[Transition from pediatric to adult care: Recommendations of the French network for autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases (FAI2R)]

Autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases. They can occur in childhood and account for significant morbidity and mortality. Transitioning from pediatric to adult healthcare can be difficult for patients and their families. It can interfere with patient follow-up and management, and eventually lead to complications. Although recommendations exist for the successful transition of patients with chronic diseases, few are specifically adapted to children and adults with AIDs (Suris et al., 2015-Solau-Gervais, 2012). The French working group on transition of the rare autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases presents its reflections and recommendations for a successful transition. Preparation for transition should start early. Its goals are to empower adolescents by providing them with the knowledge to manage their own care, respond appropriately to changes in their condition, and evolve within the adult healthcare system. This requires the active participation of the patient, his or her family, as well as the pediatric and adult medical teams. The transition process involves multidisciplinary care and dedicated therapeutic education programs. Finally, the identification of medical specialists by region, trained in rare AIDs and accompanied by expert patients, may improve the management of patients with rare AIDs from adolescence to adulthood.

AB0772 JAK INHIBITORS IN REFRACTORY ADULT AND CHILDHOOD ONSET STILL’S DISEASE

Background:

Excessive and inappropriate production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6 or IL-18, is a pathogenic cornerstone in adult and childhood onset Still’s disease. Beyond therapies targeting IL-1 or IL-6, Janus kinases (JAK) inhibitors have been proposed for adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) patients refractory to or intolerant of treatment with biologicals. Recently, it has been suggested that JAK inhibitors might be efficient in refractory AOSD patients1.

Objectives:

To assess the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of refractory systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) or AOSD.

Methods:

This retrospective study was based on a national survey of the departments of rheumatology, paediatric rheumatology and internal medicine in all French hospitals from an online call of the “Club Rhumatismes et Inflammation” (www.cri-net.com). The data were collected using a standardized questionnaire, and analyzed at different time points (treatment initiation, M1, M3, M6 and end of the follow-up). The response to JAK inhibitors was categorized as: complete remission (resolution of all clinical and biologic signs), partial remission (clinical improvement with persistence of a few symptoms) or failure (lack of clinical or biological improvement).

Results:

6 patients (5 adults and 1 child) were recruited (Table 1). Mean age at treatment start was 39.6 years for the AOSD patient and 6 years for the sJIA patient, and mean disease duration was 5.3 years. The clinical expression was predominantly systemic in 5 five patients and chronic articular in one. Response to corticosteroids, conventional synthetic or biological Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs had been considered inadequate in all patients. Baricitinib was used in 3 patients, ruxolitinib in 2, and tofacitinib in 1. Steroids were concurrently used in all patients, anakinra in one, methotrexate and anakinra in one. At a mean (SD) follow-up of 9.5 months, partial response was observed in 4 (66.7%) cases (patients with ruxolitinib, tofacitinib or baricitinib) and failure in 2 (33.3%) (patients with baricitinib). No patient achieved complete remission. At the last visit, steroids could be decreased but not stopped in all patients. Patients with partial response had an average decrease of 72,8% (90% for tofacitinib, 70% for baricitinib, 58.5% for ruxolitinib between the start and the follow-up end date) and non-responder patients were yet able to reduce steroids by 60,5% (Table 1). Tolerance of JAK inhibitors was excellent, however patient 4 experienced an episode of infectious pulmonary disease.

Conclusion:

JAK inhibitors therapy may be helpful for some patients with refractory Still’s disease. However, no complete response was observed in this short series of cases. There might be a difference of response between the molecules, although the number of patients is too low to draw conclusions. Additional information is thus needed to evaluate more precisely the risk-benefit ratio of this treatment, and a possible difference in efficacy among the different groups of JAK inhibitors.

References:

[1]Hu Q, Wang M, Jia J, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;0:1–3. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216

Table 1.

Characteristics of the AOSD patient

No.SexAge (year)Main symptomsTreatments before JAKi onsetJAK inhibitorsSteroids at onset (mg/day)Concomitant treatmentResponse at last F-USteroids at the end of F-U (mg/day)F-U (months)1F6Fever, polyarthritis, rashAINS, ANAKI, TOCI, CANAKI, ADA, THALI, INFLIXRUXOLITINIB 5mgx2/day30P1232M28Fever, polyarthritis, rashANAKIBARICITINIB 4mg/day800N1013M32Fever, polyarthritis, rashTOCI+MTX, ANAKI+MTX, CANAKI+MTX, ADA, CICLO, IgIVBARICITINIB 4mg/day16MTX 20 mg/week ANAKINRA 100mg/dayP12194F40Fever, polyarthritis, rashMTX, IMUREL, CICLO, ETANERCEPT, ANAKI+MTX, TOCI+MTX, IgIVRUXOLITINIB 15mgx2/day60ANAKI 200mg/dayP3045F48Fever, polyarthritis, rashTOCI, ANAKI, CICLO, CANAKI, IMURELTOFACITINIB 5mgx2/day500P7.596F50Fever, polyarthralgia, rashANAKIBARICITINIB 4mg/day600N401

F-U: Follow-up

N: No response

P: Partial response

Acknowledgements:

I thank all the coauthors, particularly Stéphane Mitrovic and Bruno Fautrel. Also, a special thank to the CRI.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

Age-specific characteristics of neutrophilic dermatoses and neutrophilic diseases in children

BACKGROUND

Our suggested 'modern' concepts of 'neutrophilic dermatoses' (ND) and 'neutrophilic disease' were based on observations in adult patients and have not been studied in paediatric patients. Only a minority of ND occurs in children, and little is known about age-specific characteristics.

OBJECTIVES

To describe age-specific characteristics of ND in children and to study whether our suggested 'modern' classification of ND may be applied to children.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicentre study in a French cohort of 27 paediatric patients diagnosed with pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) or Sweet's syndrome (SS).

RESULTS

Demographics and distribution of typical/atypical forms were similar in patients diagnosed with PG and SS. Atypical ND were more frequent in infants (90%), when compared to young children (60%) and adolescents (33%). Neutrophilic disease was observed in 17/27 patients and was most frequent in infants. Neutrophilic disease of the upper respiratory tract, as well as cardiac neutrophilic disease, was only observed in infants, whereas other locations were similarly found in infants, young children and adolescents. In infants and young children, ND were associated with a large spectrum of general diseases, whereas in adolescents associations were limited to inflammatory bowel disease and Behçet's disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study describes the concept of ND in paediatric patients and shows that they have some characteristics different from ND occurring in adults. ND occurring in infants can be associated with a large spectrum of general diseases. Occurrence of neutrophilic disease is frequent in children. Thus, ND occurring in young paediatric patients should incite clinicians to schedule complementary explorations in order to search for involvement of other organs and to rule out monogenetic autoinflammatory syndromes.