Reperfusion strategy and late clinical outcomes of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the absence of standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs)

Introduction

There is growing evidence that patients presenting with STEMI in the absence of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs; smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes) have poorer outcomes compared to those with atleast one SMuRF. It has been hypothesised that this may be in part due to decreased administration of pharmacotherapies in the post-infarct period due to perceived low risk. Long term outcomes of patients without SMuRFs based on reperfusion strategy received during the index admission have not been investigated.

Purpose

We sought to analyse late clinical outcomes of STEMI patients with and without SMuRFs based on reperfusion strategy received during the index admission.

Methods

All patients who underwent PCI between 2003 and 2014 were identified from a PCI centre STEMI database. Late clinical outcomes of patients with and without SMuRFs were analysed overall and based on reperfusion strategy [primary PCI (pPCI) vs pharmaco-invasive PCI (PI-PCI)]. Propensity matching was used to account for differences in baseline characteristics between the groups.

Results

Amongst 2,091 STEMI patients, 531 (25%) had no SMuRFs (51% pPCI, 49% PI-PCI) and 1560 (75%) had ≥1 SMuRF (52% pPCI, 48% PI-PCI). Unadjusted late mortality in SMuRF-less patients was 13.4% (18.8% pPCI, 7.7% PI-PCI) and for those with ≥1 SMuRF was 9.7% (11.0% pPCI, 8.4% PI-PCI). After propensity-matching clinical and angiographic characteristics, 5 year mortality rates were significantly higher for patients without SMuRFs compared to those with SMuRFs [HR 1.36, CI: 1.03–1.81, p=0.031]. This difference was attenuated for patients who underwent pPCI [HR 1.72, CI: 1.22–2.43, p=0.002]. Interestingly, this discrepancy was not observed amongst individuals who underwent pharmaco-invasive PCI [HR 1.13, CI: 0.53–1.48, p=0.638], as SMuRF-less patients had similar mortality rates to their counterparts. Long term rates of reinfarction, stent thrombosis and target vessel revascularisation were similar between the groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in rates of stroke and major bleeding amongst all 4 subgroups.

Conclusion

Patients presenting with STEMI in the absence of SMuRFs have increased overall late mortality compared to those with at least one SMuRF. However, this difference was not observed in patients who underwent a pharmaco-invasive strategy, whereby patients without SMuRFs had similar outcomes to those with SMuRFs after adjusting for confounders. Our findings suggest the use of a pharmaco-invasive strategy in appropriate SMuRF-less patients presenting with STEMI.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

P1530 Dense spontaneous echo contrast and thrombus in patients on new oral anticoagulant and warfarin therapy: a retrospective audit

Background

Cardioembolic stroke is a known complication of atrial fibrillation (AF), which is increasing in global prevalence. Spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in the left atrium (LA) is a precursor for thrombus formation detected on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). There is limited data regarding the prevalence of dense SEC and/or left atrial thrombus (LAT) detected by TEE in patients on novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with Warfarin.

Purpose

To determine and compare the prevalence of dense SEC and/or LAT among patients with AF/atrial flutter undergoing TEE while on continuous NOAC or Warfarin therapy.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of prospectively entered data for all patients who were on continuous oral anticoagulants and underwent TEE with DC cardioversion, over a 9-year period (1st January 2011 to 31st December 2018) at a public teaching hospital in NSW, Australia. SEC was classified according to emptying flow velocities, as per the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines.

Results

Among the 195 patients, 94 (48%) patients were on NOAC therapy (52% Apixaban, 25% Rivaroxaban, 23% Dabigatran) while 101 (52%) patients were on Warfarin. There was no difference in age (mean ± SD: 64 ± 12 vs. 65 ± 13, p = 0.71) or proportion of males (71% vs 69%, p = 0.76) between patients on NOAC therapy compared with Warfarin. However, the NOAC therapy group had a lower prevalence of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) (18% vs. 33%, p < 0.05) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (2% vs. 19%, p < 0.001), in addition to a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score (2.1 ± 1.7 vs 2.7 ± 1.7, p = 0.03) and higher haemoglobin levels (145.3 ± 19 vs 133.8 ± 24, p = 0.001). The overall rate of dense SEC and/or LAT detected by TEE was 9.7%. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of dense SEC and/or LAT between patients on NOACs and Warfarin (6.4% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.13). On multivariable analysis of IHD, CKD, Warfarin, NOACs and CHA2DS2-VASc score, there was no significant difference in prevalence of SEC/LAT between Warfarin and NOACs.

Conclusions

In this study, 6.4% of patients on continuous NOACs and 12.9% of patients on Warfarin therapy had dense SEC and/or LAT detected by TEE. Although the trend towards higher rates of dense SEC and pre-thrombus in the Warfarin group did not reach statistical significance, it still holds clinical significance as these patients cannot be cardioverted. Therefore, these data support the need to consider anticoagulant optimisation in the overall management of patients with SEC.