Prospective randomized trial of maintenance immunosuppression with rapid discontinuation of prednisone in adult kidney transplantation

Rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDP) has minimized steroid-related complications following kidney transplant (KT). This trial compares long-term (10-year) outcomes with three different maintenance immunosuppressive protocols following RDP in adult KT. Recipients (n=440; 73% living donor) from March 2001 to April 2006 were randomized into one of three arms: cyclosporine (CSA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (CSA/MMF, n=151); high-level tacrolimus (TAC, 8-12 μg/L) and low-level sirolimus (SIR, 3-7 μg/L) (TACH/SIRL, n=149) or low-level TAC (3-7 μg/L) and high-level SIR (8-12 μg/L) (TACL/SIR(H) , n=140). Median follow-up was ∼7 years. There were no differences between arms in 10-year actuarial patient, graft and death-censored graft survival or in allograft function. There were no differences in the 10-year actuarial rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection (30%, 26% and 20% in CSA/MMF, TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH) and chronic rejection (38%, 35% and 31% in CSA/MMF, TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH). Rates of new-onset diabetes mellitus were higher with TACH/SIRL (p=0.04), and rates of anemia were higher with TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH (p=0.04). No differences were found in the overall rates of 16 other post-KT complications. These data indicate that RDP-based protocol yield acceptable 10-year outcomes, but side effects differ based on the maintenance regimen used and should be considered when optimizing immunosuppression following RDP.

2202 kidney transplant recipients with 10 years of graft function: what happens next?

The ultimate goal of clinical transplantation is for the recipients to achieve long-term survival, with continuing graft function, that is equivalent to that of the age-matched general population. We studied subsequent outcome in kidney transplant recipients with 10 years of graft function. In all, 2202 kidney transplant recipients survived with graft function >10 years. For 10-year survivors, the actuarial 25-year patient survival rate for primary transplant living donor (LD) recipients was 57%; graft survival, 43%. For primary transplant deceased donor (DD) recipients, the actuarial 25-year patient survival rate was 39%; graft survival, 27%. The two major causes of late graft loss were death (with graft function) and chronic allograft nephropathy (tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis). The two major causes of death with function were cardiovascular disease (CVD) and malignancy. For nondiabetic recipients, the mean age at death with function from CVD was 54 +/- 13 years; for diabetic recipients, 53 +/- 7 years. By 20 years posttransplant, morbidity was common: >40% recipients had skin cancer (mean age for nondiabetic recipients, 53 +/- 13 years; for diabetics, 49 +/- 8 years), >10% had non-skin cancer (mean age for nondiabetic recipients, 53 +/- 16 years; for diabetics, 46 +/- 9 years), and >30% had CVD (mean age for nondiabetic recipients, 53 +/- 15 years; for diabetics, 47 +/- 9 years). We conclude that long-term transplant recipients have a high rate of morbidity and early mortality. As short-term results have improved, more focus is needed on long-term outcome.

Increased urologic complications in children after kidney transplants for obstructive and reflux uropathy

In the cyclosporine era, reports on pediatric kidney transplant (KTx) patients with obstructive and reflux uropathy are limited by small numbers, short follow-up, and/or lack of control groups. Our single-center study evaluated long-term outcomes (patient and graft survival, urinary tract infections [UTIs], urologic complications) in a large cohort of KTx recipients (<20 years old). We matched our 117 study patients with obstructive and reflux uropathy with 117 controls whose KTx was needed for other reasons; all 234 underwent their KTx between April 25, 1984, and October 23, 2002. The mean age was 8.0 +/- 6.2 years; mean follow-up, 133 +/- 67 months. The urologic complication rate was higher in study patients (43%) than in controls (11%) (p < 0.0001), as was the UTI rate (45% vs. 2%; p < 0.0001). The metabolic acidosis and UTI rates were higher in study patients who did (vs. did not) undergo bladder augmentation (p < 0.0001). We found no significant difference between study patients and controls in patient or graft survival, acute or chronic rejection, or mean estimated glomerular filtration rates. Unique to our study is the finding of higher metabolic acidosis and UTI rates in study patients who underwent bladder augmentation.

Evolution of immunosuppression at the University of Minnesota

Immunosuppressive protocols at the University of Minnesota have evolved from identical immunosuppression for all recipients (prednisone, azathioprine, and antilymphocyte globulin) to differing protocols for living (triple therapy) and cadaver (sequential therapy) donor recipients, and then to our current protocol in which all recipients receive induction therapy with rapid discontinuation of prednisone. At the same time, progress has been made in the prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection along with numerous parallel improvements in patient care, including in anesthesia, dialysis, and intensive care unit care. The net result has been an incremental improvement in recipient and graft survival.

Kidney transplantation in young children: should there be a minimum age?

The optimal age for transplantation in children with end-stage renal disease remains controversial. Many centers have adopted a policy of waiting until such children reach a certain minimum age or weight, maintaining them on chronic dialysis until then. Their policy is based on historical data showing inferior graft survival in very young children. We feel that with proper donor selection and recipient care, comparable results can be achieved in very young age groups. We herein present our results with kidney transplantation in children <1 year old. Between 1 January 1984 and 31 December 1999, we performed 321 kidney transplants in children < or =13 years at the University of Minnesota. We analyzed our results in three age groups: <1 year (n=30), 1 through 4 years (n=122), and 5 through 13 years (n=169). We found no significant differences in patient or graft survival rates between the three groups. Almost all our infant (<1 year) recipients underwent primary transplants from living donors (LDs). However, even when we compared results only of primary LD transplants between the three groups, we found no significant differences. To date, all our infant recipients are alive and well, 24 (80%) with a functioning original graft. Causes of the 6 graft losses were chronic rejection (n=3), vascular thrombosis (n=2), and recurrent disease (n=1). Infants had significantly lower incidences of acute and chronic rejection compared with older recipients, but a tendency to higher incidences of delayed graft function and vascular thrombosis. Infants had significant increases in weight post transplant: the mean standard deviation score rose from -2.8 pre transplant to -0.2 by age 5 years and to +1.8 by age 10 years. The improvement in height was less marked: the mean standard deviation rose from -3.2 pre transplant to -1.6 by age 5 years and to -1.4 by age 10 years. Kidney transplant results in very young children can be comparable to those in older children. There need be no minimum age for performing a kidney transplant. The timing of the transplant should not be based on age or size alone.

5,000 kidney transplants--a single-center experience

Between 6/1963 and 12/1998, 5,069 kidney transplants were done at the University of Minnesota. Of these, about half have been living donor, half cadaver. The majority (83%) have been primary transplants. Recipients were grouped in 6 eras based on changes in our immunosuppressive protocols--6/63-12/67 (n = 98); 1/68-7/79 (n = 1,188); 8/79-6/84 (n = 789); 7/84-9/90 (n = 1,006); 10/90-12/95 (n = 1,050; 1/96-12/98 (n = 718)--and their outcomes were compared. Recent eras contained a higher proportion of recipients aged > 50. Since the inception of the program, there has been a steady improvement in actuarial patient survival, graft survival, and death-censored graft survival. Short-term outcome for primary and retransplant recipients has been similar; however, long-term outcome seems worse for retransplant recipients. Importantly, acute rejection and infectious death have become rare causes of graft loss. Chronic rejection and death with function (most often due to a cardiovascular event) have become the predominant causes of graft loss. Recent changes in immunosuppressive protocols (Era VI) have included more aggressive attempts to maintain CsA levels > 150 ng/ml (by HPLC) in the first 3 months and the substitution of mycophenolate mofetil for azathioprine. As a result, the incidence of acute and chronic rejection has decreased and graft survival has improved.

Rapid discontinuation of steroids in living donor kidney transplantation: a pilot study

Steroids are associated with significant postoperative complications (hypertension, cosmetic changes, bone loss, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and cataracts). Most develop early; in addition, late post-transplant steroid withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients has been associated with increased acute rejection (AR). To obviate these problems, we studied outcome of a protocol of rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDS) (steroids stopped on POD6). Between November 1, 1999 and October 31, 2000, 51 adult living donor (LD) first transplant recipients (2 HLA-id, 28 non-id relative, 21 LURD) were immunosuppressed with thymoglobulin (1.25 mg/kg intraoperatively and then qdx4); prednisone (P) (500 mg methylprednisolone intraoperatively, 1 mg/kg x 1 day, 0.5 mg/kg x 2 days, 0.25 mg/kg x 2 days, then d/c); MMF, 1 g b.i.d.; and CSA, 4 mg/kg b.i.d. adjusted to achieve levels of 150-200 ng/mL (by HPLC). Exclusion criteria were delayed graft function or primary disease requiring P. Minimum follow-up was 5.5 months (range 5.5 to 17.5 months). Outcome was compared vs. previous cohorts of LD recipients immunosuppressed with P/AZA/CSA (n = 171) or P/MMF/CSA (n = 43) (both without antibody induction).

RESULTS

For the RDS group, average CSA level (+/- S.E.) at 3 and 6 months was 190 +/- 12 and 180 +/- 9; avg. MMF dose, 1.7 +/- 0.1 g and 1.7 +/- 0.1 g. There was no significant difference in 6- and 12-month actuarial patient survival, graft survival and rejection-free graft survival between recipients on the RDS protocol vs. historical controls. For RDS recipients, actuarial 6- and 12-month rejection-free graft survival was 87%. Of the 51 RDS recipients, five (10%) have had AR (at 20 days, 1 month, 3 months, 3 months, and 3.5 months post-transplant). After treatment, all five were maintained on 5 mg P; there have been no second AR episodes. Two additional recipients were started on 5 mg P due to low white blood count (WBC) and low/no MMF. Of the 51 grafts, one has failed (death with function). Average serum Cr level (+/- S.E.) at 3 and 6 months for RDS recipients was 1.7 +/- 0.5 (NS vs. historical controls).

CONCLUSION

For low-risk LD recipients, a kidney transplant with an RDS protocol does not increase risk of AR or graft loss. Future studies will need to be done to assess AR rates with an RDS protocol in cadaver transplant recipients and in recipients with delayed graft function.

Pediatric kidney transplantation: historic hallmarks and a personal perspective

Over the last five decades, pediatric kidney transplantation (Tx) has proved to be a viable therapeutic alternative for children with end-stage renal disease. Patient and graft survival rates, as well as long-term quality of life, have improved dramatically during this time, as a result of advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and pre- and post-operative care. The inspired, hard work of multi-disciplinary clinical teams, combined with the determination and courage of the young patients and their families, have fueled the success of pediatric kidney Tx. It is with similar optimism and drive that we face the great challenges of the future, such as maximizing the donor pool and inducing tolerance.

2,500 living donor kidney transplants: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

To review a single center's experience and outcome with living donor transplants.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Outcome after living donor transplants is better than after cadaver donor transplants. Since the inception of the authors' program, they have performed 2,540 living donor transplants. For the most recent cohort of recipients, improvements in patient care and immunosuppressive protocols have improved outcome. In this review, the authors analyzed outcome in relation to protocol.

METHODS

The authors studied patient and graft survival by decade. For those transplanted in the 1990s, the impact of immunosuppressive protocol, donor source, diabetes, and preemptive transplantation was analyzed. The incidence of rejection, posttransplant steroid-related complications, and return to work was determined. Finally, multivariate analysis was used to study risk factors for worse 1-year graft survival and, for those with graft function at 1 year, to study risk factors for worse long-term survival.

RESULTS

For each decade since 1960, outcome has improved after living donor transplants. Compared with patients transplanted in the 1960s, those transplanted in the 1990s have better 8-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates. Death with function and chronic rejection have continued to be a major cause of graft loss, whereas acute rejection has become a rare cause of graft loss. Cardiovascular deaths have become a more predominant cause of patient death; infection has decreased. Donor source (e.g., ideally HLA-identical sibling) continues to be important. For living donor transplants, rejection and graft survival rates are related to donor source. The authors show that patients who had preemptive transplants or less than 1 year of dialysis have better 5-year graft survival and more frequently return to full-time employment. Readmission and complications remain problems; of patients transplanted in the 1990s, only 36% never required readmission. Similarly, steroid-related complications remain common. The authors' multivariate analysis shows that the major risk factor for worse 1-year graft survival was delayed graft function. For recipients with 1-year graft survival, risk factors for worse long-term outcome were pretransplant smoking, pretransplant peripheral vascular disease, pretransplant dialysis for more than 1 year, one or more acute rejection episodes, and donor age older than 55.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that the outcome of living donor transplants has continued to improve. However, for living donors, donor source affects outcome. The authors also identify other major risk factors affecting both short- and long-term outcome.

Lessons learned from more than 1,000 pancreas transplants at a single institution

OBJECTIVE

To determine outcome in diabetic pancreas transplant recipients according to risk factors and the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols that evolved during a 33-year period at a single institution.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is associated with a high incidence of management problems and secondary complications. Clinical pancreas transplantation began at the University of Minnesota in 1966, initially with a high failure rate, but outcome improved in parallel with other organ transplants. The authors retrospectively analyzed the factors associated with the increased success rate of pancreas transplants.

METHODS

From December 16, 1966, to March 31, 2000, the authors performed 1,194 pancreas transplants (111 from living donors; 191 retransplants): 498 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) and 1 simultaneous pancreas-liver transplant; 404 pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplants; and 291 pancreas transplants alone (PTA). The analyses were divided into five eras: era 0, 1966 to 1973 (n = 14), historical; era 1, 1978 to 1986 (n = 148), transition to cyclosporine for immunosuppression, multiple duct management techniques, and only solitary (PAK and PTA) transplants; era 2, 1986 to 1994 (n = 461), all categories (SPK, PAK, and PTA), predominantly bladder drainage for graft duct management, and primarily triple therapy (cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone) for maintenance immunosuppression; era 3, 1994 to 1998 (n = 286), tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil used; and era 4, 1998 to 2000 (n = 275), use of daclizumab for induction immunosuppression, primarily enteric drainage for SPK transplants, pretransplant immunosuppression in candidates awaiting PTA.

RESULTS

Patient and primary cadaver pancreas graft functional (insulin-independence) survival rates at 1 year by category and era were as follows: SPK, era 2 (n = 214) versus eras 3 and 4 combined (n = 212), 85% and 64% versus 92% and 79%, respectively; PAK, era 1 (n = 36) versus 2 (n = 61) versus 3 (n = 84) versus 4 (n = 92), 86% and 17%, 98% and 59%, 98% and 76%, and 98% and 81%, respectively; in PTA, era 1 (n = 36) versus 2 (n = 72) versus 3 (n = 30) versus 4 (n = 40), 77% and 31%, 99% and 50%, 90% and 67%, and 100% and 88%, respectively. In eras 3 and 4 combined for primary cadaver SPK transplants, pancreas graft survival rates were significantly higher with bladder drainage (n = 136) than enteric drainage (n = 70), 82% versus 74% at 1 year (P =.03). Increasing recipient age had an adverse effect on outcome only in SPK recipients. Vascular disease was common (in eras 3 and 4, 27% of SPK recipients had a pretransplant myocardial infarction and 40% had a coronary artery bypass); those with no vascular disease had significantly higher patient and graft survival rates in the SPK and PAK categories. Living donor segmental pancreas transplants were associated with higher technically successful graft survival rates in each era, predominately solitary (PAK and PTA) in eras 1 and 2 and SPK in eras 3 and 4. Diabetic secondary complications were ameliorated in some recipients, and quality of life studies showed significant gains after the transplant in all recipient categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient and graft survival rates have significantly improved over time as surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols have evolved. Eventually, islet transplants will replace pancreas transplants for suitable candidates, but currently pancreas transplants can be applied and should be an option at all stages of diabetes. Early transplants are preferable for labile diabetes, but even patients with advanced complications can benefit.

Should I accept this kidney?

BACKGROUND

Transplant candidates frequently ask whether they should, based on information available at the time, accept a cadaver kidney or wait for a potentially better one.

METHODS

We analyzed 937 first and second cadaver transplants done between January 1, 1984 and December 31, 1997 to determine if information available at the time an offer is made could be used to predict long-term graft survival.

RESULTS

By Cox regression, risk factors for worse long-term graft survival were older donor age, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular cause of donor death, and delayed graft function (DGF). HLA-ABDR mismatch was marginally significant. Whether DGF will occur is not known at the time of an offer, but risk factors can be determined; we found these to be older donor age and > 10% panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) at transplantation (by Cox regression). Using these variables (PRA, ABDR mismatch, donor age, and donor cause of death) known at the time of an offer, we calculated the relative risk of worse long-term graft survival for each subgroup (Table 3 in manuscript). In general, older age and donor death from cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease were associated with worse outcome. Kidneys from donors of < 50 yr had the best outcome, irrespective of match.

CONCLUSION

The data provided can be used to help guide patients as to whether they are better off accepting an offered kidney or waiting for a potentially better one. If an offer is declined, the next kidney may have a potentially worse outcome.

Immunologic and nonimmunologic factors: different risks for cadaver and living donor transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is a debate about the relative contribution of immunologic (rejection) and nonimmunologic (limited nephron mass) factors in long-term graft survival.

METHODS

Using multivariate analysis, we studied the association of the following variables with outcome: delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection, recipient race (black vs. nonblack), donor age (<50 vs. > or =50), donor race, and donor and recipient gender. Because of the association between DGF and rejection, recipients were grouped as follows: DGF, rejection; DGF, no rejection; no DGF, rejection; no DGF, no rejection. Data were analyzed on 1199 first kidney transplants in adults (752 living donor, 447 cadaver donor) done between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 1996. Two analyses were done: first, all transplants; second, only those with > or =1 year survival. For both, there was no difference in risk factors if death with function was or was not censored.

RESULTS

For all cadaver transplant recipients, risk factors were acute rejection, DGF plus rejection, black recipient race, and donor age > or =50. For living donor recipients, only acute rejection was a risk factor. When only 1-year graft survivors were considered, risk factors were the same: for cadaver recipients, risk factors were acute rejection, DGF plus rejection, black recipient race, and donor age > or =50; for living donor recipients the risk factor was rejection.

CONCLUSION

We found immunologic factors (rejection with or without DGF) to be significant in both living donor and cadaver donor transplants. Nonim. munologic factors (donor age, recipient race) were significant only in cadaver donor transplants.

Decreased acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients is associated with decreased chronic rejection

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a recent decrease in the rate of acute rejection after kidney transplantation was associated with a decrease in the rate of chronic rejection.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Single-institution and multicenter retrospective analyses have identified acute rejection episodes as the major risk factor for chronic rejection after kidney transplantation. However, to date, no study has shown that a decrease in the rate of acute rejection leads to a decrease in the rate of chronic rejection.

METHODS

The authors studied patient populations who underwent transplants at a single center during two eras (1984-1987 and 1991-1994) to determine the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection, the rate of biopsy-proven chronic rejection, and the graft half-life.

RESULTS

Recipients who underwent transplantation in era 2 had a decreased rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection compared with era 1 (p < 0.05). This decrease was associated with a decreased rate of biopsy-proven chronic rejection for both cadaver (p = 0.0001) and living donor (p = 0.08) recipients. A trend was observed toward increased graft half-life in era 2 (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Development of immunosuppressive protocols that decrease the rate of acute rejection should lower the rate of chronic rejection and improve long-term graft survival.

Living kidney donation: donor risks and quality of life

This review describes the immediate and long-term risks to kidney donors. We reviewed their perioperative morbidity and mortality as well as their quality of life after donation. The overall mortality in our series was zero. Nationally, donor mortality has been estimated to be 0.03% (5). Our overall complication rate was 8.2% with only 2 (0.2%) complications considered to be major (16). Complications were associated with male sex, body weight > or = 100 kg, and inadvertent entry into the pleura during the donor operation. Most of our donors were discharged from the hospital in < 5 days. Risk factors for a longer hospital stay were age 50 or older and an operative time of 4 hours or more. The average donor quality of life after donation, as measured by the SF-36, was better than that of the general US population. This finding persisted for years after donation. The vast majority of our donors found the experience to be very rewarding and would readily donate again if it were possible. However, 4% were dissatisfied and regretted their decision to donate a kidney; these were most likely to be donors other than a first-degree relative and donors whose recipient died within the first posttransplant year. Living donation of kidneys appears to be relatively safe, with very few physical and psychologic complications. It may even improve the donor's quality of life. Living donors are an underutilized source of kidneys. We continue to advocate and encourage living kidney donation.

Pre-emptive renal transplantation

We report our experience with pre-emptive renal transplantation and review the literature. While eliminating the cost, complications and inconvenience of dialysis, transplantation prior to dialysis therapy can be performed safely and effectively as it does not pose any additional immunological hazards to allograft outcome. It is safe regardless of the immunosuppressive agents employed and is successful without early rejection even in the nonuremic state.

Kidney transplantation in children younger than 1 year using cyclosporine immunosuppression

OBJECTIVE

The optimal age for transplantation in children with end-stage renal disease remains controversial. Supported by national data, many centers recommend dialysis until the child reaches a certain minimum age. The authors' policy, however, has been to encourage living donor (LD) transplants for young children, with no minimum age restriction.

METHODS

Between January 1, 1984, and December 31, 1996, the authors performed 248 kidney transplants in children younger than age 13 years, using cyclosporine as the primary immunosuppressive agent. Recipients were analyzed in three age groups: group 1, younger than age 1 year (n = 26); group 2, age 1 through 4 (n = 92); and group 3, age 5 through 13 (n = 130). Almost all recipients in group 1 underwent a primary LD transplant. Therefore, to compare results more meaningfully among the three age groups, only primary LD transplants were analyzed (group 1, n = 25; group 2, n = 59; group 3, n = 58).

RESULTS

In primary LD transplants, no significant difference was noted among the age groups in 1-and 5-year patient or graft survival rates. To date, all 25 recipients from group 1 are alive and well; 19 still have a functional original graft. Causes of graft loss in the remaining six recipients were chronic rejection (n = 3), vascular thrombosis (n = 2), and recurrent disease (n = 1). The incidence of acute rejection in group 1 recipients was lower than in the two older groups. However, the incidence of delayed graft function was slightly higher in the youngest group than in the two older groups. For recipients in group 1, growth (as measured by weight) improved significantly posttransplant: the mean standard deviation score rose from -2.8 pretransplant to -0.2 by age 5 and to +1.8 by age 10. The improvement in height was not as dramatic: the mean standard deviation score rose from -3.2 pretransplant to -1.6 by age 5 and to -1.4 by age 10.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney transplantation in young children, including those younger than 1 year old, can achieve results comparable to those in older children. As long as an adult LD is available, the timing of the transplant should be based on renal function rather than age.

Long-term quality of life after kidney and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

We are using a validated questionnaire (SF-36) to annually assess health-related quality of life (QOL) in kidney and pancreas-kidney transplant recipients. The SF-36 consists of eight scales to assess physical functioning, general health, and mental functioning. Norms and 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) have been developed for the US population. At present, 1138 recipients with functioning grafts (520 Type I diabetic; 618 nondiabetic) 1-10 yr post-transplant have completed the questionnaire. Of the recipients, 446 completed the questionnaire once; 632 twice; and 53 three times (305 after 1 yr; 266 after 2 yr; 256 after 3 yr; 206 after 4 yr; 192 after 5 yr; 150 after 6 yr; 130 after 7 yr; 138 after 8 yr; 125 after 9 yr; 92 after 10 yr). For both diabetic and nondiabetic recipients, there was little change in average scores for each scale between years (p = NS). In relation to the US population, average scores for nondiabetics were below the 50th percentile on all 8 scales; for diabetics < 25th percentile on the physical functioning and vitality scales, < 50th percentile on all others. For both diabetic and nondiabetic recipients, average scores were higher than reported norms for patients with CHF, COPD, or depression but were similar to those with Htn or recent MI. Individual scores were then compared with age-matched means (+/- 2 SEMs) (95% C.I.) for the US population. At each year post-transplant, up to 40% of nondiabetic and up to 65% of diabetic recipients had scores below the 95% C.I. on individual scales (particularly the physical functioning and general health scales)--e.g. over 30% nondiabetic and up to 60% diabetic recipients had scores on the physical functioning scales below the 95% C.I. More diabetic recipients (vs. nondiabetics) reported poor QOL on the physical functioning, general health and social functioning scales. There was little difference in the mental health scales. For those with Type I diabetes, a similar percentage of kidney and K/P recipients reported QOL below the 95% C.I. for the age-matched population, except on the GH scale (better QOL for K/P recipients). We conclude that successful transplant recipients report health-related QOL below that of the age-matched general population but similar to those with other chronic diseases. Diabetic and nondiabetic recipients have similar scores on the mental health scales; nondiabetic recipients score better on the general health and physical functioning scales.

The acutely ischemic extremity after kidney transplant: an approach to management

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to review arterial thromboembolic complications presenting with an acutely ischemic lower extremity after a kidney (KTx) or simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SPK) and to describe an approach to their management.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all such transplantations (a total of 2109) performed between January 1985 and August 1995. We identified 16 recipients (incidence, 0.76%) in whom an acutely ischemic leg developed during the immediate postoperative period (within the first 48 hours).

RESULTS

Of the 16 recipients, eight underwent a KTx (incidence, 0.45%) and eight underwent an SPK transplantation (incidence, 2.90%). Median age was 38 years (range, 15 months to 61 years). Thirteen had insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), a significantly higher incidence than in the control group (i.e., transplant recipients without this complication) (p < 0.01). Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) was documented before operation in eight (50%) of the recipients (vs 8.9% in the control group) (p < 0.01). Ten were uremic (on chronic dialysis) before transplantation; six were nonuremic (not on dialysis). Intraoperatively, 14 had moderate to severe atherosclerotic disease affecting the iliac vessels, seven of whom required some manipulation of the artery (either endarterectomy or tacking of the intima) to make it suitable for anastomosis. Heparin was administered systemically during cross clamping to only four. Most of the 16 recipients showed symptoms or signs of arterial occlusion within the first few hours after operation. The most common symptom was pain; the most common physical finding was loss of femoral and distal pulses. Thirteen recipients had moderate to severe ischemia, as judged by physical examination; 15 returned to the operating room for surgical exploration. Eight underwent thrombectomy through an inguinal incision, with successful restoration of flow. Seven underwent exploration through the initial incision because of concern regarding the viability of the transplanted organ; five of them required transplant nephrectomy because of simultaneous thrombosis of the renal artery. No patient needed a bypass procedure to restore flow. Long-term morbidity as a result of the arterial occlusion was related to the severity and length of ischemia.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of these results, we suggest the following recommendations: (1) all patients should undergo a thorough peripheral vascular examination before and after transplantation; (2) patients at higher risk for arterial thromboembolic complications (e.g., those with significantly diseased vessel at intraoperative examination, nonuremic patients) should receive intraoperative systemic heparin before cross clamping of the artery; and (3) patients with signs or symptoms suggesting arterial occlusion after operation should undergo prompt surgical exploration.

Venous thromboembolic complications after kidney and kidney-pancreas transplantation: a multivariate analysis

BACKGROUND

We reviewed the incidence of and risk factors for venous thromboembolic complications in our population of kidney (KTx) and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SPK) recipients.

METHODS

Information was collected retrospectively from a database on 1833 KTx and 276 SPK recipients who underwent transplant surgery between January 1985 and August 1995.

RESULTS

The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was 6.2% (n= 132), with significantly higher rates after SPK (18.1%) vs. KTx (4.5%) (P < 0.001). The number of DVT episodes was highest in the first month; 17.5% occurred during this time. For KTx recipients, early thrombotic events were more common on the side of the graft (P=0.03); however, after 1 month, no correlation existed between the side of the graft and the side of DVT. For SPK recipients, DVT tended to be more common on the side of the pancreas (57%) vs. the kidney (43%) (P=0.10). By multivariate analysis, risk factors for DVT were: age > 40 years (odds ratio [OR]=2.2, P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR=2.0, P=0.002), previous DVT (OR=4.4, P=0.001), and SPK transplant (OR=2.8, P < 0.001). Pulmonary embolus (PE) was identified in 44 recipients (incidence, 2.1%) and was fatal in 13 (30%). The incidence was significantly higher in SPK (4.71%) vs. KTx recipients (1.69%) (P < 0.01). The risk of death from PE was 0.5% in KTx recipients and 1.37% in SPK recipients (P=0.08). Risk factors for PE included DM (OR=2.6, P=0.005) and recent DVT (OR=8.9, P=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on risk and extrapolating from the general surgical literature, our recommendations for prophylaxis against DVT are use of graduated compression stockings for all recipients and, in addition, low-dose heparin for moderate and high-risk recipients (previous DVT, SPK, age > 40 years, DM).

Solitary pancreas transplantation for nonuremic patients with labile insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation has become a widely accepted treatment option for selected uremic patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Patient survival rates at 1 year exceed 90%, and rates of pancreas graft survival, 70%. However, solitary pancreas transplantation for nonuremic patients with IDDM has been controversial because of the less favorable outcome and the need for long-term immunosuppression with its associated morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

We studied the outcome of 225 solitary pancreas transplants during three immunosuppressive eras: the precyclosporine (CsA) era (n=83), the CsA era (n=118), and the tacrolimus era (n=24). Only patients with labile IDDM (e.g., hypoglycemic unawareness, insulin reactions, > or = 2 failed attempts at intensified insulin therapy for metabolic control) underwent solitary pancreas transplantation. Using univariate and multivariate analyses, we looked at patient and graft survival, the risk of surgical complications, and native kidney function during these three eras.

RESULTS

Pancreas graft survival improved significantly over time: 34% at 1 year after transplantation in the pre-CsA era, 52% in the CsA era, and 80% in the tacrolimus era (P=0.002). Pancreas graft loss due to rejection decreased from 50% at 1 year in the pre-CsA era, to 34% in the CsA era, to 9% in the tacrolimus era (P=0.008). The rate of technical failures (i.e., the risk of surgical complications) decreased from 30% in the pre-CsA era, to 14% in the CsA era, to 0% in the tacrolimus era (P=0.001). Patient survival rates at 1 year have ranged between 88% and 95% in the three eras (P=NS). Matching for at least one antigen on each HLA locus and avoiding HLA-B mismatches significantly decreased the incidence of rejection. The incidence of native kidney failure due to drug-induced toxicity decreased significantly over time, in part because only recipients with pretransplant creatinine clearance > or = 80 ml/min received transplants.

CONCLUSIONS

Solitary pancreas transplantation has become a viable alternative for nonuremic patients with labile IDDM. The risks of surgical complications and drug-induced nephrotoxicity have significantly decreased over time. Using tacrolimus as the mainstay immunosuppressant, patient and graft survival rates now no longer trail those of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Effect of early cyclosporine levels on kidney allograft rejection

Acute rejection is the greatest risk factor for development of biopsy-proven chronic rejection and late kidney allograft loss. We previously noted that low cyclosporine (CsA) levels were a risk factor for early acute rejection in pediatric recipients (1). In our current study, we used logistic regression to identify risk factors for acute rejection in 726 adult kidney transplant recipients on triple therapy (prednisone, azathioprine, CsA). Variables considered for logistic regression analysis were donor organ source (cadaver vs. living), degree of HLA mismatch (1 to 6 vs. 0 antigen mismatch), transplant number (primary vs. retransplant), CsA levels (< 125 vs. > or = 125 ng/ml, < 150 ng/ml vs. > or = 150 ng/ml, and < 175 vs. > or = 175 ng/ml), and acute rejection episodes (0 vs. > or = 1). Of 726 recipients, 401 (55%) received cadaver kidneys; 325 (45%), living related. Overall, 572 (79%) had a primary transplant; 154 (21%), a retransplant. The vast majority of acute rejection episodes occurred within the first 2 months posttransplant; 68% of recipients had no acute rejection episodes by 2 months and 58% had none by 60 months posttransplant. Logistic regression analysis revealed that a cadaver donor kidney (vs. living) (p = 0.004), a 1 to 6 antigen mismatch (vs. 0 mismatch) (p = 0.001), and CsA levels < 150 ng/ml (vs. > or = 150 ng/ml) correlated with biopsy-proven acute rejection. The correlation for CsA levels < 150 ng/ml (vs. > or = 150 ng/ml) held true for levels at 1 wk (p < 0.05), 1 month (p = 0.0001), 2 months (p = 0.01), and 3 months (p = 0.02) posttransplant. Similar correlation was found for CsA levels < 125 ng/ml (vs. > or = 125 ng/ml) and < 175 ng/ml (vs. > or = 175 ng/ml). Comparative analyses were made (by Chi-square) of acute and chronic rejection rates when recipients were divided into 3 groups by CsA level (< 125 ng/ml, > or = 125 to < 150 ng/ml, and > or 150 ng/ml). At each time point (1 wk, 2 wk, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months), CsA levels < 125 ng/ml (vs. > or = 125 to < 150 ng/ml and > or = 150 ng/ml) were associated with the greatest increased risk of acute rejection--for both cadaver and living related recipients (all p < 0.05). CsA levels < 125 ng/ml at each time point (1 wk, 2 wk, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months) were also associated with a significantly increased risk of chronic rejection (all p < 0.001). The incidence of both acute and chronic rejection was reduced in the group with CsA levels > or = 125 to < 150 ng/ml and further reduced in the > or = 150 ng/ml group. Our data indicate that maintaining CsA levels > or = 150 ng/ml as part of triple therapy reduces the incidence of both acute and chronic rejection. Because chronic rejection is the leading cause of late allograft loss, maintaining adequate CsA levels should improve long-term graft survival. Based on this analysis, we have modified our own immunosuppressive regimens to achieve higher CsA levels earlier posttransplant.

Effect of initial slow graft function on renal allograft rejection and survival

Cadaver renal allografts with immediate excellent function have good long-term outcomes, while grafts with delayed function have been associated with an increased incidence of acute rejection (AR) and subsequent poor long-term graft survival. There is, however, an intermediate group with initial slow function whose outcome is not well defined. This group was examined by reviewing 510 patients that received primary cadaver transplants between 1/85 and 8/95. Recipients were grouped by initial function into: 1) those with immediate graft function (IGF), defined by serum creatinine (Cr) level < 3 mg/dl on post-operative day (POD) 5 (n = 237); 2) those with slow graft function (SGF), defined by serum Cr > 3 mg/dl on POD 5 but no need for dialysis (n = 160); and 3) those with delayed graft function (DGF), defined by the need for dialysis in the first week post-transplant (n = 113). Five-year graft survivals were determined for each group by Kaplan-Meier methods and compared by a generalized Wilcoxon test. The incidence of AR in the first 6 months was significantly higher in those with SGF (40%) vs. those with IGF (30%) (p < 0.05); both groups had a lower incidence than those with DGF (47%) (p < 0.05). In the absence of AR, 5-yr graft survival was similar between the 3 groups, 94%, 97% and 92% for IGF, SGF and DGF respectively. In the presence of AR, 5-yr graft survival was significantly reduced in all groups, but most notably in those with SGF (51%) or DGF (53%), as compared to those with IGF (80%), (p < 0.001). We conclude that recipients with SGF, but no AR, have excellent outcomes, comparable to those with IGF. However, there is an increased incidence of early AR associated with SGF. In recipients with SGF or DGF, AR has a more profound detrimental effect on long-term graft survival than in the IGF group. Thus, recipients with SGF are at increased risk for AR with resultant poor long-term graft survival, and may need modified immunosuppressive protocols.

Complications and risks of living donor nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

Short- and long-term patient and graft survival rates are better for living donor (vs. cadaver) kidney transplant recipients. However, donor nephrectomy is associated with at least some morbidity and mortality. We have previously estimated the mortality of living donor nephrectomy to be 0.03%. In our present study, to determine associated perioperative morbidity, we reviewed donor nephrectomies performed at our institution from January 1, 1985, to December 31, 1995.

METHODS

The records of 871 donors were complete and available for review. Of these donors, 380 (44%) were male and 491 (56%) were female. The mean age at the time of donation was 38 years (range: 17-74 years), and mean postoperative stay was 4.9 days (range: 2-14 days).

RESULTS

We noted two (0.2%) major complications: femoral nerve compression with resulting weakness, and a retained sponge that required reexploration. We noted 86 minor complications in 69 (8%) donors: 22 (2.4%) suspected wound infections (only 1 wound was opened), 13 (1.5%) pneumothoraces (6 required intervention, 7 resolved spontaneously), 11 (1.3%) unexplained fevers, 8 (0.9%) instances of operative blood loss > or = 750 ml (not associated with other complications), 8 (0.9%) pneumonias (all of which resolved quickly with antibiotics alone), 5 (0.6%) wound hematomas or seromas (none were opened), 4 (0.5%) phlebitic intravenous sites, 3 (0.3%) urinary tract infections, 3 (0.3%) readmissions (2 for pain control and 1 for mild confusion that resolved with discontinuation of narcotics), 3 (0.3%) cases of atelectasis, 2 (0.2%) corneal abrasions, 1 (0.1%) subacute epididymitis, 1 (0.1%) Clostridium difficile colitis, 1 (0.1%) urethral trauma from catheter placement, and 1 (0.1%) enterotomy. At our institution, no donor died or required ventilation or intensive care. We noted no myocardial infarctions, deep wound infections, or reexplorations for bleeding. Analysis, by logistic regression, identified these significant risk factors for perioperative complications: male gender (vs. female, P<0.001), pleural entry (vs. no pleural entry, P<0.004), and weight > or = 100 kg (vs. < 100 kg, P<0.02). Similar analysis identified these significant risk factors for postoperative stay > 5 days: operative duration > or = 4 hr (vs. < 4 hr, P<0.001) and age > or = 50 years (vs. < 50 years, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Living donor nephrectomy can be done with little major morbidity. The risks of nephrectomy must be balanced against the better outcome for recipients of living donor transplants.

Grandparent donors in a living related renal transplant program

Clinical renal transplantation is limited by the number of cadaver and living related donors. The use of kidneys from older donors and non-first-degree relatives, including grandparents, has increased the supply of organs for transplantation. The purpose of this study was to assess donor and recipient outcomes after living related renal transplants between grandparent donors and grandchild recipients. Fifteen living related renal transplants using grandparent donors were performed at the University of Minnesota from 1971 to 1995. All medical records from donors and recipients were retrospectively reviewed. In addition, all grandparents or, in one case, a surviving family member were contacted to obtain current information on medical health and feedback about the donation process. A current serum creatinine (Cr) level was obtained from 14 donors and 15 recipients. Statistical calculations were performed using the SAS system. Eleven grandmothers and four grandfathers, 34-70 yr old (mean, 55 yr) at the time of transplantation, donated a kidney to 15 grandchildren with end-stage renal disease. There were no major surgical complications in either group. One donor died from unrelated causes; the other 14 donors are alive with stable renal function (1.3 +/- 0.3 mg/dL). Of 15 transplanted kidneys, 10 remain functional (Cr 1.3 +/- 0.7 mg/dL) with 2- and 5-yr graft survival rates of 76% and 63%, respectively. Our results indicate that healthy grandparents provide an excellent population for living related kidney donation.

Risk factors for prolonged hospitalization after kidney transplants

A major variable in the cost of kidney transplants is the length of initial hospitalization. Using multivariate analysis, we studied risk factors for hospital stay > 10 d post-transplant. Between 1 January 1985 and 31 August 1995 a total of 1588 patients underwent first or second kidney transplants at the University of Minnesota. Antibody was used for 1 wk in cadaver donor recipients and for 2 wk in pediatric recipients (resulting in a long stay for all pediatric recipients). Adult living related donor recipients were immunosuppressed with triple therapy. Donor risk factors studied were age (< 15, 15-50, > 50 yr) and,- for cadaver recipients, preservation time (< 12, 12-18, 18-24, 24-30, > 30 h) and cause of death (trauma, cerebrovascular accident, or cardiac). Recipient risk factors studied were age (< 18, 18-55, > 55 yr); sex; transplant number; antigen mismatch; peak PRA; PRA at transplant (< 11, 11-50, > 50); diabetic status; pretransplant dialysis (vs. pre-emptive transplant); pretransplant cardiac, peripheral vascular, or respiratory disease; and delayed graft function (DGF) (dialysis in the first week vs. no dialysis). Risk factors were analyzed separately for living donor and cadaver donor recipients. For cadaver donor recipients, DGF was the major risk factor (p < 0.0001); others were age 55 yr (p = 0.03) and diabetes (p = 0.02). For living donor recipients, DGF was also a risk factor (p = 0.003); others were diabetes (p = 0.01), retransplant (p = 0.006), PRA at transplant > 50 (p < 0.0001), age > 55 yr (p = 0.02), pretransplant respiratory disease (p = 0.005), and pretransplant dialysis (p = 0.005). Because DGF was the major risk factor for a prolonged stay, we then studied risk factors for DGF using multivariate analysis. For cadaver donor recipients, risk factors were recipient weight > 90 kg (p = 0.004), preservation time 24 h (p = 0.03), PRA at transplant > 50 (p = 0.03), and donor age < 15 or > 50 yr (p = 0.002). For living donor recipients, risk factors were recipient age < 18 yr (p = 0.01), donor age > 50 yr (p = 0.03), female sex (p = 0.05), pretransplant respiratory disease (p = 0.1), pretransplant peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.05), and recipient weight > 90 kg (p = 0.1). From our data, a profile emerged of recipients likely to have a longer hospital stay. Important variables, either simultaneous with or related to DGF, include donor and recipient age, diabetes, pretransplant recipient weight, PRA at transplant, preservation time, and pretransplant respiratory or peripheral vascular disease.

Risk factors for chronic rejection in pediatric renal transplant recipients--a single-center experience

Chronic rejection (CR) is the most common cause of graft loss beyond the 1st posttransplant year. The aim of this analysis was to identify the risk factors for the development of CR in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Between June 1984 and March 1994, 217 renal transplants were performed in children at our center. Immunosuppression included prednisone, azathioprine, cyclosporine (CsA), and prophylactic antibody. Using multivariate analysis, we studied the impact of the following variables on the development of biopsy-proven CR: age at transplant (< or = 5 years, > 5 years), gender, race, transplant number (primary, retransplant), donor source (cadaver, living donor), donor age (< 20 years, 20-49 years, > 49 years), number of ABDR mismatches (0, 1-2, 3-4, 5-6), number of DR mismatches (0, 1, 2), percentage peak panel reactive antibody (PRA) (< or = 50%, > 50%), percentage PRA at transplantation (< or = 50%, > 50%), dialysis pretransplant, preservation time > 24 h, acute tubular necrosis requiring dialysis, initial CsA dosage (< or = 5 mg/kg per day, > 5 mg/kg per day), CsA dosage at 1 year posttransplant (< or = 5 mg/kg per day, > 5 mg/kg per day), acute rejection (AR), number of AR episodes (ARE) (1, > 1), timing of AR (< or = 6 months, > 6 months), reversibility of AR (complete, partial), and infection [cytomegalovirus (CMV), non-CMV viral, bacterial]. Risk factors for the development of CR in pediatric renal transplant recipients were: AR (P < 0.0001, odds ratio 19.4), multiple ARE (> 1 vs. 1) (P < 0.0001, odds ratio 30.1), and high percentage peak PRA (> 50%) (P < 0.03, odds ratio 3.6).

Colon perforation after renal transplantation: a single-institution review

Colon perforation (CP) is an uncommon but dramatic complication after renal transplantation. Of 1530 consecutive kidney transplants performed at our center, 8 recipients had an CP (incidence of 0.5%), either early (n = 5, 2-14 days) or late (n = 3, 8-48 months) post transplant. Clinical symptoms were generally vague. Biological findings were inconstant. Risk factors for CP included a cadaver graft (versus a living donor), high body weight, history of diverticulitis, and Kayexalate use. Crucial to outcome were: 1) immediate diagnosis and 2) aggressive surgical care consisting of resectional therapy, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and reduced immunosuppression. Applying these principles, mortality in our patients (25%) was lower than in previously reported series (33-64%). All grafts were functioning at the time of diagnosis; graft function was preserved in recipients who recovered from CP. Patients with a documented history of diverticulitis should undergo prophylactic colonic resection. Constipation and colonic dilatation should be treated aggressively in the early post-operative period.

Combined liver and kidney transplantation

Patients with end-stage renal and hepatic failure may be treated with combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKTx). We reviewed the indications and outcomes of 16 CLKTx performed at the University of Minnesota between 1980 and 1994. The majority of the recipients (87.5%) were young patients affected by congenital hepatic anomalies and concomitant end-stage renal failure. Fourteen were treated with cyclosporin-based immunosuppression and had an excellent outcome: with an average of 6 years of follow-up, patient survival was 85.7%, liver graft survival 85.7%, and kidney graft survival 72%. The incidence of rejection episodes was similar to the rate of rejection in our solitary kidney and liver transplants. In conclusion, our experience supports the value of CLKTx in treating patients with simultaneous failure of both organs or with congenital enzymatic hepatic deficits leading to renal failure.

A third kidney transplant: cost-effective treatment for end-stage renal disease?

Given the organ donor shortage, some question whether a third kidney transplant can be justified. We studied the outcome of 51 third transplants (mean age 28 +/- 2 yr) done between 1 January 1985 and 31 December 1994. We compared hospital stay (mean +/- S.E.), cost, readmissions, readmission days, and outcome of third (vs. first and second) transplants. We found that patient survival for third transplants was equivalent to first and second transplants; graft survival was not as good. However, when third transplant recipients with recurrent disease (specifically, hemolytic uremic syndrome and focal sclerosis) were excluded from our analysis, we found no difference in 5-yr graft survival (vs. first or second transplant recipients). Of the 51 third transplant recipients, 41 had a cadaver donor transplant. Third cadaver transplant recipients tended to have a longer hospital stay (p = NS) than first cadaver transplant recipients but had no more readmissions or readmission days than first and second cadaver transplant recipients. Employment data are available for 28 third transplant recipients; 16 (57%) are currently working or going to school. Of the 21 recipients who responded to quality of life questionnaires, 17 (81%) reported being healthy and all 21 (100%) said transplantation was not a drawback to their health. We conclude that third transplants should be considered for selected patients with renal failure whose first and second transplants have failed. Such patients can often be successfully transplanted.

The importance of early cyclosporine levels in pediatric kidney transplantation

We studied the impact of early cyclosporine (CSA) levels on the incidence of rejection in pediatric transplant recipients. Between 1 January 1984 and 31 December 1994, a total of 234 pediatric patients underwent kidney transplants and received CSA immunosuppression. We analyzed the impact of CSA levels (at 1 wk, 2 wk, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months) on the incidence of rejection in the first 3 and the first 6 months post-transplant. We found that CSA levels at all timepoints correlated, i.e. recipients with low levels in the early post-transplant period tended to have low levels throughout the first 12 months. Multivariate analysis for risk factors by biopsy-proven rejection in the first 3 months revealed that the CSA trough level was the critical factor (p < 0.05). Recipients with CSA trough levels < 100 ng/ml had 2.24 times the risk of rejections vs. those with blood levels > 100 ng/ml. Similarly, the CSA trough level at 1 month was the critical risk factor for biopsy-proven rejection within the first 6 months (p < 0.05). The major risk factor for graft loss within the first 12 months was a biopsy-proven rejection episode. We conclude that in pediatric kidney transplant recipients, early CSA trough levels < 100 ng/ml are associated with a significantly increased incidence of rejection in the first 6 months post-transplant.

Combined liver and kidney transplantation

Patients with end-stage renal and hepatic failure may be treated with combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKTx). We reviewed the indications and outcomes of 16 CLKTx performed at the University of Minnesota between 1980 and 1994. The majority of the recipients (87.5%) were young patients affected by congenital hepatic anomalies and concomitant end-stage renal failure. Fourteen were treated with cyclosporin-based immunosuppression and had an excellent outcome: with an average of 6 years of follow-up, patient survival was 85.7%, liver graft survival 85.7%, and kidney graft survival 72%. The incidence of rejection episodes was similar to the rate of rejection in our solitary kidney and liver transplants. In conclusion, our experience supports the value of CLKTx in treating patients with simultaneous failure of both organs or with congenital enzymatic hepatic deficits leading to renal failure.

Delayed graft function in the absence of rejection has no long-term impact. A study of cadaver kidney recipients with good graft function at 1 year after transplantation

We previously reported that delayed graft function (DGF) in the absence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (Rej) had no effect on outcome of primary cadaver kidney transplantation (TX). By contrast, DGF in combination with Rej strongly predicted poor long-term graft survival. We asked whether this poor long-term outcome was due to early graft loss associated with DGF, or to an ongoing process leading to late graft loss. To answer this question, we studied a subset of 298 cadaver kidney transplant recipients who had not suffered early graft loss and had a serum creatinine level < or = 2.0 mg/dl at 1 year after TX. The incidence of DGF (defined by dialysis during the first week after TX) in this subset was 19%. DGF was associated with cold ischemia time >24 hr (P = 0.0003) and Rej (P = 0.06). For grafts with versus without DGF, the incidence of late acute Rej (>1 year after TX) was similar. Actuarial graft survival was similar for Rej-free recipients with versus without DGF (P = 0.9) and was worse for those with Rej and no DGF (P < 0.02). Importantly, however, in our recipients who all had a serum creatinine level < or = 2.0 mg/dl at 1 year after TX, the worst long-term outcome was noted in the subgroup with both DGF and Rej (P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, DGF was also only a risk factor in combination with Rej (P = 0.002, relative risk = 3.7), while a 0-antigen HLA mismatch had no impact. Patient survival decreased for recipients with both DGF and Rej by univariate (P = 0.009) and multivariate (P = 0.02, relative risk = 2.9) analyses. We conclude that DGF without Rej has no impact on long-term survival. However, our data for recipients with both DGF and Rej suggest that a chronic ongoing process leads to late graft failure. Further research is necessary to identify the exact pathophysiology of this process, which appears to be, at least in part, HLA antigen independent.

Renal artery stenosis in infants: long-term medical treatment before surgery

This report describes five infants (3 male, 2 female) with renal artery stenosis diagnosed in their 1st year of life. The age at initial presentation was 5 days to 10 months. All had symptoms of congestive heart failure, cardiomegaly on chest X-ray, and left ventricular hypertrophy by electrocardiogram or echocardiogram. Renograms were abnormal in four of the five infants. An intravenous pyelogram was obtained in three infants and was abnormal in two. Renal ultrasounds were obtained in two infants and were normal in both. Patients were treated for 4.4 +/- 0.9 years with antihypertensive drug therapy until surgical correction of the renal artery stenosis. Blood pressure was persistently elevated above the 95th percentile in four of the infants during the course of antihypertensive therapy prior to surgery. Patients have been followed for 9.4 +/- 2 years since surgery. The blood pressure of four patients is normal, and the blood pressure of the oldest patient (age 23 years) is borderline hypertensive. These data show that infants with renal artery stenosis can be cared for successfully with long-term antihypertensive drug therapy to preserve renal mass with minimal chronic adverse effects.

Does re-exposure to mismatched HLA antigens decrease renal re-transplant allograft survival?

We analyzed 420 kidney retransplants at the University of Minnesota, 87 of which did and 333 which did not share HLA mismatches with the previous transplant. There was no difference in outcome. We conclude that exceptions to routine HLA matching policies do not have to be made for kidney retransplants.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the kidney graft functional survival rate for retransplants is influenced by presence of HLA mismatches in common with the previous (failed) transplant.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Kidney retransplants have a lower function rate than primary grafts. An anamnestic response to HLA antigens shared with the previous donor could be one factor responsible, but reports in the literature are conflicting.

METHODS

Of 420 kidney retransplants with HLA information done at the University of Minnesota, 87 shared > or = 1 HLA antigens specifically mismatched with the previous donor (63 cadaver and 24 living donor retransplants), while 333 did not (247 cadaver, 86 living donor). Patient and graft survival rates were calculated by life-table analysis for recipients with vs. without repeat mismatches, with the significance of differences determined by the Lee-Desu statistic.

RESULTS

Patient and kidney graft retransplant survival rate curves were not significantly different (p > or = 0.41) for those exposed or not exposed to the same HLA mismatches as before. At 2 years, 70% vs. 61%, respectively, of cadaver grafts and 71% vs. 78%, respectively, of living donor grafts were functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

The probability of a successful outcome with a kidney retransplant is no different for patients who do than for those who do not receive an organ sharing HLA mismatches with the previous donor. Exceptions to routine HLA matching policies do not need to be made for kidney retransplants.

Vascular graft thrombosis after pancreatic transplantation: univariate and multivariate operative and nonoperative risk factor analysis

BACKGROUND

Vascular thrombosis is still the leading cause of nonimmunologic, technical pancreatic transplant graft failures. The paucity of published data--coupled with our large institutional experience with pancreatic transplantation in all recipient and transplant categories, using a wide spectrum of surgical techniques--provided the impetus for a retrospective study of graft thrombosis risk factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Four hundred thirty-eight patients with pancreatic transplants (45 percent simultaneous pancreas-kidney [SPK], 23 percent pancreas-after-kidney [PAK], and 32 percent pancreatic transplants alone [PTA] and with Type I insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were studied retrospectively. Of 438 pancreatic transplants, 90 percent were bladder-drained and 10 percent were enteric-drained. Ninety-three percent were from cadaver donors, 90 percent were whole-organ grafts, and 20 percent were retransplantations. Quadruple immunosuppression was given. For bladder-drained, whole-organ transplantations (n=378), we performed Cox regression analyses to study the impact on pancreatic graft thrombosis of donor, recipient, mode of preservation, and surgical variables.

RESULTS

The overall thrombosis rate was 12 percent (5 percent arterial, 7 percent venous). For cadaver, bladder-drained, whole-organ pancreatic transplants, the thrombosis incidence was highest in PAK recipients (20 percent). The PAK category was also found to be an independent risk factor for thrombosis by stepwise Cox regression analysis. In separate stepwise Cox regression analyses for each category, other identified risk factors for thrombosis included the following: donor age (PAK, PTA); cardiocerebrovascular cause of donor death (SPK, PAK); the use of an aortic Carrel patch (SPK); arterial pancreatic graft reconstruction using a splenic artery to superior mesenteric artery anastomosis (SPK, PTA) or an interposition graft between the splenic artery and the superior mesenteric artery (PTA); portal vein extension graft (PAK); left-sided implantation into the recipient (PAK); and graft pancreatitis (defined as hyperamylasemia exceeding five days post-transplant [PAK, PTA]).

CONCLUSIONS

Older donors or those who died of cardiocerebrovascular disease should not be considered for any recipient category. Preservation time needs to be minimized and strategies need to be developed to decrease graft pancreatitis. Surgically, left-sided implantation and arterial reconstructions other than the Y-graft also increase risk, as do portal vein extensions. Renal transplants alone in prospective PAK recipients with Type I diabetes mellitus should, therefore, always be implanted left-sided to allow for right-sided pancreatic graft placement.

Employment patterns after successful kidney transplantation

We studied 822 kidney transplant recipients followed 1-9 years to determine the dynamics of their entering and leaving the work force. Multivariate analysis revealed that not being diabetic and that being employed pretransplant were associated with a higher rate of posttransplant employment. Some recipients in all pretransplant employment categories, including those receiving disability benefits pretransplant, returned to full-time work posttransplant. The most rapid return to work was in those who had been working full-time or attending school pretransplant. After returning to work, a higher percentage of diabetic recipients stopped working; of those who stopped working, 50% received disability benefits. In contrast, nondiabetic recipients who stopped working full-time were more likely to be retired or working part-time; only 22% received disability benefits.

Quadruple immunosuppression in a pig model of small bowel transplantation

Rejection remains a major obstacle to successful small bowel transplantation in humans, irrespective of the immunosuppressants. Previous large animal studies have not used quadruple immunosuppression (with high-dose intravenous cyclosporine A [CSA]) for induction, followed by triple immunosuppression for maintenance therapy. Nor have immunosuppressive doses been comparable to clinical solid organ transplants. We studied, in 78 nonrelated outbred pigs, the effect of quadruple immunosuppression (including horse anti-pig thymocyte globulin [ATG] and high-dose intravenous CSA) on the incidence and severity of rejection in the early, critical posttransplant period. Group A (n = 19) pigs were nonimmunosuppressed. Group B (n = 20) received quadruple immunosuppression: pig ATG (10 mg/kg/day x 10 days), intravenous CSA (3.0 mg/kg/day), prednisolone (2 mg/kg/day), and azathioprine (2.5 mg/kg/day); prednisolone and azathioprine were each reduced by 50% on posttransplant Days 8 and 15. Trough CSA levels were > or = 400 ng/ml for the first 7 days posttransplant, > 200 ng/ml thereafter. Recipient pigs underwent resection of large and small bowel; orthotopic transplants (proximal duodenojejunostomy, distal ileostomy) were done with systemic vein drainage. We developed a scoring system (no, mild, moderate, severe rejection) to grade the extent of both interstitial and vascular rejection: biopsies were obtained daily from the ileostomy. Rejection-free graft survival at posttransplant Days 7, 10, and 14 was 32, 26, and 16% in the nonimmunosuppressed group versus 95, 90, and 85% in the immunosuppressed group (P < 0.0001). Rejection grades were significantly better over the whole observation period in immunosuppressed pigs: interstitial rejection was not present in up to 67% of all daily biopsy specimens. Rejection was present in all specimens of nonimmunosuppressed pigs. Vascular rejection was uncommon (incidence < 10%) in both groups. Isolated vascular rejection without interstitial rejection was not found. Graft-versus-host reaction was noted in both groups in the skin only; liver and native bowel were not involved. We conclude that quadruple immunosuppression with pig ATG and high-dose intravenous CSA for induction effectively prevents moderate and severe rejection in this model. Since clinical transplant complications (rejection, lymphomas) have persisted under FK 506 treatment, our immunosuppressive regimen should be considered an alternative for bowel transplantation in humans to prevent early rejection.