POS0272 INTRAVENOUS VERSUS SUBCUTANEOUS TOCILIZUMAB IN A SERIES OF 471 PATIENTS WITH GIANT CELL ARTERITIS

Background

Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy in large-vessel vasculitis, including Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) (1-3). Clinical trials with TCZ in GCA was performed with intravenous (iv) TCZ in a phase 2 trial (3), and with subcutaneous (sc) TCZ in the phase 3 GiACTA (4). However, in GCA there are no studies comparing IV vs SC TCZ.

Objectives

To compare the efficacy of TCZ in GCA patients according to the route of administration IV-TCZ vs SC-TCZ.

Methods

Multicentre study of 471 patients diagnosed with GCA and treated with TCZ. They were divided into 2 groups according to the route of administration: a) IV, and b) SC. GCA was diagnosed by: a) ACR criteria, and/or b) temporal artery biopsy, and/or c) imaging techniques. Sustained remission was established according to EULAR definitions (5).

Results

We studied 471 patients (mean age, 74±9 years) treated with TCZ, 238 with IV-TCZ and 233 with SC-TCZ (Table 1). The time between diagnosis of GCA and TCZ onset was shorter in the SC TCZ group. Regarding acute phase reactants at the beginning of TCZ, no differences were found between both groups. There were no significant differences in sustained remission or in glucocorticoid-sparing effect of TCZ (Figure 1). Patients on IV TCZ treatment suffered more relevant adverse effects during follow-up.

Table 1.

Main characteristics of GCA patients treated with intravenous and subcutaneous tocilizumab

IV TCZ (n= 238)SC TCZ (n=233)PBaseline characteristics at TCZ onsetAge(years), mean±SD73.3±8.773.7±9.30.63Sex, female/male (% female)175/63 (73)167/66 (72)0.65Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]8 [3-23.5]5 [2-15]0.016ESR, mm 1st hour, median [IQR]30.5 [12.5-53]28 [10-56.5]0.66CRP, mg/dL, median [IQR]1.4 [0.5-2.8]1.4 [0.4-4]0.92Prednisone dose, mg/day, median [IQR]20 [10-40]20 [10-36.2]0.69Safety after TCZ onsetFollow-up, (months), median [IQR]27 [16-44]14 [6-26.7]<0.001Relevant adverse events, n (%)80 (34)46 (19)<0.001Relevant adverse events per 100 patients-year12.715.2NSSerious infections, n (%)44 (18)21 (9)0.44Serious infections per 100 patients-year6.77.2NSMACEs, n (%)/1 (0.4)0 (0)-MACEs per 100 patients-year0.10NSMalignancies, n (%)4 (1.7)1 (0.4)0.20Malignancies per 100 patients-year0.60.3NS

Abbreviations: CRP: C-reactive protein; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; GCA: giant cell arteritis; IQR: interquartile range; IV: intravenous; MACEs: major adverse cardiovascular events; NS: non significant; SC: subcutaneous; SD: standard deviation

Conclusion

In GCA, TCZ seems equally effective and safe regardless of the route of administration IV or SC.

References

[1]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 49: 126-135. PMID: 30655091

[2]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021; 13: 1759720X211020917. PMID: 34211589

[3]Villiger PM, et al. Lancet. 2016; 387:1921-1927. PMID: 26952547

[4]Stone JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:317-328. PMID: 28745999

Hellmich B, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79: 19-30. PMID: 31270110

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0806 OPTIMIZATION OF TOCILIZUMAB THERAPY IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS. A MULTICENTER REAL-LIFE STUDY OF 471 PATIENTS

Background

Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown to be useful in the treatment of large-vessel vasculitis, including giant cell arteritis (GCA) (1-4). There is general agreement on the initial and the standard maintenance dose of TCZ. However, information on duration and optimization of TCZ in GCA is really scarce.

Objectives

Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of TCZ therapy optimization in an unselected wide series of GCA in real-world clinical practice.

Methods

Multicenter study on 471 patients with GCA who received TCZ therapy. Once complete remission was reached (n=231) TCZ was optimized in 125 patients. We compared patients in whom TCZ was optimized (TCZOPT group) or not (TCZNON-OPT group). Complete remission was defined as normalization of clinical and analytical (CRP and ESR) data. Optimization was done by decreasing the dose and/or prolonging the TCZ dosing interval progressively. We performed a comparison in effectiveness and safety parameters between optimized and non-optimized patients.

Results

We evaluated 231 GCA patients treated with TCZ with complete remission. No demographic or laboratory data differences was observed at TCZ onset between both groups (Table 1). The mean prednisone dose was higher in the TCZNON-OPT group at TCZ onset. The first TCZ optimization was performed after a median [25-75th] follow-up of 12 [6-17] months.

Table 1.

Main general features at TCZ onset of 231 GCA patients with prolonged remission.

OPTIMIZED-TCZ GROUP (n=125)NON-OPTIMIZED TCZ GROUP (n=106)pGENERAL FEATURES Age, years, mean± SD72.7±8.674±8.70.197 Sex, female/male n (% female)91/34 (72.8)74/32 (69.8)0.616 Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]8 [2-21.5]5 [2-21]0.384SYSTEMIC MANIFESTATIONS Fever, n (%)14 (11.2)15 (14.2)0.500 Constitutional syndrome, n (%)54 (43.2)39 (36.8)0.322 PMR, n (%)75 (60)69 (65.1)0.426ISCHEMIC MANIFESTATIONS Visual involvement, n (%)14 (11.2)16 (15.1)0.380 Headache, n (%)66 (52.8)62 (58.5)0.386 Jaw claudication, n (%)24 (19.2)25 (23.6)0.417AORTITIS (large-vessel involvement), n (%)65 (52)42 (39.6)0.060ANALYTICAL FINDINGS ESR, mm/1st hour, mean (SD)39.1±29.337.5±33.50.334 CRP, mg/dL mean (SD)2.6± 3.42.7± 40.305 Hemoglobin, g/dL, mean (SD)13.5±9.612.9±1.50.153GLUCOCORTICOIDS Prednisone dose, mg/d mean (SD)20.3±16.427±17.80.001

Abbreviations: CRP: C-reactive protein; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; GCA: giant cell arteritis; IQR: interquartile range; IV: intravenous; PMR: polymyalgia rheumatica; SC: subcutaneous; SD: standard deviation; TCZ: tocilizumab.

The median prednisone dose at first TCZ optimization was 2.5 [0-5] mg/day. At the end of follow-up prolonged remission was observed in 78.2% of TCZOPT group compared with 66.7% in the TCZNON-OPT group (p= 0.001) (Figure 1). Seven (5.6%) of the 125 optimized cases relapsed. Serious adverse events were similar in both groups, while serious infections were more frequent in the TCZNON-OPT group (p=0.009).

Conclusion

Once complete remission is reached in GCA patients under TCZ treatment, optimization of biologic may be performed. Based on our experience it could be performed by reducing the dose or by prolonging dosing interval of TCZ. It seems to be an effective and safe practice.

References

[1]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 49: 126-135. PMID: 30655091

[2]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016; 34: S44-53. PMID: 27050507

[3]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021; 13: 1759720X211020917. PMID: 34211589

[4]Loricera J, et al. Int Immunopharmacol. 2015; 27: 213-9. PMID: 25828585

Disclosure of Interests

Carmen Álvarez-Reguera: None declared, Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, E. Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Iván Ferraz-Amaro: None declared, Julio Sanchez-Martin: None declared, Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Jose Luis Hernández Hernández: None declared, Miguel Á. González-Gay Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and MSD., Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche., Ricardo Blanco Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Lilly and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche.

AB1367 PET ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TOCILIZUMAB IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS. STUDY OF 101 PATIENTS FROM CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background

Positron emission tomography (PET) is one of the tools available for the diagnosis of extracranial large-vessel vasculitis (1-5). Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy in large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) including GCA. However, the improvement objectified by imaging techniques after TCZ therapy in extracranial GCA patients is controversial.

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness of TCZ improving the wall vessel inflammation by PET in GCA patients with large-vessel involvement.

Methods

Observational, multicenter study of 101 GCA patients treated with TCZ. GCA was diagnosed according to: a) ACR criteria, and/or b) biopsy of temporal artery, and/or c) presence of signs of vessel wall inflammation by PET, defined by the presence of vascular wall uptake of Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Patients were divided into two subgroups: a) with, and b) without signs of improvement (partial or total) in the follow-up PET.

Results

We studied 101 patients (74 women/27 men; mean age 69.7±9.3 years). Main clinical features of GCA with and without PET improvement are shown in Table 1. The group of patients which experienced PET improvement was older and was receiving higher doses of corticosteroids at TCZ onset.

Table 1.

Main features of 101 GCA patients treated with tocilizumab and with presence of signs of vessel wall inflammation by PET.

With PET improvement (n=88)Without PET improvement (n=13)pBaseline characteristics at TCZ onsetGeneral characteristicsAge(years), mean±SD70.6±9.163.8±9.20.014Sex, female/male (% female)67/21(76)7/6 (54)0.103Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]11 [4-24.2]4 [2-6]0.102Systemic manifestations, n (%)Fever, n (%)5 (6)2 (15)0.225Constitutional syndrome, n (%)36 (41)4 (31)0.466PmR, n (%)53 (60)9 (10)0.761Ischaemic manifestations, n (%)Visual involvement, n (%)2 (2)1 (1)0.342Headache, n (%)30 (34)3 (23)0.538Jaw claudication, n (%)8 (9)0 (0)0.592Laboratory dataESR, mm 1st hour, median [IQR]38.0 ± 26.213.54 ± 9.90.001CRP, mg/dL, median [IQR]1.5 [0.7-2.4]1 [0.5-1.7]0.179Prednisone dose, mg/day, median [IQR]40.3 ± 19.421.9 ± 12.70.001Time from TCZ onset and follow-up PET (months)13.1±8.010.1±5.30.446

Conclusion

TCZ seems to be effective controlling GCA including vascular involvement detected by PET. However, the improvement observed by PET is most often partial, and rarely complete.

Figure 1.

Improvement by PET according to the time of the test.

References

[1]Loricera J, et al. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2015; 34: 372-7. PMID: 26272121

[2]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015; 33: S19-31. PMID: 25437450

[3]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021; 13: 1759720X211020917. PMID: 34211589

[4]Martínez-Rodríguez I, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018; 47: 530-537. PMID: 28967430

[5]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 48: 720-727. PMID: 29903537

Acknowledgements

Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis Spanish Collaborative Group: Juan C. González Nieto (H. Gregorio Marañón), Juan R. de Dios (H.U. Araba), Esther Fernández (H. Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca), Isabel de la Morena (H. Clínico Universitario de Valencia), Patricia Moya (H. Sant Pau), Roser Solans i Laqué (H. Valle de Hebrón), Eva Pérez Pampín (H.U. de Santiago), José L. Andréu (H.U. Puerta de Hierro), Marcelino Revenga (H. Ramón y Cajal), Juan P. Baldivieso Achá (H. U. de La Princesa), Eztizen Labrador (H. San Pedro), Andrea García-Valle (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia), Adela Gallego (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Badajoz), Carlota Iñíguez (H.U. Lucus Augusti), Cristina Hidalgo (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca), Noemí Garrido-Puñal (H. Virgen del Rocío), Ruth López-González (Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora), José A. Román-Ivorra (H.U. y Politécnico La Fe), Sara Manrique (H. Regional de Málaga), Paz Collado (H.U. Severo Ochoa), Enrique Raya (H. San Cecilio), Valvanera Pinillos (H. San Pedro), Francisco Navarro (H. General Universitario de Elche), Alejandro Olivé-Marqués (H. Trías i Pujol), Francisco J. Toyos (H.U. Virgen Macarena), María L. Marena Rojas (H. La Mancha Centro), Antoni Juan Más (H.U. Son Llàtzer), Beatriz Arca (H.U. San Agustín), Carmen Ordás-Calvo (H. Cabueñes), María D. Boquet (H. Arnau de Vilanova), Noelia Álvarez-Rivas (H.U. Lucus Augusti), María L. Velloso-Feijoo (H.U. de Valme), Cristina Campos (H. General Universitario de Valencia), Íñigo Rúa-Figueroa (H. Doctor Negrín), Antonio García (H. Virgen de las Nieves), Carlos Vázquez (H. Miguel Servet), Pau Lluch (H. Mateu Orfila), Carmen Torres (Complejo Asistencial de Ávila), Cristina Luna (H.U. Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria), Elena Becerra (H.U. de Torrevieja), Nagore Fernández-Llanio (H. Arnáu de Vilanova), Arantxa Conesa (H.U. de Castellón), Eva Salgado (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense).

Disclosure of Interests

Julio Sanchez-Martin: None declared, Javier Loricera: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, E. Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Iván Ferraz-Amaro: None declared, Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, Jose Luis Hernández Hernández: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche

POS0796 TREATMENT, ADVERSE EVENTS AND FOLLOW UP IN PATIENTS WITH GIANT CELL ARTERITIS IN THE ARTESER MULTICENTER STUDY

Background

Glucocorticoids (GC) are the mainstay therapy in Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA), initially at high doses (40-60 mg/day) followed by gradual glucocorticoid tapering. This treatment, especially in older patients, is associated with numerous adverse effects (AE). In addition, there are frequent relapses. Therefore, conventional synthetic immunosuppressants such as methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate, have been used with controversial results. Studies with biological immunosuppressants, such as TNFi have been ineffective; in contrast, tocilizumab (TCZ) has obtained positive results and was approved for the treatment of GCA.

Objectives

In the ARTESER study we describe a) treatment with GC, synthetic or biological immunosuppressants; b) AE of CG; and c) evolution.

Methods

ARTESER is a retrospective observational study sponsored by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology. 26 Spanish centers participated and all new patients diagnosed with GCA from June 1, 2013 to March 29, 2019 were included. Data on GC and immunosuppressants were collected at the beginning and during the follow-up of GCA patients. For the calculation of the cumulative dose of GC, an application was developed that, by including the periods of time, dose and type of GC received during follow-up, performs the automatic calculation in mg of prednisone.

Results

Of the 1675 patients included, GC treatment was adequately recorded in 1650 patients (Table 1). All received oral treatment, being prednisone the most frequently drug used (N=1602, 97.09%). In addition, 426 (25.82%) patients received at least one iv pulse of methylprednisolone, being the 1000 mg regimen the most frequent (n=217; 50.9%). The total mean duration of GC treatment was 22.65 months. The mean cumulative dose per patient at the end of follow-up was 8514.98 mg of prednisone.

Table 1.

Corticosteroid treatment and immunosuppressive treatment

Patients taking oral corticosteroid1650 Prednisone, n (%)1602 (97.09) Methylprednisolone, n (%)164 (9.94) Deflazacort, n (%)64 (3.88)Patients receiving intravenous corticosteroid, n (%)426 (25.82)Mean duration of steroid treatment, mean (SD)22.65 (17.36)Mean cumulative dose at the end of follow-up per patient, mg of prednisone, mean (SD)8514.98 (6570.21)Methotrexate at diagnosis*, n (%)165 (9.9)Leflunomide at diagnosis*, n (%)2 (0.1)Azathioprine at diagnosis*, n (%)3 (0.2)Cyclophosphamide at diagnosis*, n (%)7 (0.4)Mycophenolate at diagnosis*, n (%)1 (0.1)Tocilizumab at diagnosis*, n (%)22 (1.3)Methotrexate during follow-up, n (%)532 (31.8)Leflunomide during follow-up, n (%)19 (1.2)Azathioprine during follow-up, n (%)26 (1.5)Cyclophosphamide during follow-up, n (%)10 (0.6)Mycophenolate during follow-up, n (%)10 (0.6)Tocilizumab during follow-up, n (%)153 (9.1)

The most widely used immunosuppressant was MTX both at diagnosis (n=165; 9.9%) and during follow-up (n=532; 31.8%), followed by TCZ, at diagnosis (22; 1.3%) and at follow-up (153; 9.1%).

AE with GC were described in 393 patients (23.8%), highlighting serious infections (n=67; 10.03%) followed by diabetes mellitus (n=63; 9.43%), steroid myopathy (n=53; 7.9%), vertebral fractures (n=47; 7.04%), non-vertebral fractures (n=36; 5.39%), heart failure (n=36; 5.39%), arterial hypertension (n=34; 5.09%) and neuropsychiatric alterations (n=27; 4.04%).

During the follow-up, 334 (19.9%) patients had relapses, 532 (31.8%) were hospitalized on some occasion, and 142 patients (8.48%) died. The main cause of death were infections (n=44; 30.99%), neoplasms (n=23; 16.2%), cardiovascular (n=15; 10.56%), and cerebrovascular (n=10; 7.04%).

Conclusion

The main treatment for GCA was oral GC, which were required for almost two years on average, in a quarter of patients associated with IV pulses. The cumulative steroid dose was high as well as the side effects. MTX was the most widely used immunosuppressant and TCZ was prescribed in 10%. Relapses and admissions at the hospital were relatively frequent.

Acknowledgements

This study has been funded by ROCHE Farma. The funder has not participated in the design, analysis, or interpretation of the results

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0638 INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN IN ANTINEUTROPHIL CYTOPLASMIC ANTIBODY-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS. STUDY OF 28 CASES FROM A SINGLE UNIVERISTARY HOSPITAL AND LITERATURE REVIEW

Background

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) includes granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) or microscopic polyarteritis (MPA). Standard treatment is often accompained by significant adverse events. Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) may constitute a therapeutic alternative, however, the data are scarce.

Objectives

To assess the utility and safety of IVIG in AAV.

Methods

Observational study of patients with AAV from Spanish referral center treated with IVIG. AAV diagnosis was based on a compatible clinical presentation and/or positive ANCA serology and/or histology. Disease activity was assessed with the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS).

Results

We included a total of 28 patients; GPA (n=15), MPA (10), and EGPA (3). The main features are summarized in Table 1. The reasons for using IVIG were: a) relapse/refractory disease (n=20), or presence/suspicion of infection (8). We observed a rapid and maintained Clinical improvement, since first month of IVIG onset, yielding a BVAS score of zero in 56.5% of patients at 24 months (Figure 1). Serious Adverse event was only observed in 1 patient who developed congestive cardiac failure and had to stop the IVIG therapy.

Table 1.

Main general features of 28 patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis treated with intravenous immunoglobulins.

GENERAL FEATURESRESULTSGENERAL FEATURES (Continuation)RESULTS (Continuation)DEMOGRAPHIC FEATURESANALITICAL FINDINGSAge of Diagnosis of AAV, mean±SD57.1±18CRP (mg/dL), median [IQR]13.02Men/ Women; n, (% men)15/13 (53.6%)ESR, mm/1st hour, median [IQR]70.4AAV Subtype, n (%)PR3-ANCA, n (%)11 (39.3)GPA15(53.6%)MPO-ANCA, n (%)12 (42.8)EGPA3(10.7%)ANCA negative, n(%)5 (17.8)MPA10(35.7%)FFS at AAV diagnosis, n (%)CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS, n (%)010 (35.7)Fever15 (53.6%)111 (39.3)Constitutional symptoms26 (92.85%)27 (25)ORL involvement7 (25%)PREVIOUS TREATMENT, n (%)Pulmonary involvement19 (67.9%)Cyclophospamide13 (46.4%)Renal involvement25 (89.3%)Methotrexate6 (21.4%)Cutaneous involvement)6 (21.5%)Azathioprine3 (10.7%)Ocular involvement4 (14.3%)Cyclophosphamide13 (46.4%)Joint involvement4 (14.3%)Mycophenolate mofetil4 (14.3%)Neurologic involvement8 (28.57%)Rituximab5 (17.9%)

Abbreviations: ANCA:antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; EGPA: eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis; FFS: Five-Factors Score; GPA: granulomatosis with polyangiitis; MPA: microscopic polyangiitis

Figure 1.

BVAS Evolution with IVIG treatment of all our patients.

Conclusion

IVIG seems to be an effectiveness and relative safe therapeutic option in relapse/refractory AAV or in presence of a concomitant infection.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0913 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SWITCHING FROM FILGOTINIB TO TOFACITINIB IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS AFTER 6 MONTHS OF FOLLOW-UP

Background

Phase 2 studies have shown that Filgotinib (FIL), a JAK-inhibitor (JAKi), significantly improves signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with active disease. PENGUIN 1 and 2 were two phase III trials of FIL in PsA that were stopped. We considered Tofacitinib (TOFA) the best alternative drug for these patients because TOFA is the only JAKi approved so far in Spain for PsA. However, data in clinical practice about switching from FIL to TOFA have not been reported.

Objectives

To assess the efficacy and safety of switching FIL to TOFA in patients with PsA.

Methods

Prospective Single-University-hospital study of PsA patients diagnosed according to CASPAR criteria, and previously treated with FIL 100 mg and 200 mg/day in two clinical trials (PENGUIN 1 and 2). Based on a shared decision between the patient and the physician, once the trial was finished, patients receiving FIL were switched to TOFA (5 mg/12h) with a 7 days wash-up period. PsA activity, analytical and ultrasound outcomes were assessed at baseline and after 1, 3 and 6 months of treatment with TOFA.

A power doppler ultrasound score (PDUS) was obtained using a scoring system which assessed bilateral midline wrists, metacarpophalangeal joints 1-5, proximal and distal interphalangeal joints 2–5 in hands and feet, bilateral knees, ankles and metatarsophalangeal joints 2-5 (apart from any other painful joint). Each image was scored semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0-3.

We used MASEI index for the enthesis US evaluation (that includes entheses at 6 sites: proximal plantar fascia, distal Achilles tendon, distal and proximal patellar tendon insertion, distal quadriceps tendon and distal brachial triceps tendon). We also evaluated in these enthesis the presence/absence (0/1) of PD signal as it is the main activity signal.

Results

We included 11 patients (6 women/5 men) with a mean age of 52.5±6.5 years who had received FIL during a mean time of 16.0±9.3 weeks. JAKi was used in monotherapy or combined with sulfasalazine (n=2), methotrexate (n=1) and apremilast (n=1).

Disease activity, US scores and laboratory values during the follow-up are shown in Table 1. No significant changes were observed in any case.

Table 1.

Psoriatic Arthritis activity, ultrasound and analytical outcomes at baseline, month 1, 3 and 6.

BaselineMonth 1Month 3Month 6pMusculoskeletal activity scores, median [IQR]TJC – no.2 [0-3]3 [1.5-16]1 [0-12]2 [0-5]0.22SJC – no.0 [0-0]0 [0-5]0 [0-6]0 [0-2]0.09Ultrasound exam, median [IQR]PDUS score (0-90)2 [1-9]3 [1-6]2 [0-4]2 [2-9]0.99Enthesitis according to PDUS (n)1 [0-2]1 [0-2]0 [0-2]1 [0-1]0.85MASEI index16.5 ±10.519.6 ± 14.515.5 ± 4.817.5 ± 11.80.82Laboratory valuesHemoglobin (g/dl) - mean±SD13.96 ± 1.4013.54 ± 1.3813.79 ±1.6014.40 ± 1.750.64Leucocytes (x103/µL) - mean±SD7.10 ± 3.407.27 ± 2.967.14 ± 2.898.20 ± 2.870.89Lymphocytes (x103/µL) - mean±SD2.03 ± 1.011.94 ± 0.952.16 ± 0.861.96 ± 0.450.94Neutrophils (x103/µL) - mean±SD4.24 ± 2.924.54 ± 1.974.18 ± 1.845.30 ± 2.370.85Platelet count (x103/µL) - mean±SD266.44 ± 57.35250.67 ± 53.29264.90 ± 56.78287.20 ± 25.580.69CRP (mg/dl) - median [IQR]0.00 [0.00-1.70]0.00 [0.00-0.00]0.00 [0.00-0.00]0.00 [0.00-0.00]0.12ESR (mm/h) - median [IQR]15 [6-19]9 [5-15]12 [4-15]13 [5-45]0.12

CRP: C-reactive protein; ESR: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate; MASEI: Madrid Sonographic Enthesis Index; TJC: Tender joint count; PDUS: Power doppler ultrasound; SJC: Swollen joint count.

No adverse events were reported during the 6 month of follow-up except for 1 patient with lymphopenia (500/µL).

TOFA was discontinued after 1 month in 1 patient because of lypmphopenia and inefficacy and after 3 months in 4 patients for worsening of the joint pain. It was remarkable that in some of the patients who reported a worsening of painful joints we did not observed a higher inflammatory activity in the SJC or US exam, and this incongruity could be due to the role that JAK/STAT inhibition plays in pain signaling pathways.

Conclusion

Switching from FIL to TOFA appears to be an effective and safe therapeutic option.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0795 EPIDEMIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS AND CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GIANT CELL ARTERITIS IN PATIENTS INCLUDED IN THE ARTESER MULTICENTER STUDY

Background

Epidemiological information on Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) comes mainly from the Scandinavian countries of northern Europe, which show a higher incidence than the countries of southern Europe. GCA clinical manifestations can be divided into cranial, extracranial, and general syndrome.

Objectives

In a large series of GCA from Spain, we studied a) the incidence of GCA, b) clinical manifestations, and c) comorbidities at the time of disease diagnosis.

Methods

ARTESER is a retrospective epidemiological observational study of GCA promoted by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology in which 26 hospitals participate. The inclusion criteria were: all new patients diagnosed with GCA by a) ACR criteria, b) positive diagnostic test (temporal artery biopsy, temporal artery ultrasound or other relevant imaging techniques) and/or c) investigator’s clinical judgment. The patient recruitment period ranged from June 1, 2013 to March 29, 2019. The overall incidence of GCA per 100,000 people ≥50 years for the whole period and the mean annual incidence were evaluated. The clinical variables were collected by reviewing the patient’s medical history.

Results

1675 patients were included. The average annual incidence rate was 7.42 (95% CI: 6.57-8.27). All the cases were older than 50 years, and the age group with the highest annual incidence was that of 80 to 84 years, where it reached a value of 22.63 (95% CI: 22.04 -23.22). The mean annual incidence is higher in women than in men 10.07 (95% CI: 8.74-11.55) vs 4.81 (95% CI 3.84-5.93) (Table 1).

Table 1.

General characteristics, comorbidities and clinical manifestations

Epidemiologic, demographic and diagnosisMenWomenTotalGender, n (%)497 (29.7)1178 (70.3)1675Incidence annual rate (95% CI)4.81 (3.84-5.93)10.07 (8.74-11.55)7.42 (6.57-8.27)Age at diagnosis, years, mean (SD)76.9 (8.3)76.9 (8.0)76.9 (8.1)Diagnosis only by ACR Criteria89 (17.91)266 (22.58)355 (21.19)Diagnosis only with objective tests73 (14.69)140 (11.88)213 (12.72)Diagnosis ACR criteria + diagnosis objective tests311 (62.58)734 (62.31)1045 (62.39)Diagnosis by clinical judgment24 (4.8)38 (3.2)62 (3.7)Comorbidities at diagnosisArterial hypertension, n (%)330 (66.8)749 (63.7)1079 (64.6)Dyslipidemia, n (%)238 (48.3)563 (47.9)801 (48.0)Cranial clinical manifestationsNew-onset headache, n (%)382 (76.9)955 (81.1)1337 (79.9)Visual Clinic, n (%)194 (39.0)411 (34.9)605 (36.1)Extracranial manifestations and general syndromePolymyalgia rheumatica, n (%)178 (35.8)521 (44.3)699 (41.8)Asthenia, n (%)239 (48.1)634 (53.9)873 (52.2)Analysis at diagnosisErythrocyte sedimentation rate mm/h, mean (SD)72.3 (34.7)77.4 (33.0)75.9 (33.6)

The principal clinical characteristics of the population is shown in Table 1, the mean age at diagnosis was 76.9±8.1 years, 1178 (70.3%) were women. 1045 patients (62.39%) had ACR criteria and some positive objective test, 355 patients (21.9%) presented only ACR criteria and 213 (12.72%) only had a positive diagnostic test; 62 (3.7%) of the patients underwent diagnosis based on clinical judgment. The more frequent comorbidity was arterial hypertension (n=1079; 64.6%), followed by dyslipidemia (n=801, 48%). The predominant cranial manifestation was headache (n= 1337; 79.9%) and 605 patients experienced visual symptoms (36.1%). Polymyalgia rheumatica (n=699; 41.8%) and asthenia (n=837; 52.2%) were the most frequent extracranial and general syndrome manifestation, respectively. Regarding laboratory parameters, the most characteristic data was the increase of ESR (75.9±33.6 mm/1st h).

Conclusion

The mean annual incidence of GCA in Spain, 7.42 (95% CI: 6.57-8.27), is lower than that of the Scandinavian countries. It is higher in people older than 80 years. More than 60% of the patients met the ACR criteria and had a positive diagnostic test. Cranial manifestations constituted the most clinical features. The most frequent clinical manifestations are cranial. Up to a third of patients had visual manifestations.

Acknowledgements

This study has been funded by ROCHE Farma. The funder has not participated in the design, analysis, or interpretation of the results

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB1366 ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TOCILIZUMAB IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS. STUDY OF 26 PATIENTS FROM CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background

Large-vessel vasculitis are characterized by the wall inflammation of the involved vessels, which can be detected by imaging tools (1-3). Ultrasound (US) is one of the most commonly used tools for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA), especially in patients with a cranial phenotype. Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy in large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) including GCA (4,5). However, the improvement objectified by imaging techniques such as US after TCZ therapy is poorly documented.

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness of TCZ improving the wall vessel inflammation by US.

Methods

Observational, multicenter study of 26 GCA patients treated with TCZ. GCA was diagnosed according to: a) ACR criteria, and/or b) biopsy of temporal artery, and/or c) presence of signs of vessel wall inflammation by US, defined by the presence of halo sign. In all the cases a baseline US and in the follow-up was mandatory.

Patients were divided into two subgroups: a) with, and b) without signs of improvement (partial or total) in the follow-up US.

Results

We studied 26 patients (19 women/7 men; mean age, 76.3±9.7 years). Main clinical features of GCA with and without US improvement are shown in Table 1. We found no significant differences in any of the variables studied between the two groups.

Table 1.

Main features of 27 GCA patients treated with tocilizumab followed by Ultrasound (US).

With US improvement (n=21)Without US improvement (n=5)pBaseline characteristics at TCZ onsetGeneral characteristicsAge(years), mean±SD77.3±8.972.2±12.90.270Sex, female/male (% female)17/4 (80,95)2/3 (40)0.101Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]6 [3-9]3 [1-6]0.452Systemic manifestations, n (%)Fever, n (%)1/21 (4.76)1/5 (20)0.354Constitutional syndrome, n (%)10/21 (47.62)2/5 (40)0.999PmR, n (%)11/21 (52.38)1/5 (20)0.330Ischaemic manifestations, n (%)Visual involvement, n (%)1/21 (4.76)1/5 (20)0.354Headache, n (%)15/21 (71.43)5/5 (100)0.298Jaw claudication, n (%)4/15 (26.67)¼ (25)0.999Laboratory dataESR, mm 1st hour, median [IQR]33 [22-49]55 [54-80]0.216CRP, mg/dL, median [IQR]1.5 [0.7-6.7]3.8 [1-4.2]0.948Prednisone dose, mg/day, median [IQR]13.7 [10-30]30 [12.5-30]0.505Time from TCZ onset and follow-up US (months)3.9±3.63.1±2.10.456

After TCZ onset, 21 of 26 patients (80.7%) showed US signs of improvement (12 complete, 9 partial). In 4 out of 5 patients in whom there was no improvement in US findings, clinical improvement was observed at first month after starting TCZ.

Conclusion

TCZ seems to be effective controlling GCA including vascular involvement detected by US. This improvement can be seen by follow-up US, especially when performed at least 3 months after TCZ onset.

References

[1]Loricera J, et al. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2015; 34: 372-7. PMID: 26272121

[2]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015; 33: S19-31. PMID: 25437450

[3]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021; 13: 1759720X211020917. PMID: 34211589

[4]Martínez-Rodríguez I, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018; 47: 530-537. PMID: 28967430

[5]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 48: 720-727. PMID: 29903537

Acknowledgements

Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis Spanish Collaborative Group: Juan C. González Nieto (H. Gregorio Marañón), Juan R. de Dios (H.U. Araba), Esther Fernández (H. Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca), Isabel de la Morena (H. Clínico Universitario de Valencia), Patricia Moya (H. Sant Pau), Roser Solans i Laqué (H. Valle de Hebrón), Eva Pérez Pampín (H.U. de Santiago), José L. Andréu (H.U. Puerta de Hierro), Marcelino Revenga (H. Ramón y Cajal), Juan P. Baldivieso Achá (H. U. de La Princesa), Eztizen Labrador (H. San Pedro), Andrea García-Valle (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia), Adela Gallego (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Badajoz), Carlota Iñíguez (H.U. Lucus Augusti), Cristina Hidalgo (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca), Noemí Garrido-Puñal (H. Virgen del Rocío), Ruth López-González (Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora), José A. Román-Ivorra (H.U. y Politécnico La Fe), Sara Manrique (H. Regional de Málaga), Paz Collado (H.U. Severo Ochoa), Enrique Raya (H. San Cecilio), Valvanera Pinillos (H. San Pedro), Francisco Navarro (H. General Universitario de Elche), Alejandro Olivé-Marqués (H. Trías i Pujol), Francisco J. Toyos (H.U. Virgen Macarena), María L. Marena Rojas (H. La Mancha Centro), Antoni Juan Más (H.U. Son Llàtzer), Beatriz Arca (H.U. San Agustín), Carmen Ordás-Calvo (H. Cabueñes), María D. Boquet (H. Arnau de Vilanova), Noelia Álvarez-Rivas (H.U. Lucus Augusti), María L. Velloso-Feijoo (H.U. de Valme), Cristina Campos (H. General Universitario de Valencia), Íñigo Rúa-Figueroa (H. Doctor Negrín), Antonio García (H. Virgen de las Nieves), Carlos Vázquez (H. Miguel Servet), Pau Lluch (H. Mateu Orfila), Carmen Torres (Complejo Asistencial de Ávila), Cristina Luna (H.U. Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria), Elena Becerra (H.U. de Torrevieja), Nagore Fernández-Llanio (H. Arnáu de Vilanova), Arantxa Conesa (H.U. de Castellón), Eva Salgado (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense).

Disclosure of Interests

Julio Sanchez-Martin: None declared, Javier Loricera: None declared, Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, E. Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Juan Carlos Nieto González: None declared, Patricia Moya: None declared, Eztizen Labrador-Sánchez: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche

POS0802 INVOLVEMENT OF THE AORTA AND/OR ITS MAIN BRANCHES IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS. TREATMENT WITH TOCILIZUMAB

Background

Large vessel involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA), especially the aorta and/or its main branches, is frequent. Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy and safety in GCA and other large-vessel vasculitis (1-4).

Objectives

To assess the efficacy and safety of TCZ in GCA patients with involvement of the aorta and/or its main branches.

Methods

Multicenter observational study of 196 patients with GCA and involvement of the aorta and/or its major branches treated with TCZ. GCA was diagnosed by: a) ACR criteria, and/or b) temporal artery biopsy, and/or c) imaging techniques. The presence of aortitis was performed by imaging techniques, mainly PET, and A-MRI.

Maintained remission was considered according to EULAR definitions (5).

Results

The main features of the 196 patients are showed in Table 1. Polymyalgia rheumatica, constitutional syndrome and headache were the most frequent clinical manifestations at TCZ onset. At 6 months after starting TCZ, 20% of the patients reached a sustained remission, that was progressively increasing. (Figure 1). A corticosteroid-sparing effect was observed from month 1 of TCZ onset (Figure 1). Relevant adverse events were observed in 12 per 100 patients-year, documenting serious infections in 4.8 per 100 patients-year (Table 1).

Table 1.

Main features of 196 GCA patients with involvement of the aorta and/or its main branches treated with TCZ.

GCA (n=196)Features at TCZ onsetAge(years), mean±SD71.3±9.5Sex, female/male (% female)148/48 (75)Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]7 [2-18.25]Systemic manifestations, n (%)Fever, n (%)24 (12)Constitutional syndrome, n (%)87 (44)PmR, n (%)131 (67)Ischaemic manifestations, n (%)Visual involvement, n (%)16 (8)Headache, n (%)74 (38)Jaw claudication, n (%)27 (14)Laboratory dataESR, mm 1st hour, median [IQR]32 [14-54]CRP, mg/dL, median [IQR]1.5 [0.6-3.2]Prednisone dose, mg/day, median [IQR]15 [10-30]Safety after TCZ onsetRelevant adverse events, per 100 patients-year12Serious infections, per 100 patients-year4.8Figure 1.

A) Sustained remission, and B) median prednisone dose required in GCA patients with aortitis treated with tocilizumab

Conclusion

TCZ seems to be effective and relatively safe in GCA patients with involvement of the aorta and/or its main branches.

References

[1]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 49: 126-135. PMID: 30655091

[2]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016; 34: S44-53. PMID: 27050507

[3]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015; 33: S19-31. PMID: 25437450

[4]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021; 13: 1759720X211020917. PMID: 34211589

[5]Hellmich B, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79: 19-30. PMID: 31270110

Disclosure of Interests

Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Javier Loricera Speakers bureau: from Roche, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Celgene, and Grünenthal., Rafael Melero: None declared, Santos Castañeda Speakers bureau: UAM-Roche, EPID- Future chair, Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain., Clara Moriano: None declared, Iván Ferraz-Amaro: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, E. Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Julio Sanchez-Martin: None declared, Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, J. Luis Hernández: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene, and MSD., Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, Jansen, and Roche,, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Lilly, Janssen, and MSD., Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, and Roche

POS0817 TOCILIZUMAB IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GIANT CELL ARTERITIS VERSUS REFRACTORY/RECURRENT GIANT CELL ARTERITIS; MULTICENTER STUDY OF 471 PATIENTS OF CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background

Tocilizumab (TCZ) is the only biologic drug approved in giant cell arteritis (GCA), based in two clinical trials (CT) (1,2). CT included selected patients who may differ from those of clinical practice (CP). A high proportion of GCA patients treated with TCZ in CT had a newly diagnosed GCA, whereas in CP, most of them are refractory/recurrent GCA (3,4). Although in CT the efficacy of TCZ seems to be similar in patients with newly diagnosed GCA and in patients with refractory/recurrent GCA, in CP it is not documented.

Objectives

To compare in CP, the effectiveness and safety of TCZ in newly diagnosed vs refractory/recurrent GCA.

Methods

Multicentre observational study on 471 GCA patients treated with TCZ. GCA was diagnosed by: a) ACR criteria, and/or b) temporal artery biopsy, and/or c) imaging techniques. A comparative study between patients with newly diagnosed GCA (<6 weeks) and those with refractory/recurrent GCA (>6 weeks) (according to GiACTA study definitions) (2). Sustained remission was based on EULAR definitions (5).

Results

The 471 GCA patients were divided into 2 subgroups: a) newly diagnosed GCA (n=91) and b) refractory/recurrent GCA (n=380) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Main features of patients with newly diagnosed GCA and refractory/recurrent GCA treated with tocilizumab.

Newly diagnosed GCA (n=91)Refractory/recurrent GCA (n=380)pBaseline characteristics at TCZ onset Age(years), mean±SD74.3±8.573.3±9.10.35 Sex, female/male (% female)60/31 (66)282/98 (74)0.11 Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]1 [0.5-1]10 [4-24]0.0001 ESR, mm 1st hour, median [IQR]46 [17.5-80.5]27 [10-50]0.02 CRP, mg/dL, median [IQR]2.1 [0.7-8.5]1.3 [0.4-2.8]0.13 Haemoglobin, g/dL, mean±SD12.3±1.512.7±1.50.03 Prednisone dose, mg/day, median [IQR]40 [21.2-50]15 [10-30]<0.001Effectiveness and Safety after TCZ onsetFollow-up, (months), median [IQR]15 [6-27.5]22 [11-37]0.004Relevant adverse events, n (%)23 (25)102 (27)0.54Relevant adverse events per 100 patients-year2015NSSerious infections, n (%)13 (14)53 (14)0.49Serious infections per 100 patients-year11.28NSMACES, n (%)0 (0)1 (0.3)-MACES per 100 patients-year00.2-Malignancies n (%)2 (2)3 (0.8)0.99Malignancies per 100 patients-year1.60.5NS

Abbreviations: CRP: C-reactive protein;ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate;GCA: giant cell arteritis; IQR: interquartile range; IV: intravenous; MACEs: major adverse cardiovascular events; NS: non significant; SC: subcutaneous; SD: standard deviation

No significant differences were observed between both groups in sustained remission, although a greater tendency towards sustained remission is observed in newly diagnosed than in refractory/recurrent GCA patients (Figure 1). The decrease in glucocorticoids dose was faster in the first three months in the newly diagnosed GCA group, but thereafter, was similar in both groups, as well as the appearance of relevant adverse events and serious infections.

Figure 1.

A) Sustained remission, and B) median prednisone dose required in patients with newly diagnosed GCA and in patients with refractory/recurrent GCA treated with tocilizumab.

Conclusion

The effectiveness and safety of TCZ seems to be similar in patients with newly diagnosed GCA and in patients with refractory/recurrent GCA.

References

[1]Villiger PM, et al. Lancet. 2016; 387:1921-1927. PMID: 26952547

[2]Stone JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:317-328. PMID: 28745999

[3]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 49: 126-135. PMID: 30655091

[4]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020; 124: S112-119. PMID: 32441643

[5]Hellmich B, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79: 19-30. PMID: 31270110

Acknowledgements

Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis Spanish Collaborative Group: Juan C. González Nieto (H. Gregorio Marañón), Juan R. de Dios (H.U. Araba), Esther Fernández (H. Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca), Isabel de la Morena (H. Clínico Universitario de Valencia), Patricia Moya (H. Sant Pau), Roser Solans i Laqué (H. Valle de Hebrón), Eva Pérez Pampín (H.U. de Santiago), José L. Andréu (H.U. Puerta de Hierro), Marcelino Revenga (H. Ramón y Cajal), Juan P. Baldivieso Achá (H. U. de La Princesa), Eztizen Labrador (H. San Pedro), Andrea García-Valle (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia), Adela Gallego (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Badajoz), Carlota Iñíguez (H.U. Lucus Augusti), Cristina Hidalgo (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca), Noemí Garrido-Puñal (H. Virgen del Rocío), Ruth López-González (Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora), José A. Román-Ivorra (H.U. y Politécnico La Fe), Sara Manrique (H. Regional de Málaga), Paz Collado (H.U. Severo Ochoa), Enrique Raya (H. San Cecilio), Valvanera Pinillos (H. San Pedro), Francisco Navarro (H. General Universitario de Elche), Alejandro Olivé-Marqués (H. Trías i Pujol), Francisco J. Toyos (H.U. Virgen Macarena), María L. Marena Rojas (H. La Mancha Centro), Antoni Juan Más (H.U. Son Llàtzer), Beatriz Arca (H.U. San Agustín), Carmen Ordás-Calvo (H. Cabueñes), María D. Boquet (H. Arnau de Vilanova), Noelia Álvarez-Rivas (H.U. Lucus Augusti), María L. Velloso-Feijoo (H.U. de Valme), Cristina Campos (H. General Universitario de Valencia), Íñigo Rúa-Figueroa (H. Doctor Negrín), Antonio García (H. Virgen de las Nieves), Carlos Vázquez (H. Miguel Servet), Pau Lluch (H. Mateu Orfila), Carmen Torres (Complejo Asistencial de Ávila), Cristina Luna (H.U. Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria), Elena Becerra (H.U. de Torrevieja), Nagore Fernández-Llanio (H. Arnáu de Vilanova), Arantxa Conesa (H.U. de Castellón), Eva Salgado (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense).

Disclosure of Interests

Julio Sanchez-Martin: None declared, Javier Loricera: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, E. Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Iván Ferraz-Amaro: None declared, Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, Jose Luis Hernández Hernández: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche

POS0801 VISUAL INVOLVEMENT AND PERMANENT VISUAL LOSS IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS: PREDICTIVE FACTORS

Background

Visual involvement is the most feared complication of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) (1-5). Permanent visual loss (PVL) may be preceded by transient visual loss. Once blindness is established, the prognosis is poor. Most of the series of predictive factors of visual involvement in GCA are old and with a small number of patients.

Objectives

To assess the predictive factors of visual involvement and PVL in GCA.

Methods

Multicenter observational study of 471 patients with GCA. The diagnosis of GCA was performed between 2016 and 2021 according to: a) ACR criteria, and/or b) temporal artery biopsy, and/or c) imaging techniques.

From the 471 patients, we selected patients who developed a) visual involvement at any time during GCA and b) PVL. PVL was defined as partial or complete visual loss of >24 hours. Predictive factors were identified by multivariate analysis.

Results

Visual involvement was observed in 122 cases and PVL in 60 (Table 1). The ischemic and systemic manifestations set of variables associated with visual involvement were headache, and jaw claudication, whereas large-vessel involvement was a protective variable (Figure 1). The area under the curve (AUC) for the model was 0.72 (95%CI 0.67-0.77; p<0.0001).

Figure 1.

Forest plot of multivariate analysis.

Table 1.

Main features of the patients

Overall (n= 471)GCA without visual involvement (n=349)GCA with visual involvement (n= 122)GCA with PVL (n=60)P visual vs non visual involvementP PVL vs non visual involvementAge at diagnosis of GCA (mean±SD)72±971±975±875±90.0010.001Female/Male (% of female)342/129 (73)265/84 (76)77/45 (63)41/19 (68)0.0060.21Positive TAB, n (%)201 (43)146 (42)55 (45)33 (55)0.530.34Cardiovascular risk factorsHigh blood pressure, n (%)272 (58)189 (54)83 (68)40 (67)0.0130.058Dyslipidemia, n (%)241 (51)175 (50)66 (54)32 (53)0.610.63Diabetes, n (%)81 (17)50 (14)31 (25)16 (27)0.0070.016Previous or current smoking history, n (%)47 (10)31 (9)16 (13)8 (13)0.210.27CHADS2 score, median [IQR]1 [1-2]1 [0-2]2 [1-2]2 [1-2]0.0010.004Ischemic manifestationsHeadache, n (%)259 (55)167 (48)92 (75)42 (70)0.0000.002Jaw claudication, n (%)112 (24)63 (18)49 (40)26 (43)0.0000.000Systemic manifestationsFever, n (%)57 (12)47 (13)10 (8)4 (7)0.120.20Constitutional syndrome, n (%)175 (37)132 (38)43 (35)20 (33)0.550.47PmR, n (%)284 (60)218 (62)66 (54)29 (48)0.0940.022Large-vessel involvement, n (%)254 (54)211 (60)43 (35)20 (33)0.0000.000ESR, mm/1st hour, median [IQR]32 [12-57]30 [11-54]34 [15-67]42 [12-67]0.220.28CRP (mg/dL), median [IQR]1.5 [0.5-3.4]1.4 [0.5-3.0]1.5 [0.4-4.7]1.5 [0.4-3.6]0.0420.30

In the same line, the set of variables associated with PVL were headache, and jaw claudication. By contrast, polymyalgia rheumatica (PmR), and large-vessel involvement were protective factors (Figure 1). The AUC for this model was 0.77 (95%CI 0.71-0.83; p<0.0001).

Conclusion

Headache, and jaw claudication seem to be associated with visual involvement in GCA, while large vessel involvement seems to be a protective factor. PmR also appears to be a protective factor for the development of PVL.

References

[1]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 49: 126-135. PMID: 30655091

[2]Baalbaki H, et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2021; 40: 3207-3217. PMID: 33580374

[3]González-Gay MA, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 1998; 41: 1497-1504. PMID: 9704651

[4]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 48: 720-727. PMID: 29903537

[5]Martínez-Rodríguez I, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018; 47: 530-537. PMID: 28967430

Acknowledgements

Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis Spanish Collaborative Group.

Disclosure of Interests

Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Javier Loricera Speakers bureau: Roche, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Celgene, and Grünenthal, Clara Moriano: None declared, Santos Castañeda Speakers bureau: UAM-Roche, EPID- Future chair, Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain., Iván Ferraz-Amaro: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, E. Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Julio Sanchez-Martin: None declared, Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, J. Luis Hernández: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene, and MSD., Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, Jansen, and Roche,, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Lilly, Janssen, and MSD., Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, and Roche

POS0804 TOCILIZUMAB IN LARGE-VESSEL GIANT CELL ARTERITIS AND TAKAYASU ARTERITIS: MULTICENTRIC OBSERVATIONAL COMPARATIVE STUDY

Background

Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown to be effective for large vessel vasculitis including giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK) (1-5). However, LVV-GCA and TAK show different demographic and clinical features that may influence on TCZ therapeutic response.

Objectives

To compare the effectiveness of TCZ in patients with LVV-GCA and patients with TAK.

Methods

Observational multicenter study of patients with LVV-GCA and TAK who received TCZ. Outcome variables were: a) proportion of patients who achieved complete clinical improvement along with normalization of laboratory markers (CRP ≤0.5mg/dL and/or ESR ≤ 20 mm/1st hour) at 12 months b) complete improvement in imaging techniques. A comparative study between patients with LVV-GCA and TAK was performed.

Results

We evaluated 70 LVV-GCA and 57 TAK patients who received TCZ. Main clinical and demographic characteristic are described in Table 1. Patients with TAK were younger, had longer disease duration, had received more commonly previous biologic therapy and were receiving higher doses of prednisone at baseline. TCZ intravenous administration was more common in TAK patients (80.7% vs 48.6%; p<0.01). Follow-up time after TCZ onset was similar in both groups. At 12 months, about 75% of patients achieved complete clinical improvement and ESR/CRP normalization in both groups. A follow-up imaging technique was performed in 37 LVV-GCA patients after a mean time of 12.9±6.0 months and 38 TAK patients after 9.5±5.0 months. Complete improvement in imaging techniques was only observed in 18.9% and 21.1% of patients with LVV-GCA and TAK, respectively (Figure 1).

Table 1.LVV-GCA (n=70)TAK (n=57)pGeneral featuresAge (years), mean ± SD67.2 ± 10.540.5 ± 16.3< 0.01Sex (female), n (%)51 (72.9)49 (86)0.07Disease evolution before TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]5 [2-15]12 [3-37]<0.01Baseline laboratory parametersESR (mm/1st hour), median [IQR]32 [12.5-54.7]31 [10-52]0.82CRP (mg/dL), median [IQR]1.4 [0.5-2.4]1.4 [0.5-3.5]0.41Baseline prednisone dose (mg/day), median [IQR]15 [10-20]30 [15-50]< 0.01Previous therapyConventional DMARDs, n(%)45 (64.3)44(77.2)0.51Biologic therapy, n (%)0(0)12 (21.1)<0.01TCZ therapyIntravenous, n (%)34 (48.6)46 (80.7)< 0.01Combined with MTX, n(%)24 (34.3)24 (42.1)0.37Follow-up time after TCZ onset, median [IQR]20 [10-36]18 [7-41]0.73Complete clinical improvement and ESR/CRP normalization at 12 months, n/N (%)35/47 (74.4)30/39 (76.9)0.79Complete improvement in imaging techniques, n/N(%)7/37 (18.9)8/38 (21.1)0.85

CRP: C-reactive protein; DMARDs: Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; GCA: giant cell arteritis; IQR: interquartile range; LVV: large vessel; MTX: methotrexate; n: Number of patients; N: total number of patients: TCZ: tocilizumab; TAK:takayasu

Figure 1.

Conclusion

The effectiveness of TCZ was similar in patients with LVV-GCA and TAK, despite a more refractory disease in TAK patients. A discordance between clinical and imaging activity improvement was observed in both LVV-GCA and TAK, as reported in previous studies (3).

References

[1]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019; 49:126-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.003

[2]Prieto-Peña D et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021;13:175. PMID: 34211589.

[3]Prieto Peña D et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2021;39 Suppl 129:69-75. PMID: 33253103.

[4]González-Gay MA, et al. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2019;19:65-72. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2019.1556256.

[5]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019;48(4):720-727. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.05.007

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0513 ABATACEPT IN MONOTHERAPY VERSUS COMBINED IN INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. MULTICENTER STUDY OF 263 CAUCASIAN PATIENTS

Background:

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a severe complication of RA. Abatacept (ABA) have demonstrated efficacy in RA-ILD [1,2], although combined treatment with MTX or others DMARDs remain controversial.

Objectives:

To assess the efficacy and safety of ABA in monotherapy (ABAMONO) versus combined-ABA, ABA plus MTX(ABAMTX) or ABA plus other non-MTX DMARDs (ABANON-MTX), in RA-ILD.

Methods:

Observational multicenter study of RA-ILD caucasian patients treated with ABA. We analyzed in three groups (ABAMONO, ABAMTX, ABANON-MTX) the following outcomes: a) Dyspnea, b) FVC and DLCO, c) HRCT, d) DAS28-ESR, e) corticosteroid-sparing effect. Differences between basal and final follow-up were evaluated. Multivariable linear regression was used between the three groups.

Results:

We studied 263 RA-ILD patients (mean age 64.6±10 years) [ABAMONO (n=111), ABAMTX (n=46) and ABANON-MTX (n=106)]. At baseline, ABAMONO patients were older (67±10 years) and took higher prednisone dose (10 [IQR 5-15] mg/day). There was no statistically significant differences in sex, seropositivity, ILD patterns, FVC, DLCO or disease duration. In all groups, most patients experienced stabilization or improvement in FVC, DLCO, dyspnea, HRCT as well as improvement in DAS28-ESR. A statistically significant difference between basal and final follow-up was only found in corticosteroid-sparing effect in ABAMTX or ABANON-MTX(Figure 1). However, in the multivariable analysis, there were no differences in any outcome between the three groups(Table 1).

Table 1.

Effect in FVC, DLCO, dyspnea (mMRC) and HRCT pulmonary scan after abatacept.

ABAMONON=111ABAMTXN=46ABANON-MTXN=106ABAMTXvs ABAMONOABANON-MTXvs ABAMONOpppp*UnadjustedAdjusted**UnadjustedAdjusted**Follow-up, median [IQR] months12 [6-36]12 [6-36]18[12-36]0.400.670.17Differences between basal and final follow-upFVC, %-0.5 (-2.5, 1.5)0.641.2(-0.6, 3.1)0.17-1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)0.170.330.300.390.590.90DLCO, %1.8 (-0.7, 4.34)0.160.5 (-3.8, 4.8)0.82-1.5 (-4.1, 1.1)0.260.200.580.800.070.32mMRC, n (%)Worsening5 (5)3 (8)5 (5)0.830.470.99Stable or improving93 (95)36 (92)87 (95)HRCT pulmonary scan, n (%)Worsening13 (28)2 (11)15 (25)0.240.100.78Stable or improving34 (72)19 (89)44 (75)DAS28-ESR-1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)0.000-1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)0.000-1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)0.0000.740.580.92Prednisone, mg/day-3.8 (-8.3, 0.8)0.10-2.7 (-4.6, -0.8)0.006-4.8 (-6.3, -3.4)0.0000.690.670.65

Differences in DAS28-ESR, prednisone, FVC and DLCO are expressed as mean difference (95%CI) comparing final follow-up minus basal values.

*Differences between the 3 groups.

**Differences between ABAMTX vs. ABAMONO, and between ABANON-MTX vs ABAMONO are adjusted for age, disease duration until abatacept treatment, and DAS28 and prednisone dose at baseline.

Abbreviations(DAS28-ESR: Disease activity score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate; DLCO: Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity; HRCT: High resolution computed tomography; FVC: Forced vital capacity, mMRC: modified Medical Research Council scale

Figure 1.

Conclusion:

In caucasian individuals with RA-ILD, ABAMONO or ABAMTX or ABANON-MTX seems to be equally effective and safe. However, a corticosteroid-sparing effect is only observed in combined-ABA.

References:

[1]Fernández-Díaz C, et al. Abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and interstitial lung disease: A national multicenter study of 63 patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Aug;48(1):22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.12.012.

[2]Fernández-Díaz C, et al. Abatacept in interstitial lung disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis: national multicenter study of 263 patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Dec 1;59(12):3906-3916. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa621.

Acknowledgements:

Spanish Collaborative Group of Interstitial Lung Disease Associated to Rheumatoid Arthritis

Disclosure of Interests:

Carlos Fernández-Díaz Speakers bureau: Roche, bristol myers squibb, Belén Atienza-Mateo: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Francisco Ortiz-Sanjuán: None declared, Ivette Casafont-Solé: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Sebastián C Rodriguez-García: None declared, Iván Ferraz-Amaro: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay: None declared, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: bristol myers squibb

OP0064 TOCILIZUMAB IN CRANIAL AND EXTRACRANIAL REFRACTORY GIANT CELL ARTERITIS: A MULTICENTER STUDY OF 312 CASES

Background:

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) may be divided into cranial, and extracranial GCA. Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy and safety in GCA and other large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) (1-5).

Objectives:

To compare the efficacy of TCZ in cranial and extracranial GCA.

Methods:

Multicenter observational study of 312 patients with GCA treated with TCZ. They were divided into 3 groups a) only cranial (cGCA), b) only extracranial (ecGCA), c) mixed affection (mixGCA). GCA was diagnosed by a) ACR criteria, and/or b) positive temporal artery biopsy, and/or c) LVV by imaging. Remission and sustained remission was defined according to EULAR definitions (1). In ecGCA and mixGCA we also studied the improvement (complete or partial) by imaging techniques.

Results:

We studied 312 patients (218 females; mean age, 73.4±9.6 years). TABLE shows the main features of the 3 groups. Remission at month 6 was higher in cGCA, as well as the sustained remission at month12 (FIGURE). At 18 and 24months, were similar in the 3 groups. Improvement by imaging techniques was partial/complete at 6,12,18 and 24 months, in 50%/0%,71%/0%, 61%/15% and 67%/17% respectively, in ecGCA, and in 75%/0%,53%/18%, 64%/12% and 50%/28% in mixGCA.

Table 1.

Main features of 312 patients at TCZ onset.

Cranial GCA(n=152)Extracranial GCA(n=49)Mixed GCA(n=111)Cranial vs Extracranial GCApAge at TCZ onset, years, mean± SD76.0±8.265.4±12.273.5±8.10.000*Sex, female/male, n (% female)105/47 (69)33/16 (67)80/31 (72)0.960Time from diagnosis to TCZ onset (months, median [IQR]6 [2-21]7 [2-20]9 [3-25]0.765Biopsy-proven GCA, n (%)87/128 (68)0 (0)50/87 (57)0.000*Systemic manifestations at TCZ onset109 (72)32 (65)84 (76)0.501Fever, n (%)18 (12)1 (2)8 (7)0.048*Constitutional syndrome, n (%)52 (34)16 (33)47 (42)0.933PmR, n (%)88 (58)29 (59)71 (64)0.999Ischemic manifestations at TCZ onset117 (77)0 (0)70 (63)0.000*Visual involvement, n (%)31 (20)0 (0)16 (14)0.000*Headache, n (%)103 (85)0 (0)63 (57)0.000*Jaw claudication, n (%)39 (26)0 (0)21 (19)0.000*Acute phase reactantsESR, mm/1st hour, median [IQR]28 [9-53]24 [10-43]28 [15-48]0.462CRP, mg/dL, median [IQR]1.2 [0.3-3.4]0.7 [0.4-1.8]1.6 [0.4-3.8]0.153Prednisone dose at TCZ onset, mean ± SD26.2±17.615.4±14.220.1±14.90.000*TCZmono/TCZcombo, n (% TCZ mono)116/36 (76)26/23 (53)69/42 (62)0.003*Follow-up (months), mean ± SD27.3±21.132.7±23.327.9±22.00.143Figure 1.

Remission and sustained remission of cGCA, ecGCA and mixGCA according to EULAR (1). In the first 3 months we only could assess cGCA because in ecGCA and mixGCA a control imaging was not performed

Conclusion:

TCZ seems to be effective in all phenotypes but it is faster in cGCA in reaching remission. However, improvement by imaging techniques was partial and very rarely complete in ecGCA and mixGCA.

References:

[1]Hellmich B, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79: 19-30.

[2]Stone JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 317-28.

[3]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019; 49:126-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.003.

[4]Prieto Peña D et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2020 Nov 27. PMID: 33253103.

[5]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2016; 34:S44-53. PMID: 27050507

Disclosure of Interests:

Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Javier Loricera: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro: None declared, Juan Pablo Valdivieso-Achá: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Julio Sánchez: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, Eva Perez-Pampín: None declared, Juan Ramón De Dios: None declared, Juan Carlos Nieto González: None declared, Eva Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, Patricia Moya: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Valvanera Pinillos: None declared, Andrea García-Valle: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, Marcelino Revenga: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Enrique Raya: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Ruth López-González: None declared, Cristina Campos Fernández: None declared, Antonio Juan-Mas: None declared, Beatriz Arca: None declared, Iñigo Rua-Figueroa: None declared, María Dolors Boquet: None declared, Antonio García: None declared, Adela Gallego: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche

AB0366 TOCILIZUMAB FOR TAKAYASU ARTERITIS: MULTICENTER STUDY OF 54 WHITE PATIENTS

Background:

Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown to be effective for large vessel vasculitis including Takayasu arteritis (TAK) (1-3). Most evidence in TAK comes from Asian patients. However, white patients seem to have different clinical and prognostic features.

Objectives:

Our aims were to: a) assess the efficacy and safety of TCZ in white patients with refractory TAK, b) determine if clinical improvement correlates with imaging outcomes, c) compare TCZ in monotherapy (TCZMONO) vs combined with conventional immunosuppressive drugs (TCZCOMBO)

Methods:

Multicenter study of white patients with refractory TAK who received TCZ.Outcomes variables were remission, glucocorticoid-sparing effect, improvement in imaging techniques, and adverse events. A comparative study between patients who received TCZMONO and TCZCOMBO was performed.

Results:

54 patients (46 women/8 men; median age 42.0 [32.5-50.5] years). TCZ was started after 12.0 [3.0-31.5] months since TAK diagnosis. Remission was achieved in 12/54 (22.2%), 19/49 (38.8%), 23/44 (52.3%) and 27/36 (75%) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Prednisone dose was reduced from 30.0 [12.5-50.0] to 5.0 [0.0-5.6] mg/day at 12 months (Table 1). 10 (26.3%) of the 38 patients in whom an imaging follow-up test was performed showed no radiographic improvement after a median of 9.0 [6.0-14.0] months. 4 of them were in clinical remission.23 (42.6%) patients were on TCZMONO and 31 (57.4%) on TCZCOMBO: MTX (n=28), cyclosporine A (n=2), azathioprine (n=1). Patients on TCZCOMBO were younger (38.0 [27.0-46.0] vs 45 [38.0-57.0] years; p= 0.048), with a trend to longer TAK duration (21.0 [6.0-38.0] vs 6.0 [1.0-23.0] months; p= 0.08) and higher C-reactive protein (2.4 [0.7-5.6] vs 1.3 [0.3-3.3] mg/dL; p=0.16). Despite these differences, similar outcomes were observed in both groups (log rank p=0.862) (Figure 1). Relevant adverse events were reported in 6 (11.1%) patients, but only 3 developed severe events that required TCZ withdrawal.

Table 1.Baselinen=54Month 1N=54Month 3N=49Month 6N=44Month 12N=36Clinical remission, n (%)12 (22.2)19 (38.8)23 (52.3)27 (75.0)Laboratory improvementCRP (mg/dL), median [IQR]1.5 [0.5-3.5]0.2 [0.1-0.7]*0.2 [0.5-0.5]*0.2 [0.1-0.5]*0.1 [0.0-0.4]*ESR (mm/1sthour), median [IQR]30.5 [8.7-52.7]7.0 [3.0-14.0]*4.5 [2.0-8.0]*5.0[2.0-6.0]*4.0 [2.0-9.5]*Hemoglobin (g/dL), mean ± SD12.4 ±1.513.0 ±1.2*13.0 ±1.4*13.2 ±1.5*12.9 ±1.6*Prednisone dose, median [IQR]30.0 [12.5-50.0]20.0 [10.0-30.0]*10.0 [5.0-20.0]*5.0 [5.0-10.5]*5.0 [0.0-5.6]*

CRP: C-Reactive Protein; ESR: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate; IQR: interquartile range; n: number. *p<0.01 vs baseline (Wilcoxon test).

Conclusion:

TCZ is effective and safe in white patients with refractory TAK. A discordance between clinical and imaging activity assessment may exist.

References:

[1]Prieto Peña D et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2020 Nov 27. PMID: 33253103.

[2]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2016; 34:S44-53. PMID: 27050507.

[3]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019; 49:126-35. PMID: 30655091

Disclosure of Interests:

Diana Prieto-Peña Grant/research support from: DP-P has received research support from UCB Pharma, Roche, Sanofi, Pfizer, AbbVie and Lilly., Pilar Bernabéu: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Mercedes Freire González: None declared, Beatriz González-Alvarez: None declared, Roser Solans-Laqué: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Carlos Fernández-Díaz: None declared, Esteban Rubio Romero: None declared, SALVADOR GARCÍA MORILLO: None declared, Mauricio Minguez: None declared, Cristina Fernández-Carballido: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, Sheila Melchor: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Beatriz Bravo: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Juan Salvatierra: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, C. Romero-Gómez: None declared, Patricia Moya: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, Javier Mendizabal: None declared, Francisco Miguel Ortiz Sanjuan: None declared, I. Pérez de Pedro: None declared, JOSE LUIS ALONSO VALDIVIESO: None declared, Pérez Sánchez Laura: None declared, Roldán Molina Rosa: None declared, Nagore Fernández-Llanio: None declared, Ricardo Gómez de la Torre: None declared, Silvia Suarez: None declared, María Jesús Montesa: None declared, Monica Delgado Sanchez: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Belén Atienza-Mateo: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: MAG-G received grants/research supports from Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche and had consultation fees/participation in company sponsored speaker´s bureau from Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: RB received grants/research supports from Abbvie, MSD and Roche, and had consultation fees/participation in company sponsored speaker´s bureau from Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD.

OP0065 TOCILIZUMAB IN VISUAL INVOLVEMENT OF GIANT CELL ARTERITIS. MULTICENTER STUDY OF 312 PATIENTS OF CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background:

Visual involvement is one of the most feared complication of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA).Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy and safety in large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) including GCA (1-4).

Objectives:

To assess the efficacy of TCZ to: a) prevent the appearance of new ocular involvement, and b) to improve visual symptoms if present.

Methods:

Observational, multicenter study of 312 patients with GCA treated with TCZ. Patients were diagnosed with GCA accordingly to a) ACR criteria, and/or b) biopsy of temporal artery, and/or c) presence of LVV by imaging.

Patients were divided into two subgroups: a) with, and b) without visual involvement at any time. Visual manifestations were classified as: a) Transient visual loss (TVL) (amaurosis fugax), b) Permanent visual loss (PVL) (longer than 24 hours) (partial or complete; unilateral or bilateral), c) diplopia, and d) blurred vision. Accordingly to visual duration up to TCZ onset, we considered: a) 1-10 days, b) 11-30 days, and c) more than 30 days.

Results:

We studied 312 (218 women/94 men; mean age73.4±9.6 years). Visual manifestations at any time (before and/or after TCZ) were observed in 78 (25%). In 47 of them visual manifestations were present at TCZ onset, and in the remaining 31 patients had had a complete recovery. Main clinical features of GCA with and without visual involvement are shown in TABLE. Patients with visual involvement were older, with other ischemic complications, and requiring more corticosteroids dose.

Table 1.

Main features of 312 patients at TCZ onset.

OverallN= 312GCA with visual involvement(n= 78)GCA without visual involvement(n=234)pGeneral featuresAge (mean±SD)73.4±9.676.6±8.072.4±9.80.001*Female/Male(% of female), n218/94 (70)47/31 (60)171/63(73)0.046*Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]8 [3-24]5 [1-14]10 [3-24]0.040*Positive TAB, n (%)137/229 (60)33/60 (55)104/169 (61)0.444Ischemic manifestationsVisual involvement, n (%)47 (15)47 (60)00.000*Headache, n (%)166 (53)59 (76)107 (46)0.000*Jaw claudication60 (19)26 (33)34 (14)0.001*Systemic manifestationsFever, n (%)27 (9)8 (10)19 (8)0.743Constitutional syndrome, n (%)115 (37)30 (38)85 (36)0.878PmR, n (%)188 (60)46 (59)142 (61)0.830Acute phase reactantsESR, mm/1st hour, median [IQR]27 [10-50]34.5 [15.2-58]26.0 [10.0-48.0]0.193CRP (mg/dL), median [IQR]1.4 [0.4-3.3]1.5 [0.3-5.5]1.3 [0.4-2.9]0.134Prednisone dose, mg/day, mean±SD22.3±16.627.1±18.620.8±15.60.008*TCZmono/TCZcombo, n (%)211/10157/21154/800.295Follow-up (months), mean±SD28.4±21.825.8±22.429.3±21.60.119

After TCZ onset, none patient developed new visual involvement. At TCZ onset 47 patients had the following visual manifestations; PVL (n= 28; unilateral/bilateral; 22/6), TVL (n=15; unilateral/bilateral; 9/6), diplopia (n=2) and blurred vision (n=2).

None of the patients with TVL presented new episodes after TCZ onset, while 8 out of 28 patients with PVL experienced partial improvement (FIGURE). The 2 patients with diplopia and 1 of 2 patients with blurred vision improved.

Figure 1.

Efficacy of TCZ in 47 patients with GCA and visual involvement at TCZ onset.

Conclusion:

TCZ seems to prevent the appearance of new ocular manifestations. When they are present, TCZ may improve totally TVL and partially PVL.

References:

[1]Stone JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 317-28.

[2]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019;49:126-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.003.

[3]Prieto Peña D et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2020 Nov 27. PMID: 33253103.

[4]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2016; 34:S44-53. PMID: 27050507.

Disclosure of Interests:

Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Javier Loricera: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco: None declared, Eztizen Labrador-Sánchez: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, Eva Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, Eva Perez-Pampín: None declared, Andrea García-Valle: None declared, Cristina Campos Fernández: None declared, Juan Ramón De Dios: None declared, Carlota Laura Iñíguez: None declared, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Julio Sánchez: None declared, Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Consultant of: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche

SAT0075 ABATACEPT IN COMBINATION WITH METOTREXATE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS ASSOCIATED TO INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE: NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY OF 263 PATIENTS

Background:

Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) is an extra-articular complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Conventional disease-modifying drugs (DMARDs) such as methotrexate (MTX) have been implicated in the development and exacerbation of a pre-existing ILD.

Objectives:

The aim of our study was to check the influence of combined MTX treatment in patients with RA-ILD treated with abatacept (ABA).

Methods:

National multicentre retrospective registry of 263 patients with RA-ILD treated with ABA. RA was diagnosed according to the ACR classification criteria of 1987 or by the EULAR/ACR criteria of 2010. ILD was diagnosed by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT). In this study we have done a subanalysis of the 46 patients treated with ABA in combination with MTX (ABA+MTX) vs. 217 patients treated with ABA in monotherapy or in combination with other synthetic DMARDs. Efficacy was evaluated according to the following parameters: a) Dyspnoea (MMRC) considering variations ≥ 1; b) Lung function test (LFT) considering variations ≥ 10% in FVC and a variation of DLCO ≥ 10%; c) Imaging test (HRCT) d) DAS28 score e) prednisone dose. Variables were collected at the beginning of the study and at months 3, 6, 12 and then every 12 months until a maximum of 60 months.

Results:

263 patients with ILD associated with RA were included in the study with mean age 64.64±10 years. RF or CCPA were positive in 235 (89.4%) and 233 (88.6%) cases, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 22.7±19.7 months. Baseline characteristics of both groups are shown in table 1, while data obtained during evolution of this complication are presented in Figure 1.

Conclusion:

Despite the baseline differences of both groups, the good evolution in the ABA+MTX subgroup suggests that this therapeutic strategy can be a safe combination for patients with RA-ILD.

ABA with MTX (n=46)ABA w/t MTX (n=217)PSex (F/M)28/18122/950.625Age (years)65.11±10.216.2±9.80.202RF/CCPA + (%)91.3/91.389.8/90.10.810Smoking or past smoking (%)47.855.10.417Follow-up (months)22.73±18.0022.3±20.850.916DAS28 at baseline4.08±1.514.61±1.470.056DAS28 at last visit3.00±1.463.13±1.310.642Prednisone at baseline, median (IQR) (mg)5 (5-7.5)7.75 (5-15)0.008*Prednisone at the end of study, median (IQR) (mg)5 (1-5)5 (5-7.5)0.032*DLCO at baseline (%)66.85±19.0465.43±18.210.823DLCO at the end of study (%)66.05±20.9565.17±19.720.831FVC at baseline (%)90.06±17.7785.40±21.560.164FVC at the end of study (%)90.58±15,4584.21±21.490.038*

Disclosure of Interests:

Carlos Fernández-Díaz Speakers bureau: Brystol Meyers Squibb, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Francisco Ortiz-Sanjuán: None declared, A. Juan-Mas: None declared, Carmen Carrasco-Cubero Speakers bureau: Janssen, MSD, AbbVie, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Celgene, S, Rodriguéz-Muguruza: None declared, S. Rodrigez -Garcia: None declared, R. Castellanos-Moreira: None declared, RAQUEL ALMODOVAR Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer.

, CLARA AGUILERA CROS: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco Consultant of: UCB, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Lilly, Sergi Ordoñez: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, C. Ojeda-Garcia: None declared, Manuel Moreno: None declared, Gemma Bonilla: None declared, I. Hernández-Rodriguez: None declared, Mireia Lopez Corbeto: None declared, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Trinidad Pérez Sandoval: None declared, Alejandra López Robles: None declared, Patricia Carreira Grant/research support from: Actelion, Roche, MSD, Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, VivaCell Biotechnology, Emerald Health Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Speakers bureau: Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Natalia Mena-Vázquez: None declared, C. Peralta-Ginés: None declared, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared, Luis Marcelino Arboleya Rodríguez: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, DESEADA PALMA SANCHEZ: None declared, Olga Maiz-Alonso: None declared, J. Fernández-Leroy: None declared, I. Cabezas-Rodriguez: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, A. Ruibal-Escribano: None declared, JR De Dios-Jiménez Aberásturi: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, C. González-Montagut Gómez: None declared, J M Blanco: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, N. Del-Val: None declared, M. Rodíguez-Gómez: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, E.C. Cervantes Pérez: None declared, A. Devicente-DelMas: None declared, Blanca Garcia-Magallon Consultant of: MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Amgen, Celgene, MSD, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sabela Fernández: None declared, Edilia García-Fernández: None declared, R. López-Sánchez: None declared, S. Castro: None declared, P. Morales-Garrido: None declared, Andrea García-Valle: None declared, Rosa Expósito: None declared, L. Exposito-Perez: None declared, Lorena Pérez Albaladejo: None declared, Ángel García-Aparicio: None declared, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD

SAT0270 TOCILIZUMAB IN REFRACTORY TAKAYASU ARTERITIS. OPEN-LABEL NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY OF 53 PATIENTS OF CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background:

Tocilizumab (TCZ) was recently approved for Takayasu Arteritis (TAK) in Japan based on the results of the TAKT trial(1).However, data in clinical practice in Europe and America are scarce(2).

Objectives:

To assess efficacy and safety of TCZ in TAK of clinical practice in Spain.

Methods:

Observational, open-label multicentre study of 53 TAK patients treated with TCZ due to refractoriness or adverse events of previous therapy. Outcomes variables were improvement of clinical features, acute phase reactants and glucocorticoid-sparing effect.

Results:

53 patients (46w/7m); mean age, 40.6±14.6 years at TCZ onset. TCZ was started after a median of 12 [3.0-48.0] months from TAK diagnosis. In addition to systemic corticosteroids and before TCZ they received conventional immunosuppressant drugs (n=42) and biologic therapy (n=14). TCZ was prescribed as standard I.V. (n=42; 79.2%) or subcutaneous (n=11; 20.8%). The initial dose was 8 mg/kg/IV/4 weeks or 162 mg/SC/week, respectively. TCZ was used in monotherapy or combined with immunosuppressants (n=32; 60.4%): methotrexate (n=27), azathioprine (n=2), cyclosporine (n=3). Main clinical features at TCZ onset were: malaise (n=30),limb claudication (n=22), headache (n=18), fever (n=14), abdominal pain (n=10), and chest pain (n=9). Most of the patients experienced a rapid and maintained clinical, analytical improvement(TABLE).After a median follow-up of 18.0 [7.0-45.0] months, TCZ was discontinued in 20 patients due to: sustained remission (n=6), relapse (n=6), adverse event (n=5), gestation (n=3). Most relevant adverse side effects were serious infections: pneumonia (n=2), herpes zoster (n=1), abdominal sepsis (n=1).

Table.Basal(N=53)Month 1(N=53)Month 3(N=46)Month 6(N=44)Month 12(N=34)Clinical improvement, n/N(%)Complete17/53 (32.1)19/46 (41.3)23/44 (52.3)26/34 (76.5)Partial30/53 (54.6)26/46 (56.5)18/44 (40.9)8/34 (23.5)No improvement6/53 (11.3)1/46 (2.2)3/44 (6.8)0/34 (0.0)Analytical markers,ESR (mm/1sth),median [IQR]35.0 [16.0-52.0]7.5 [3.0-14.0] *3.5 [2.0-8.0]*5.0[2.0-6.0]*5.0 [2.0-8.5]*CRP (mg/dL),median [IQR]1.7 [0.6 -3.5]0.21 [0.05-0.6]*0.14 [0.05-0.5]*0.14 [0.04-0.4]*0.10 [0.03-0.30]*Hb (g/dL),mean±SD12.3±1.512.8±1.2*12.9±1.3*12.9±1.4*12.9±1.4*Prednisone dose (mg/day),median [IQR]30.0 [15.0-50.0]20.0 [10.0-37.5]*10.0 [5.0-20.0]*5.0 [5.0-12.5]*5.0 [0.0-7.5]*

*Wilcoxon test p < 0.001.

Conclusion:

TCZ appears to be effective and safe in patients with refractory TAK in clinical practice.

References:

[1]Nakaoka Y et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:348-354

[2]Loricera J et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016; 34: S44-53.

Disclosure of Interests:

D. Prieto-Peña: None declared, Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, Pilar Bernabéu: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Mercedes Freire González: None declared, Beatriz González-Alvarez: None declared, Roser Solans-Laqué: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Carlos Fernández-Díaz Speakers bureau: Brystol Meyers Squibb, Esteban Rubio Romero: None declared, SALVADOR GARCÍA MORILLO: None declared, Mauricio Minguez: None declared, Cristina Fernández-Carballido Consultant of: Yes, I have received fees for scientific advice (Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly and Novartis), Speakers bureau: Yes, I have received fees as a speaker (Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis), Eugenio de Miguel Grant/research support from: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Consultant of: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Paid instructor for: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Speakers bureau: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Sheila Melchor: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Beatriz Bravo: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, J Salvatierra: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, C. Romero-Gómez: None declared, Patricia Moya: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, Javier Mendizabal: None declared, Francisco Miguel Ortiz Sanjuan: None declared, I. Pérez de Pedro: None declared, Javier Loricera: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma. MSD

FRI0487 APREMILAST IN MONOTHERAPY OR COMBINED IN NON-ULCER MANIFESTATIONS OF BEHÇET’S DISEASE. NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY OF 34 REFRACTORY CASES OF CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background:

Apremilast (APR) has demonstrated efficacy in orogenital ulcers of Behçet´s disease (BD). Response of other clinical manifestations remains unknown.

Objectives:

To assess the efficacy and safety of APR in monotherapy or combined with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in non-aphthous ulcers of BD.

Methods:

National multicenter open-label study on 34 BD patients treated with APR at maintained standard dose of 30 mg twice daily.

Results:

From a cohort of 51 patients with APR by refractory orogenital ulcers of BD, we selected 34 (24 women/10 men, mean age 43.8±14.3 years), cases with another clinical manifestation/s.

Excluding CTs, colchicine or NSAIDs, APR was given in monotherapy (n=21) or combined with conventional and/or biologic DMARDs in 13 cases (5 methotrexate, 3 azathioprine, 3 hydroxychloroquine, 1 sulfasalazine, 1 dapsone, 2 tocilizumab, 1 IFX). Other active manifestations present at APR onset were: arthralgia/arthritis (16, true arthritis in 5), folliculitis/pseudofolliculitis (14), erythema nodosum (3), furunculosis (2), paradoxical psoriasis by TNFi (2), intestinal ileitis (2), deep venous thrombosis (2), leg ulcers (1), erythematosus and scaly skin lesions (1), fever (1), unilateral anterior uveitis (1) and neurobehçet (1).

After a median follow-up of 6 [3-12] months, folliculitis and ileitis improved, neurobehçet remained stable and musculoskeletal manifestations evolved in a variable way.(TABLE)

TABLE.

Conclusion:

In addition of orogenital ulcers, APR in monotherapy or combined, seems to be useful in skin manifestations of BD

Disclosure of Interests:

Alba Herrero Morant: None declared, Belen Atienza Mateo: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Vanesa Calvo del Rio Grant/research support from: MSD and Roche, Speakers bureau: Abbott, Lilly, Celgene, Grünenthal, UCB Pharma, José Luis Martín-Varillas Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Janssen and Celgene, Speakers bureau: Pfizer and Lilly, Gerard Espinosa: None declared, Jenaro Graña: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Trinidad Pérez Sandoval: None declared, Manuel Martín Martínez: None declared, Elvira Diez: None declared, María Dolores García-Armario: None declared, Esperanza Martínez: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Patricia Moya Alvarado: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Jaime Calvo Grant/research support from: Lilly, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Jansen, Celgene, Isabel de la Morena: None declared, Francisco Ortiz Sanjuán: None declared, José Andrés Román Ivorra: None declared, Ana Pérez Gómez: None declared, Alejandro Olive: None declared, Carolina Díez: None declared, Juan José Alegre: None declared, D Ybáñez-García Speakers bureau: Lilly, Roche, Sanofi, Ángels Martínez-Ferrer: None declared, Javier Narvaez: None declared, Ignasi Figueras: None declared, Ana Isabel Turrión: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Pilar Trénor: None declared, Soledad Ojeda Speakers bureau: AMGEN, LILLY, GEBRO, Miguel Á. González-Gay Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen and MSD, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Lilly and MSD

THU0307 RESPONSE OF BEHÇET’S REFRACTORY ORAL AND/OR GENITAL ULCERS TO APREMILAST IN COMBINATION VS MONOTHERAPY. NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY OF 51 CASES OF CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background:

Apremilast (APR) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of oral and/or genital aphthous ulcers in Behçet´s disease (BD). Combination of APR to other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has not been assessed.

Objectives:

To compare the efficacy and safety of APR in monotherapy or combined with DMARDs in refractory BD.

Methods:

National multicenter open-label study on 51 BD patients with oral and/or genital ulcers refractory to conventional treatment.

Results:

We included 51 patients (35 women/16 men), mean age 44.7±13.2 years. Before APR, all patients had received several systemic conventional drugs. The main clinical symptoms for starting APR were oral (n=19) and genital (2) aphthous ulcers or both (30).

Excluding corticosteroids, colchicine or NSAIDs, APR was given at standard dose of 30 mg twice daily in monotherapy (n=31), or combined with conventional DMARDs in 16 cases (6 azathioprine, 5 methotrexate, 4 hydroxychloroquine, 4 sulfasalazine, 1 dapsone) or with biologic DMARDs in 4 (2 tocilizumab, 1 adalimumab, 1 infliximab). There were not found statistically significant differences in demographic features, previous therapy, clinical manifestations or reported adverse effects.

After a median follow-up of 6 [3-12] months, most of the patients experienced improvement of the orogenital ulcers in both groups (89.8% in the first 2 weeks), without statistically significant differences.(TABLE)

Conclusion:

APR leads to a rapid and maintained improvement in most patients with refractory BD orogenital ulcers. APR seems as effective and safe in monotherapy as combined.

TABLE:Week 1-2Week 4Month 6Month 12Month 24Outcome of oral and/or genital ulcers n, (%)Cn=19Mn=30Cn=19Mn=26Cn=12Mn=17Cn=7Mn=6Cn=1Mn=1 Complete resolution8 (42.1)11 (36.7)12 (63.2)20 (77)7 (58.4)14 (82.4)3 (42.8)3 (50)1 (100)1 (100) Partial resolution9 (47.4)16 (53.4)7 (36.8)3 (11.5)5 (41.6)2 (11.7)4 (57.2)3 (50)00 No response2 (10.5)3 (9.9)03 (11.5)01 (5.9)0000p value0.90.10.10.80.7

Abbreviations: C= combined; M= monotherapy; n= available data.

Disclosure of Interests:

Alba Herrero Morant: None declared, Belen Atienza Mateo: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Vanesa Calvo del Rio Grant/research support from: MSD and Roche, Speakers bureau: Abbott, Lilly, Celgene, Grünenthal, UCB Pharma, José Luis Martín-Varillas Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Janssen and Celgene, Speakers bureau: Pfizer and Lilly, Jenaro Graña: None declared, Gerard Espinosa: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Trinidad Pérez Sandoval: None declared, Manuel Martín Martínez: None declared, Elvira Diez: None declared, María Dolores García-Armario: None declared, Esperanza Martínez: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Patricia Moya Alvarado: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Jaime Calvo Grant/research support from: Lilly, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Jansen, Celgene, Isabel de la Morena: None declared, Francisco Ortiz Sanjuán: None declared, José Andrés Román Ivorra: None declared, Ana Pérez Gómez: None declared, Sergi Heredia: None declared, Alejandro Olive: None declared, Águeda Prior: None declared, Carolina Díez: None declared, Juanjo J Alegre-Sancho Consultant of: UCB, Roche, Sanofi, Boehringer, Celltrion, Paid instructor for: GSK, Speakers bureau: MSD, GSK, Lilly, Sanofi, Roche, UCB, Actelion, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, D Ybáñez-García Speakers bureau: Lilly, Roche, Sanofi, Ángels Martínez-Ferrer: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Ignasi Figueras: None declared, Ana Isabel Turrión: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Pilar Trénor: None declared, Soledad Ojeda Speakers bureau: AMGEN, LILLY, GEBRO, Miguel Á. González-Gay Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen and MSD, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Lilly and MSD

SAT0035 RESPONSE TO ABATACEPT OF DIFFERENT PATTERNS OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY OF 263 PATIENTS

Background:

Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) is a severe extraarticular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this line, several radiological patterns of RA-ILD have been described: i) usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), ii) nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), iii) obliterating bronchiolitis, iv) organized pneumonia and mixed patterns. Abatacept (ABA) could be an effective and safe option for patients with RA-ILD, although the response in the different radiological patterns is not well defined.

Objectives:

Our aim was to assess the response to ABA in different radiological patterns of ILD.

Methods:

Observational retrospective multicenter study of RA-ILD treated with ABA. ILD was diagnosed by HRCT and classified by radiological patterns in 3 different subgroups of RA-ILD: a) UIP, b) NSIP and c) “other”. ABA was used sc. or iv. at standard dose. We assessed: a) Dyspnoea (MMRC scale; significant variation ≥1); b) Respiratory function tests (significant changes ≥10% in FVC and DLCO); c) HRCT imaging; d) DAS28 e)prednisone dose.

Variables were collected at months 0, 3, 6, 12 months and subsequently every 12 months until a maximum of 60 months.

Results:

We included 263 patients: 106 UIP, 84 NSIP and 73 others (150 women / 113 men), mean age 64.64±10 years. Total patients positive for RF or CCPA were 235 (89.4%) and 233 (88.6%), respectively. In 26 out of 263 patients, the development of ILD was closely related to the administration of sDMARDs (MTX n = 11 and LFN n = 1) or bDMARDs (ETN n = 5, ADA n = 4, CZP n = 2 and IFX n = 3). Patient characteristics are shown in table 1. Figure 1 shows the evolution of the cases with available data after a mean follow-up of 22.7±19.7 months. Mean DLCO and FVC remained stable in the 3 groups without statistically significant changes, and all the groups showed a statistically significant reduction in DAS28 and prednisone dose.

Conclusion:

ABA could be a good choice of treatment in patients with RA-ILD independently of the radiological pattern of ILD.

Disclosure of Interests:

Carlos Fernández-Díaz Speakers bureau: Brystol Meyers Squibb, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Francisco Ortiz-Sanjuán: None declared, A. Juan-Mas: None declared, Carmen Carrasco-Cubero Speakers bureau: Janssen, MSD, AbbVie, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Celgene, S, Rodriguéz-Muguruza: None declared, S. Rodrigez -Garcia: None declared, R. Castellanos-Moreira: None declared, RAQUEL ALMODOVAR Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer.

, CLARA AGUILERA CROS: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco Consultant of: UCB, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Lilly, Sergi Ordoñez: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, C. Ojeda-Garcia: None declared, Manuel Moreno: None declared, Gemma Bonilla: None declared, I. Hernández-Rodriguez: None declared, Mireia Lopez Corbeto: None declared, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Trinidad Pérez Sandoval: None declared, Alejandra López Robles: None declared, Patricia Carreira Grant/research support from: Actelion, Roche, MSD, Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, VivaCell Biotechnology, Emerald Health Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Speakers bureau: Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Natalia Mena-Vázquez: None declared, C. Peralta-Ginés: None declared, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared, Luis Marcelino Arboleya Rodríguez: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, DESEADA PALMA SANCHEZ: None declared, Olga Maiz-Alonso: None declared, J. Fernández-Leroy: None declared, I. Cabezas-Rodriguez: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, A. Ruibal-Escribano: None declared, JR De Dios-Jiménez Aberásturi: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, C. González-Montagut Gómez: None declared, J M Blanco: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, N. Del-Val: None declared, M. Rodíguez-Gómez: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, E.C. Cervantes Pérez: None declared, A. Devicente-DelMas: None declared, Blanca Garcia-Magallon Consultant of: MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Amgen, Celgene, MSD, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sabela Fernández: None declared, R. López-Sánchez: None declared, Edilia García-Fernández: None declared, S. Castro: None declared, P. Morales-Garrido: None declared, Andrea García-Valle: None declared, Rosa Expósito: None declared, L. Exposito-Perez: None declared, Lorena Pérez Albaladejo: None declared, Ángel García-Aparicio: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD

FRI0132 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SWITCHING JAKINIBS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

Different Jakinibs (JAKi) have shown efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but in an important proportion of patients, insufficient response leads to therapy withdrawal. The different JAKi show variable selectivity for the four Jak isoforms (Jak1,2,3 y Tyk2) but there are no clinical trials analyzing the response to a JAKi after the suspension of another JAKi and therefore, observational data may be useful in this regard.

Objectives:

To describe efficacy and safety of the second JAKi in patients with suspension of the first due to failure or side effects.

Methods:

Spanish observational multicentric study. Data were retrospectively obtained from medical records of 28 patients with RA sequentially treated with baricitinib o tofacitinib in any order.

Results:

We identified 28 patients with RA treated with baricitinib and tofacitinib. Patient´s characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Half of the patients received tofacitinib first, and the other half baricitinib as the first JAKi. Mean survival for the first JAKi was 7,6 ± 6,1 months. The reason for withdrawal was inefficacy in 17 cases (61%) and adverse effects in 11 (39%). Mean follow-up after starting on the second JAKi was 9,6 ± 5,6 [3-19] months. Disease activity data along follow-up are depicted in Table 2. Survival on the second JAKi was 82% at 3, 76% at 6, and 62% at 12 months when 13 of the 21 patients maintained the therapy. In all 8 patients who discontinued the second JAKi, the reason was inefficacy. The treatment suspension rate was similar among patients discontinuing the first JAKi for inefficacy (n=5, 29,4%) or for adverse effects (n=3; 27,3%).

Table 1.

Baseline Charateristics.

N 28Clinical characteristicsFemale24 (86%)Age*61.2 ± 13.2ACPA (+)19 (67,9%)Erosions13 (46,4%)Extra-articular manifestations8 (28,6%)TJC*10,8 ± 5,4SJC *7,4 ± 4,6DAS28-CPR*5,4 ± 0,91 High disease activity71,5% Moderate disease activity23,8% Low disease activity4,7%Previous treatmentbDMARD24 (86%)N° of previous bDMARDs *3,9±2,2 iTNF75% No-iTNF67,9%

(*) Mean ± SD

Tabla 2.

Treatment results during the follow-up period.

Baseline (n 28)3 m (n 28)6 m (n 25)12 m (n 21)TJC10,8±5,43,8±3,34,23±2,51,9±1,5SJC7,2±4,61,8±1,71,7±20,7±1CPR mg/dL1±0,60,54±0,480,64±0,90,33±0,24DAS28CPR5,4±0,913,29±0,973,15±1,22,15±0,6Prednisone mg7,2±4,26,8±3,55,3±2,53,1±2,1

Conclusion:

Our data show that therapy with a second JAKi is a safe and efficacious option after discontinuation of the first JAKi due to either inefficacy or side effects. The response rate to the second JAKi is similar in patients with inefficacy or side effects which suggests that failure to the first does not reduce the chance of response to the second.

Acknowledgments:

M. Retuerto was recipient of a training grant from Sociedad Española de Reumatología (SER).

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

OP0212 ABATACEPT IN INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE ASSOCIATED WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY OF 263 PATIENTS

Background:

Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) is a severe complication of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Several conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) and biologic (b) DMARDs may induce or impaired ILD-RA. Abatacept (ABA) may be useful in ILD-RA (1).

Objectives:

To assess the efficacy and safety of ABA in a large series of ILD-RA for a long-term follow-up.

Methods:

Multicenter open-level study of ILD-RA treated with at least 1 dose of ABA. ILD was diagnosed by high-resolution computed tomography (HRTC). We study these outcomes: a) 1-point change Modied Medical Research Council (MMRC); b) forced vital capacity (FVC) and/or DLCO improvement or decline ≥10%; c) change in HRCT, d) change in DAS28. e) Prednisone dose. Values were collected at 0, 3, 6, 12 and then every 12 months.

Results:

We studied 263 patients (150 women/113 men) (mean age;64.6±10 years), with ILD-RA. At ABA-onset they were smokers or exsmoker (53.8%), positive APCC (88.6%), median [IQR] duration of ILD of 12 [3-41.25] months, mean DLCO (65.7±18.3) and FVC (85.9±21.8).

The ILD-pattern were usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) (40.3%), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (31.9%) and others (27.8%).

ABA was prescribed at standard subcutaneous (125 mg/w) in 196 (74.5%) or intravenously (10 mg/kg/4 w) in 67 (25.5%); in monotherapy (n=111) or combined with cDMARDs (n=152); especially leflunomide (n=55), MTX (n=46), or antimarials (n=21).

After a mean follow-up of 22.7±19.7 months most outcomes remain stable (Figure). Moreover, DAS28 improved from 4.5±1.5 to 3.1±1.3; prednisone dose reduced from a median 7.5 [5-10] to 5 mg [5-7.5] and retention rate was 76.4%. The main adverse effects were serious infections (n=28), neoplasia (n=3), serious infusion reaction (n=1) and myocardial infarction (n=1).

Conclusion:

ABA seems effective and relatively safe in ILD-RA.

References:

[1]Fernández-Díaz C et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018; 48:22-27

Disclosure of Interests:

Carlos Fernández-Díaz Speakers bureau: Brystol Meyers Squibb, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Francisco Ortiz-Sanjuán: None declared, A. Juan-Mas: None declared, Carmen Carrasco-Cubero Speakers bureau: Janssen, MSD, AbbVie, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Celgene, S, Rodriguéz-Muguruza: None declared, S. Rodrigez -Garcia: None declared, R. Castellanos-Moreira: None declared, RAQUEL ALMODOVAR Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer.

CLARA AGUILERA CROS: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco Consultant of: UCB, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Lilly, Sergi Ordoñez: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, C. Ojeda-Garcia: None declared, Manuel Moreno: None declared, Gemma Bonilla: None declared, I. Hernández-Rodriguez: None declared, Mireia Lopez Corbeto: None declared, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Trinidad Pérez Sandoval: None declared, Alejandra López Robles: None declared, Patricia Carreira Grant/research support from: Actelion, Roche, MSD, Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, VivaCell Biotechnology, Emerald Health Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Speakers bureau: Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Natalia Mena-Vázquez: None declared, C. Peralta-Ginés: None declared, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared, Luis Marcelino Arboleya Rodríguez: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, DESEADA PALMA SANCHEZ: None declared, Olga Maiz-Alonso: None declared, J. Fernández-Leroy: None declared, I. Cabezas-Rodriguez: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, A. Ruibal-Escribano: None declared, JR De Dios-Jiménez Aberásturi: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, C. González-Montagut Gómez: None declared, J M Blanco: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, N. Del-Val: None declared, M. Rodíguez-Gómez: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, E.C. Cervantes Pérez: None declared, A. Devicente-DelMas: None declared, Blanca Garcia-Magallon Consultant of: MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Amgen, Celgene, MSD, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sabela Fernández: None declared, Edilia García-Fernández: None declared, R. López-Sánchez: None declared, S. Castro: None declared, P. Morales-Garrido: None declared, Andrea García-Valle: None declared, Rosa Expósito: None declared, L. Exposito-Perez: None declared, Lorena Pérez Albaladejo: None declared, Ángel García-Aparicio: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD

[Dermatological emergencies: A descriptive study in a tertiary hospital]

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays, there is an increasing number of patients who seek emergency treatment for their dermatology complaints. However, it is unknown to what extent a skin disease is urgent enough to require immediate specialised care. Our aims were to assess the type and prevalence of the dermatological diseases treated in the division of Dermatology of a tertiary hospital, as well as to determine the main features of the patients with these disorders and the means of access to the Dermatology Department.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A descriptive and prospective study was conducted on patients with dermatological conditions diagnosed in the Dermatology outpatient clinic of a hospital during a 5 month period. For this purpose, the information corresponding to health cover, basic epidemiological characteristics, origin, diagnosis, and destiny of each patient was entered into a database.

RESULTS

The dermatologist attended 242 patients, of whom 49% were women and 51% men. The mean age was 49.2 years. The 78 different diagnoses made were grouped into 12 categories to facilitate analysis. According to this classification, most patients had eccemas (17.8%), followed by miscellaneous (17.4%), tumours and cysts (16.2%), and infectious dermatoses (15%). In 7 (2.9%) cases, the patient was admitted to hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Dermatological diseases attended to in the Dermatology Department were varied. The most common diagnoses were psoriasis, eccemas, and toxicoderma. The profile of the patient seeking emergency dermatological care is a person between the fourth and fifth decade of the life, who arrives directly to the Emergency Department without requesting previous assessment by a Primary Care physician. The most common reason for admission was erythrodermic psoriasis.

Non-infectious aortitis: a report of 32 cases from a single tertiary centre in a 4-year period and literature review

OBJECTIVES

Non-infectious aortitis often presents with non-specific symptoms leading to inappropriate diagnostic delay. We intend to describe the clinical spectrum and outcome of patients with aortitis diagnosed at a single centre.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical charts of patients diagnosed with non-infectious aortitis between January 2010 and December 2013 at the Rheumatology Division from a 1.000-bed tertiary teaching hospital from Northern Spain. The diagnosis of aortitis was usually based on FDG-PET-CT scan, and also occasionally on CT or MRI angiography or helical CT-scan.

RESULTS

During the period of assessment 32 patients (22 women and 10 men; mean age 68 years [range, 45-87]) were diagnosed with aortitis. The median interval from the onset of symptoms to the diagnosis was 21 months. FDG-PET CT scan was the most common tool used for the diagnosis of aortitis. The underlying conditions were the following: giant cell arteritis (n=13 cases); isolated polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) (n=11); Sjögren's syndrome (n=2), Takayasu arteritis (n= 1); sarcoidosis (n=1), ulcerative colitis (n=1), psoriatic arthritis (n=1), and large-vessel vasculitis that also involved the aorta (n=2). The most common clinical manifestations at diagnosis were: PMR features, often with atypical clinical presentation (n=23 patients, 72%); diffuse lower limb pain (n=16 patients, 50%); constitutional symptoms (n=12 patients, 37%), inflammatory low back pain (n=9 patients, 28%) and fever (n=7 patients, 22%). Acute phase reactants were increased in most cases (median erythrocyte sedimentation rate 46 mm/1st hour, and a median serum C-reactive protein 1.5 mg/dL).

CONCLUSIONS

Aortitis is not an uncommon condition. The diagnosis is often delayed. Atypical PMR features, unexplained low back or limb pain, constitutional symptoms along with increased acute phase reactants should be considered 'red flags' to suspect the presence of aortitis.

Applicability of the 2006 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria for the classification of Henoch-Schönlein purpura. An analysis based on 766 patients with cutaneous vasculitis

OBJECTIVES

In 2006 the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) proposed new classification criteria for Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP). We aimed to establish the applicability of these criteria in patients with primary cutaneous vasculitis (CV). We also compared these criteria with previously established classification criteria for HSP.

METHODS

A series of 766 (346 women/420 men; mean age 34 years) consecutive unselected patients with CV was assessed. One hundred and twenty-four of them with secondary CV or with CV associated with other well defined entities were excluded from the analysis. The 2006 EULAR criteria for HSP were tested in the remaining 642 patients with primary CV. Two sets of criteria for HSP were used for comparisons: a) the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR-1990), and b) the ACR modified criteria proposed by Michel et al. in 1992 (Michel-1992).

RESULTS

451 (70.2%) of 642 patients were classified as having HSP according to the EULAR-2006 criteria, 405 (63.1%) using the ACR-1990 criteria, and 392 (61.1%) by the Michel-1992 criteria. However, only 336 patients (52.3%) met at the same time the EULAR-2006 and the ACR-1990 criteria, and only 229 patients (35.7%) fulfilled both the EULAR-2006 and Michel-1992 criteria. It is noteworthy that only 276 (43%) patients met the three set of criteria. Children fulfilled all the sets of criteria more commonly than adults (215 [66.6%] of 323 vs. 61 [19%] of 319, respectively; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, the EULAR-2006 criteria show low concordance with previous sets of classification criteria used for HSP.

Cutaneous vasculitis associated with severe bacterial infections. A study of 27 patients from a series of 766 cutaneous vasculitis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical spectrum of severe bacterial infections presenting as cutaneous vasculitis (CV) in a defined population.

METHODS

Unselected series of 766 patients with CV diagnosed at a single university referral center.

RESULTS

An underlying severe bacterial infection was diagnosed in 27 (22 men/5 women; mean age ± standard deviation [SD]: 53 ± 18 years) of 766 cases presenting with CV (3.5%). These infections were: pneumonia (n=8), endocarditis (n=6), meningitis (n=4), intra-abdominal infections (n=3), septic arthritis (n=2), septicaemia (n=2), septic bursitis (n=1), and urinary tract infection (n=1). All the patients were admitted for suspected CV. The median delay from admission to the diagnosis of infection was 4 days. A typical palpable purpura without relevant visceral vasculitic involvement was the main clinical manifestation. Patients with severe bacterial infections were older, with male predominance, had more frequently fever, constitutional symptoms, focal infectious features, and leukocytosis with left shift and anaemia than the remaining patients with CV. Although antibiotics were prescribed in all the patients, seven also required the use of low-dose corticosteroids to achieve complete resolution of the cutaneous lesions. Most patients experienced full recovery but two of them underwent prosthetic cardiac valve replacement, and another two died due to infection-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

CV may be the presenting manifestation of a severe underlying bacterial infection. Physicians should keep in mind this fact to make an early diagnosis of infection and, consequently, prevent life-threatening complications.