Factors associated with the emergence of integrase resistance mutations in patients failing dual or triple integrase inhibitor-based regimens in a French national survey

BACKGROUND

Successful 2-drug regimens (2DRs) for HIV were made possible by the availability of drugs combining potency and tolerability with a high genetic barrier to resistance. How these deal with resistance development/re-emergence, compared with 3DRs, is thus of paramount importance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A national survey including patients who were either naive or experienced with any 2DR or 3DR but failing integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-containing regimens [two consecutive plasma viral load (VL) values >50 copies/mL] was conducted between 2014 and 2019. Genotypic resistance tests were interpreted with the v28 ANRS algorithm.

RESULTS

Overall, 1104 patients failing any INSTI-containing regimen (2DRs, n = 207; 3DRs, n = 897) were analysed. Five hundred and seventy-seven (52.3%) patients were infected with a B subtype and 527 (47.3%) with non-B subtypes. Overall, 644 (58%) patients showed no known integrase resistance mutations at failure. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with the emergence of at least one integrase mutation were: high VL at failure (OR = 1.24 per 1 log10 copies/mL increase); non-B versus B subtype (OR = 1.75); low genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) (OR = 0.10 for GSS = 2 versus GSS = 0-0.5); and dolutegravir versus raltegravir (OR = 0.46). Although 3DRs versus 2DRs reached statistical significance in univariate analysis (OR = 0.59, P = 0.007), the variable is not retained in the final model.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is one of the largest studies characterizing integrase resistance in patients failing any INSTI-containing 2DR or 3DR in routine clinical care and reveals factors associated with emergence of integrase resistance that should be taken into consideration in clinical management. No difference was evidenced between patients receiving a 2DR or a 3DR.

NS3 protease polymorphism and natural resistance to protease inhibitors in French patients infected with HCV genotypes 1-5

BACKGROUND

Resistant HCV populations may pre-exist in patients before NS3 protease inhibitor therapy and would likely be selected under specific antiviral pressure. The higher prevalence and lower rate of response to treatment associated with HCV genotype 1 infections has led to drug discovery efforts being focused primarily on enzymes produced by this genotype. Protease inhibitors may also be useful for non-genotype-1-infected patients, notably for non-responders.

METHODS

We investigated the prevalence of dominant resistance mutations and polymorphism in 298 HCV protease-inhibitor-naive patients infected with HCV genotypes 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5. Genotype-specific NS3 primers were designed to amplify and sequence the NS3 protease gene.

RESULTS

None of the 233 analysed sequences contained major telaprevir (TVR) or boceprevir (BOC) resistance mutations (R155K/T/M, A156S/V/T and V170A). Some substitutions (V36L, T54S, Q80K/R, D168Q and V170T) linked to low or moderate decreases in HCV sensitivity to protease inhibitors were prevalent according to genotype (between 2% and 100%). Other than genotype signature mutations at positions 36, 80 and 168, the most frequent substitution was T54S (4 genotype 1 and 2 genotype 4 sequences). All genotype 2-5 sequences had the non-genotype-1 signature V36L mutation known to confer low-level resistance to both TVR and BOC.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed an HCV protease NS3 inhibitor resistance genotyping tool suitable for use with HCV genotypes 1-5. Polymorphism data is valuable for interpreting genotypic resistance profiles in cases of failure of anti-HCV NS3 protease treatment.

Detection and quantification of serum or plasma HCV RNA: mini review of commercially available assays

The treatment schedule (combination of compounds, doses, and duration) and the virological follow-up for management of antiviral treatment in patients chronically infected by HCV is now well standardized, but to ensure good monitoring of the treated patients, physicians need rapid, reproducible, and sensitive molecular virological tools with a wide range of detection and quantification of HCV RNA in blood samples. Several assays for detection and/or quantification of HCV RNA are currently commercially available. Here, all these assays are detailed, and a brief description of each step of the assay is provided. They are divided into two categories by method: those based on signal amplification and those based on target amplification. These two categories are then divided into qualitative, quantitative, and quantitative detection assays. The real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based assays are the most promising strategy in the HCV virological area.