Efficacy and Safety of Lateral Approach-Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (L-VEIL) over Open Inguinal Block Dissection: a Retrospective Study

This retrospective study compared the immediate post-operative short-term outcomes of Lateral Approach-Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (L-VEIL) and open surgery approach in patients with TNM stage N0 and N1 tumors. Inguinal lymphadenectomies performed for various TNM stage N0 and N1 cancers between January 2011 and December 2015 at a single center were analyzed by collecting data from operation theater records and case files. Mean blood loss, operative time, drain output, nodal yield, nodal positivity, and complications were analyzed as post-procedural outcomes. Among the 116 surgeries performed, 92 were open surgery and 24 were L-VEIL. Compared with open surgery, L-VEIL led to significantly lower blood loss (64.8 mL vs. 23.3 mL; p = 0.002), mean nodal yield (11.04 vs. 8.38; p = 0.001), and mean hospital stay (3.08 vs. 8 days; p < 0.001). However, the operative time was similar for both the groups (94.5 vs. 68.1 min; p = 0.08). Complications that were significantly low in L-VEIL were flap necrosis [RR 1.29; 95% CI (1.03-1.72); p < 0.001], wound dehiscence [RR 1.25; 95% CI (1.19-1.51); p = 0.005), wound infection [RR 1.34; 95% CI (1.19-1.51); p = 0.003], readmission [RR 1.3; 95% CI (1.17-1.44); p = 0.005], and re-surgery [p = 0.014]. Occurrence of complications such as lymphocele [RR 1.25; 95% CI (0.33-4.78); p = 0.5], lymphorrhea [RR 1.27; 95% CI (1.15-1.40); p = 0.5], and pedal edema [p = 0.2] were similar for both the approaches. L-VEIL was effective and safe compared with open inguinal block dissection in treatment of various TNM stage N0 and N1 urogenital and skin cancers.

Giant cell tumor of distal radius treated with ulnar translocation and wrist arthrodesis

INTRODUCTION

The aim is to analyze the functional outcomes of patients of giant cell tumor (GCT) of distal radius treated with ulnar translocation and wrist arthrodesis.

METHODS

Study included 25 patients of aggressive GCT of distal radius, resected and reconstructed using ulnar translocation and wrist arthrodesis. The ulna-carpal radius fixation was performed with plate and screws. The patients were followed to bony union and minimum follow-up was 1 year.

RESULT

Twenty-two patients were of Campanacci grade 3 and three patients were of Campanacci grade2. The mean follow-up was of 23 months (12-36). All patients had an excellent range of pronation and supination. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 24 (range 22-28). Grip strength of affected hand compared to the contra lateral hand was found good in 17 cases and average in 7 cases. The mean bone union time at ulna to radius junction was at 6.5 (5-8) months and ulna to carpal junction at 4.5 (4-6) months. The complications were surgical site infection (one case), recurrence (one case) and failure of union (one case), and ulna graft fracture with implant failure in (two cases).

CONCLUSION

Reconstruction of distal end of radius using ulnar translocation and wrist arthrodesis provides excellent functional outcomes with preservation of rotational movement of forearm and hand function. Reconstruction of the distal radius by ulnar translocation without complete detachment from surrounding soft tissues functions like vascularized graft without use of microvascular techniques.