Endovascular treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms: Results from a single-team experience of 81 cases including 13 flow diversion treatment

INTRODUCTION

Relatively constant surgical risks and rapid advances in endovascular treatment have caused a major shift toward endovascular management of posterior circulation aneurysms. This paper presents the results of a series of endovascularly treated posterior circulation aneurysms.

METHODS

A total of 81 patients who underwent endovascular treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms performed by a single team between 2009 and 2019 were included. Demographic, clinical, radiologic, and management details were retrospectively obtained from hospital records.

RESULTS

Among the included patients, 50 (61.7%) and 31 (38.3%) were female and male, respectively. Subarachnoid hemorrhage was observed in 30 patients (37%). Moreover, 40 (49.3%) aneurysms were treated with stent-assisted coiling, 1 (1.2%) aneurysm was treated with parent artery occlusion, 2 (2.4%) aneurysms were coiled using balloon assistance, 24 (29.6%) aneurysms were coiled primarily, 1 (1.2%) patient had an unsuccessful treatment attempt, and 13 (16.0%) aneurysms were treated with flow-diverter stents or stent monotherapy. During the last follow-up, 57 (83.8%) aneurysms were completely occluded, whereas 6 (8.8%) and 2 (2.9%) aneurysms did and did not have a residual neck, respectively. Flow diversion was used to treat 13 patients, among whom 8 had total occlusion or stable residue. A total of 7 deaths (8.6%) were encountered in this series.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular treatment should be considered as the primary treatment modality for posterior circulation aneurysms. Despite the high morbidity and mortality rates, promising results can be achieved with correct patient selection. Flow diversion can be a feasible alternative for complex aneurysms that are difficult to treat.

Versatile Use of Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance for Brain Puncture

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) is an effective guidance and imaging system commonly used in neuro-oncological surgery. Despite the versatility of iUS, its utility for single burr hole puncture guidance remains fairly underappreciated.

OBJECTIVE

To highlight the simplicity, versatility, and effectiveness of iUS guidance in brain puncture by presenting the current case series and technical note collection.

METHODS

We present 4 novel uses of iUS guidance for single burr hole brain puncture: cannulation of normal-sized ventricles, endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) guidance, evacuation of interhemispheric empyema, and stereotactic biopsy assistance.

RESULTS

All techniques were performed successfully in a total of 16 patients. Normal-sized ventricles were cannulated in 7 patients, among whom 5 underwent Ommaya reservoir placement and 2 underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. No more than 1 attempt was needed for cannulation. All ventricular tip positions were optimal as shown by postoperative imaging. iUS guidance was used in 5 ETV procedures. The working cannula was successfully introduced to the lateral ventricle, providing the optimal trajectory to the third ventricular floor in these cases. Interhemispheric subdural empyema was aspirated with iUS guidance in 1 patient. Volume reduction was clearly visible, allowing near-total evacuation of the empyema. iUS guidance was used for assistive purposes during stereotactic biopsy in 3 patients. No major perioperative complications were observed throughout this series.

CONCLUSION

iUS is an effective and versatile guidance system that allows for real-time imaging and can be easily and safely employed for various brain puncture procedures.