Impact of homecare electronic health record on timeliness of clinical documentation, reimbursement, and patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

Homecare is an important and effective way of managing chronic illnesses using skilled nursing care in the home. Unlike hospitals and ambulatory settings, clinicians visit patients at home at different times, independent of each other. Twenty-nine percent of 10,000 homecare agencies in the United States have adopted point-of-care EHRs. Yet, relatively little is known about the growing use of homecare EHRs.

OBJECTIVE

Researchers compared workflow, financial billing, and patient outcomes before and after implementation to evaluate the impact of a homecare point-of-care EHR.

METHODS

The design was a pre/post observational study embedded in a mixed methods study. The setting was a Philadelphia-based homecare agency with 137 clinicians. Data sources included: (1) clinician EHR documentation completion; (2) EHR usage data; (3) Medicare billing data; (4) an EHR Nurse Satisfaction survey; (5) clinician observations; (6) clinician interviews; and (7) patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Clinicians were satisfied with documentation timeliness and team communication. Following EHR implementation, 90% of notes were completed within the 1-day compliance interval (n = 56,702) compared with 30% of notes completed within the 7-day compliance interval in the pre-implementation period (n = 14,563; OR 19, p <. 001). Productivity in the number of clinical notes documented post-implementation increased almost 10-fold compared to pre-implementation. Days to Medicare claims fell from 100 days pre-implementation to 30 days post-implementation, while the census rose. EHR implementation impact on patient outcomes was limited to some behavioral outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Findings from this homecare EHR study indicated clinician EHR use enabled a sustained increase in productivity of note completion, as well as timeliness of documentation and billing for reimbursement with limited impact on improving patient outcomes. As EHR adoption increases to better meet the needs of the growing population of older people with chronic health conditions, these results can inform homecare EHR development and implementation.

Central venulitis in pediatric liver allografts

Central venulitis (CV), a distinct histologic lesion described in adult liver transplants, can occur with acute portal tract rejection or in isolation (ICV). Possible etiologies include immunosuppressive drug toxicity, acute cellular rejection, viral hepatitis, ischemic injury, and recurrent disease. This study was designed to characterize ICV and to assess its potential etiology in pediatric liver recipients because this population generally does not develop recurrent disease or viral hepatitis. All posttransplantation liver biopsy specimens that were obtained from children who received liver allografts over a 4-year period were reviewed. ICV was identified in 12 of 127 posttransplantation biopsies and in 7 of 45 allograft recipients. Only 4 liver transplantations were performed for potentially recurrent diseases (primary sclerosing cholangitis). ICV first appeared in posttransplantation biopsy specimens significantly later than did portal rejection alone. The finding of CV was not significantly correlated with elevation of Tacrolimus levels, reason for transplantation, donor/recipient cytomegalovirus (CMV) status or blood type, cold ischemic times, or the incidence of outflow obstruction. The responses of CV to therapy were variable and, although the majority of cases resolved, several episodes persisted or recurred. In conclusion, ICV occurs in 16% of pediatric liver allograft recipients and does not appear to be related to recurrent disease, viral hepatitis, drug toxicity, or graft ischemia. CV may be a variant of acute rejection, but longer follow-up is required to determine the most adequate therapy for this entity.