3
|
Real-world comparative study of the efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the ANSWER cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023:kead543. [PMID: 37924201 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This multicentre, retrospective study compared the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, peficitinib and upadacitinib in real-world clinical settings after minimizing selection bias and adjusting the confounding patient characteristics. METHOD The 622 patients were selected from the ANSWER cohort database and treated with tofacitinib (TOF), baricitinib (BAR), peficitinib (PEF) or upadacitinib (UPA). The patient's background was matched using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) among four treatment groups. The values of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), C-reactive protein (CRP), and modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) after drug initiation and the remission or low disease activity (LDA) rates of CDAI at 6 months after drug initiation were compared among the four groups. Further, the predictive factor for TOF and BAR efficacy was analysed. RESULTS The retention and discontinuation rates until 6 months after drug initiations were not significantly different among the four JAK inhibitors treatment groups. Mean CDAI value, CDAI remission rate, and CDAI-LDA rate at 6 months after drug initiation were not significantly different among treatment groups. Baseline CDAI (TOFA: OR 1.09, P < 0.001; BARI: OR 1.07, P < 0.001), baseline CRP (TOFA: OR 1.32, P = 0.049), baseline glucocorticoid dose (BARI: OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.38, P = 0.035), a number of previous biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (biological/targeted synthetic DMARDs) (BARI: OR 1.36, P = 0.004) were predictive factors for resistance to CDAI-LDA achievement to JAK inhibitor treatment. CONCLUSION The efficacy and safety of TOF, BAR, PEF and UPA were not significantly different for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Collapse
|
4
|
Demographic, Physical, and Psychological Determinants of Patient Experience with Subcutaneous Self-Injection in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:1551-1559. [PMID: 37426046 PMCID: PMC10327901 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s413871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To achieve a better patient experience with self-injection, an assessment of potential demographic, physical, and psychological barriers is necessary. The aim of this study was to examine the demographic, physical, and psychological characteristics associated with the experiences of self-injection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients and Methods In this study, overall patient experience with subcutaneous self-injection was assessed using the Self-Injection Assessment Questionnaire. Upper limb function was assessed using the three domains of the Health Assessment Questionnaire associated with upper extremity disability (dressing and grooming, eating, and grip). Structural equation modeling was used to estimate the association between the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with RA and their experiences with self-injection in the theoretical model. Results Data from 83 patients with RA were analyzed. Compared with younger patients, elderly patients were more likely to experience lower self-confidence, self-image, and ease of use. Female patients had lower ease of use than male patients. In terms of upper limb function, patients with more difficulty in performing activities of daily living were more likely to have a lower self-image. Self-injection perceptions before learning the method of injection, such as fear of needles and anxiety about self-injection, were associated with post-injection feelings, injection site reactions, self-confidence, and ease of use. Conclusion To optimize patients' experiences with self-injection, healthcare workers should assess each patient's age, sex, upper limb function, and pre-self-injection perceptions as demographic, physical, and psychological barriers.
Collapse
|
6
|
POS0532 DRUG RETENTION OF BIOLOGICS OR JAK INHIBITORS IN PATIENTS WITH DIFFICULT-TO-TREAT RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: RESULTS FROM THE ANSWER COHORT. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.1994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundDifficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) is defined as RA in which disease activity is uncontrolled despite the use of two or more biologics or Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) with different mechanisms of action (MOA).ObjectivesTo explore the optimal treatment strategy for D2T RA, we evaluated the drug retention, efficacy, and reasons for discontinuation of biologics or JAKi used for patients with D2T RA in a longitudinal multicenter cohort.MethodsRA patients with clinical disease activity index (CDAI) >10 despite the use of at least two biologics or JAKi with different MOA and further treated with biologics or JAKi were included. The drug retention rates of biologics (TNFi, IL-6Ri, and CTLA4-Ig) or JAKi were estimated at 12 months using the Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted for potential confounders (age, sex, disease duration, concomitant MTX and PSL use, and the number of switched biologics or JAKi) using Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsA total of 251 treatment courses (TCs) from 167 patients were included (TNFi: 97 TCs, IL-6Ri: 67 TCs, CTLA4-Ig: 27 TCs, JAKi: 60 TCs). Baseline characteristics showed no difference in age, sex, disease duration, ACPA positivity, CDAI, and concomitant MTX and PSL use between the four groups. Drug retention excluding non-toxic reasons and remission was significantly higher in patients treated with JAKi or IL-6Ri than in patients treated with TNFi or CTLA4-Ig (P=0.00172). Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards models demonstrated that discontinuation of the drug was associated with the use of TNFi or CTLA4-Ig (HR: 3.29, 95%CI: 1.15-9.42, P=0.027) and concomitant PSL use (HR: 1.14, 95%CI: 1.04-1.26, P=0.0084). In terms of disease activity evaluated with CDAI, no difference was observed between the four groups at 3 months (P=0.90), at 6 months (P=0.77), and at 12 months (P=0.75).ConclusionIn patients with D2T RA, JAKi or IL-6Ri may have treatment advantages compared with TNFi or CTLA4-Ig.References[1] EULAR definition of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis.Nagy G, Roodenrijs NMT, Welsing PM, Kedves M, Hamar A, van der Goes MC, Kent A, Bakkers M, Blaas E, Senolt L, Szekanecz Z, Choy E, Dougados M, Jacobs JW, Geenen R, Bijlsma HW, Zink A, Aletaha D, Schoneveld L, van Riel P, Gutermann L, Prior Y, Nikiphorou E, Ferraccioli G, Schett G, Hyrich KL, Mueller-Ladner U, Buch MH, McInnes IB, van der Heijde D, van Laar JM.Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jan;80(1):31-35.[2] Prevalence and predictive factors of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: the KURAMA cohort.Watanabe R, Hashimoto M, Murata K, Murakami K, Tanaka M, Ohmura K, Ito H, Matsuda S.Immunol Med. 2021 May 25:1-10.Disclosure of InterestsRyu Watanabe Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Pfizer, Sanofi, AbbVie, Asahi Kasei, Eisai, Bristol-Myers Squibb, UCB Japan, Chugai, Janssen, Astellas, Nippon Shinyaku, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead Sciences Japan, and Boehringer ingelheim., Tadashi Okano Speakers bureau: Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Abbvie, Amgen, Ayumi, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, Grant/research support from: Asahi Kasei, Abbvie, Chugai, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Shinsuke Yamada: None declared, Wataru Yamamoto: None declared, Koichi Murata Speakers bureau: Eisai Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp.; and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., and Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Kosaku Murakami: None declared, Kosuke Ebina Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Asahi-Kasei, Astellas, Ayumi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB Japan., Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Asahi-Kasei, Astellas, Chugai, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Ono Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, and UCB Japan, Yuichi Maeda Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation., Sadao Jinno Speakers bureau: AbbVie G.K., Asahi Kasei Pharma., Bristol-Myers Squibb., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, and Ono Pharmaceutical Co, Iku Shirasugi: None declared, Yonsu Son: None declared, Hideki Amuro Speakers bureau: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd, Masaki Katayama: None declared, Ryota Hara: None declared, Kenichiro Hata Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Chugai, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Eisai, Ayaka Yoshikawa: None declared, Motomu Hashimoto Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Asahi-Kasei, Brystol-Meyers, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Novartis Pharma.
Collapse
|
8
|
SAT0222 CLINICAL SPECTRUM AND LONG TERM FOLLOWUP OF SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS-ASSOCIATED MACROPHAGE ACTIVATION SYNDROME. Ann Rheum Dis 2020. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.5135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background:Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients present with variable clinical features ranging from mild joint and skin involvement to life-threatening organ involvement such as nephritis, neuropsychiatric involvement, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). HLH is rare, but fatal complication of SLE. Recently, European League Against Rheumatism, the American College of Rheumatology, and the Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization was to develop a set of classification criteria for MAS complicating systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (PRINTO criteria) [1]. Sung Soo Ahn and his colleagues reported PRINTO criteria predicted mortality of adult SLE patient, but they followed only one year [2].Objectives:To reveal association PRINTO criteria with long term mortalities in SLE patient in our Hospital.Methods:We performed a retrospective analysis of SLE patients who received moderate dose glucocorticoid therapy (>0.4mg/kg/d) in our hospital between April 2008 and April 2019. Patients were evaluated for HLH using the 2016 PRINTO classification criteria for MAS. Clinical features and laboratory findings were compared and overall survival rate was analyzed.Results:Among 164 episode (144 patients) with SLE, 31 episode (31 patients) 5.2% were considered to have MAS on admission.The overall survival rate was significantly lower in patients with MAS than without MAS (86.2% vs. 95.3%, p = 0.048). Interestingly, SLEDAI had no association with mortality, relapse rate, and MAS complication. SLEDAI more focused on renal and neuropsychiatric symptoms than hematologic features. So SLEDAI might not be associated with MAS secondary to SLE. Furthermore, we observed no death patient with MAS after one year, and only 1 case relapse in MAS patient. So MAS might have fatal but less relapsing property compared with other lupus cases.Conclusion:PRINTO criteria may be useful to differentiated fatal MAS patients from others. Further investigations are required to confirm our findings.Limitation The main limitations of our study include its retrospective design, single center site, and that the number of admitted patients with SLE was small.Limitation:The main limitations of our study include its retrospective design, single center site, and that the number of admitted patients with SLE was small.Limitation:Limitation The main limitations of our study include its retrospective design, single center site, and that the number of admitted patients with SLE was small.References:[1]Wulffraat N, Schneider R, Filipovic L, et al. 2016 Classification Criteria for Macrophage Activation Syndrome Complicating Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:481–9.[2]Ahn SS, Yoo BW, Jung SM, et al. In-hospital mortality in febrile lupus patients based on 2016 EULAR/ACR/PRINTO classification criteria for macrophage activation syndrome. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2017;47:216–21.Disclosure of Interests:None declared
Collapse
|