1
|
Personalized atrial fibrillation ablation by tailoring ablation index to the left atrial wall thickness. the ablate by-law single center study. Europace 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab116.203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Dr Teres is funded by the research fellowship grant from the Swiss Heart Rhythm Foundation, Dr Carreno was funded was funded by a Scholarship from Sociedad Española de Cardiología (SEC).
Introduction
Left atrial wall thickness (LAWT) is a determinant of transmural lesion formation during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The utility of ablation index (AI) to dose radiofrequency (RF) delivery for the reduction of AF recurrences has already been proven with a target AI ≥ 400 at the posterior wall and ≥550 at the anterior wall.
Objective
To determine if adapting AI to atrial wall thickness (AWT) is feasible, effective and safe during AF ablation.
Methods
Consecutive patients referred for a first PAF ablation. LAWT 3D-maps were obtained from multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and integrated into the CARTO navigation system. LAWT maps were semi-automatically computed from the MDCT as the local distance between the LA endo and epicardium and categorized into 1mm-layers and AI was titrated to the LAWT, as follows: Thickness < 1 mm (red): 300; 1-2 mm (yellow): 350; 2-3 mm (green): 400; 3-4 mm (blue): 450; > 4 mm (purple): 450 (Figure). The ablation line was designed in a personalized fashion to avoid thicker regions. All ablation procedures were performed under general anesthesia with a high frequency low-volume ventilation. Primary endpoints were acute efficacy and safety, and freedom from AF recurrences. Follow-up (FU) was scheduled at 1, 3, 6, and every 6 months thereafter.
Results
90 patients [60 (67 %) male, age 58 ± 13 years] were included. Mean LAWT was 1.25 ± 0.62 mm. Mean AI was 366 ± 26 on the right pulmonary veins (RPVs) with a first-pass isolation in 84 (93%) patients and 380 ± 42 on the left pulmonary veins (LPVs) with first-pass in 87 (97%). Procedure time was 59 min [49-66]; RF time 14 min [12,5-16]; fluoroscopy time 0.7 min [0.5-1.4]. No major complication occurred. Eighty-six out of 90 (95.5%) patients were free of recurrence after a mean FU of 11 ± 4 months.
Conclusions
Personalized AF ablation, adapting the AI to LAWT allowed decreasing RF delivery, fluoroscopy and procedure time while obtaining a high rate of first-pass isolation. Lesion durability as estimated by freedom from AF recurrences was as high as in more demanding ablation protocols. Abstract Figure. Personalized protocol and results
Collapse
|
2
|
Esophagus-to-posterior Atrial wall relationship: pre- and Intra-procedural three-dimensional multimodality imaging for esophageal position. Europace 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab116.241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Dr Teres was funded by the research fellowship grant of the Swiss Heart Rhythm Foundation. Dr Carreno-Lineros was funded by a Scholarship from Sociedad Española de Cardiología (SEC).
Introduction
pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) approach implies unavoidable ablation on the posterior atrial wall which is closely related to the esophagus. PVI may result in several complications.
Objective
the present study aims to analyze the stability of the esophageal position inside the mediastinum at the level of the posterior atrial wall from one procedure to another (Redo group) and during a single procedure (multi-image group).
Methods
the esophageal position was compared in two groups. First, pre-procedural multidetector computerized tomography (MDCTs) of the first PVI and the redo intervention (Redo group) were segmented with ADAS 3D™ software to compare the esophageal position and the atrio-esophageal distance prints (Figure A). Second, three imaging modalities were compared for the same procedure (multi-image group): i) preprocedural MDCT; ii) intraprocedural fluoroscopy obtained with the TEE probe in place in three projections with CARTOUNIVU™ (Biosense Webster); and iii) esophageal fast-anatomical map (FAM) obtained at the end of the procedure (Figure D). Ablation procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Exclusion criteria were unavailability or contraindication to obtain any of the techniques. The 3D correlation of the esophageal position acquired with different techniques, was computed in Matlab using semiautomatic segmentation analysis.
Results
35 patients were analyzed for the Redo group. Mean age 61 ± 10 years, 17 (65%) male, mean LVEF 57 ± 7%, mean LA diameter 43 ± 5 mm, median time since previous ablation (and therefore between MDCT acquisitions) was 6 months (IQR 3-9). Mean atrio-esophageal distance for both MDCTs was 1.2 ± 0.6 mm . The esophageal trajectory as related to the atrial posterior wall was left for 20 (57%) patients, central for 6 (18%) patients, and right for 3 (9%) patients, left-central for 4 (11%) patients, and right-central for 2 (5%) patients. There was a 91 ± 5% correlation on the esophageal position between the first procedure and the redo procedure MDCT. In 3 cases the position was clearly different with a correlation of only 40 ± 22%. The multi-imaging group was composed of 100 patients, mean age 61 ± 10 years, 17 (65%) male, mean LVEF 56 ± 7%, mean LA diameter 39 ± 6 mm. The esophageal trajectory as related to the atrial posterior wall was left for 55 (55%) patients, central for 23 (23%) patients, and right for 9 (9%) patients, left-central for 8 (8%) patients, and right-central for 5 (5%) patients. The correlation between MDCT and CARTOUNIVU™ was 82 ± 10% (Figure B); between MDCT and ESOFAM 80 ± 12% (Figure B); and between ESOFAM and CARTOUNIVU™ 83 ± 15% (Figure C).
Conclusions
There is a high stability of the esophageal position between procedures and from the beginning to the end of procedure. This observation needs to be tested for its clinical utility by designing studies that take into account the esophagus distance print to modulate RF delivery Abstract Figure. Multimodal Esophageal imaging
Collapse
|