Interpretation of Post-operative Distal Humerus Radiographs After Internal Fixation: Prediction of Later Loss of Fixation

PURPOSE

Stable fixation of distal humerus fracture fragments is necessary for adequate healing and maintenance of reduction. The purpose of this study was to measure the reliability and accuracy of interpretation of postoperative radiographs to predict which implants will loosen or break after operative treatment of bicolumnar distal humerus fractures. We also addressed agreement among surgeons regarding which fracture fixation will loosen or break and the influence of years in independent practice, location of practice, and so forth.

METHODS

A total of 232 orthopedic residents and surgeons from around the world evaluated 24 anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of distal humerus fractures on a Web-based platform to predict which implants would loosen or break. Agreement among observers was measured using the multi-rater kappa measure.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of prediction of failure of fixation of distal humerus fracture on radiographs was 63%, specificity was 53%, positive predictive value was 36%, the negative predictive value was 78%, and accuracy was 56%. There was fair interobserver agreement (κ = 0.27) regarding predictions of failure of fixation of distal humerus fracture on radiographs. Interobserver variability did not change when assessed for the various subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

When experienced and skilled surgeons perform fixation of type C distal humerus fracture, the immediate postoperative radiograph is not predictive of fixation failure. Reoperation based on the probability of failure might not be advisable.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic III.

The effect of simulated elbow arthrodesis on the ability to perform activities of daily living

The dominant elbow joint of 24 healthy volunteers was immobilized with a functional brace in increments of 20 degrees (6 positions ranging from 30 degrees to 130 degrees ). Average scores were obtained for personal care hygiene tasks (PCH), activity of daily living (ADL), and total functional scores (PCH + ADL) for each elbow flexion position. Functional scores increased with increasing elbow flexion, peaking at 110 degrees and then tapering down. Repeated-measures analysis of variance showed statistical significance, with functional scores improving with increasing elbow flexion for PCH, ADL, and PCH + ADL scores. Further pairwise comparisons for elbow position between 90 degrees and 110 degrees flexion groups demonstrated significant higher mean functional scores for ADL and combined PCH + ADL for the 110 degrees group. The results of this study support a clear advantage in subjects' upper-extremity functional abilities with the elbow immobilized at 110 degrees of flexion when dealing with normal upper-extremity joints. This angle of flexion should be considered in patients undergoing trial immobilization before an elbow arthrodesis.

Extensor carpi radialis brevis. An anatomical analysis of its origin

We studied the origin of extensor carpi radialis brevis using 40 fresh frozen human cadaver specimens. Ten were stained with haematoxylin and eosin and trichrome which showed the collagenous structure of the extensor tendons at their origin. Gross anatomical observation showed that there was no definitive separation between brevis and communis at the osseotendinous junction. The histological findings confirmed the lack of separation between the two tendons. The extensor tendons were in close proximity to the joint capsule but trichrome staining showed no interdigitation of the tendon with the capsule. The validity of ascribing the pain of lateral epicondylitis to extensor carpi radialis brevis must be questioned. It appears to arise more from the 'common extensor' origin.

Extensor carpi radialis brevis

We studied the origin of extensor carpi radialis brevis using 40 fresh frozen human cadaver specimens. Ten were stained with haematoxylin and eosin and trichrome which showed the collagenous structure of the extensor tendons at their origin. Gross anatomical observation showed that there was no definitive separation between brevis and communis at the osseotendinous junction. The histological findings confirmed the lack of separation between the two tendons. The extensor tendons were in close proximity to the joint capsule but trichrome staining showed no interdigitation of the tendon with the capsule. The validity of ascribing the pain of lateral epicondylitis to extensor carpi radialis brevis must be questioned. It appears to arise more from the ‘common extensor’ origin.