Computed tomography assessment of pelvic bone density: Associations with age and pelvic fracture in motor vehicle crashes

Motor vehicle crash (MVC) occupants routinely get a computed tomography (CT) scan to screen for internal injury, and this CT can be leveraged to opportunistically derive bone mineral density (BMD). This study aimed to develop and validate a method to measure pelvic BMD in CT scans without a phantom, and examine associations of pelvic BMD with age and pelvic fracture incidence in seriously injured MVC occupants from the Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) study. A phantom-less muscle-fat calibration technique to measure pelvic BMD was validated using 45 quantitative CT scans with a bone calibration phantom. The technique was then used to measure pelvic BMD from CT scans of 252 CIREN occupants (ages 16+) in frontal MVCs who had sustained either abdominal or pelvic injury. Pelvic BMD was analyzed in relation to age and pelvic fracture incidence. In the validation set, phantom-based calibration vs. phantom-less muscle-fat calibration yielded similar BMD values at the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS; R2 = 0.95, p < 0.001) and iliac crest (R2 = 0.90, p < 0.001). Pelvic BMD was measured in 150 female and 102 male CIREN occupants aged 16-89, and 25% of these occupants sustained pelvic fracture. BMD at the ASIS and iliac crest declined with age (p < 0.001). For instance, iliac crest BMD decreased an average of 25 mg/cm3 per decade of age. The rate of iliac crest BMD decline was 7.6 mg/cm3 more per decade of age in occupants with pelvic fracture compared to those not sustaining pelvic fracture. Findings suggest pelvic BMD may be a contributing risk factor for pelvic fracture in MVCs.

Body mass index influence on lap belt position and abdominal injury in frontal motor vehicle crashes

OBJECTIVE

As obesity rates climb, it is important to study its effects on motor vehicle safety due to differences in restraint interaction and biomechanics. Previous studies have shown that an abdominal seatbelt sign (referred hereafter as seatbelt sign) sustained from motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) is associated with abdominal trauma when located above the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). This study investigates whether placement of the lap belt causing a seatbelt sign is associated with abdominal organ injury in occupants with increased body mass index (BMI). We hypothesized that higher BMI would be associated with a higher incidence of superior placement of the lap belt to the ASIS level, and a higher incidence of abdominal organ injury.

METHODS

A retrospective data analysis was performed using 230 cases that met inclusion criteria (belted occupant in a frontal collision that sustained at least one abdominal injury) from the Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) database. Computed tomography (CT) scans were rendered to visualize fat stranding to determine the presence of a seatbelt sign. 146 positive seatbelt signs were visualized. ASIS level was measured by adjusting the transverse slice of the CT to the visualized ASIS level, which was used to determine seatbelt sign location as superior, on, or inferior to the ASIS.

RESULTS

Obese occupants had a significantly higher incidence of superior belt placement (52%) vs on-ASIS placement (24%) compared to their normal (27% vs 67%) BMI counterparts (p < 0.001). Notable trends included obese occupants with superior placement having less abdominal organ injury incidence than those with on-ASIS belt placement (42% superior placement vs 55% on-ASIS). In non-obese occupants, there was a higher incidence of abdominal organ injury with superior lap belt placement compared to on-ASIS placement counterparts (Normal BMI: 62% vs 41%, Overweight: 57% vs 43%).

CONCLUSIONS

In CIREN occupants with abdominal injury, those with obesity are more prone to positioning the lap belt superior to the ASIS, though the impact on abdominal injury incidence remains a key point for continued exploration into how occupant BMI affects crash safety and belt design.