Incisional hernia following colorectal cancer surgery according to suture technique: Hughes Abdominal Repair Randomized Trial (HART)

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernias cause morbidity and may require further surgery. HART (Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial) assessed the effect of an alternative suture method on the incidence of incisional hernia following colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

A pragmatic multicentre single-blind RCT allocated patients undergoing midline incision for colorectal cancer to either Hughes closure (double far-near-near-far sutures of 1 nylon suture at 2-cm intervals along the fascia combined with conventional mass closure) or the surgeon's standard closure. The primary outcome was the incidence of incisional hernia at 1 year assessed by clinical examination. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Between August 2014 and February 2018, 802 patients were randomized to either Hughes closure (401) or the standard mass closure group (401). At 1 year after surgery, 672 patients (83.7 per cent) were included in the primary outcome analysis; 50 of 339 patients (14.8 per cent) in the Hughes group and 57 of 333 (17.1 per cent) in the standard closure group had incisional hernia (OR 0.84, 95 per cent c.i. 0.55 to 1.27; P = 0.402). At 2 years, 78 patients (28.7 per cent) in the Hughes repair group and 84 (31.8 per cent) in the standard closure group had incisional hernia (OR 0.86, 0.59 to 1.25; P = 0.429). Adverse events were similar in the two groups, apart from the rate of surgical-site infection, which was higher in the Hughes group (13.2 versus 7.7 per cent; OR 1.82, 1.14 to 2.91; P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of incisional hernia after colorectal cancer surgery is high. There was no statistical difference in incidence between Hughes closure and mass closure at 1 or 2 years.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN25616490 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).

O-B01 Role of Ursodeoxycholic acid in prevention of gallstones formation in bariatric patients: need to amend recent BOMSS guidelines

Background

During rapid weight-loss phase following bariatric procedures, biliary cholesterol homeostasis is altered leading to increased propensity to gallstone formation. Incidence of gallstone formation following bariatric procedures is shown to be 10-38%. There is no consensus regarding its prevention and current BOMSS guidelines do not address this issue. This meta-analysis aims to pool high level evidence (RCTs) to assess efficacy of Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in reducing risk of gallstone formation in this cohort of patients and the need for revision of current guidelines.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed using electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, PROSPERO and Google Scholar) in line with PRISMA guidelines. Only randomised controlled trials were included without restrictions on study language, year, status of publication and patient’s age. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager Software to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR) using random-effects model.

Results

Fifteen trials were included (3952 patients analysed, 2487 in UDCA and 1465 in placebo group). The overall rate of gallstone formation was 16.0% (6.4% in UDCA vs 31.4% in placebo group). Trials included various bariatric procedures (SG/RYGB/OAGB/AGB/Gastroplasty). UDCA dose ranged from 300 to 1200mg per day. UDCA significantly reduced the risk of post-operative gallstone formation (3952 patients, RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.16-0.37, p < 0.0001). The absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat (NNT) were 25% and 4 respectively.

Conclusions

Oral Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment following restrictive bariatric surgical procedures significantly reduces the risks of gallstone formation. As such, its regular use in first 6 months (rapid weight-loss phase) can significantly reduce the risk of complications associated with gallstones. Such treatment would be cost effective and benefit 1 in 4 patients. There is significant evidence available on benefits of using UDCA in post-operative bariatric patients and that this should be added to the recent BOMSS guidelines.

TP6.2.12Prognostic significance of symptomatic presentation in patients with Gastro-Intestinal Stromal Tumours

Background

Gastro-Intestinal Stromal tumours (GISTs) are rare neoplasms of mesenchymal origin that arise in the GI tract and account for approximately 0.1-3% of all GI tumours. The aim of this study was to determine whether the mode of clinical presentation of GISTs has an effect on outcome.

Methods

Consecutive 143 patients diagnosed with GISTs were identified from the regional network database (median age 67 (21-88) years, 85 male). Data were collected on presenting symptoms, tumour, treatment undertaken, and the primary outcome measure was survival.

Results

The commonest GIST anatomical sites were stomach (69.9%), small bowel (13.3%), and colon (4.9%). Commonest symptoms were abdominal pain (30.0%), dyspepsia (11.8%), and anaemia (11.1%). Symptomatic presentations were associated with older age (p = 0.056) and higher mitotic index (>5 per 50HPF, p = 0.045). On univariable analysis the factors associated with cumulative 10-year survival were age (p = 0.076), the presence of symptoms (78.1% vs. 96.4%, p = 0.028), mitotic index (p = 0.011), and modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) prognostic index (p = 0.010), but not deprivation index, anatomical site or GIST diameter. Symptomatic patients aged over 60 years with mitotic index >5 per 50 HPF had the poorest 10-year survival at 63.6% (HR 2.577, 95%CI 1.132-5.867). On multivariable analysis, NIH index (HR 4.283, 95%CI 1.395-13.149, p = 0.011) and age (HR1.061, 95%CI 1.006-1.118, p = 0.029) were independently associated with 10-year survival.

Conclusions

Age, symptoms, and NIH criteria represent the most important prognostic biomarkers in patients diagnosed with GISTs.

A meta-analysis on continuous versus interrupted skin closure following appendicectomy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this review was to analyse RCTs comparing wound-related outcomes between continuous subcuticular and interrupted transdermal wound closures for open appendicectomies in all age groups.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in April 2020 (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, PROSPERO, Google Scholar, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform). RCTs without restrictions on study language, year, status of publication, and patient age were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the risk-of-bias tool for RCTs. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) for binary and continuous variables were calculated using random-effects models. A summary-of-findings table was generated to assess the level of evidence.

RESULTS

Eleven trials were included (1781 patients analysed, 891 in continuous and 890 in interrupted groups). The overall rate of wound infection was 7.1 per cent. There was no significant difference in the risk of wound infection (11 trials, 1781 patients; RR 1.13, 95 per cent c.i. 0.77 to 1.66; P = 0.530) or wound exploration (7 trials, 1129 patients; RR 0.74, 0.41 to 1.34, P = 0.320) between the two groups. Continuous wound closure had a significantly reduced risk of wound dehiscence (6 trials, 865 patients; RR 0.16, 0.05 to 0.50; P = 0.002) and smaller wound scar (3 trials, 417 patients; MD -2.11 (95 per cent c.i. -2.57 to -1.66) mm; P < 0.001). The absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat for wound dehiscence were 6.1 per cent and 16 respectively. There was no significant statistical heterogeneity for all outcomes (I2 0-15 per cent, χ2 P > 0.100). Most RCTs had a high risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Continuous subcuticular open appendicectomy wound closure is not associated with an increased risk of wound infection and exploration. This method of closure has a reduced risk of wound dehiscence and better cosmetic outcomes.

Association between preadmission frailty and care level at discharge in older adults undergoing emergency laparotomy

Background

Older adults undergoing emergency abdominal surgery have significantly poorer outcomes than younger adults. For those who survive, the level of care required on discharge from hospital is unknown and such information could guide decision-making. The ELF (Emergency Laparotomy and Frailty) study aimed to determine whether preoperative frailty in older adults was associated with increased dependence at the time of discharge.

Methods

The ELF study was a UK-wide multicentre prospective cohort study of older patients (65 years or more) undergoing emergency laparotomy during March and June 2017. The objective was to establish whether preoperative frailty was associated with increased care level at discharge compared with preoperative care level. The analysis used a multilevel logistic regression adjusted for preadmission frailty, patient age, sex and care level.

Results

A total of 934 patients were included from 49 hospitals. Mean(s.d.) age was 76·2(6·8) years, with 57·6 per cent women; 20·2 per cent were frail. Some 37·4 per cent of older adults had an increased care level at discharge. Increasing frailty was associated with increased discharge care level, with greater predictive power than age. The adjusted odds ratio for an increase in care level was 4·48 (95 per cent c.i. 2·03 to 9·91) for apparently vulnerable patients (Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) 4), 5·94 (2·54 to 13·90) for those mildly frail (CFS 5) and 7·88 (2·97 to 20·79) for those moderately or severely frail (CFS 6 or 7), compared with patients who were fit.

Conclusion

Over 37 per cent of older adults undergoing emergency laparotomy required increased care at discharge. Frailty scoring was a significant predictor, and should be integrated into all acute surgical units to aid shared decision-making and discharge planning.

Mortality for emergency laparotomy is not affected by the weekend effect: a multicentre study

INTRODUCTION

The 'weekend effect' describes variation in outcomes of patients treated over the weekend compared with those treated during weekdays. This study examines whether a weekend effect exists for patients who undergo emergency laparotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data entered into the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit between 2014 and 2017 at four NHS trusts in England and Wales were analysed. Patients were grouped into those admitted on weekdays and those on weekends (Friday 5pm to Monday 8am). Patient factors, markers of quality of care and patient outcomes were compared. Secondary analysis was performed according to the day of surgery.

RESULTS

After exclusion of patients who underwent laparotomy more than one week after admission to hospital, a total of 1717 patients (1138 patients admitted on weekdays and 579 admitted on weekends) were analysed. Age, preoperative lactate and P-POSSUM scores were not significantly different between the two groups. Time from admission to consultant review, decision to operate, commencement of antibiotics and theatre were not significantly different. Grades of operating surgeon were also similar in both groups. Inpatient 60-day mortality was 12.5% on weekdays and 12.8% on weekends (P = 0.878). Median length of postoperative stay was 12 days in both groups. When analysed according to day of surgery, only number of hours from admission to antibiotics (12.8 weekday vs 9.4 weekend, P = 0.046) and number of hours to theatre (26.5 weekday vs 24.1 hours weekend, P = 0.020) were significantly different.

DISCUSSION

Quality of care and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy during the weekend are not significantly different to those carried out during weekdays.

Acute afferent loop syndrome in the early postoperative period following pancreaticoduodenectomy

INTRODUCTION

Afferent loop syndrome (ALS) is a recognised complication of foregut surgery caused by mechanical obstruction at the gastrojejunostomy anastomosis itself or at a point nearby. Acute ALS has only been reported following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) after several years due to recurrence of malignancy at the anastomotic site. We report five cases of acute ALS in the first postoperative week.

METHODS

The presentation, clinical findings and successful management of the 5 patients with ALS were obtained from a prospectively collected database of 300 PDs. All five patients with early acute ALS presented with signs and symptoms of a bile leak. Since the fifth patient, the surgical technique has been modified with the creation of a larger window in the transverse mesocolon and a Braun enteroenterostomy.

RESULTS

There have been no further incidents of ALS since the adoption of these modifications to the standard technique of PD and there has also been a reduction in postoperative bile leaks (6.4% vs 3.6%, p=0.416).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute ALS is a rare but important complication in the immediate postoperative period following PD and causes disruption to adjacent anastomoses, resulting in a bile leak. A prophylactic Braun anastomosis and wide mesocolic window may prevent this complication and subsequent deterioration.

The two-port laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach for minimal access pancreatic necrosectomy

INTRODUCTION

Despite advances in surgery and critical care, severe pancreatitis continues to be associated with a high rate of mortality, which is increased significantly in the presence of infected pancreatic necrosis. Controversy persists around the optimal treatment for such cases, with specialist units variously advocating open necrosectomy, simple percutaneous drainage or one of several minimal access approaches. We describe our technique and outcomes with a two-port laparoscopic retroperitoneal necrosectomy (2P-LRN).

METHODS

Thirteen consecutive patients with proven infected pancreatic necrosis were treated by 2P-LRN over a three-year period in the setting of a specialist hepatopancreatobiliary unit. The median patient age was 46 years (range: 28-87 years) and 10 of the patients were male.

RESULTS

The median number of procedures required to clear the necrosis was 2 (range: 1-5), with a median time to discharge following the procedure of 44 days (range: 10-135 days). There was no 90-day mortality and the morbidity rate was 38%, consisting of pancreatic fistula (31%) and bleeding (23%).

CONCLUSIONS

Two-port laparoscopic retroperitoneal necrosectomy has been demonstrated to confer similar or better outcomes to other techniques for necrosectomy. It carries the additional advantages of better visualisation, leading to fewer procedures and the opportunity to deploy simple laparoscopic instruments such as diathermy or haemostatic clips.

Acute abdominal pain following fracture of a heterotopically formed bone incorporating a prolene mesh

A case is presented of severe abdominal pain around a healed scar following fracture of a heterotopically formed bone. This should be considered an unusual differential diagnosis in patients with acute pain of unknown origin who had open abdominal surgery in the past. To our knowledge, we have also reported the first case of hetertopic bone formation incorporating a prolene mesh.