[Hepatology]

Therapy by pegylated interferon-alpha (PEG-IFN-alpha), lamivudine and adefovir have significantly improved treatment perspectives for patients with chronic hepatitis B. New nucleos(t)ide analogues should permit the development of more effective combination therapies. In autoimmune hepatitis, if there is no response or an intolerance to therapy with prednisone and imurek, administration of mycophenolate mofetil should be envisaged. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy, at a dosage of 13-15 mg/ kg/day, remains the treatment of choice for primary biliary cirrhosis and should be administered at an early stage to improve patients' survival. In the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, thiazolidinediones show considerable promise, but further clinical studies are required in order to prove their efficacity and safety.

[When and how to treat hepatitis B and C?]

The introduction of pegylated interferon-alpha (PEG-IFN-alpha) as well as lamivudine and adefovir has greatly improved the perspectives for patients with chronic hepatitis B. In addition, new nucleos(t)ide analogues are currently being evaluated and may allow the development of effective combination therapy regimens in the future. In the absence of resistance development, lamivudine reduces the risk of decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Current standard therapy of chronic hepatitis C, PEG-IFN-alpha combined with ribavirin, results in a sustained virologic response in 20-80% of patients, depending on the viral genotype and additional factors, such as ethnicity, fibrosis stage, body mass index, viral load, alcohol consumption, and coinfections. Novel antiviral strategies are currently being explored.

[Auto-immune liver diseases and their treatment]

There are three main types of auto-immune liver disease, auto-immune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. In the case of auto-immune hepatitis, prednisone therapy, with or without azathioprine, can improve quality of life and halt progression to cirrhosis. If there is no response or if the therapy is poorly tolerated, mycophenolate mofetil or cyclosporin should be considered. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), at a dosage of 13 to 15 mg/kg/day slows the progression of fibrosis in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Pruritus may be treated with cholestyramine, rifampicin or opiate antagonists. Ursodeoxycholic acid at a dosage of 20 to 30 mg/kg/day will slow the evolution of fibrosis.

[Complications of liver cirrhosis: oesophageal varices, ascites and hepato-cellular carcinoma]

The principal treatment for bleeding oesophageal varices is endoscopic ligation. Non-cardioselective beta-blockers are the gold-standard of primary prophylaxis. The principal treatment for ascites is a salt-free diet and diuretics, mainly spironolactone, if necessary associated with a loop diuretic. In refractory ascites, paracentesis or installation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) are two possible treatment options. Cirrhosis patients are at higher risk of developing hepato-cellular carcinoma. Surgery is only possible in a small number of cases. Percutaneous destruction techniques have nearly the same survival rate as that obtained by surgery and should be proposed to patients where surgery is not an option.

Do explicit appropriateness criteria enhance the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Appropriateness of use of colonoscopy is an important issue in health care in the quest to improve quality of care while at the same time containing costs. This prospective study examined whether detailed and explicit appropriateness criteria significantly improve the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients referred for diagnostic colonoscopy at five centers (one university hospital and its outpatient department, two district hospitals, and two gastroenterology practices) were prospectively studied over a 17-month period. The appropriateness of the indications for these colonoscopies was assessed using explicit Swiss criteria developed by the Rand Corporation/University of California at Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) panel method, and the relationship between appropriateness of use and the presence of clinically relevant endoscopic lesions was analysed.

RESULTS

1188 patients were included in the study. Indications for 1144 (96.3 %) of the colonoscopies could be evaluated using explicit criteria; 64.1 % of the colonoscopies were judged appropriate, 13.3 % uncertain and 22.6 % inappropriate. Significant endoscopic lesions were found in 23.8 % of the colonoscopies. Colonoscopies judged appropriate or uncertain yielded significantly more relevant lesions than did those judged to be inappropriate (25.6 % vs. 17.4 %; P = 0.007). Of 51 colon cancers, all but one were found in colonoscopies judged to be appropriate or uncertain. In a multivariate analysis, the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy was significantly influenced by appropriateness, patient gender and treatment setting.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of detailed and explicit appropriateness criteria for colonoscopy significantly enhances the identification of relevant lesions and in particular of colon cancer. The use of such criteria could therefore improve patient selection for colonoscopy and thus contribute to efforts aimed at enhancing the quality and efficiency of care.

Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment does not benefit patients with nonulcer dyspepsia

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the still controversial role of treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial comparing the efficacy of 7 days of eradication treatment (lansoprazole 15 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin I g b.i.d., and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d.) with a control treatment (lansoprazole 15 mg b.i.d. and placebo) in H. pylori-infected patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. 13C breath tests were performed at baseline and during follow-up. We assessed patient symptoms, health status (based on the SF-12 questionnaire), patient satisfaction, drug consumption, health care consultation behavior, and absenteeism related to dyspepsia over a 1-yr period.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients randomized to eradication treatment and 70 patients randomized to placebo were compared. The rate of eradication of H. pylori infection was 75% in the active treatment group and 4% in the placebo group (p < 0.005). The symptom score improved to a similar extent in the group receiving active treatment (-4.0; 95% CI = -5.0 to -3.0) and placebo (-3.6; 95% CI = -4.5 to -2.7). Treatment response was not related to the severity or duration of initial symptoms or to the severity of gastritis on histology. Quality of life scores were comparable at 12 months. There was no significant difference in dyspepsia-related absenteeism or satisfaction with management of NUD. Patients receiving active treatment were more likely not to have had to use any dyspepsia treatment over the 12 months (60.8% vs 44.3%; p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not demonstrate any substantial benefit of curing H. pylori infection in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. The study adds further evidence that H. pylori is not the main pathogenetic or therapeutic target in these patients.

Overuse and underuse of colonoscopy in a European primary care setting

BACKGROUND

Efforts to decrease overuse of health care may result in underuse. Overuse and underuse of colonoscopy have never been simultaneously evaluated in the same patient population.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, the appropriateness and necessity of referral for colonoscopy were evaluated by using explicit criteria developed by a standardized expert panel method. Inappropriate referrals constituted overuse. Patients with necessary colonoscopy indications who were not referred constituted underuse. Consecutive ambulatory patients with lower gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms from 22 general practices in Switzerland, a country with ready access to colonoscopy, were enrolled during a 4-week period. Follow-up data were obtained at 3 months for patients who did not undergo a necessary colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Eight thousand seven hundred sixty patient visits were screened for inclusion; 651 patients (7.4%) had lower GI symptoms (mean age 56.4 years, 68% women). Of these, 78 (12%) were referred for colonoscopy. Indications for colonoscopy in 11 patients (14% of colonoscopy referrals or 1.7% of all patients with lower GI symptoms) were judged inappropriate. Among 573 patients not referred for the procedure, underuse ranged between 11% and 28% of all patients with lower GI symptoms, depending on the criteria used.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying criteria from an expert panel of nationally recognized experts indicates that underuse of referral for colonoscopy exceeds overuse in primary care in Switzerland. To improve quality of care, both overuse and underuse of important procedures must be addressed.

Is the diagnostic yield of upper GI endoscopy improved by the use of explicit panel-based appropriateness criteria?

BACKGROUND

Increasing the appropriateness of use of upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is important to improve quality of care while at the same time containing costs. This study explored whether detailed explicit appropriateness criteria significantly improve the diagnostic yield of upper GI endoscopy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients referred for upper GI endoscopy at 6 centers (1 university hospital, 2 district hospitals, 3 gastroenterology practices) were prospectively included over a 6-month period. After controlling for disease presentation and patient characteristics, the relationship between the appropriateness of upper GI endoscopy, as assessed by explicit Swiss criteria developed by the RAND/UCLA panel method, and the presence of relevant endoscopic lesions was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 2088 patients (60% outpatients, 57% men) were included. Analysis was restricted to the 1681 patients referred for diagnostic upper GI endoscopy. Forty-six percent of upper GI endoscopies were judged to be appropriate, 15% uncertain, and 39% inappropriate by the explicit criteria. No cancer was found in upper GI endoscopies judged to be inappropriate. Upper GI endoscopies judged appropriate or uncertain yielded significantly more relevant lesions (60%) than did those judged to be inappropriate (37%; odds ratio 2.6: 95% CI [2.2, 3.2]). In multivariate analyses, the diagnostic yield of upper GI endoscopy was significantly influenced by appropriateness, patient gender and age, treatment setting, and symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Upper GI endoscopies performed for appropriate indications resulted in detecting significantly more clinically relevant lesions than did those performed for inappropriate indications. In addition, no upper GI endoscopy that resulted in a diagnosis of cancer was judged to be inappropriate. The use of such criteria improves patient selection for upper GI endoscopy and can thus contribute to efforts aimed at enhancing the quality and efficiency of care. (Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:333-41).

Appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy: risk of complications

The balance between risks and benefits of gastrointestinal endoscopy for a given patient is essential in defining the appropriate use of endoscopic procedures. The current literature suggests that gastrointestinal endoscopy infrequently results in major procedure-related morbidity and mortality, while cardio-respiratory events occur commonly. However, true complication rates may be underestimated due to inconsistencies in the types of complications reported. No formal reporting requirements exist, and most of the published studies on complications come from centres with highly-skilled endoscopists.

Hemobilia, a rare cause of acute pancreatitis after percutaneous liver biopsy: diagnosis and treatment by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

We here report the case history of a 75-yr-old woman who developed pancreatitis and recurrent symptomatic, cholestasis-induced hemobilia after percutaneous liver biopsy. An endoscopic sphincterotomy with clot extraction led to relief of symptoms. The risk of hemobilia after percutaneous liver biopsy is less than one per 1000 procedures, and only two cases of acute pancreatitis after percutaneous liver biopsy have previously been reported. To our knowledge, this is the first case in which endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was used to both diagnostic and therapeutic ends.

Microheterogeneity of serum glycoproteins in patients with chronic alcohol abuse compared with carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome type I

BACKGROUND

Chronic alcohol abuse alters the normal N-glycosylation of transferrin, producing the carbohydrate-deficient transferrin isoforms. This alteration could be similar to that present in patients with carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome type 1 (CDG1). We thus compared the alterations of N-glycans present in patients with alcoholism and patients with CDG1.

METHODS

The N-glycans of serum glycoproteins were compared in sera of patients with alcoholism, patients with CDG1, and controls by two-dimensional electrophoresis, neuraminidase, peptide:N-glycosidase F, and endoglycosidase F2 treatments. A specific antibody directed against the amino acid sequence surrounding the N-432 N-glycosylation site of transferrin was prepared (SZ-350 antibody).

RESULTS

In patients with alcoholism, the abnormal transferrin and alpha(1)-antitrypsin isoforms were devoid of a variable number of entire N-glycan moieties and were identical with those present in CDG1. In the serum of patients with alcoholism, this finding was less pronounced than in CDG1. In contrast to CDG1, there was no decrease in clusterin or serum amyloid P in patients with alcoholism. The SZ-350 antibody recognized only transferrin isoforms with one or no N-glycan moieties.

CONCLUSION

Antibodies directed against specific N-glycosylation sites of glycoproteins could be useful for developing more specific immunochemical tests for the diagnosis of chronic alcohol abuse.

Overuse and underuse of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in various clinical settings

OBJECTIVES

To describe and compare both overuse and underuse of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in different settings.

DESIGN

Merging of data from three prospective observational studies. The appropriateness and necessity of indications for gastroscopy were evaluated using explicit criteria developed by a standardized expert panel method (RAND-UCLA). Inappropriate endoscopies represent overuse. Necessary indications not referred for the procedure constitute underuse.

SETTING

Three primary care outpatient clinics, 20 general practices, three gastroenterology practices, two district and one university hospitals.

SUBJECTS

A third of the collective were consecutive ambulatory patients with upper abdominal complaints, whereas the other two thirds were ambulatory and hospitalized patients referred for the procedure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportions of overuse and underuse in the different settings.

RESULTS

A total of 2885 patients were included (mean age, 49 years, 52% male, 2442 outpatients), 1858 patients underwent > or = 1 endoscopy. Among 2086 endoscopies, 805 (39%) were inappropriate, most of which were performed for dyspepsia (83%). Overuse was higher in young, foreign, female patients and lower in inpatient settings, the latter reflecting a different distribution of presenting symptoms. Among 1646 patient visits in primary care, overuse represented 148 endoscopies (9%). Underuse was identified in 104 of the same patient visits (6%) and was higher as patient age increased; there were no significant differences between men and women.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of overuse and underuse depend mainly on case presentation and patient characteristics. Both over- and underuse should be addressed to maintain and improve quality of care.

Hypothyroid myopathy as a complication of interferon alpha therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus infection

Interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) therapy is associated with a number of immunological side-effects, including autoimmune diseases and a 10% prevalence of thyroiditis. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection itself predisposes to autoimmune phenomena including hypothyroidism and myositis. The development of clinical hypothyroidism in the presence of positive thyroid antibodies in patients infected with HCV and treated with IFN-alpha suggests a possible association between the viral disease and the therapy. HCV infection may predispose to autoimmune thyroid disease and IFN-alpha therapy may secondarily lead to the development of thyroid dysfunctions. We report the single case of a female patient who developed a severe proximal myopathy in conjunction with primary hypothyroidism (Hoffmann's syndrome) secondarily to IFN-alpha therapy for HCV infection. This case highlights the need for careful clinical and biological monitoring for potential side-effects in such patients.

Performance of panel-based criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of colonoscopy: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Prospective data describing the appropriateness of use of colonoscopy based on detailed panel-based clinical criteria are not available.

METHODS

In a cohort of 553 consecutive patients referred for colonoscopy to two university-based Swiss outpatient clinics, the percentage of patients who underwent colonoscopy for appropriate, equivocal, and inappropriate indications and the relationship between appropriateness of use and the presence of relevant endoscopic lesions was prospectively assessed. This assessment was based on criteria of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and explicit American and Swiss criteria developed in 1994 by a formal panel process using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.

RESULTS

The procedures were rated appropriate or equivocal in 72.2% by criteria of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, in 68.5% by explicit American criteria, and in 74.4% by explicit Swiss criteria (not statistically significant, NS). Inappropriate use (overuse) of colonoscopy was found in 27.8%, 31.5%, and 25.6%, respectively (NS). The proportion of appropriate procedures was higher with increasing age. Almost all reasons for using colonoscopy could be assessed by the two explicit criteria sets, whereas 28.4% of reasons for using colonoscopy could not be evaluated by the criteria of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (p < 0.0001). The probability of finding a relevant endoscopic lesion was distinctly higher in the procedures rated appropriate or equivocal than in procedures judged inappropriate.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of inappropriate use of colonoscopy is substantial in Switzerland. Explicit criteria allow assessment of almost all indications encountered in clinical practice. In this study, all sets of appropriateness criteria significantly enhanced the probability of finding a relevant endoscopic lesion during colonoscopy.

Budd-Chiari syndrome related to factor V Leiden mutation

We here describe a young patient who presented with chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome. An exhaustive etiological investigation to detect a procoagulable state was negative except for factor V mutation (factor V Leiden), a factor associated with resistance to activated protein C. Factor V Leiden is known to be a common, high risk factor for thrombosis. This factor should be routinely investigated in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, as factor V Leiden mutation is probably the procoagulable state responsible for many cases of "idiopathic" Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Reliability of panel-based guidelines for colonoscopy: an international comparison

BACKGROUND

This study examined the reliability of explicit guidelines developed using the RAND-UCLA appropriateness method.

METHODS

The appropriateness of over 400 indications for colonoscopy was rated by two multispecialty expert panels (United States and Switzerland). A nine-point scale was used, which was consolidated into three categories of appropriateness: appropriate, uncertain, inappropriate. The distribution of appropriateness ratings between the two panels and the intrapanel and interpanel agreement for categories of appropriateness were calculated for all possible indications. Similar statistics were calculated for a series of 577 primary care patients referred for colonoscopy in Switzerland.

RESULTS

Over 80% of all indications (348) could be directly compared. The proportions of indications classified as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate were 28.4%, 24.7%, 46.6% and 33.0%, 23.0%, 44.0% for the U.S. and the Swiss panels, respectively. Interpanel agreement was excellent for all the possible indications (kappa value: 0.75) and lower for actual cases (kappa value: 0.51) because of lower agreement for the most frequently encountered indications.

CONCLUSIONS

Good agreement between the two sets of criteria was found, pointing to the reliability of the method. Partial disagreement occurred essentially for a few, albeit frequently encountered, indications for use of colonoscopy in cases of uncomplicated lower abdominal pain or constipation.

Is carbohydrate-deficient transferrin a specific marker for alcohol abuse? A study in patients with chronic viral hepatitis

Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin, a transferrin isoform, is hailed as a new marker of chronic alcohol abuse, but its specificity is, however, not unequivocally accepted. The aim of the present study was therefore to determine carbohydrate-deficient transferrin levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C with or without documented chronic alcohol intake. Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin was measured using a double-antibody radioimmunoassay (CDTect, Pharmacia) in serum samples from 66 patients (45 males and 21 females; mean age: 39 years) with chronic viral hepatitis B (n = 20) or C (n = 46). Diagnosis of the underlying liver disease was established by liver biopsy. Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin levels were raised in 15 patients [23%; hepatitis B (n = 2) and hepatitis C (n = 13)]. In patients with chronic hepatitis B, the carbohydrate-deficient transferrin level was raised in two abstainers. In the 46 patients with chronic hepatitis C, 10 (22%) patients with an alcohol consumption of < 60 g/day for the men and 30 g/day for the women had raised carbohydrate-deficient transferrin levels. The overall specificity of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin for chronic alcohol abuse was thus 78%, suggesting an association between elevated carbohydrate-deficient transferrin levels and the presence of chronic viral hepatitis. Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin levels were not correlated with the histological grading or staging of chronic hepatitis B and C, or with biological markers of hepatic synthesis and cellular damage. Thus, an increased carbohydrate-deficient transferrin level may occur in patients with chronic viral hepatitis in the absence of chronic alcohol abuse. This fact should be kept in mind by physicians when using this marker to detect alcohol abuse.

Appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison of American and Swiss criteria

OBJECTIVE

Examine the reproducibility of the RAND method for developing criteria for the appropriateness of medical procedures.

DESIGN

Comparison of two sets of explicit criteria for appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy, developed by separate expert panels from two countries.

SETTING

United States, Switzerland.

STUDY PARTICIPANTS

National experts from different medical specialties involved in the referral or application of UGI endoscopy.

INTERVENTIONS

Each panel was presented with about 500 clinical scenarios (indications) that were rated on a nine-point scale as to the appropriateness of performing UGI endoscopy for a patient with that clinical presentation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

(1) distribution of appropriateness ratings and intrapanel agreement categories between the two panels, (2) between-panel agreement of assigning appropriateness for comparable indications and, (3) percentage of indications with major between-panel differences.

RESULTS

Ratings for 2/3 of indications could be compared. The Swiss panel showed higher intrapanel agreement (54.6% versus 46.2%, P = 0.002). Seventy-eight per cent of comparable indications were assigned to identical categories of appropriateness by both panels (kappa = 0.76, P < 0.001). For 93% of the 376 comparable indications, there were no major interpanel differences.

CONCLUSION

Separate expert panels in different countries, using a standardized methodology, produce criteria for appropriateness of medical procedures that are similar. Given the resources being invested throughout the world in developing criteria and guidelines, international collaboration in seeking optimal use of limited health care resources should be intensified.

Underutilization of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Efforts to reduce costs in health care may raise concerns about underuse of medical procedures. This study prospectively assessed underuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a cohort of patients in whom we have recently published data on overuse of endoscopy.

METHODS

Underuse was identified by formal necessity criteria for endoscopy, obtained by an explicit panel process. Outpatients were consecutively included in two clinical settings. Setting A consisted of 20 primary care physicians and 7215 patient visits that occurred within 1 month. Setting B consisted of 920 visits that occurred during 3 weeks at an outpatient clinic.

RESULTS

During these 8135 visits, 611 patients complained of upper digestive symptoms; 63 of them underwent endoscopy. Underuse was identified in 72 patients (11.8%). The two clinical situations mainly responsible for underuse of endoscopy were uninvestigated peptic symptoms resistant to treatment and dysphagia. At first follow-up, 29 of the patients with initial underuse still fulfilled criteria of necessity (underuse rate, 4.7%). One-year follow-up showed underuse of endoscopy in 5 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective evidence shows that underuse of a medical procedure exists. The estimated overuse and underuse of endoscopy in this cohort were approximately equal (5%). Improving quality of care will require reductions of both overuse and underuse of medical procedures.

Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory parameters

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy is generally performed with the patient sedated and receiving analgesics. However, the benefit of the most often used combination of intravenous midazolam and pethidine on patient tolerance and pain and its cardiorespiratory risk have not been fully defined.

METHODS

In this double-blind prospective study, 150 outpatients undergoing routine colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive either (1) low-dose midazolam (35 micrograms/kg) and pethidine (700 micrograms/kg in 48 patients, 500 micrograms/kg in 102 patients), (2) midazolam and placebo pethidine, or (3) pethidine and placebo midazolam.

RESULTS

Tolerance (visual analog scale, 0 to 100 points: 0 = excellent; 100 = unbearable) did not improve significantly more in group 1 compared with group 2 (7 points; 95% confidence interval [-2-17]) and group 3 (2 points; 95% confidence interval [-7-12]). Similarly, pain was not significantly improved in group 1 as compared with the other groups. Male gender (p < 0.001) and shorter duration of the procedure (p = 0.004), but not amnesia, were associated with better patient tolerance and less pain. Patient satisfaction was similar in all groups. Oxygen desaturation and hypotension occurred in 33% and 11%, respectively, with a similar frequency in all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the combination of low-dose midazolam and pethidine does not improve patient tolerance and lessen pain during colonoscopy as compared with either drug given alone. When applying low-dose midazolam, oxygen desaturation and hypotension do not occur more often after combined use of both drugs. For the individual patient, sedation and analgesia should be based on the endoscopist's clinical judgement.

Overuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a country with open-access endoscopy: a prospective study in primary care

BACKGROUND

This prospective observational study was aimed at evaluating the appropriateness of use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) in primary care in a country with open access to and high availability of the procedure.

METHODS

Outpatients were consecutively included in two clinical settings: Setting A (20 primary care physicians during 4 weeks) and B (university-based outpatient clinic during 3 weeks). In patients undergoing UGE, appropriateness of referral was judged by explicit Swiss criteria developed by the RAND/UCLA panel method.

RESULTS

Patient visits (8135) were assessed. Six hundred eleven patients complained of upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Physicians decided to perform UGE in 63 of these patients. Twenty-five (40%) of the endoscopies were rated appropriate, 7 (11%) equivocal, and 31 (49%) inappropriate. Overuse of UGE occurred in 5.1% (setting A: 4.7%; setting B:6.5%; p = 0.39) of the patients who presented with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. The decision to perform UGE in previously untreated dyspeptic patients was the most common clinical situation resulting in overuse.

CONCLUSIONS

Inappropriate use of UGE is high in Switzerland. However, to better reflect primary care decision making, overuse should be related not only to patients referred for a medical test, but also to the number of patients who complain of the symptoms that would be investigated by the procedure.

Influence of orlistat on the regulation of gallbladder contraction in man: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study

Orlistat (tetrahydrolipstatin) is a potent inhibitor of gastric and pancreatic lipase activity causing a diminution of free fatty acids in the intestinal lumen. The release of cholecystokinin (CCK) critically depends on the presence of free fatty acids in the small intestine. Postprandial CCK release and gallbladder contraction might be decreased by orlistat, potentially resulting in an increased risk of gallstone formation. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, six-way crossover study, six healthy volunteers ingested in a randomized order three isocaloric test meals (250 ml) of identical osmolality with either orlistat (200 mg) or placebo: (a) a pure-fat meal (25 g triglycerides), (b) a mixed meal containing fat (8 g; 29% of caloric content), protein (10 g; 17%), and dextrose (32 g; 54%), and (c) a fat-free meal containing albumin (25 g; 46%) and dextrose (32 g; 54%). Gallbladder volumes were determined by ultrasonography, and plasma CCK, pancreatic polypeptide and gastrin levels by RIA. Gall-bladder contraction (AUC, % x 90 min; difference of means +/- 95% CI) in subjects receiving orlistat or placebo did not significantly differ after intake of the pure-fat meal (443+/-1174), the mixed meal (313+/-1170), or the fat-free-meal (-760+/-1180). The release of CCK (AUC; pM x 90 min; difference of means +/- 95% CI) was not different between orlistat and placebo after ingestion of the pure-fat meal (-18+/-64), the mixed meal (-45+/-62), and the fat-free meal (27+/-63). Likewise, the release of pancreatic polypeptide and gastrin was similar after intake of the meals with either orlistat or placebo. A single dose of orlistat did not reduce gallbladder motility after ingestion of meals with differing fat contents. The safety of long-term treatment with orlistat with respect to gallstone formation remains to be determined.

Appropriateness and diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

This prospective study tested the appropriateness of referrals for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit, using the criteria of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. It also examined whether there was any relationship between appropriateness of use and the presence of significant lesions detected by endoscopy.

METHODS

Four hundred fifty consecutive upper gastrointestinal endoscopies were studied prospectively. The referral indication was recorded by the endoscopist before the procedure was performed, and was compared with the current criteria of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and with endoscopic findings.

RESULTS

The appropriateness of referral was assessed in 442 consecutive endoscopies. Of these, 252 (57%) were judged to be appropriate. In 168 (88%) of the 190 endoscopies rated as inappropriate, the reason was that the patient had not undergone empirical anti-ulcer therapy before endoscopy. The probability of finding a significant lesion did not differ between the endoscopies judged to be appropriate (50%) and those judged to be inappropriate (46%)

CONCLUSIONS

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was frequently used for inappropriate indications. The main reason for inappropriate use was insufficient treatment, or no treatment, of dyspeptic symptoms prior to endoscopy. In this study, the criteria for appropriateness did not predict the probability of finding a significant endoscopic lesion.

Fixed versus titrated interferon-alpha 2B in chronic hepatitis C. A randomized controlled multicenter trial. The Swiss Association for the Study of the Liver

BACKGROUND/AIM

Interferon has become the mainstay of treatment of chronic hepatitis C; however, duration of treatment and dose remain unresolved questions. The present study aimed to compare standard dose interferon with a titrated dose regimen carried out for 1 year.

METHODS

This was a randomized, controlled multicenter trial. Patients with chronic hepatitis C were randomly allocated to a control group (n = 30), to a fixed dose group (n = 31) where interferon-alpha 2b 3 MU thrice weekly was given for 1 year or a titrated group (n = 34) where interferon was titrated starting at 5 MU thrice weekly to the lowest dose keeping the patient in remission as assessed by a normal ALT value. Liver biopsies were obtained before and at the end of treatment; in addition, galactose elimination capacity was measured as a measure of cytosolic function.

RESULTS

In the control, fixed and titrated groups a complete response was achieved in 2/29, 10/28 and 15/31, respectively (p < 0.001 in favor of treatment, p = n.s. for the two treatments). The corresponding figure for sustained response was 1/29, 5/28 and 6/ 31 (p = n.s). In the titrated group, a complete (sustained) response was achieved with 5 MU in 2 (2), with 4 MU in 1 (0), with 3 MU in 4 (0), with 2 MU in 3 (0) and with 1 MU in 5 (4). Liver biopsy score and galactose elimination capacity improved significantly in responders but not in treatment failures.

CONCLUSIONS

Both fixed and titrated dosing of interferon given for 1 year induced virus clearance in only a minority of treated patients. However, in a small number of patients, a complete and sustained response can be achieved with low doses of interferon. Dose titration could be an interesting approach to decreasing the cost and side effects in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

Bacterial overgrowth during treatment with omeprazole compared with cimetidine: a prospective randomised double blind study

BACKGROUND

Gastric and duodenal bacterial overgrowth frequently occurs in conditions where diminished acid secretion is present. Omeprazole inhibits acid secretion more effectively than cimetidine and might therefore more frequently cause bacterial overgrowth.

AIM

This controlled prospective study compared the incidence of gastric and duodenal bacterial overgrowth in patients treated with omeprazole or cimetidine.

METHODS

47 outpatients with peptic disease were randomly assigned to a four week treatment regimen with omeprazole 20 mg or cimetidine 800 mg daily. Gastric and duodenal juice were obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and plated for anaerobic and aerobic organisms.

RESULTS

Bacterial overgrowth (> or = 10(5) cfu/ml) was present in 53% of the patients receiving omeprazole and in 17% receiving cimetidine (p < 0.05). The mean (SEM) number of gastric and duodenal bacterial counts was 6.0 (0.2) and 5.0 (0.2) respectively in the omeprazole group and 4.0 (0.2) and 4.0 (0.1) in the cimetidine group (p < 0.001 and < 0.01; respectively). Faecal type bacteria were found in 30% of the patients with bacterial overgrowth. Basal gastric pH was higher in patients treated with omeprazole compared with cimetidine (4.2 (0.5) versus 2.0 (0.2); p < 0.001) and in patients with bacterial overgrowth compared with those without bacterial overgrowth (5.1 (0.6) versus 2.0 (0.1); p < 0.0001). The nitrate, nitrite, and nitrosamine values in gastric juice did not increase after treatment with either cimetidine or omeprazole. Serum concentrations of vitamin B12, beta carotene, and albumin were similar before and after treatment with both drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that the incidence of gastric and duodenal bacterial overgrowth is considerably higher in patients treated with omeprazole compared with cimetidine. This can be explained by more pronounced inhibition of gastric acid secretion. No patient developed signs of malabsorption or an increase of N-nitroso compounds. The clinical significance of these findings needs to be assessed in studies with long-term treatment with omeprazole, in particular in patients belonging to high risk groups such as HIV infected and intensive care units patients.

Conscious sedation for gastroscopy: patient tolerance and cardiorespiratory parameters

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Most patients receive conscious sedation for gastroscopy. However, the benefit of the most often used combination of low-dose intravenous midazolam and topical lidocaine on patient tolerance remains poorly defined and has not been shown to outweigh cardiorespiratory risks. To respond to these issues, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled prospective study was performed.

METHODS

Two hundred outpatients undergoing diagnostic gastroscopy were assigned to receive either (1) midazolam (35 micrograms/kg) and lidocaine spray (100 mg), (2) midazolam and placebo lidocaine, (3) placebo midazolam and lidocaine, or (4) placebo midazolam and placebo lidocaine.

RESULTS

Tolerance (visual analogue scale, 0-100 points; 0, excellent; 100, unbearable) improved as compared with placebo midazolam and placebo lidocaine by 23 points (95% confidence interval, 15-32) in group 1, 15 points (95% confidence interval, 7-24) in group 2, and 10 points (95% confidence interval, 2-18) in group 3. Increasing age (P < 0.001), low anxiety (P < 0.001), and male sex (P < 0.03), but not amnesia, were associated with better patient tolerance. Oxygen desaturation (< 1 minute) occurred in 8.2% and was not more frequent after midazolam treatment. Hypotension was rare (2.1%), and no adverse outcome occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Both low-dose midazolam (35 micrograms/kg) and lidocaine spray have an additive beneficial effect on patients tolerance and rarely induce significant alterations in cardiorespiratory monitoring parameters, thus supporting the widespread use of conscious sedation.

Role of nutrient fat and cholecystokinin in regulation of gallbladder emptying in man

Postprandial gallbladder contraction is mainly regulated by cholecystokinin (CCK), but little is known about the dose-response relationship between CCK release and gallbladder contraction, in particular after meals with differing fat content. Decreased postprandial gallbladder emptying has been suggested to play a major role in the development of gallstones in man, and dietary factors may therefore be important in the pathogenesis of gallbladder stasis. We studied, in a randomized order, the effect of three isocaloric meals (250 ml) with identical osmolality on CCK release and gallbladder contraction in six healthy volunteers: (1) a pure fat meal (25 g triglycerides); (2) a mixed meal containing fat (8 g, 29% of caloric content), protein (10 g, 17%), and dextrose (32 g, 54%); and (3) a fat-free meal containing albumin (25 g, 46%) and dextrose (32 g, 54%). Gallbladder volumes and antral cross-sectional areas were determined by ultrasonography and plasma CCK and PP levels by RIA. The pure fat meal caused the highest CCK release (187 +/- 27; mean +/- SEM) and maximal (> 85% of fasting volume) gallbladder contraction (3172 +/- 361; AUC) as compared to the other two meals (P < 0.05). The mixed and the fat-free meal caused similarly low (< 50% of fasting volume) gallbladder contraction (6052 +/- 342 and 6134 +/- 500, respectively), although they induced markedly different CCK levels (157 +/- 12 and 87 +/- 13, respectively; P < 0.05). Gastric emptying rates were similar for all meals (18,500 +/- 3300, 18,600 +/- 2700 and 19,800 +/- 3100, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of cisapride on gallbladder motility after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Altered gallbladder motility is regarded as one of the important factors involved in the formation and recurrence of gallstones. Previous studies have suggested that cisapride increases postprandial gallbladder contraction and may therefore be theoretically useful in preventing stone recurrence. The aim of our study was therefore to investigate the effect of cisapride on gallbladder motility in stone-free patients after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, as compared to healthy volunteers pair-matched for age and sex.

METHODS

Each subject received cisapride or placebo in a double-blind, cross-over, random order. Gallbladder volumes were measured by ultrasonography in the fasting state and after intake of a standard liquid meal. Plasma cholecystokinin levels were determined by radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

Fasting gallbladder volumes were smaller in patients as compared to volunteers (20.7 +/- 1.3 ml vs. 46.0 +/- 9.2 ml; p < 0.05) but were not modified by cisapride (21.1 +/- 1.7 ml vs. 58.6 +/- 11.3 ml). The maximal postprandial decrease in gallbladder volume was similar in patients and volunteers (64.5 +/- 12% vs. 62 +/- 10%; NS) and was not significantly altered by cisapride (59 +/- 9.4% vs. 54 +/- 9%; NS). In patients, cisapride increased integrated postprandial gallbladder volume by accelerating gallbladder refilling as compared to placebo by 37 +/- 15% (p < 0.05). Integrated cholecystokinin plasma levels were similar in patients and volunteers and were 13.4 +/- 4.7% higher after cisapride as compared to placebo (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that cisapride does not alter postprandial gallbladder contraction but accelerates gallbladder refilling in patients free from gallstones after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. This effect of cisapride is probably due to an acceleration of gastric emptying also causing a secondary enhanced cholecystokinin release.