Addition of infliximab compared with addition of sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine to methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (Swefot trial): 1-year results of a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

New treatment strategies for early rheumatoid arthritis are evolving rapidly. We aimed to compare addition of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine) with addition of a tumour necrosis factor antagonist (infliximab) to methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

We undertook a randomised trial in 15 rheumatology units in Sweden. We enrolled patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (symptom duration <1 year) and administered methotrexate (up to 20 mg per week). After 3-4 months, those who had not achieved low disease activity but who could tolerate methotrexate were randomly allocated by computer addition of either sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine or infliximab. Primary outcome was achievement of a good response according to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria at 12 months. Patients were followed up to 24 months; here, we present findings at 12 months. Analysis was by intention to treat and we used non-responder imputation. The Swefot (Swedish Pharmacotherapy) study is registered in the WHO database at the Karolinska University Hospital, number CT20080004.

FINDINGS

487 patients were initially enrolled. Of 258 who had not achieved low disease activity with methotrexate, 130 were allocated sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine and 128 were assigned infliximab. 32 of 130 (25%) patients allocated sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine achieved the primary outcome compared with 50 of 128 (39%) assigned infliximab (risk ratio 1.59 [95% CI 1.10-2.30], p=0.0160). Adverse events were balanced fairly well between the two groups and accorded with known adverse events of the drugs used. No deaths occurred in either group.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with early rheumatoid arthritis in whom methotrexate treatment failed, addition of a tumour necrosis factor antagonist to methotrexate monotherapy is clinically superior to addition of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

FUNDING

Swedish Rheumatism Association, Schering-Plough.

Remission and response to early treatment of RA assessed by the Disease Activity Score. BARFOT study group. Better Anti-rheumatic Farmacotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To assess criteria for individual response and remission based on the Disease Activity Score (DAS) in patients with RA participating in a long-term observational study.

METHODS

The EULAR (European League against Rheumatism) criteria for individual response and a recently proposed remission criterion, DAS < 1.6, were applied to 90 patients with RA after treatment for 2 yr with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and/or corticosteroids.

RESULTS

Seventy-six per cent of the patients were classified as responders (46% good and 30% moderate responders). Good responders had significantly more improvement in pain and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score than moderate responders and non-responders. Paired comparisons showed significant X-ray progression both for moderate responders and non-responders but not for good responders. Twenty-nine per cent of all responders had an end-point DAS > 2.4, indicating active disease. In this group of responders, X-ray changes progressed significantly, but this could not be demonstrated in the group of responders with DAS < or = 2.4. Thirty-six per cent of the patients included in the study were classified as being in remission after 2 yr of treatment. The group of patients in remission showed no evidence of X-ray progression after 2 yr.

CONCLUSIONS

Response and remission criteria based on DAS were useful in a study of patients with RA who were managed essentially as in clinical practice. The criteria used showed construct and criterion validity, although discriminant validity could not be shown. The application of valid criteria for response and remission in clinical practice may be a useful aid in the evaluation of treatment effects and in making treatment decisions for individual patients.

Contact allergy to gold and gold therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis were investigated for contact allergy to gold in connection with treatment with gold preparations. There were 57 patients with rheumatoid arthritis previously treated with gold, with or without cutaneous side-effects, as well as 20 patients intended for such treatment; all were exposed to patch and intradermal tests with gold sodium thiosulfate, gold sodium thiomalate and auranofin. Contact allergy to gold was demonstrated in 8 out of 77 patients (10.4%). In the retrospective material, gold allergy was found in 1.8%, in the prospective material in 35.0%. Contact allergy to gold is very frequent among patients with rheumatoid arthritis before gold therapy. In order to avoid early hypersensitivity reactions skin tests should be carried out before gold therapy is instituted.

Skin rashes and stomatitis due to parenteral treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with sodium aurothiomalate

In a prospective study of 45 patients with rheumatoid arthritis mucocutaneous symptoms and signs were evaluated before and during treatment with intramuscular sodium aurothiomalate (Myocrisin). The work, performed in close collaboration between dermatology and rheumatology departments, showed that there was no significant increase in mucocutaneous side effects in patients with pre-existing mucocutaneous disease. It is concluded that pre-existing dermatitis is not a contraindication for treatment with gold salts and that a previous mucocutaneous reaction to gold salts is not an absolute contraindication for a new trial of chrysotherapy.

Palmoplantar pustulosis and sternocostoclavicular arthro-osteitis

Seventeen patients with shoulder pain and radiographic involvement of the sternoclavicular or sternocostal joints, or both, are described. Eleven of these patients also had palmoplantar pustulosis. Histological examination of the joints showed chronic and subacute inflammation, increased osteoblastic activity, and cartilage degeneration. Propionibacterium acnes was cultured in tissue samples from seven of the 15 biopsied patients, a finding at variance with those of previous reports. The possibility that sternoclavicular arthro-osteitis is of infectious origin should be the subject of further investigation. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may provide pain relief, possibly owing to their inhibitory action on osteoblasts. In cases of severely restricted movement or severe pain resection of the medial clavicle may be considered.