The effect of kyphosis on the mechanical strength of a long-segment posterior construct using a synthetic model

STUDY DESIGN

This experimental study used synthetic spine models to compare the effect of the angle of kyphosis, rod diameter, and hook number on the biomechanical stiffness of a long-segment posterior spinal construct.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the biomechanical effects of incremental kyphosis on variously instrumented long-segment posterior spinal constructs.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Euler's formula for loading of curved long columns would suggest that kyphosis has a profound impact on the biomechanical behavior of long-segment posterior spinal constructs. The effects of sagittal contour on the mechanical properties of long-segment posterior spinal constructs have not been well documented.

METHODS

Kyphotic and straight synthetic spine models were used to test long-segment posterior instrumentation constructs biomechanically while varying rod diameter and the number of hook sites. The synthetic spines, composed of polypropylene vertebral blocks and isoprene elastomer intervertebral spacers, were fabricated with either 0 degrees, 27 degrees, or 53 degrees of sagittal contour. The models were instrumented with 5.5- or 6.35-mm titanium rods, and with either 8 or 12 hooks. The models were loaded from 0 to 300 N in a cyclical ramp fashion using an MTS 858 Bionix testing device testing device. Construct stiffness (force and displacement) during axial compression was determined.

RESULTS

Straight model: Changing the hook number from 8 to 12 caused a 32% increase in construct stiffness with the 5.5-mm rod. Changing the rod diameter from 5.5 to 6.35 mm caused a 36% increase in construct stiffness with the 8-hook pattern. Changing both the rods and hooks caused the stiffness to increase 44%. 27 degrees

MODEL

Changing the hook number from 8 to 12 caused a 20% increase in construct stiffness with the 6.5-mm rod. Changing the rod diameter from 5.5 to 6.35 mm caused a 29% increase in construct stiffness with the 12-hook pattern. Changing both the rods and hooks caused the construct stiffness to increase 26%. 53 degrees

MODEL

Changing the hook number from 8 to 12 caused a 14% increase in construct stiffness with the 6.35-mm rod. Changing the rod diameter from 5.5 to 6.35 mm caused a 17% (P<0.0005) increase in construct stiffness with the 12-hookpattern. Changing both rods and hooks caused the stiffness to increase 21%. Summary data on angular kyphosis: Using the same rod diameter and the same number of hooks, and progressing from a straight alignment to 27 degrees of sagittal contour decreased construct stiffness 32%. Going from straight alignment to 53 degrees decreased the stiffness 59.6%. All reported values were statistically significant (P < 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

The biomechanical stiffness of the straight spine was sensitive to both an increase in hook fixation sites and an increase in rod diameter. The kyphotic spines, however, were more sensitive to variations in rod diameter. Although with increasing kyphosis, the optimum instrumentation strategy will maximize both rod diameter and the number of hook sites, instrumented kyphotic spines remain biomechanically "disadvantaged" as compared with nonkyphotic instrumented spines.

Meta-analysis of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A 35-year English literature review of 11,000 patients

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis of the English literature on the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

OBJECTIVE

To gather comparable data from a number of different sources and combine the data to create a larger, more statistically significant pool of information for the analysis of surgical outcome.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Meta-analysis is a technique of scientific literature review used in outcome evaluation of medical treatment. This technique has been applied to the surgical outcome of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS

A structured literature review was performed that cross-referenced English literature articles pertaining to the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a focus on patient-based outcomes. Measures of patient satisfaction were compared with process measures of care.

RESULTS

A number of patients (10,989) were reviewed in 139 patient populations. Unspecified curve types (9424) and King curve types (1565) were reviewed over a 35-year period from 1958 to 1993. Of the patients, 87.32% were studied retrospectively and 12.70% prospectively. Effect-weighted follow-up was 6.8 years. Only studies with complete process and patient data for unspecified or King curve types were included for satisfaction correlation calculations. Pearson product moment correlation for n = 33 studies, n' = 2926 patients revealed a positive r' = 0.628 correlation between degree of curve correction and percent satisfaction per study. To determine the degree of curvature correction resulting in patient satisfaction, a stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed with level of confidence (P < or = 0.05). Of significance was that the degree of curvature corrected accounted for all the satisfaction variance predicted. A significant correction exists between degree of curve correction and percent of patients satisfied. The percent of correction and the Group type (either unspecified or King classified), did not significantly alter this prediction. The best predictor of satisfaction appears to be degree of curve correction according to these data.

CONCLUSION

Patients appear to be more satisfied by the magnitude of curve correction rather than the percent of curve correction. The degree of curvature before surgery did not predict patient satisfaction. Pearsons r' = 0.045. Satisfaction appears to be best predicted by the degree of correction only and not by the percent curve correction, the curve magnitude before surgery, nor the Group type (King, unspecified). Patient satisfaction is subjective. It does not reflect the benefits of surgery with respect to the future preservation of pulmonary function in thoracic curves nor the prevention of osteoarthritis in lumbar curves.