treatment, with a significant difference favouring the MF group at treatment cycles 5 and 6. In the T group, the scores on the other functional scales remained stable throughout the first six cycles. There were significant differences favouring the MF group on the social functioning scale at treatment cycle 6 and on the Global QoL scale at treatment cycles 5 and 6. On most symptom and single-item scales there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. However, at baseline, the T patients reported more appetite loss, at treatment cycles 2-4, the MF patients reported more nausea/vomiting, and at treatment cycle 6, the T patients reported more symptoms of fatigue, dyspnoea and insomnia. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the mean change scores of the functional and symptom scales. Interindividual variance was, however, larger in the T group. Differences in QoL between the two treatment groups were minor. Hence, given the expectancy of comparable QoL outcomes, the choice of treatment should be made on the basis of the expected clinical effect.

[Should all younger patients with breast cancer be offered adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy?]

The aim of the study was to investigate whether young age at diagnosis is a negative prognostic factor in primary breast cancer and how stage of disease at diagnosis and treatment may influence such an association. It was conducted as a retrospective cohort study based on a population-based data-base of breast cancer diagnosis with detailed information on tumour characteristics, treatment regimens, and vital status and included 10,356 patients with primary breast cancer less than 50 years of age at diagnosis. The main outcome measures were relative risk of dying within the first ten years after diagnosis according to age at diagnosis, adjusted for effect of known prognostic factors and expected mortality. Overall, young patients with low risk disease who did not receive adjuvant treatment had a significantly increasing risk of dying with decreasing age at diagnosis (adjusted relative risk: 45-49 years: 1 (reference); 40-44 years: 1.12 (0.89-1.40); 35-39 years: 1.40 (1.10-1.78); < 35 years: 2.18 (1.64-2.89). However, a similar trend was not seen in young patients who received adjuvant cytotoxic therapy. We found the same difference as above when comparing women receiving no treatment with those receiving adjuvant cytotoxic therapy within strata of node negative patients and patients with the same tumour size. In conclusion, the negative prognostic effect of young age is almost exclusively seen in women diagnosed with low risk disease not receiving adjuvant cytotoxic therapy, whereas young women who receive adjuvant cytotoxic therapy have the same prognosis as middle-aged women. These results suggest that young women with breast cancer, on the basis of age alone, should be regarded as high risk patients and be given adjuvant cytotoxic therapy.

Tamoxifen in high-risk premenopausal women with primary breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Report from the Danish Breast Cancer co-operative Group DBCG 82B Trial

Following modified radical mastectomy, pre- and perimenopausal (amenorrhoea for < 5 years) patients with stage II or III breast cancer received CMF (cyclophosphamide 600, methotrexate 40, 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) every 4 weeks, 9 cycles). The effect on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of the addition of adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM) to adjuvant chemotherapy was examined by randomisation either to no additional treatment (n = 314), or concurrently TAM 30 mg daily for 1 year (n = 320). 40% had positive, 12% negative and 48% unknown receptor status. One year after surgery 21% versus 35% (CMF + TAM versus CMF) were still menstruating (P < 0.01). With a median follow-up of 12.2 years there was no difference in RFS (10-year RFS 34% versus 35%, P = 0.81) or OS (45% versus 46%, P = 0.73). In a Cox proportional hazards model, tumour size, number of metastatic lymph nodes, frequency of metastatic nodes in relation to total number of nodes removed, degree of anaplasia, age, and menostasia within the first year after operation were significant independent prognostic factors for RFS, and the same factors except age for OS. No significant interactions with TAM were seen. Thus, in this group of pre- and perimenopausal high-risk early breast cancer patients with heterogeneous receptor status given CMF i.v., concurrent TAM for 1 year did not improve the outcome. These results do not exclude that receptor positive patients may benefit from adjuvant TAM for longer periods given sequentially to chemotherapy.

Docetaxel compared with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced breast cancer after anthracycline failure: a randomised phase III study with crossover on progression by the Scandinavian Breast Group

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of docetaxel to methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in advanced breast cancer after anthracycline failure. A randomised multicentre trial was conducted in 283 patients with advanced breast cancer who had failed previous anthracycline treatment. Docetaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (n = 143) was compared with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF; n = 139) given at day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks at dosages of 200 mg/ m2 and 600 mg/m2, respectively. After progression, crossover to the alternative treatment group was recommended. There was a significantly higher overall response rate in the docetaxel 42% (CR 8% + PR 34%) than in the MF arm 21% (CR 3% + PR 18%) (P < 0.001). The median time to progression (TTP) was 6.3 months in the docetaxel arm and 3.0 months in the MF arm (P < 0.001). Docetaxel also had a significantly higher response rate of 27% following crossover compared with MF (12%). Significantly more side-effects (leucopenia, infections, neuropathy, oedema, asthenia, skin, nail changes, alopecia) were seen in the docetaxel than in the MF group. However, grade 3 and 4 side-effects were infrequent with both drugs, with the exception of fatigue, alopecia and infections. Median overall survival (OS) including crossover phase was 10.4 months in the docetaxel and 11.1 months in the MF arm (P = 0.79). Based on the response rate and the primary endpoint of TTP, docetaxel is superior to sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in advanced breast cancer after anthracycline failure.

Reproductive risk factors for breast cancer by receptor status, histology, laterality and location

It is well established that a woman's reproductive history influences her risk of breast cancer. We examined whether the effect of reproductive history was similar for different sub-types of breast cancer. The study was based on a population-based cohort of 1.5 million Danish women born between 1935 and 1978, with individual information on births. Between 1978 and 1994, 10,790 incident cases of breast cancer were identified in a nationwide cancer registry, including detailed information on receptor status, histology, laterality and location of the tumour. Overall, the incidence of breast cancer was 13% lower in parous compared with nulliparous women. This reduction was significantly stronger for mucinous than for ductal carcinomas and for tumours located centrally than for those non-central in the breast. Overall, the incidence in parous women increased by 10% by each 5-year postponement of their first birth. For the incidence of lobular carcinomas this increase was significantly stronger, and for mucinous carcinomas it tended to be stronger than for ductal carcinomas. For the incidence of centrally located tumours the increase was stronger than for non-centrally located tumours. On average, there was a 10% decrease in breast-cancer risk by each additional birth. This decrease was seen in most sub-types, but not for lobular carcinomas of for centrally located tumours. According to our findings, lobular and mucinous carcinomas and centrally located tumours may have risk-factor profiles that differ from other types of breast cancer.

Prognostic factors for the outcome of chemotherapy in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis of 2,185 patients treated with anthracycline-containing first-line regimens--a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Study

PURPOSE

A total of 2,185 patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas who had been treated in seven clinical trials investigating the use of doxorubicin- or epirubicin-containing regimens as first-line chemotherapy were studied in this prognostic-factor analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Overall survival time (median, 51 weeks) and response to chemotherapy (26% complete response or partial response) were the two end points. The cofactors were sex; age; performance status; prior therapies; the presence of locoregional or recurrent disease; lung, liver, and bone metastases at the time of entry onto the trial; long time period between the initial diagnosis of sarcoma and entry onto the study; and histologic type and grade.

RESULTS

Univariate analyses showed (a) a significant, favorable influence of good performance status, young age, and absence of liver metastases on both survival time and response rate, (b) a significant, favorable influence of low histopathologic disease grade on survival time, despite a significantly lower response rate, (c) increased survival time for patients with a long time period between the initial diagnosis of sarcoma and entry onto the study, despite equivalent response rates, and (d) increased survival time with liposarcoma or synovial sarcoma, a decreased survival time with malignant fibrous histiocytoma, a lower response rate with leiomyosarcoma, and a higher response rate with liposarcoma (P < .05 for all log-rank and chi2 tests). The Cox model selected good performance status (P < .0001), absence of liver metastases (P = .0001), low histopathologic grade (P = .0002), long time lapse since initial diagnosis (P = .0004), and young age (P = .0045) as favorable prognostic factors of survival time. The logistic model selected absence of liver metastases (P < .0001), young age (P = .0024), high histopathologic grade (P = .0051), and liposarcoma (P = .0065) as favorable prognostic factors of response rate.

CONCLUSION

This analysis demonstrates that for advanced soft tissue sarcoma, response to chemotherapy is not predicted by the same factors as is overall survival time. This needs to be taken into account in the interpretation of trials assessing the value of new agents for this disease on the basis of response to treatment.

High-dose epirubicin is not an alternative to standard-dose doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcomas. A study of the EORTC soft tissue and bone sarcoma group

The activity and toxicity of single-agent standard-dose doxorubicin were compared with that of two schedules of high-dose epirubicin. A total of 334 chemonaive patients with histologically confirmed advanced soft-tissue sarcomas received (A) doxorubicin 75 mg m(-2) on day 1 (112 patients), (B) epirubicin 150 mg m(-2) on day 1 (111 patients) or (C) epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) day(-1) on days 1, 2 and 3 (111 patients); all given as bolus injection at 3-week intervals. A median of four treatment cycles was given. Median age was 52 years (19-70 years) and performance score 1 (0-2). Of 314 evaluable patients, 45 (14%) had an objective tumour response (eight complete response, 35 partial response). There were no differences among the three groups. Median time to progression for groups A, B and C was 16, 14 and 12 weeks, and median survival 45, 47 and 45 weeks respectively. Neither progression-free (P = 0.93) nor overall survival (P = 0.89) differed among the three groups. After the first cycle of therapy, two patients died of infection and one owing to cardiovascular disease, all on epirubicin. Both dose schedules of epirubicin were more myelotoxic than doxorubicin. Cardiotoxicity (> or = grade 3) occurred in 1%, 0% and 2% respectively. Regardless of the schedule, high-dose epirubicin is not a preferred alternative to standard-dose doxorubicin in the treatment of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas.

Clinical trials

The randomized clinical trial is a scientific method for solving clinical problems. The method is typically employed before a new type of treatment is offered on a major scale in order to safeguard patients against a less curative therapy. Especially with regard to cancer treatment, randomized studies are conducted in increasing numbers. However, there remains a considerable discrepancy between the actual number of patients entered in randomized trials and the eligible number available. The demand of obtaining informed consent is a major reason for not entering patients into randomized studies. The critical item is whether information about randomization as a method for allocation should be disclosed to the patient. The doctor feels embarrassed not to be able to advise and support the patient in decision making about treatment and finds his or her role as the caring doctor replaced by the roulette. The requirement to seek informed consent has increased the rate of denial to participate in randomized trials from a few percent, up to about 50% or even higher.

Doxorubicin versus CYVADIC versus doxorubicin plus ifosfamide in first-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

PURPOSE

The aim of this trial was to compare the activity and toxicity of single-agent doxorubicin with that of two multidrug regimens in the treatment of patients with adult advanced soft tissue sarcomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective randomized phase III trial performed by 35 cancer centers within the Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Six hundred sixty-three eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive either doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 (arm A), cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dacarbazine (CYVADIC) (arm B), or ifosfamide 5 g/m2 plus doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 (arm C).

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 24% (95% confidence interval, 20.7% to 27.3%) among eligible patients and 26% among assessable patients. No statistically significant difference was detected among the three study arms in terms of response rate (arm A, 23.3%; arm B, 28.4%; and arm C, 28.1%), remission duration (median, 46 weeks on arm A, 48 weeks on arm B, and 44 weeks on arm C), or overall survival (median, 52 weeks on arm A, 51 weeks on arm B, and 55 weeks on arm C). The degree of myelosuppression was significantly greater for the combination of ifosfamide and doxorubicin than for the other two regimens. Cardiotoxicity was also more frequent in this arm, but other toxicities were similar.

CONCLUSION

In advanced soft tissue sarcomas of adults, single-agent doxorubicin is still the standard chemotherapy against which more intensive or new drug treatments should be compared. Combination chemotherapy cannot be recommended outside a controlled clinical trial with the exclusion of some subsets of sarcoma patients for whom significant tumor volume reduction may be an important end point of a chemotherapy regimen.

Regional trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality in Denmark prior to mammographic screening

To provide a basis for the evaluation of mammographic screening programmes in Denmark, a study was undertaken of the regional differences in breast cancer incidence and mortality. All 16 regions were followed for the 20 year period, 1970-89, before the start of the first population-based mammographic screening programme in the Copenhagen municipality in 1991. Multiplicative Poisson models were used for the analysis. In general, the incidence increased during this period from 55 to 70 [per 100,000 standardised world standard population (WSP)], and the analysis shows this to be most pronounced among women below age 60. The mortality was more stable, changing only from 24 to 28 (per 100,000 standardised WSP), but a significant increase occurred in the late 1980s. The study showed regional differences in both incidence and mortality of breast cancer in Denmark. Both the incidence and the mortality varied between the regions, with maximum differences of 22%. The analysis showed no variation in the time trends in the different regions, and thus indicates that the use of a regional comparison group would be a valid basis for evaluation of the Copenhagen programme. Our study, however, underlies the difficulties inherent in the evaluation of screening programmes without internal control groups.

Phase II study of liposomal muramyl tripeptide phosphatidylethanolamine (MTP/PE) in advanced soft tissue sarcomas of the adult. An EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group study

The EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group conducted a phase II study with intravenous muramyl tripeptide phosphatidylethanolamine (MTP/PE) at a dose of 4 mg once weekly in 20 patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Responses were not seen in 19 evaluable patients. Toxicity consisted mainly of a mild flu-like syndrome after 62% of drug administrations. It is concluded that MTP/PE at this dose and schedule has no activity in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

Effect of high-dose dexamethasone in carcinomatous metastatic spinal cord compression treated with radiotherapy: a randomised trial

We performed a randomised single blind trial of high-dose dexamethasone as an adjunct to radiotherapy in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression from solid tumours. After stratification for primary tumour and gait function, 57 patients were allocated randomly to treatment with either high-dose dexamethasone or no steroidal treatment. Dexamethasone was administered as a bolus of 96 mg intravenously, followed by 96 mg orally for 3 days and then tapered in 10 days. A successful treatment result defined as gait function after treatment was obtained in 81% of the patients treated with dexamethasone compared to 63% of the patients receiving no dexamethasone therapy. Six months after treatment, 59% of the patients in the dexamethasone group were still ambulatory compared to 33% in the no dexamethasone group. Life table analysis of patients surviving with gait function showed a significantly better course in patients treated with dexamethasone (P < 0.05). Median survival was identical in the two treatment groups. Similar results were found in subgroup analysis of 34 patients with breast cancer as the primary malignancy. Significant side-effects were reported in 3 (11%) of the patients receiving glucocorticoids, 2 of whom discontinued the treatment. We conclude that high-dose glucocorticoid therapy should be given as adjunct treatment in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.

Vimentin expression in 98 breast cancers with medullary features and its prognostic significance

The expression of vimentin, as assessed by immunohistochemistry, has been evaluated in 69 medullary carcinomas of the breast: 28 typical medullary carcinomas (TMC), 41 atypical medullary carcinomas (AMC), and 29 invasive ductal carcinomas with subtle medullary features that, however, did not fulfill the strict criteria of TMC or AMC. Immunoreactivity of at least 10% of the component cells was found in 14 of the medullary carcinomas (5 out of 28 TMC, 9 out of 41 AMC whereas only 1 of the invasive ductal carcinomas was vimentin-positive. The patients were followed for 8-13 years. No difference in recurrence-free survival or overall survival could be documented between vimentin-positive and vimentin-negative carcinomas with medullary features. No biological significance could be established for vimentin labelling in these lesions.

Selection of large and objectively measurable target lesions in EORTC phase II trials: impact on recruitment and response rate. EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG)

The EORTC has recently issued minimum requirements for target lesions in phase II trials, aiming at a decrease in measurement errors [minimum size, computer tomography (CT) scan or ultrasound for deep lesions]. Their impact on recruitment and response has been retrospectively studied in a trial of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG), investigating high-dose chemotherapy in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, where 46/103 objective responses were seen, including 10 complete responses. For the 20 patients who did not satisfy the criteria, a similar objective response rate and a significantly higher complete response rate were reported. Among 265 target lesions, the same trends were observed when comparing small to large lesions, for different tumour sites. For deep lesions clinically assessed, significantly higher response rates were reported than for those measured by CT scans or ultrasound. The new stricter EORTC criteria improve the reliability of measurements and have been adopted for future phase II trials of the STBSG. This will not result in the selection of potentially poor responders. Less than 20% of the present recruitment will be lost.

Phase II study of miltefosine (hexadecylphosphocholine) in advanced soft tissue sarcomas of the adult--an EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Study

The EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group conducted a phase II study with oral miltefosine at a dose of 50 mg thrice daily in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. No responses were seen in 18 evaluable patients. Toxicity consisted mainly of nausea/vomiting. It is concluded that oral miltefosine has no activity in soft tissue sarcoma.