35 years of the Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research

The authors pay homage to the three founders of the Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research Profs. Lewis Joel Greene, Sérgio Henrique Ferreira and Eduardo Moacyr Krieger for their vision and commitment to divulge the scientific production of developing countries.

Variability in baseline laboratory measurements of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil)

Multi-center epidemiological studies must ascertain that their measurements are accurate and reliable. For laboratory measurements, reliability can be assessed through investigation of reproducibility of measurements in the same individual. In this paper, we present results from the quality control analysis of the baseline laboratory measurements from the ELSA-Brasil study. The study enrolled 15,105 civil servants at 6 research centers in 3 regions of Brazil between 2008-2010, with multiple biochemical analytes being measured at a central laboratory. Quality control was ascertained through standard laboratory evaluation of intra- and inter-assay variability and test-retest analysis in a subset of randomly chosen participants. An additional sample of urine or blood was collected from these participants, and these samples were handled in the same manner as the original ones, locally and at the central laboratory. Reliability was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), estimated through a random effects model. Coefficients of variation (CV) and Bland-Altman plots were additionally used to assess measurement variability. Laboratory intra and inter-assay CVs varied from 0.86% to 7.77%. From test-retest analyses, the ICCs were high for the majority of the analytes. Notably lower ICCs were observed for serum sodium (ICC=0.50; 95%CI=0.31-0.65) and serum potassium (ICC=0.73; 95%CI=0.60-0.83), due to the small biological range of these analytes. The CVs ranged from 1 to 14%. The Bland-Altman plots confirmed these results. The quality control analyses showed that the collection, processing and measurement protocols utilized in the ELSA-Brasil produced reliable biochemical measurements.

Neoplastic pulmonary lymphangitis: Symptomatic treatment and quality-of-life evaluation in a prospective palliative care series

19536

Background: Neoplastic lymphangitis, or lymphangitis carcinomatosa, is a rare and distressing form of lung metastasis, for which symptom improvement is strongly necessary. Since measuring quality of life is an important step toward improving symptom management in cancer patients, and dyspnea in pulmonary lymphangitis is a complex syndrome in end-of-life care, we focused on evaluating a cohort of those individuals. Methods: 52 consecutive patients with neoplastic pulmonary lymphangitis (NPL) were prospectivelly followed in 3 services, with quality of life (QoL) evaluation also, using Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF- 36) and Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Results: 65% (34) of patients were female; age ranged from 37 to 84 years (median: 60). Primary tumor sites were: 28 lung (54%), 18 breast (35%), 5 digestive (9%) and 1 bone cancer. Histological findings were of adenocarcinoma in most cases (71%). Karnofsky performance scale ranged from 10 to 90% (median: 60%); 52% (27) patients had other comorbidities (Charlson index ranged from 6–10; median 7); 48% (25) were previous smokers; hemoglobin levels ranged from 4.9 to 16.7 g/dL (median: 12). We also evaluated 33 patients with echocardiography, and 13 (43%) of them had signs of associated pulmonary hypertension; ejection fraction ranged from 46 to 83% (median: 69%); diastolic dysfunction was present in 22 and pericardial effusion in 10 patients. At accrual, median QoL scores were of: 32% (range: 0–84%) for SF-36 (scale with 0 worst) and 66% (range: 0–100%) for SGRQ (scale with 100% worst). Treatment is showed in a table below. Median survival was of 4 months (range: 0.2–40+ months); 22 (42%) of the patients had an unusual longer survival of more than 6 months, still showing good QoL scores. Conclusions: Despite the fact that QoL is generally poor and survival is short for patients with NPL, some patients may have longer survival time and some improvement is possible with active palliative care.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.