Cold hardening and transcriptional change in Drosophila melanogaster

Cold hardening treatment - a brief exposure to low temperatures - can protect certain insects against subsequent exposure to temperatures sufficiently low to cause damage or lethality. Microarray analysis to examine the changes in transcript abundance associated with cold hardening treatment (0 degrees C for 2 h followed by 30 min recovery at 25 degrees C) was undertaken in Drosophila melanogaster in order to gain insight into this phenomenon. Transcripts associated with 36 genes were identified, a subset of which appeared to be also differentially expressed after heat shock treatment. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to independently determine transcript abundance of a subset of these sequences. Taken together, these assays suggest that stress proteins, including Hsp23, Hsp26, Hsp83 and Frost as well as membrane-associated proteins may contribute to the cold hardening response.

Human heat shock factor 1 is predominantly a nuclear protein before and after heat stress

The induction of the heat shock genes in eukaryotes by heat and other forms of stress is mediated by a transcription factor known as heat shock factor 1 (HSF1). HSF1 is present in unstressed metazoan cells as a monomer with low affinity for DNA, and upon exposure to stress it is converted to an ‘active’ homotrimer that binds the promoters of heat shock genes with high affinity and induces their transcription. The conversion of HSF1 to its active form is hypothesized to be a multistep process involving physical changes in the HSF1 molecule and the possible translocation of HSF1 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. While all studies to date have found active HSF1 to be a nuclear protein, there have been conflicting reports on whether the inactive form of HSF is predominantly a cytoplasmic or nuclear protein. In this study, we have made antibodies against human HSF1 and have reexamined its localization in unstressed and heat-shocked human HeLa and A549 cells, and in green monkey Vero cells. Biochemical fractionation of heat-shocked HeLa cells followed by western blot analysis showed that HSF1 was mostly found in the nuclear fraction. In extracts made from unshocked cells, HSF1 was predominantly found in the cytoplasmic fraction using one fractionation procedure, but was distributed approximately equally between the cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions when a different procedure was used. Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that HSF1 was predominantly a nuclear protein in both heat shocked and unstressed cells. Quantification of HSF1 staining showed that approximately 80% of HSF1 was present in the nucleus both before and after heat stress. These results suggest that HSF1 is predominantly a nuclear protein prior to being exposed to stress, but has low affinity for the nucleus and is easily extracted using most biochemical fractionation procedures. These results also imply that HSF1 translocation is probably not part of the multistep process in HSF1 activation for many cell types.

Cell-specific expression and heat-shock induction of Hsps during spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster

The developmental and heat-shock-induced expression of two small heat-shock proteins (Hsp23 and Hsp27) was investigated during spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Both of these Hsps were expressed in unstressed and stressed male gonads as shown by immunoblotting. Immunostaining of whole-mount organs and thin sections of testes showed that an anti-Hsp23 antibody specifically decorated cells of the somatic lineage, such as the cyst cells and the epithelial cells of the testis and of the seminal vesicle. Hsp27 was expressed in some somatic cells (cyst cells and epithelial cells of the accessory glands) and, in addition, was also visible in the maturing spermatocytes of the germline. The same cell-specific pattern of expression was observed after heat shock, and cells which did not express Hsp23 and Hsp27 in the absence of stress were similarly unable to mount a heat shock response for these s-Hsps. However other Hsps such as Hsp70 and Hsp22 were induced under heat-shock conditions in testes. Actinomycin D prevented the heat-induced accumulation of these Hsps indicating that the induction of Hsps was regulated at the transcriptional level. The heat shock transcriptional factor of Drosophila (DmHSF), present in significantly lower amount in testes when compared to other tissues such as the head, was shown to be required for the heat activation of Hsp22 and Hsp70. Immunostaining revealed that HSF expression was restricted to specific cells such as cyst cells, epithelial pigment cells, spermatogonia and spermatids but not the primary spermatocytes. These data show that the expression and induction of the different small Hsps is regulated in a cell-specific manner under both normal and heat shock conditions and suggest that factors other than the DmHSF are involved in this regulation in male gonads.

Xenopus heat shock factor 1 is a nuclear protein before heat stress

Stress-induced expression of the heat shock (hs) genes in eukaryotes is mediated by a transcription factor known as heat shock factor 1 (HSF1). HSF1 is present in a latent, monomeric form in unstressed metazoan cells and upon exposure to heat or other forms of stress is converted to an "active" trimeric form, which binds the promoters of hs genes and induces their transcription. The conversion of HSF1 to its active form is hypothesized to be a multistep process involving (i) oligomerization of HSF1, plus (ii) additional changes in its physical conformation, (iii) changes in its phosphorylation state, and for some species (iv) translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Oligomerization of HSF appears to be essential for high affinity DNA binding, but it remains unclear whether the other steps occur in all organisms or what their mechanistic roles are. In this study we have examined if heat-induced cytoplasmic-nuclear translocation of HSF1 occurs in Xenopus oocytes. We observed that germinal vesicles (nuclei) that were physically dissected from unshocked Xenopus laevis oocytes contain no HSF1 binding activity. Interestingly, in vitro heat shock treatments of isolated nuclei from unshocked oocytes activated HSF1 binding, indicating that HSF1 must have been present in the unshocked nuclei prior to isolation. Induction of HSF1 binding was not observed in enucleated oocytes. Western blot analysis using an affinity-purified polyclonal antibody made against X. laevis HSF1 showed that HSF1 is present in equal amounts in unshocked and shocked oocytes and isolated nuclei. HSF1 was not detected in enucleated oocytes. These results clearly demonstrate that HSF1 is a nuclear protein in oocytes prior to exposure to stress. In Xenopus oocytes, therefore, HSF1 translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus is not part of the multistep process of HSF1 activation. These results also imply that the signals and/or factors involved in HSF1 activation must have their effect in the nuclear compartment.

Sodium salicylate decreases intracellular ATP, induces both heat shock factor binding and chromosomal puffing, but does not induce hsp 70 gene transcription in Drosophila

Sodium salicylate has long been known to be an inducer of the heat shock puffs and presumably heat shock gene transcription in the polytene chromosomes of Drosophila salivary gland cells. Stress-induced transcription of the heat shock genes is mediated by the transcription factor known as Heat Shock Factor (HSF). In yeast, sodium salicylate has been reported to induce the DNA binding of HSF but not heat shock gene transcription itself, and similar findings have been reported in human cells. This apparent discrepancy in the induction of certain aspects of the heat shock response between these organisms prompted us to carefully reexamine the induction of the heat shock response in Drosophila salivary gland cells of third instar larvae and Drosophila tissue culture (SL2) cells. Sodium salicylate (3-30 mM) decreases intracellular ATP levels in SL2 cells and induces HSF binding activity in SL2 and salivary gland cells in a dose-dependent manner. Despite the induction of HSF binding and heat shock puffs in polytene chromosomes, we found no evidence for increased hsp 70 gene transcription suggesting that chromosomal puffing and gene transcription may be separable events. Salicylate did not induce the HSF hyperphosphorylation that is normally associated with HSF activation. Furthermore, salicylate (30 mM) prevented heat-induced hyperphosphorylation of HSF and hsp 70 gene transcription indicating that salicylate's inhibitory effect on hsp 70 transcription may be independent of its effect on HSF binding activity. We propose that the reduction in intracellular ATP caused by the addition of salicylate likely plays a role in the activation of HSF binding and the inhibition of both HSF hyperphosphorylation and hsp 70 gene transcription.

Activation of Drosophila heat shock factor: conformational change associated with a monomer-to-trimer transition

The induction of heat shock genes in eukaryotic cells is regulated by the transcription factor heat shock factor (HSF). Activation of HSF occurs at two independent levels, DNA binding and the acquisition of transcriptional competence. The binding of HSF to DNA is accomplished by a stress-induced oligomeric switch of HSF protein. We have defined the oligomeric state of the latent and induced forms of HSF by measuring the sedimentation coefficient and the Stokes radius of the protein in Drosophila cell extracts. Calculation of the native molecular mass indicates that the two forms of Drosophila HSF are best described as a monomer and trimer, respectively, of the 77-kDa HSF polypeptide. The monomeric and trimeric states of HSF were verified by chemical cross-linking experiments. The finding of a monomeric composition for the latent form of HSF is incompatible with speculative models which suggest that molecular chaperones such as hsp70 feed back to inhibit trimerization of HSF by forming a stable heteromeric complex. We also found that both HSF monomers and HSF trimers exhibit unusually high frictional ratios, indicating that they have asymmetric shapes. The degree of asymmetry is significantly greater for the HSF trimer, suggesting that the monomer undergoes a conformational change to a more extended structure upon trimerization. These findings are consistent with a model for the inert HSF protein that is based on a monomer constrained by intramolecular coiled-coil interactions between amino- and carboxy-terminal domains.

Stress-induced oligomerization and chromosomal relocalization of heat-shock factor

The induction of heat-shock transcription factor (HSF) binding to DNA is accomplished by a heat-induced oligomerization. The transition to the induced state is accompanied by a chromosomal redistribution of HSF to the heat-shock puff sites. Over 150 additional chromosomal sites also accumulate HSF, including developmental loci that are repressed during heat shock. These findings suggest an unforeseen role for HSF as a repressor of normal gene activity during heat stress.

Molecular cloning and expression of a hexameric Drosophila heat shock factor subject to negative regulation

We report the cloning of the transcriptional activator of heat shock genes, HSF, from Drosophila. The predicted sequence of Drosophila HSF protein is surprisingly divergent from that of yeast HSF, except in regions important for DNA binding and oligomerization. A segment of the DNA binding domain of HSF bears an intriguing similarity to the putative DNA recognition helix of bacterial sigma factors, while the oligomerization domain contains an unusual arrangement of conserved hydrophobic heptad repeats. Drosophila HSF produced in E. coli under nonshock conditions forms a hexamer that binds specifically to DNA with high affinity and activates transcription from a heat shock promoter in vitro. In contrast, when HSF is expressed in Xenopus oocytes, maximal DNA binding affinity is observed only after heat shock induction. These results suggest that Drosophila HSF has an intrinsic affinity for DNA, which is repressed under nonshock conditions in vivo.

Effects of heat and other inducers of the stress response on protein degradation in Chinese hamster and Drosophila cells

Many recent studies have suggested that heat and other inducers of the heat shock (stress) response in eukaryotic cells might result in the generation of abnormal proteins which would result in the overloading of protein degradation systems and the stabilization of proteins involved in positively regulating heat shock (hs) gene expression. In this study we have examined the effects different heat treatments and other hs inducers have on protein degradation in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) and Drosophila Kc and Schneider cells. We have found that intermediate temperatures which induced the hs response (42 degrees C in CHO and 34 degrees C in Kc cells) did increase protein degradation rates whereas, higher temperatures which also induced the hs response (45 degrees C in CHO and 37 degrees C in Kc cells) initially increased but then decreased protein degradation rates. While these results are consistent with a model in which the protein degradation system is being overloaded and/or components of it are being depleted, we have found several conditions which induce hs proteins which rule out this mechanism. Exposure of either cell type to amino acid analogs (5 mM canavanine or 5 mM S-aminoethyl cysteine) resulted in the rapid degradation of those proteins which had incorporated the analogs in both CHO and Drosophila cells. However, the addition of analogs had little or no effect on the degradation of preexisting proteins, indicating that the introduction of abnormal proteins probably didn't overload the protein degradation system(s). The addition of 100 microM cadmium sulfate or 100 microM sodium arsenite had little or no effect on protein degradation rates in CHO cells even though both were good inducers of the hs proteins. Thus, exposure to inducers of the hs response does not universally increase protein degradation rates nor does it stabilize preexisting proteins. Therefore, the degradation of abnormal proteins is probably not involved in inducing the hs genes.

Patterns of protein synthesis during the cell cycle of Chinese hamster ovary cells

The protein synthesis patterns at various stages of the cell cycle of Chinese hamster ovary cells were examined by labelling cells with [35S]methionine and then separating the proteins by isoelectric focussing and two-dimensional, nonequilibrium pH gradient gel electrophoresis. We have observed a number of proteins which display quantitative differences in synthesis at specific cell cycle stages and of these the alpha- and beta-tubulins have been identified. A few proteins appear to be uniquely synthesized at specific times during the cell cycle. These include the histones and a modified version of them, which are synthesized only in S phase, and a pair of 21 kilodalton (kDa), pI 5.5 proteins, which appear only in late G2 and mitosis. We have also identified a 58-kDa, pI 7.5 protein which is present at all cell cycle stages except during late G2. This protein appears to have the same temporal properties as a 57-kDa protein called "cyclin" originally described in sea urchin embryos.

Changes in protein phosphorylation during the cell cycle of Chinese hamster ovary cells

The phosphorylation patterns of proteins were examined during the cell cycle of Chinese hamster ovary cells. This was accomplished by labeling synchronized cells at various times with [32P]orthophosphate and separating the proteins by both isoelectric focusing and nonequilibrium pH gradient two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. The most dramatic changes occurred during late G2/M when approximately eight proteins (including vimentin, lamin B, and histones 1 and 3) showed increased phosphorylation. Ten other proteins appeared to be uniquely phosphorylated during late G2/M. Of these 10 proteins, seven were no longer phosphorylated shortly after mitosis. There is also at least one protein which showed a relative decrease in phosphorylation during late G2/M.

Synthesis of unique low molecular weight proteins during late G2 and mitosis

Changes in protein synthesis were examined during the cell cycle of Chinese hamster ovary cells by labeling synchronized cells at various times with [35S]methionine and separating the proteins on two-dimensional polyacrylamide gels. Several proteins, including tubulin, showed marked differences in their relative rates of synthesis during the cell cycle. A few proteins were found to be synthesized at a specific time during the cycle. In particular, a pair of proteins of approximately 21,000 daltons and isoelectric point of 5.5 were found to be synthesized only in late G2 and mitotic cells. Cells that were labeled during mitosis and then allowed to divide showed no trace of these proteins, indicating that their presence is transient and that they are likely involved in mitosis.

Chinese hamster cells can be reversibly blocked before mitosis with the protein synthesis inhibitor, emetine

The inhibition of protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells will prevent them from entering mitosis. Emetine inhibits peptide elongation. When it was added to asynchronous populations of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, the mitotic index decreased sharply 30 to 40 min later. It was found that the inhibitory effect of emetine could be reversed when it was removed and the reversibility was dependent on both the initial concentration of emetine and the pH of the medium. Cell populations that were blocked by emetine for up to 2h showed a four- to fivefold increase in mitotic index approximately 1 h after the emetine was removed. These results indicate that there is a point or period in G2 phase at which critical ‘mitotic proteins’ are being synthesized, and if their synthesis is interrupted cells will fail to enter mitosis.