The effects of betaine treatment on rats fed an acute bolus of ethanol at 3 and 12 h post bolus: a microarray analysis

Betaine, a methyl donor active in methionine metabolism, is effective in preventing and reversing experimental alcohol liver disease. The metabolic and molecular biologic mechanisms involved in this prevention are only partially known. To further investigate how betaine modifies the effects of ethanol on the liver, rats were given an acute ethanol bolus with or without betaine and the results were compared to isocaloric dextrose-fed controls. Livers were subjected to microarray analysis, and functional pathways and individual gene expression changes were analyzed. Experimental groups were compared by Venn diagrams showing that both ethanol and betaine caused a change in the expression of a large number of genes indicating that the changes were global. The bio-informatic analysis showed that all the KEGG functional pathways were affected and mainly down regulated at 3 h post bolus when ethanol plus betaine were compared with ethanol-fed rats. The most profound effect of betaine was on the metabolic pathways both at 3 and 12 h post bolus. At 3 h, the changes in gene expression were mostly down regulated, but at 12 h, the changes were regulated equally up and down. This hypothesis-driven analysis showed that the effects of betaine on the effects of ethanol were partly transient.

The effect of propranolol on gene expression during the blood alcohol cycle of rats fed ethanol intragastrically

Propranolol, a beta adrenergic blocker prevents the blood alcohol (BAL) cycle in rats fed ethanol intragastrically at a constant rate by preventing the cyclic changes in the metabolic rate caused by fluctuating levels of norepinephrine released into the blood. The change in the rate of metabolism changes the rate of alcohol elimination in the blood which causes the BAL to cycle. Microarray analysis of the livers from the rats fed ethanol and propranolol showed similar changes in clusters of functionally related gene expressions. The controls and the trough of the cycle differed dramatically from the cluster pattern seen in the rats at the peaks of the blood alcohol cycle. The changes in gene expression induced by ethanol were similar when propranolol was fed without ethanol especially with the changes in the kinases and phosphatases, Toll-like receptor signaling and cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction were also changed. The changes in gene expression caused by ethanol and propranolol feeding are alike probably because both drugs induce beta adrenergic receptor desensitization.

Comparison of the response of midgut epithelial cells and cell lines from lepidopteran larvae to CryIA toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis

The cytotoxic responses of midgut epithelial cells (MEC) from spruce budworm (SBW), gypsy moth (GM) and silkworm (SW) larvae were compared with the cytotoxic response of lepidopteran cell lines (SF-9, SE-1a, and CF-1) to CryIA toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis. The MEC from SBW, SW and GM had binding proteins for CryIA(a,b,c) toxins, whereas the lepidopteran cell lines had binding proteins for CryIA(c). Single MEC exposed to CryIA(a,b,c) toxins in a qualitative lawn assay were equally susceptible to the toxins with a threshold response at about 1ng. The cell lines were not susceptible to CryIA(a,b) toxins in the dose range tested, but had threshold responses for CryIA(c) of 3.4ng for SF-9, 50.2ng for SE-1a and 5.9ng for CF-1. In the quantitative Live/Dead assay, MEC were equally susceptible to CryIA(a,b,c) toxins with a threshold effect at about 1ng and a maximum effect at about 10ng. CF-1 was most sensitive to CryIA(c) with a threshold effect at 0.39ng and a maximal effect at about 1ng. In contrast, a 25-50 times greater dose of CryIA(a) or CryIA(b) was required to elicit a similar response as CryIA(c) for CF-1. SF-9 and SE-1a were most susceptible to CryIA(c) with a threshold effect observed at about 0.5ng and maximal effects at about 2ng. SF-9 cells have a threshold and maximum response to CryIA(a,b) of about 10ng and 20ng, respectively. SE-1a cells have a threshold and maximal response to CryIA(a,b) of 5ng and 10ng, respectively. Intact midgut epithelium exposed to CryIA(a,b,c) toxins had a threshold dose of 2ng for CryIA(b), 10-30ng for CryIA(a) and 2-30ng for CryIA(c). This study has shown that MEC are affected by a broader spectrum of toxins compared to the lepidopteran larvae and insect cell lines.