The dialogue between the brain and immune system involves not only the HPA-axis

Starting out from our previous observations that defects in the immune system-brain feedback predispose to pathogenic immune responses, our interest focuses at the roles of adrenergic/cholinergic neurotransmitters in brain-immune interactions. We have shown in rodent models that 1) both catecholamines and acetylcholine are potent modulators of peripheral immune functions, 2) cholinergic signals are involved in the afferent signalling of the immune system, and 3) lymphocytes not only express functional adrenergic and cholinergic receptors, but synthesize and release neurotransmitters, such as acetylcholine, in quantitative dependence of differentiation and activation. Studies are presently being initiated to investigate the role(s) of these non-neuronal neurotransmitters within immune tissues, and to explore the relevance of excitatory amino acids as important central neurotransmitters in the brain-immune system dialogue.

In vivo immunomodulation by peripheral adrenergic and cholinergic agonists/antagonists in rat and mouse models

Our work is devoted to defining relationships between the immune system and the adrenergic and cholinergic systems in vivo. In the rat model, we have shown that the cells of different immune compartments express the genes of a defined set of adrenergic/cholinergic receptors, and it was shown that lymphocytes are a site of non-neuronal production of norepinephrine and acetylcholine. Furthermore, using implantable slow-release tablets containing adrenergic or cholinergic agonists/antagonists, distinct and partly opposite effects were observed on peripheral immune functions. Concerning sympathetic immunoregulation, our data--in contrast to those of other studies--suggest that an enhanced adrenergic tonus leads to immunosuppression primarily via alpha 2-receptor-mediated mechanisms. Beta-blockade strongly enhances this effect, most likely by inhibition of pineal melatonin synthesis. In recent experiments on the kinetics it was found that the continuous alpha-adrenergic treatment entails a strong suppression of cellular responsiveness during the first few hours, which is increasingly followed by a general loss of lymphocytes in blood and lymphoid organs most likely due to enhanced apoptosis. More recently, we have extended our studies to the mouse model. First data obtained with RNAse protection assays suggest a biphasic effect on the gene expression of several cytokines in spleen cells due to adrenergic in vivo treatment.

Twenty-year follow-up of antenatal corticosteroid treatment

OBJECTIVE

To study late side effects of antenatal corticosteroid treatment on health and sexual development in subjects 20 to 22 years old.

METHODS

A follow-up study among young adults whose mothers had, because of a threatening delivery, participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled trial of betamethasone to prevent neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Measurements were taken on general health, growth, development in puberty, reproductivity, genital or gynecological complaints, gender development, sexual orientation, sex-specific cognitive functioning, and psychoneuroticism. In addition, some measurements were performed on family diseases, socioeconomic status, and education.

RESULTS

No differences were found between the corticosteroid-treated and placebo groups as to medical or psychological variables. In general, the subjects were healthy and had normal intellectual capacities. Groups did not differ on gender development, sexual orientation, sex-specific cognitive functioning, and psychoneuroticism. Systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in the corticosteroid group, but the groups did not differ as to diastolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Our 20-year follow-up study indicates that 1 course of antenatally administered corticosteroid to prevent respiratory distress syndrome does not have adverse effects up to adulthood.

Neuroimmunomodulation via limbic structures--the neuroanatomy of psychoimmunology

During the last 20 years, mutual communications between the immune, the endocrine and the nervous systems have been defined on the basis of physiological, cellular, and molecular data. Nevertheless, a major problem in the new discipline "Psychoneuroimmunology" is that controversial data and differences in the interpretation of the results make it difficult to obtain a comprehensive overview of the implications of immunoneuroendocrine interactions in the maintenance of physiological homeostasis, as well as in the initiation and the course of pathological conditions within these systems. In this article, we will first discuss the afferent pathways by which immune cells may affect CNS functions and, conversely, how neural tissues can influence the peripheral immune response. We will then review recent data, which emphasize the (patho)physiological roles of hippocampal-amygdala structures and the nucleus accumbens in neuroimmunomodulation. Neuronal activity within the hippocampal formation, the amygdaloid body, and the ventral parts of the basal ganglia has been examined most thoroughly in studies on neuroendocrine, autonomic and cognitive functions, or at the level of emotional and psychomotor behaviors. The interplay of these limbic structures with components of the immune system and vice versa, however, is still less defined. We will attempt to review and discuss this area of research taking into account recent evidences for neuroendocrine immunoregulation via limbic neuronal systems, as well as the influence of cytokines on synaptic transmission, neuronal growth and survival in these brain regions. Finally, the role of limbic structures in stress responses and conditioning of immune reactivity will be commented. Based on these data, we propose new directions of future research.