Erratum to “Hand Surgery Patient Perspectives on Medical Cannabis: A Survey of Over 600 Patients” [Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online 5 (2023) 102-107]

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.02.009.].

Does Time to Operative Intervention of Distal Radius Fractures Influence Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

No investigation has analyzed the time from injury to operative intervention and its effect on complications and functional outcomes in distal radius fractures. This investigation aimed to establish whether the time to surgical intervention from injury was associated with the observed rate of complications in distal radius fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all orthopedic trauma patients who came to our center was conducted from 2008 through 2014. Patients who sustained closed distal radius fractures were included. A postoperative complication following distal radius fracture was defined as reoperation, superficial or deep infection, complex regional pain syndrome, new-onset carpal tunnel syndrome, tendon irritation, and symptomatic hardware.

RESULTS

In all, 190 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 48 years (SD ±14.7). According to the AO-Müller/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, radiographs revealed 80 A fractures, 15 B fractures, and 95 C fractures. Thirty distal radii were fixed within 0 to 3 days after injury, 91 patients within 4 to 10 days, and 69 patients after 10 days. Overall, 28 complications (14.7%) were identified. There was no statistical difference in the rate of complications between the time interval groups (P = .17).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increased popularity of surgical intervention for distal radius fractures, the optimal parameters to maximize patient outcomes have yet to be clearly defined. Time to intervention did not affect the rate of postoperative complication and range of motion.

Hand Surgery Patient Perspectives on Medical Cannabis: A Survey of Over 600 Patients

Purpose

Medical cannabis (MC) has been proposed as a potential addition to multimodal pain management regimens in orthopedics. This study evaluates hand and upper-extremity patient perspectives of MC as a treatment for common orthopedic and musculoskeletal pain conditions. This study also aims to identify the proportion of patients already using MC, perceived barriers to MC use, and opinions on insurance coverage and legality of cannabis.

Methods

An anonymous cross-sectional survey study was conducted of all patients at least 18 years old presenting from October 2020 to January 2021 to a hand and upper-extremity outpatient clinic. The survey collected information regarding opinion on MC, including use, legality, and willingness to use MC in the future. Medical cannabis was legal in the states where the study was conducted.

Results

A total of 679 patients completed the survey (response rate 72.5%). Sixty-eight patients (10.0%) reported currently using MC. Of the 623 patients (90.0%) who reported not currently using MC, 504 (80.9%) would consider using MC for chronic pain, while the remaining 119 (19.1%) would not consider the use of MC for chronic pain. Age was not associated with whether a patient would consider using MC (P = .16) or was already using MC (P = .10). The most identified barrier to MC use was cost, reported as either expensive or not affordable by 477 patients (70.5%).

Conclusions

This study found that most patients presenting for hand and upper-extremity complaints would consider using MC (80.9%), and most perceive it as a safe treatment option for common orthopedic conditions. Moreover, 10% of patients reported already using MC. One of the major barriers to MC use is the cost. Most (90.9%) patients support policies for legalization and insurance coverage of MC.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic Level III.

Complications and functional outcomes after transolecranon distal humerus fracture

BACKGROUND

Transolecranon distal humerus fractures are uncommon injuries. This is the first multipatient case series to describe outcomes and complications following transolecranon distal humerus fractures in the adult population.

METHOD

Design: retrospective; setting: single level 1 trauma center; patients/participants: 16 patients; intervention: surgical management of transolecranon distal humerus fracture; main outcome measurement: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire after a minimum of 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients with open (n = 12) or closed (n = 4) transolecranon distal humerus fractures were identified. Nine female and 7 male patients with a mean age of 47 years were included. Mechanisms of injury included motor vehicle collisions (n = 3), motorcycle crashes (n = 4), ground-level falls (n = 3), falls from height (n = 4), train collision (n = 1), and an industrial accident (n = 1). Seven patients (44%) presented with nerve injury. Patients underwent open reduction with internal fixation (n = 15), external fixation (n = 6), or both (n = 5). Additional surgeries were ultimately required in 11 patients (69%), with a mean of 3 surgeries to manage each patient's elbow injuries. All patients returned for at least 3 clinical follow-up visits; mean clinical follow-up was 15.8 months and mean radiographic follow-up was 12.3 months. Complications were observed in 15 patients (94%). Eleven patients (69%) had limited range of motion with a flexion arc of less than 100° at their last clinic visit. Seven patients (44%) developed deep wound infections requiring repeat débridement and intravenous antibiotics. Implant removal was performed in 10 patients (62.5%) because of infection (n = 5), symptomatic hardware (n = 4), or device failure (n = 1). Heterotopic ossification was seen in 8 patients (50%) and post-traumatic arthrosis in 4 (25%). Two patients (12.5%) required flap reconstruction for soft tissue defects. Nonunion occurred in 7 patients (44%). DASH scores were obtained for 10 patients (62.5%) at a mean of 3.8 years after injury. The mean DASH score was 40.2, ranging from 4.2 to 76.5. Among respondents, 7 (70%) were able to resume working, with an average DASH work module score of 25.

CONCLUSION

Management of transolecranon distal humerus fractures remain a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Complication rates, including deep infection and nonunion, are high, with frequent long-term functional limitations posed to the patient, as evidenced by DASH scores.

A Multicenter Matched Cohort Study of Processed Nerve Allograft and Conduit in Digital Nerve Reconstruction

PURPOSE

Biomaterials used to restore digital nerve continuity after injury associated with a defect may influence ultimate outcomes. An evaluation of matched cohorts undergoing digital nerve gap reconstruction was conducted to compare processed nerve allograft (PNA) and conduits. Based on scientific evidence and historical controls, we hypothesized that outcomes of PNA would be better than for conduit reconstruction.

METHODS

We identified matched cohorts based on patient characteristics, medical history, mechanism of injury, and time to repair for digital nerve injuries with gaps up to 25 mm. Data were stratified into 2 gap length groups: short gaps of 14 mm or less and long gaps of 15 to 25 mm. Meaningful sensory recovery was defined as a Medical Research Council scale of S3 or greater. Comparisons of meaningful recovery were made by repair method between and across the gap length groups.

RESULTS

Eight institutions contributed matched data sets for 110 subjects with 162 injuries. Outcomes data were available in 113 PNA and 49 conduit repairs. Meaningful recovery was reported in 61% of the conduit group, compared with 88% in the PNA group. In the group with a 14-mm or less gap, conduit and PNA outcomes were 67% and 92% meaningful recovery, respectively. In the 15- to 25-mm gap length group, conduit and PNA outcomes were 45% and 85% meaningful recovery, respectively. There were no reported adverse events in either treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of digital nerve reconstruction in this study using PNA were consistent and significantly better than those of conduits across all groups. As gap lengths increased, the proportion of patients in the conduit group with meaningful recovery decreased. This study supports the use of PNA for nerve gap reconstruction in digital nerve reconstructions up to 25 mm.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Exposures of the shoulder and upper humerus

Extensile and adequate exposures of the shoulder and upper humerus are important in trauma surgery. The standard deltopectoral approach can be extended distally to expose the whole humerus if necessary. Often, wide exposures of the upper humerus are necessary to reduce complex fractures and apply the plate on the lateral aspect of the humerus. A thorough knowledge of the anatomy as well as strategies of nerve mobilization is necessary for achieving adequate exposures in this area. This article details the many exposure methods for the shoulder, upper humerus, and their extensile extensions.

Selective activation of the human tibial and common peroneal nerves with a flat interface nerve electrode

OBJECTIVE

Electrical stimulation has been shown effective in restoring basic lower extremity motor function in individuals with paralysis. We tested the hypothesis that a flat interface nerve electrode (FINE) placed around the human tibial or common peroneal nerve above the knee can selectively activate each of the most important muscles these nerves innervate for use in a neuroprosthesis to control ankle motion.

APPROACH

During intraoperative trials involving three subjects, an eight-contact FINE was placed around the tibial and/or common peroneal nerve, proximal to the popliteal fossa. The FINE's ability to selectively recruit muscles innervated by these nerves was assessed. Data were used to estimate the potential to restore active plantarflexion or dorsiflexion while balancing inversion and eversion using a biomechanical simulation.

MAIN RESULTS

With minimal spillover to non-targets, at least three of the four targets in the tibial nerve, including two of the three muscles constituting the triceps surae, were independently and selectively recruited in all subjects. As acceptable levels of spillover increased, recruitment of the target muscles increased. Selective activation of muscles innervated by the peroneal nerve was more challenging.

SIGNIFICANCE

Estimated joint moments suggest that plantarflexion sufficient for propulsion during stance phase of gait and dorsiflexion sufficient to prevent foot drop during swing can be achieved, accompanied by a small but tolerable inversion or eversion moment.

Indications and future directions for upper limb neuroprostheses in tetraplegic patients: a review

The development of the upper extremity neuroprosthesis has been a challenging and rewarding contribution to the management of the SCI patient. The authors' experience and that of their clinical trial teams has verified that this technology is a strong alternative to conventional reconstruction and conservative management. In the future, even more powerful tools will emerge from the laboratory as these devices and collaborative surgical procedures evolve.

Management of the paralyzed elbow in tetraplegia

The management of the paralytic conditions in tetraplegia requires understanding neural pathophysiology. A comprehensive rehabilitative and surgical plan requires a multidisciplinary approach. Prior to redistributing the muscle forces across the elbow, a supple osseo-articular platform must be created. The authors recommend PDT and BTT transfers and a FES neuroprosthesis. Future work in this field will advance the application of neuromodulation and its deployment in different neurophysiologic states.