1
|
Oscorbin I, Filipenko M. Bst polymerase - a humble relative of Taq polymerase. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2023; 21:4519-4535. [PMID: 37767105 PMCID: PMC10520511 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
DNA polymerases are a superfamily of enzymes synthesizing DNA using DNA as a template. They are essential for nucleic acid metabolism and for DNA replication and repair. Modern biotechnology and molecular diagnostics rely heavily on DNA polymerases in analyzing nucleic acids. Among a variety of discovered DNA polymerases, Bst polymerase, a large fragment of DNA polymerase I from Geobacillus stearothermophilus, is one of the most commonly used but is not as well studied as Taq polymerase. The ability of Bst polymerase to displace an upstream DNA strand during synthesis, coupled with its moderate thermal stability, has provided the basis for several isothermal DNA amplification methods, including LAMP, WGA, RCA, and many others. Bst polymerase is one of the key components defining the robustness and analytical characteristics of diagnostic test systems based on isothermal amplification. Here, we present an overview of the biochemical and structural features of Bst polymerase and provide information on its mutated analogs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Oscorbin
- Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ICBFM SB RAS), 8 Lavrentiev Avenue, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
| | - Maxim Filipenko
- Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ICBFM SB RAS), 8 Lavrentiev Avenue, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kechin A, Oscorbin I, Cherednichenko A, Khrapov E, Schwartz Y, Stavitskaya N, Filipenko M. Selection of IS6110 conserved regions for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using qPCR and LAMP. Arch Microbiol 2023; 205:71. [PMID: 36688992 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-023-03410-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 11/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
IS6110 insertion sequence is a frequently used target for Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection. However, its sequence variability is studied insufficiently. We aimed to identify the most conservative and variable regions in IS6110 sequences and develop qPCR and LAMP oligonucleotide sets for the conservative regions. Using in-house Python scripts, 3609 M. tuberculosis genome sequences from the NCBI database were aligned; conservative regions were identified to design oligonucleotide sets. IS6110 fragments located within the 31-231 bp region were the most conservative and represented in genomes and were used to design qPCR and LAMP oligonucleotides. The in silico sensitivity of the qPCR oligonucleotides on the whole genome set was 99.1% and 98.4%. For the LAMP primers developed, the sensitivity was 96.9%. For qPCR, the limit of detection with 95% confidence (LoD95%) was four IS6110 copies per reaction, with LoD90% being 200 BCG cells per ml of artificial sputum. For LAMP, LoD95% was 16 copies per reaction, with LoD90% being 400 Mycobacterium bovis Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) cells per ml of artificial sputum. We have demonstrated the IS6110 sequence variability and designed highly sensitive qPCR and LAMP oligonucleotides to detect M. tuberculosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrey Kechin
- Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, 8 Lavrentiev Avenue, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
| | - Igor Oscorbin
- Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, 8 Lavrentiev Avenue, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
| | - Andrey Cherednichenko
- Federal State Budgetary Institution "Novosibirsk Tuberculosis Research Institute" (NTRI) of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Okhotskaya St. 81 A, 630040, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
| | - Evgeniy Khrapov
- Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, 8 Lavrentiev Avenue, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
| | - Yakov Schwartz
- Federal State Budgetary Institution "Novosibirsk Tuberculosis Research Institute" (NTRI) of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Okhotskaya St. 81 A, 630040, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
| | - Nataliya Stavitskaya
- Federal State Budgetary Institution "Novosibirsk Tuberculosis Research Institute" (NTRI) of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Okhotskaya St. 81 A, 630040, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
| | - Maksim Filipenko
- Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, 8 Lavrentiev Avenue, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Popova A, Fedyanin M, Pokataev I, Shamovskaya D, Kudashkin N, Boyarskikh U, Kechin A, Oscorbin I, Moroz E, Trigolosov A, Filipenko M, Podluzhnyi D, Tjulandin S. P-279 Clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA in resectable and advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
4
|
Fedyanin M, Boyarskikh U, Polyanskaya E, Aliev V, Mamedli Z, Kechin A, Oscorbin I, Shamovskaya D, Popova A, Polyakov A, Kudashkin N, Arzumanyan AL, Trigolosov A, Nikulin MP, Nered SN, Stilidi I, Moroz E, Chekini A, Filipenko M, Tjulandin S. A prospective study of prognostic role of plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients (pts) with early-stage malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.3559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3559 Background: Recently, conflicting evidence has emerged showing the association of ctDNA level and cancer progression. The aim of our study was the development of a method for detecting ctDNA in plasma and the investigation of the prognostic value of ctDNA retention after surgery in the prospective way. Methods: This prospective, single-center, sample collection study; pts with early-stage malignancies of the different origin were included. Tumor somatic mutations were determined by target sequencing of DNA from FFPE tumor blocks. Sequencing was performed using the custom NGS panel covering regions of frequent somatic mutations in 50 genes. Tumor-specific mutations were monitored in plasma samples taken before and after surgery. The median time between surgery and plasma collection was 7 days (5-15). Mutations of plasma ctDNA were determined by ddPCR. The plasma sample was considered "positive" if the content of ctDNA was more than 0.5 copies of mutant DNA in ml plasma. We needed 265 pts for improving 1-year disease free survival (DFS) from 60% to 80% with α=0.01, β=0.1, 10% loss of f.-up and duration of the study for 2 years. Results: The study comprised 271 pts with various cancers including colorectal – 91 (33,6%), pancreatic – 37 (13,7%), breast – 66 (24,4%), lung – 35 (12,9%) and gastric cancer – 42 (15,5%). Pts with stage I was 50 (18,5%), stage II – 118 (43,5%) and stage III – 103 (38%). The median time of the f.-up was 9 mos. (1-37). No significant association was found between the level of ctDNA before surgery and DFS either in the general group or in groups stratified by tumor sites (HR 2.4, 95%CI 0.8-7.1, р=0.12 and HR 1.5, 95%CI 0.4-6.3, р=0.5, correspondingly). ctDNA was detected in the plasma after surgery in 57 (10%) pts: 9 (9.9%) cases of colorectal, 10 (27%) - pancreatic, 9 (13.6%) - breast, 19 (54.3%) - lung, and 10 (23.8%) - gastric cancer. Progression of the disease was detected in 28/57 (49%) pts with ctDNA(+) and 17/214 (8%) - in ctDNA(-) pts (p<0.001). One-year DFS in ctDNA(+) and ctDNA(-) pts were 57% and 87%, respectively (HR 6.1, 95%CI 3.3-11.2, p<0,001). ctDNA positivity after surgery was an independent negative prognostic factor according to Cox regression model fitted to T, N, and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 5.7, 95%CI 3.1-10.8, p <0.001). Conclusions: These results demonstrate the prognostic significance of ctDNA persisting after surgery in pts with the early stage of the different malignancies. Further clinical validation of this approach is required in trails with modifications of the adjuvant treatment, according to the content of ctDNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikhail Fedyanin
- Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Uljana Boyarskikh
- Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
| | - Elizaveta Polyanskaya
- Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Vechaslav Aliev
- Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Zaman Mamedli
- Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Andrey Kechin
- Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
| | - Igor Oscorbin
- Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
| | - Darya Shamovskaya
- Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
| | - Anna Popova
- Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Alexandr Polyakov
- Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Nikolay Kudashkin
- Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Alla L. Arzumanyan
- Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Arkadiy Trigolosov
- Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Maxim P. Nikulin
- Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Sergey N. Nered
- Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Ivan Stilidi
- Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Ekaterina Moroz
- Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Antonio Chekini
- Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Maxim Filipenko
- Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
| | - Sergei Tjulandin
- Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|