Real world data of efficacy and safety of erlotinib as first-line TKI treatment in EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Results from the EGFR-2013-CPHG study

BACKGROUND

Phase III clinical trials have demonstrated the merits of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR-activating mutations. Using a cohort of unselected patients treated with erlotinib, we sought to further describe patient and tumour characteristics, and to evaluate their progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Overall, 44 pulmonologists included patients with the required characteristics as follows: Stage IIIB-IV NSCLC, EGFR-activating mutation, age≥18 years, and having to start erlotinib therapy or receiving erlotinib therapy as the first-line TKI, regardless of treatment-line. The analyses were performed using R software, with survival rates calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 177 patients, aged 72 years on average, were enrolled over a 2-year period. The cohort included 123 women (69.5%), 158 Caucasians (89.3%), 112 non-smokers (63.2%), and 167 adenocarcinomas (94.3%), at either stage IIIB (21) or IV (156), with a good performance status (PS 0-1, 127). Overall, 40 exhibited brain metastases at baseline (22.6%), while 75 had undergone earlier treatment (42.4%). Median PFS was 11.7 months and OS 25.8 months, with respectively a 1-year rate of 48.6% and 74%. The risk of death correlated with ECOG status (PS=2, HR=4.48, P<0.001) but not with brain metastasis (HR=1.67, P=0.278).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has confirmed erlotinib's efficacy and safety for unselected patients, with PFS and OS comparable to those obtained in phase III trials.

Multicentre phase II study of cisplatin-etoposide chemotherapy for advanced large-cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma: the GFPC 0302 study

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung remains unclear. Here, our primary objective was to assess the efficacy of cisplatin-etoposide doublet chemotherapy in advanced LCNEC. Accuracy of the pathological diagnosis and treatment toxicity were assessed as secondary objectives.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective, multicentre, single-arm, phase II study with a centralised review of treatment-response and pathological data. Patients had untreated performance status (PS) 0/1 stage IV/IIIB LCNEC and received cisplatin (80 mg/m22 d1) and etoposide (100 mg/m22 d1-3) every 21 days.

RESULTS

Eighteen centres included 42 patients (mean age, 59 ± 9 years; 69% men; median of four cycles/patient). At least one grade-3/4 toxicity occurred in 59% of patients (neutropaenia, thrombocytopaenia, and anaemia in 32%, 17%, and 12%, respectively). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.2 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 3.1-6.6) and 7.7 months (95% CI, 6.0-9.6), respectively. The centralised pathologist review reclassified 11 of 40 (27.5%) patients: 9 as small-cell lung cancer, 1 as undifferentiated non-small-cell lung cancer, and 1 as atypical carcinoid. Survival data were not significantly changed by excluding the reclassified patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathological diagnosis of LCNEC is difficult. The outcomes of advanced LCNEC treated with cisplatin-etoposide doublets are poor, similar to those of patients with advanced small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC).

[Study KBP-2010-CPHG: inclusion of new cases of primary lung cancer diagnosed in general hospital pneumology departments between 1st January and 31 December 2010]

INTRODUCTION

The College of General Hospital Respiratory Physicians (CPHG) is following up the KBP-2000-CPHG study, performed ten years ago, with a new observational epidemiological study of primary lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study includes all new cases of primary lung cancer diagnosed on histology or cytology between 1 January and 31 December 2010 and managed by one of the general hospital pneumology departments participating in the study. The primary objective is to estimate five-year mortality and to analyze risk factors. Secondary objectives are to describe the characteristics of this patient population and their management, and to estimate one, four and five-year survival rates. These data will be compared to those of the KBP-2000-CPHG study. The four-year prognosis score developed in 2000 will also be assessed in the new study. Data are collected by standardized questionnaire with exhaustiveness control.

EXPECTED RESULTS

One hundred and eight investigating centers have agreed to participate; 4000 to 5000 new cases of primary lung cancer should be collected and analyzed.

CONCLUSION

The study will describe the characteristics of patients presenting with primary lung cancer in the participating pneumology departments during the year 2010, and their diagnostic and therapeutic management, and assess changes over the last ten years.

[Aneurysm of a saphenous vein bypass graft to coronary artery: a case report discovered as an incidental finding]

We report a case of aortocoronary bypass graft aneurysm revealed by exertional dyspnea and presenting as an anterior mediastinal mass at the unenhanced computed tomography scan. The diagnosis has been established using combined contrast-enhanced CT scan which specified the vascular nature of the mass and coronary angiography which connected it to the aorto-marginal branch saphenous vein graft. This case illustrates the frequently asymptomatic expression of aneurysm and the importance of combined imaging modalities for the diagnosis.