1
|
Bebb DG, Agulnik J, Albadine R, Banerji S, Bigras G, Butts C, Couture C, Cutz JC, Desmeules P, Ionescu DN, Leighl NB, Melosky B, Morzycki W, Rashid-Kolvear F, Lab C, Sekhon HS, Smith AC, Stockley TL, Torlakovic E, Xu Z, Tsao MS. Crizotinib inhibition of ROS1-positive tumours in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a Canadian perspective. Curr Oncol 2019; 26:e551-e557. [PMID: 31548824 PMCID: PMC6726257 DOI: 10.3747/co.26.5137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The ros1 kinase is an oncogenic driver in non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc). Fusion events involving the ROS1 gene are found in 1%-2% of nsclc patients and lead to deregulation of a tyrosine kinase-mediated multi-use intracellular signalling pathway, which then promotes the growth, proliferation, and progression of tumour cells. ROS1 fusion is a distinct molecular subtype of nsclc, found independently of other recognized driver mutations, and it is predominantly identified in younger patients (<50 years of age), women, never-smokers, and patients with adenocarcinoma histology. Targeted inhibition of the aberrant ros1 kinase with crizotinib is associated with increased progression-free survival (pfs) and improved quality-of-life measures. As the sole approved treatment for ROS1-rearranged nsclc, crizotinib has been demonstrated, through a variety of clinical trials and retrospective analyses, to be a safe, effective, well-tolerated, and appropriate treatment for patients having the ROS1 rearrangement. Canadian physicians endorse current guidelines which recommend that all patients with nonsquamous advanced nsclc, regardless of clinical characteristics, be tested for ROS1 rearrangement. Future integration of multigene testing panels into the standard of care could allow for efficient and cost-effective comprehensive testing of all patients with advanced nsclc. If a ROS1 rearrangement is found, treatment with crizotinib, preferably in the first-line setting, constitutes the standard of care, with other treatment options being investigated, as appropriate, should resistance to crizotinib develop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D G Bebb
- Alberta: Tom Baker Cancer Centre and University of Calgary, Calgary (Bebb); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton (Bigras); Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton (Butts); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, and Calgary Laboratory Services, Calgary (Rashid-Kolvear)
| | - J Agulnik
- Quebec: Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal (Agulnik); Department of Pathology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (Albadine); Service d'anatomopathologie et de cytologie, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City (Couture, Desmeules)
| | - R Albadine
- Quebec: Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal (Agulnik); Department of Pathology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (Albadine); Service d'anatomopathologie et de cytologie, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City (Couture, Desmeules)
| | - S Banerji
- Manitoba: Department of Medical Oncology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg (Banerji)
| | - G Bigras
- Alberta: Tom Baker Cancer Centre and University of Calgary, Calgary (Bebb); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton (Bigras); Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton (Butts); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, and Calgary Laboratory Services, Calgary (Rashid-Kolvear)
| | - C Butts
- Alberta: Tom Baker Cancer Centre and University of Calgary, Calgary (Bebb); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton (Bigras); Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton (Butts); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, and Calgary Laboratory Services, Calgary (Rashid-Kolvear)
| | - C Couture
- Quebec: Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal (Agulnik); Department of Pathology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (Albadine); Service d'anatomopathologie et de cytologie, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City (Couture, Desmeules)
| | - J C Cutz
- Ontario: St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton (Cutz); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Leighl); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa (Sekhon); Department of Clinical Laboratory Genetics, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto (Smith, Stockley); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Tsao)
| | - P Desmeules
- Quebec: Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal (Agulnik); Department of Pathology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (Albadine); Service d'anatomopathologie et de cytologie, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City (Couture, Desmeules)
| | - D N Ionescu
- British Columbia: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (Ionescu); BC Cancer-Vancouver Centre, Vancouver (Melosky)
| | - N B Leighl
- Ontario: St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton (Cutz); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Leighl); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa (Sekhon); Department of Clinical Laboratory Genetics, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto (Smith, Stockley); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Tsao)
| | - B Melosky
- British Columbia: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (Ionescu); BC Cancer-Vancouver Centre, Vancouver (Melosky)
| | - W Morzycki
- Nova Scotia: Queen Elizabeth iiHealth Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax (Morzycki, Xu)
| | - F Rashid-Kolvear
- Alberta: Tom Baker Cancer Centre and University of Calgary, Calgary (Bebb); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton (Bigras); Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton (Butts); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, and Calgary Laboratory Services, Calgary (Rashid-Kolvear)
- Quebec: Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal (Agulnik); Department of Pathology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (Albadine); Service d'anatomopathologie et de cytologie, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City (Couture, Desmeules)
- Manitoba: Department of Medical Oncology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg (Banerji)
- Ontario: St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton (Cutz); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Leighl); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa (Sekhon); Department of Clinical Laboratory Genetics, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto (Smith, Stockley); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Tsao)
- British Columbia: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (Ionescu); BC Cancer-Vancouver Centre, Vancouver (Melosky)
- Nova Scotia: Queen Elizabeth iiHealth Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax (Morzycki, Xu)
- Saskatchewan: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Saskatchewan Health Authority and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon (Torlakovic)
| | - Clin Lab
- Alberta: Tom Baker Cancer Centre and University of Calgary, Calgary (Bebb); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton (Bigras); Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton (Butts); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, and Calgary Laboratory Services, Calgary (Rashid-Kolvear)
| | - H S Sekhon
- Ontario: St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton (Cutz); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Leighl); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa (Sekhon); Department of Clinical Laboratory Genetics, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto (Smith, Stockley); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Tsao)
| | - A C Smith
- Ontario: St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton (Cutz); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Leighl); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa (Sekhon); Department of Clinical Laboratory Genetics, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto (Smith, Stockley); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Tsao)
| | - T L Stockley
- Ontario: St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton (Cutz); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Leighl); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa (Sekhon); Department of Clinical Laboratory Genetics, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto (Smith, Stockley); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Tsao)
| | - E Torlakovic
- Saskatchewan: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Saskatchewan Health Authority and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon (Torlakovic)
| | - Z Xu
- Nova Scotia: Queen Elizabeth iiHealth Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax (Morzycki, Xu)
| | - M S Tsao
- Ontario: St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton (Cutz); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Leighl); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa (Sekhon); Department of Clinical Laboratory Genetics, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto (Smith, Stockley); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Tsao)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lim C, Sekhon HS, Cutz JC, Hwang DM, Kamel-Reid S, Carter RF, Santos GDC, Waddell T, Binnie M, Patel M, Paul N, Chung T, Brade A, El-Maraghi R, Sit C, Tsao MS, Leighl NB. Improving molecular testing and personalized medicine in non-small-cell lung cancer in Ontario. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 24:103-110. [PMID: 28490924 DOI: 10.3747/co.24.3495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although molecular testing has become standard in managing advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc), most patients undergo minimally invasive procedures, and the diagnostic tumour specimens available for testing are usually limited. A knowledge translation initiative to educate diagnostic specialists about sampling techniques and laboratory processes was undertaken to improve the uptake and application of molecular testing in advanced lung cancer. METHODS A multidisciplinary panel of physician experts including pathologists, respirologists, interventional thoracic radiologists, thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists developed a specialty-specific education program, adapting international clinical guidelines to the local Ontario context. Expert recommendations from the program are reported here. RESULTS Panel experts agreed that specialists procuring samples for lung cancer diagnosis should choose biopsy techniques that maximize tumour cellularity, and that conservation strategies to maximize tissue for molecular testing should be used in tissue processing. The timeliness of molecular reporting can be improved by pathologist-initiated reflex testing upon confirmation of nonsquamous nsclc and by prompt transportation of specimens to designated molecular diagnostic centres. To coordinate timely molecular testing and optimal treatment, collaboration and communication between all clinicians involved in diagnosing patients with advanced lung cancer are mandatory. CONCLUSIONS Knowledge transfer to diagnostic lung cancer specialists could potentially improve molecular testing and treatment for advanced lung cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Lim
- Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - H S Sekhon
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa
| | - J C Cutz
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton
| | - D M Hwang
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - S Kamel-Reid
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto.,Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - R F Carter
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton.,LifeLabs Genetics, Toronto
| | - G da Cunha Santos
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - T Waddell
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - M Binnie
- Division of Respirology, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - M Patel
- Division of Respirology, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga
| | - N Paul
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, Toronto
| | - T Chung
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, Toronto
| | - A Brade
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - R El-Maraghi
- Simcoe Muskoka Regional Cancer Centre, Barrie; and
| | - C Sit
- Lung Cancer Canada, Toronto, ON
| | - M S Tsao
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - N B Leighl
- Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
VanderMeer R, Chambers S, Van Dam A, Cutz JC, Goffin JR, Ellis PM. Diagnosing lung cancer in the 21st century: are we ready to meet the challenge of individualized care? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 22:272-8. [PMID: 26300665 DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Histologic and molecular subtyping have become increasingly important as predictors of treatment benefit in lung cancer. The objective of the present study was to determine whether current diagnostic approaches provide adequate tissue to allow for individualized treatment decisions. METHODS Our retrospective cohort study of new lung cancer patients seen at an academic centre between July 2007 and June 2008 collected baseline demographic and diagnostic information, including mode of diagnosis, type of diagnostic material, and pathology diagnosis. RESULTS Of the 431 study patients, 20% had stage i or ii non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc), 24% stage iii disease, and 39% stage iv nsclc. Three quarters of the small-cell lung cancer (sclc) cases were extensive stage. Diagnostically, 18% of patients had sclc; 30%, adenocarcinoma; 27%, squamous-cell cancer; 2%, large-cell carcinoma; 1%, bronchoalveolar carcinoma; 1%, mixed histology; 18%, nsclc not otherwise specified; 4%, other; and 2%, no pathology diagnosis. Surgical pathology material was available in 80% of cases, and cytology material alone in 20%. Surgical pathology material was more common in patients with early-stage than with advanced disease (89% for stages i and ii vs. 74% for stages iii and iv, p < 0.0001). The pathology report included ambiguous terms in 24% of cases: "consistent" (12%), "suspicious" (3%), "favour" (2%), "suggestive" (2%), "likely" (1%), "compatible" with malignancy (1%), "at least" (1%), "atypical" (0.5%), and "no pathology" (1.5%). CONCLUSIONS Current diagnostic approaches in most lung cancer patients appear adequate, but complete histopathologic identification is missing in nearly 20% of cases, and some uncertainty as to the final diagnosis is expressed in 24% of pathology reports. Some improvement in diagnostic sampling and pathology reporting are required to allow for implementation of current treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R VanderMeer
- Medical Oncology Department, Walker Family Cancer Centre, St. Catharines, ON
| | - S Chambers
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON
| | - A Van Dam
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON
| | - J C Cutz
- Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON
| | - J R Goffin
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON; ; Medical Oncology Department, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON
| | - P M Ellis
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON; ; Medical Oncology Department, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tsakiridis T, Storozhuk Y, Toran S, Hopmans S, Cutz JC, Tsiani E, Wright J, Singh G. Abstract 2491: Metformin sensitizes human lung cancer xenografts to ionizing radiation: Response of the AMPK pathway. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-2491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction : Radiation therapy is a standard therapeutic modality in lung cancer (LC). Unfortunately, LC demonstrates radiation resistance and poor response to even high doses of chest radiotherapy. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop effective and well tolerated radiation sensitizers in LC. Recently, we showed that ionizing radiation (IR) and metformin (MET) activate the energy sensor and tumor suppressor kinase AMP-activated kinase (AMPK). MET enhanced IR activation of AMPK in LC cells and increased the cytotoxicity of IR in clonogenic assays. In the present study we investigated, in human LC xenografts, the radio-sensitizing properties of MET and its effects on the activity of the AMPK pathway in intact tumors.
Methods: A549 cells (2×106) were grafted in the franks of Balb/c immunodeficient athymic nude mice and tumors were left to grow to 100 mm3. MET supplementation was delivered in drinking water at a dose of 250 mg/kg daily, and IR of 10 Gy was delivered as a single fraction 7 days after initiation of metformin administration. Eight weeks later animals were euthanized and tumors where isolated. Half of each tumor was snap frozen for preparation of whole tumor lysates and immunoblotting analysis and the other half was fixed and embedded for immunohistochemistry analysis. Tumour growth kinetics and levels of total AMPK, phosphor (P)-AMPK (P-AMPK Thr172) and P-Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase (ACC) and P-Akt were evaluated.
Results: MET and IR alone inhibited significantly A549 LC xenograft tumor growth. Furthermore, the combined treatment of MET and IR produce an additive effect and inhibited tumor growth more than each treatment alone. Both IR and MET enhanced AMPK phosphorylation and activity detected by ACC phosphorylation. Similar to tumor growth kinetics, the combined treatment of MET+IR enhanced AMPK activity and phosphorylation above the levels of each treatment alone. However, we also detected that MET and IR treatments also increased significantly the total AMPK α subunit levels in tumor tissues with a consistent potentiation of this effect when the two treatments were combined. On the other hand MET showed a tendency to inhibit basal and radiation-induced Akt phosphorylation levels in xenografts. Our immunoblotting results were verified with immunohistochemistry experiments.
Conclusion: Similar to our earlier observations in tissue culture models, the present studies suggest that MET inhibits LC tumour growth and sensitizes them to IR. The two agents mediate both expression and activation of AMPK which appears to be associated with inhibition of Akt. Activation of AMPK by MET and IR in-vivo does not appear to depend on LKB1 as A549 cells are LKB1 null. These results demonstrate the potential of MET to function as a radiation sensitizer in-vivo and support evaluation of this drug in LC clinical trials in combination with radiation.
Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2491. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-2491
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yaryna Storozhuk
- 1McMaster Univ. Juravinski Cancer Ctr., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sanli Toran
- 1McMaster Univ. Juravinski Cancer Ctr., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Hopmans
- 1McMaster Univ. Juravinski Cancer Ctr., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - J-C Cutz
- 2McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - James Wright
- 1McMaster Univ. Juravinski Cancer Ctr., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gurmit Singh
- 1McMaster Univ. Juravinski Cancer Ctr., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhu CQ, Cutz JC, Liu N, Lau D, Shepherd FA, Squire JA, Tsao MS. Amplification of telomerase (hTERT) gene is a poor prognostic marker in non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2006; 94:1452-9. [PMID: 16641908 PMCID: PMC2361293 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Telomerase reactivation is a hallmark of human carcinogenesis. Increased telomerase activity may result from gene amplification and/or overexpression. This study evaluates the prognostic value of hTERT gene amplification and mRNA overexpression in 144 resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) specimens. The hTERT gene copy number was assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) on laser-capture microdissected tumour cells of 81 tumours, and by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) on a subset of 59 tumours. hTERT mRNA level was determined by reverse transcription (RT)-qPCR in 130 tumours. In total, 57% of (46 out of 81) primary NSCLC specimens demonstrated hTERT amplification, which was significantly more common (P<0.001) in adenocarcinoma (30 out of 40) than in squamous cell carcinoma (13 out of 37). The hTERT mRNA overexpression was noted in 74% (94 out of 130) of tumours; it was more frequent in squamous cell than in adenocarcinoma (87 vs 68%, P=0.03). Overexpression was significantly associated with amplification (P=0.03), especially in adenocarcinoma. The hTERT gene amplification was prognostic for shorter recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio=2.16, P=0.03). These data indicate that gene amplification is an important mechanism for hTERT overexpression in lung adenocarcinoma and is an independent poor prognostic marker for disease-free survival in NSCLC.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism
- DNA, Neoplasm/genetics
- DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics
- Disease Progression
- Female
- Gene Amplification
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
- Humans
- In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
- Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Lung Neoplasms/genetics
- Lung Neoplasms/metabolism
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Prognosis
- RNA, Messenger/genetics
- RNA, Messenger/metabolism
- Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Telomerase/genetics
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C-Q Zhu
- Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Ontario, Toranto, Canada
| | - J-C Cutz
- Department of Pathology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - N Liu
- Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Ontario, Toranto, Canada
| | - D Lau
- Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Ontario, Toranto, Canada
| | - F A Shepherd
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9
| | - J A Squire
- Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Ontario, Toranto, Canada
- Department of Pathology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9
| | - M-S Tsao
- Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Ontario, Toranto, Canada
- Department of Pathology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9
- Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|