Changes in intracortical excitability induced by stimulation of wrist afferents in man

1. Inhibitory and facilitatory neuronal circuits may be explored in the human motor cortex by double pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). At short interstimulus intervals (2-5 ms), conditioned motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are reduced (intracortical inhibition, ICI), whereas they are facilitated at longer interstimulus intervals (8-25 ms; intracortical facilitation, ICF). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of homonymous and antagonist nerve stimulation on the intracortical inhibition and facilitation in the cortical areas that control the wrist extensor and flexor radialis muscles. 2. Sixteen subjects were asked to contract either their wrist extensor or flexor muscles. The MEP evoked by a test TMS (at 1.2 x MEP threshold) and recorded in the target muscle was then conditioned by subthreshold TMS (at 0.8 x MEP threshold) 2 and 14 ms before the test TMS. The median and radial nerves were stimulated at 0.8 x motor threshold (MT). 3. In both flexor and extensor muscles, antagonist nerve stimulation 40 ms before the test TMS decreased ICI and increased ICF. In contrast, homonymous nerve stimulation had no effect on ICI and ICF. 4. The intensity of the antagonist nerve stimulation required to alter ICI and ICF was as low as 0.6 x MT, which suggests that thick diameter afferents may be involved. The nerve stimulation had to be applied 35-45 ms prior to the test TMS to alter significantly the intracortical excitability. 5. Cutaneous afferents were probably not responsible for the alterations of intracortical excitability, since cutaneous stimulation had no effect on either ICI or ICF at the investigated intervals. 6. The present data suggest that antagonist muscular afferent inputs may evoke reciprocal facilitation or disinhibition at the cortical level. This pattern of antagonist sensory afferent effects may be of significance for control of the wrist extensor and flexor muscles when used as synergists during manipulatory finger movements and gripping tasks.

Mechanical cutaneous stimulation alters Ia presynaptic inhibition in human wrist extensor muscles: a single motor unit study

Reflex responses were evoked by radial nerve stimulation in 25 single motor units in the extensor carpi radialis muscles of seven subjects during voluntary isometric wrist extension. The responses consisted of narrow peaks in the post-stimulus time histograms with latencies compatible with monosynaptic activation. When the skin of the palm and finger tips was continuously swept using a soft rotating brush, the purely monosynaptic components of the motor unit responses, as assessed from the contents of the first two 0.25 ms bins of the peak, were found to increase. This increase did not affect the motoneurone net excitatory drive, as assessed by measuring the mean duration of the inter-spike intervals. The cutaneous inputs activated by the brush may have reduced the tonic presynaptic inhibition exerted on the Ia afferents homonymous to the extensor motor units tested. To further investigate whether Ia presynaptic inhibition was involved, the responses of the extensor motor units were conditioned by stimulating the median nerve 20 ms earlier, using a protocol which is known to induce Ia extensor presynaptic inhibition originating from flexor Ia afferents. The median nerve stimulation did not affect the motoneurone excitatory drive, but led to a decrease in the responses of the extensor motor units to the radial nerve stimulation, especially in the purely monosynaptic components. This decrease was consistent with the Ia presynaptic inhibition known to occur under these stimulation conditions. The cutaneous inputs activated by the brush were found to reduce the Ia presynaptic inhibition generated by the median nerve stimulation, without affecting the distribution of the Ia presynaptic inhibition among the various types of motor units tested. The present data suggest that cutaneous inputs from the palm and finger tips may relieve the Ia presynaptic inhibition exerted on the wrist extensor motor nuclei, and thus enhance the proprioceptive assistance to fit the specific requirements of the ongoing motor task.

Proprioceptive control of wrist extensor motor units in humans: dependence on handedness

The effectiveness of the monosynaptic proprioceptive assistance to the wrist extensor motoneurone activity was investigated during voluntary contraction in relation to the subjects' handedness. The reflex responses of 411 single motor units to homonymous tendon taps were recorded in the wrist extensor carpi radialis muscles in both arms of five right-handed and five left-handed subjects. In the right-handed subjects, the motor unit reflex responses were clearly lateralized in favour of their right arm, whereas no side-related differences were observed in the left-handed subjects, whatever the motor units' mechanical properties and firing rates. When the muscle spindle sensitivity was by-passed by electrically stimulating the primary afferents in both arms of three right-handed and three left-handed subjects, no side-related differences were observed in the Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) amplitude in either of the two lateralization groups. The effectiveness of the primary afferent synapses on to the motoneurones therefore does not seem to depend on the subject's handedness. Without excluding the possibility of structural changes being involved at the periphery, the comparisons carried out on the data obtained using electrical vs mechanical stimulation suggest that the asymmetrical effectiveness of the proprioceptive assistance observed in favour of the right arm in the right-handed subjects might result from either the gamma or beta drive being more efficient. This asymmetry might result from the preferential use of the right hand in skilled movements. In a predominantly right-handed world, however, left-handed people might tend to develop the ability to use their right arm almost as skillfully as their preferred left arm, which could explain the symmetrical effectiveness of the proprioceptive assistance observed here in the left-handers' wrist extensor muscles.

Ia presynaptic inhibition in human wrist extensor muscles: effects of motor task and cutaneous afferent activity

The task-dependence of the presynaptic inhibition of the muscle spindle primary afferents in human forearm muscles was studied, focusing in particular on the modulation associated with the co-contraction of antagonist muscles and the activation of cutaneous afferents. The changes known to affect the motoneuron proprioceptive assistance during antagonist muscle co-activation in human leg and arm muscles were compared. The evidence available so far that these changes might reflect changes in the presynaptic inhibition of the muscle spindle afferent is briefly reviewed. The possible reasons for changes in presynaptic inhibition during the antagonist muscle co-contraction are discussed. Some new experiments on the wrist extensor muscles are briefly described. The results showed that the changes in the Ia presynaptic inhibition occurring during the co-contraction of the wrist flexor and extensor muscles while the hand cutaneous receptors were being activated (the subject's hand was clenched around a manipulandum) could be mimicked by contracting the wrist extensor muscles alone while applying extraneous stimulation to the hand cutaneous receptors. It is concluded that besides the possible contribution of inputs generated by the co-contraction of antagonist muscles and by supraspinal pathways, cutaneous inputs may play a major role in modulating the proprioceptive assistance during manipulatory movements.

Distribution of presynaptic inhibition on type-identified motoneurones in the extensor carpi radialis pool in man

The question was addressed as to whether the magnitude of Ia presynaptic inhibition might depend on the type of motor unit activated during voluntary contraction in the wrist extensor muscles. For this purpose, we investigated the effects of applying electrical stimulation to the median nerve on the responses of 25 identified motor units to radial nerve stimulation delivered 20 ms after a conditioning stimulation. The reflex responses of the motor units yielded peaks in the post-stimulus time histograms with latencies compatible with monosynaptic activation. Although median nerve stimulation did not affect the motoneurone net excitatory drive assessed from the mean duration of the inter-spike interval, it led to a decrease in the contents of the first two 0.25 ms bins of the peak. This decrease may be consistent with the Ia presynaptic inhibition known to occur under these stimulation conditions. In the trials in which the median nerve was being stimulated, the finding that the response probability of the motor units, even in their monosynaptic components, tended to increase as their force threshold and their macro-potential area increased and as their twitch contraction time decreased suggests that the median nerve stimulation may have altered the efficiency with which the Ia inputs recruited the motoneurones in the pool. These effects were consistently observed in seven pairs of motor units each consisting of one slow and one fast contracting motor unit which were simultaneously tested, which suggests that the magnitude of the Ia presynaptic inhibition may depend on the type of motor unit tested rather than on the motoneurone pool excitatory drive. The present data suggest for the first time that in humans, the Ia presynaptic inhibition may show an upward gradient working from fast to slow contracting motor units which is able to compensate for the downward gradient in monosynaptic reflex excitation from 'slow' to 'fast' motor units. From a functional point of view, a weaker Ia presynaptic inhibition acting on the fast contracting motor units may contribute to improving the proprioceptive assistance to the wrist myotatic unit when the contraction force has to be increased.

Task dependence of Ia presynaptic inhibition in human wrist extensor muscles: a single motor unit study

OBJECTIVE

Task-dependent changes in the Ia presynaptic inhibition generated by flexor group I afferents were investigated in 25 identified motor units (MUs) located in human extensor carpi radialis (ECR) muscles.

METHODS

Seven subjects had to voluntarily contract their ECR muscles either alone during isometric wrist extension or concurrently with their wrist and finger flexor muscles while clenching their hand around a manipulandum. The MU reflex responses to the radial nerve stimulation (test stimulation) yielded narrow peaks in the post-stimulus time histograms (PSTH). The Ia presynaptic inhibition induced while stimulating the median nerve (conditioning stimulation) 20 and 40 ms before the radial nerve was assessed from the changes in the contents of the first 0.5 ms in the peaks.

RESULTS

With both stimulation intervals, the Ia presynaptic inhibition, as assessed from the first 0.5 ms of the PSTH peaks, was consistently weaker during hand clenching. With both motor tasks, the Ia presynaptic inhibition was strongest at the 20 ms interval, in which it showed a downward gradient, working from slow to fast contracting MUs. With both intervals, the presynaptic inhibition was consistently weaker during hand clenching. The decrease in the Ia presynaptic inhibition observed at the 40 ms conditioning-test interval was less pronounced during wrist extension.

CONCLUSION

It is suggested that the reason why Ia presynaptic inhibition was weaker during hand clenching may have been that this task involved numerous cutaneous inputs originating from the palm and finger tips. During gripping tasks, these cutaneous inputs may therefore contribute to adjusting the wrist stiffness by relieving the presynaptic inhibition.

Inhibition versus facilitation of the reflex responsiveness of identified wrist extensor motor units by antagonist flexor afferent inputs in humans

The question of whether Ia reciprocal inhibition might depend on the motor task and on the type of motor unit activated was investigated in the human extensor carpi radialis muscles. Ia reciprocal inhibition induced by stimulating the median nerve (conditioning stimulation) was estimated by measuring the changes in the firing probability of 37 extensor motor units in response to the radial nerve stimulation (100 test stimuli) delivered 1 ms after the conditioning stimulation. Six subjects were asked to perform a task consisting of either selectively contracting their wrist extensor muscles or co-activating their wrist and finger antagonist muscles by clenching their hand around a manipulandum. In the control recordings (test stimulation alone), the mean response probability of the 37 motor units was found to be greater during hand clenching. The motor units were identified on the basis of their force thresholds, their macro-potentials, and their twitch contraction times. The data obtained in the control recordings were consistent with the size principle. In the recordings where the responses were conditioned by applying median nerve stimulation, the response probability of the motor units with low force thresholds, small macro-potential areas, and long twitch contraction times tended to decrease, in line with the presence of Ia reciprocal inhibition, whereas the response probability of the motor units with higher force thresholds, larger macro-potential areas, and shorter twitch contraction times tended to increase. The median nerve stimulation may therefore have altered the efficiency with which the extensor Ia inputs recruited the homonymous motoneurones in the pool. The flexor group I afferents activated while the median nerve was stimulated had inhibitory effects on the slow contracting motor units, and facilitatory effects mainly on the fast contracting motor units. Both of these effects were stronger during hand clenching, in which the numerous cutaneous receptors of the palm and fingertips are liable to be activated. Besides their own effects on the excitability of the various types of motor units, cutaneous inputs are known to potentiate the Ib interneurones. In addition, the effects of the conditioning stimulation were superimposed on the tonic activity of the Ia and Ib afferents from the flexor wrist and finger muscles. This may explain why both the inhibitory and facilitatory effects of the median nerve stimulation were enhanced during hand clenching.

Changes in the tonic activity of wrist extensor motor units induced by stimulating antagonistic group I afferents in humans

The question as to whether the firing patterns of low- and high-threshold motor units in the extensor carpi radialis muscles are affected differently by group I afferents from the wrist flexors depending on the motor task being performed was investigated in six subjects. The motor units were voluntarily activated during a task consisting of either selectively contracting the wrist extensor muscles or co-activating the wrist and finger antagonist muscles by clenching the hand around a manipulandum. The motor units (n=40) were identified on the basis of their firing thresholds, their macro-potential areas, and their twitch contraction times. The effects on the motor-unit tonic activity of stimulating the wrist flexor afferents were assessed in terms of the changes in the firing probability, which were analysed after computing peri-stimulus time histograms using the cumulative sum procedure. Median nerve stimulation induced four main changes in the tonic firing pattern of the extensor motor units. An early, short-lasting increase in the firing probability (event E1) was found to occur in the high-threshold motor units, either in both tasks (6/13) or only during hand clenching (2/13). A short-latency decrease in the firing probability (event E2) was found to occur in all the motor units, the amount of which increased from the fast- to slowly contracting motor units, especially during hand clenching. A later decrease (event E3) followed by a large, late increase (event E4) in the tonic activity of the motor units was found to occur in all the motor units, without any task-dependent effects. All these various events were consistently observed in 12 pairs of motor units, each consisting of one slowly and one fast-contracting motor unit, which were tested simultaneously. These findings suggest that median nerve stimulation may selectively alter the tonic firing patterns of identified extensor motor units, depending on their functional characteristics (recruitment threshold, motor unit macro-potential area, contraction time) rather than on the excitatory drive to the motoneurone pool. The possible origins of these various events are discussed, and it is argued that, in the wrist extensor and flexor muscles that act as synergists during manipulatory finger movements and gripping tasks, the spinal pathways which assist the voluntary command may selectively modulate the firing patterns of identified motor units, to fit the requirements of the on-going motor task.