1
|
Sawka-Gądek N, Potekhin A, Singh DP, Grevtseva I, Arnaiz O, Penel S, Sperling L, Tarcz S, Duret L, Nekrasova I, Meyer E. Evolutionary Plasticity of Mating-Type Determination Mechanisms in Paramecium aurelia Sibling Species. Genome Biol Evol 2021; 13:evaa258. [PMID: 33313646 PMCID: PMC7900874 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evaa258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The Paramecium aurelia complex, a group of morphologically similar but sexually incompatible sibling species, is a unique example of the evolutionary plasticity of mating-type systems. Each species has two mating types, O (Odd) and E (Even). Although O and E types are homologous in all species, three different modes of determination and inheritance have been described: genetic determination by Mendelian alleles, stochastic developmental determination, and maternally inherited developmental determination. Previous work in three species of the latter kind has revealed the key roles of the E-specific transmembrane protein mtA and its highly specific transcription factor mtB: type O clones are produced by maternally inherited genome rearrangements that inactivate either mtA or mtB during development. Here we show, through transcriptome analyses in five additional species representing the three determination systems, that mtA expression specifies type E in all cases. We further show that the Mendelian system depends on functional and nonfunctional mtA alleles, and identify novel developmental rearrangements in mtA and mtB which now explain all cases of maternally inherited mating-type determination. Epistasis between these genes likely evolved from less specific interactions between paralogs in the P. aurelia common ancestor, after a whole-genome duplication, but the mtB gene was subsequently lost in three P. aurelia species which appear to have returned to an ancestral regulation mechanism. These results suggest a model accounting for evolutionary transitions between determination systems, and highlight the diversity of molecular solutions explored among sibling species to maintain an essential mating-type polymorphism in cell populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Sawka-Gądek
- Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
| | - Alexey Potekhin
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Deepankar Pratap Singh
- Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France
| | - Inessa Grevtseva
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Olivier Arnaiz
- CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Simon Penel
- CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Linda Sperling
- CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Sebastian Tarcz
- Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
| | - Laurent Duret
- CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Irina Nekrasova
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Eric Meyer
- Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nikitin M, Deych K, Grevtseva I, Girsova N, Kuznetsova M, Pridannikov M, Dzhavakhiya V, Statsyuk N, Golikov A. Preserved Microarrays for Simultaneous Detection and Identification of Six Fungal Potato Pathogens with the Use of Real-Time PCR in Matrix Format. Biosensors (Basel) 2018; 8:E129. [PMID: 30551630 PMCID: PMC6316111 DOI: 10.3390/bios8040129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Revised: 12/08/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Fungal diseases of plants are of great economic importance causing 70⁻80% of crop losses associated with microbial plant pathogens. Advanced on-site disease diagnostics is very important to maximize crop productivity. In this study, diagnostic systems have been developed for simultaneous detection and identification of six fungal pathogens using 48-well microarrays (micromatrices) for qPCR. All oligonucleotide sets were tested for their specificity using 59 strains of target and non-target species. Detection limit of the developed test systems varied from 0.6 to 43.5 pg of DNA depending on target species with reproducibility within 0.3-0.7% (standard deviation). Diagnostic efficiency of test systems with stabilized and freeze-dried PCR master-mixes did not significantly differ from that of freshly prepared microarrays, though detection limit increased. Validation of test systems on 30 field samples of potato plants showed perfect correspondence with the results of morphological identification of pathogens. Due to the simplicity of the analysis and the automated data interpretation, the developed microarrays have good potential for on-site use by technician-level personnel, as well as for high-throughput monitoring of fungal potato pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maksim Nikitin
- GenBit LLC, Nauchny pr., 20, Bld. 4, Moscow 117246, Russia.
| | - Ksenia Deych
- GenBit LLC, Nauchny pr., 20, Bld. 4, Moscow 117246, Russia.
| | | | - Natalya Girsova
- All-Russian Research Institute of Phytopathology, Institute Str., 5, Bolshie Vyazemy 143050, Russia.
| | - Maria Kuznetsova
- All-Russian Research Institute of Phytopathology, Institute Str., 5, Bolshie Vyazemy 143050, Russia.
| | - Mikhail Pridannikov
- All-Russian Research Institute of Phytopathology, Institute Str., 5, Bolshie Vyazemy 143050, Russia.
- Centre of Parasitology, Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskii Prospect 33, Moscow 119071, Russia.
| | - Vitaly Dzhavakhiya
- All-Russian Research Institute of Phytopathology, Institute Str., 5, Bolshie Vyazemy 143050, Russia.
| | - Natalia Statsyuk
- All-Russian Research Institute of Phytopathology, Institute Str., 5, Bolshie Vyazemy 143050, Russia.
| | | |
Collapse
|