Abstract P5-11-01: Phamacodynamic and circulating tumor DNA evaluation in a phase I study of GDC-0927, a selective estrogen receptor antagonist/ degrader (SERD)

Background: Modulation of estrogen activity and/or synthesis is the mainstay therapeutic strategy in the treatment of ER positive breast cancer. However, despite the effectiveness of available endocrine therapies, many patients ultimately relapse or develop resistance to these agents via estrogen-dependent and estrogen-independent mechanisms, including mutations in ESR1 affecting the ER ligand binding domain that drive ER-dependent transcription and proliferation in the absence of estrogen. Based on preclinical and clinical data, SERDs are expected be effective in patients harboring ESR1 mutations. Biomarker analysis was performed on plasma and tumor samples from the Phase I study of GDC-0927 in metastatic breast cancer (Dickler et al, SABCS 2017) with the goal of evaluating activity in both ESR1 mutant and wildtype tumors, and to assess ER pathway modulation.

Methods: Hotspot mutations in ESR1, PIK3CA, and AKT1 were analyzed in baseline, on-treatment and end of treatment plasma derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) using the BEAMing assay in patients treated at multiple dose levels of GDC-0927. A subset of samples was analyzed with Foundation Medicine's next generation sequencing ctDNA assay (FACT), which covers genomic alterations in 62 commonly altered genes. Paired pre- and on-treatment biopsies were collected to assess ER pathway modulation. ER, PR, and Ki67 protein levels were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Gene expression analysis was performed using Illumina's RNA Access library preparation kit followed by paired-end (2x50b, 50M reads) sequencing on the HiSeq.

Results: Baseline and on-treatment plasma samples were available for 40 patients. ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations were observed in 52% and 33% of patient baseline samples, respectively (BEAMing method). Mutant allele frequencies (MAF) generally declined in the first on-treatment samples collected for both ESR1 (16 out of 21 samples) and PIK3CA (7 out of 12 samples). The majority of the reductions were greater than 95% relative to baseline. Increases in ESR1 MAFs were observed in later time-points and were not associated with any particular ESR1 mutation. There were six instances for which an ESR1 mutation was detected in an on-treatment sample that was not detected in the baseline sample, three at L536P and one each at D538G, L536H, and S463P, and four out of six with MAFs close to the limit of detection. The FACT assay also detected alterations in CDH1, NF1, PTEN, and TP53 in baseline samples. The relationship between MAF changes and clinical benefit to GDC-0927 will be presented. A predefined, experimentally-derived set of ER target genes were evaluated in pre- and on-treatment tumor biopsy pairs from six patients. Four of the six patients showed evidence of suppression in ER pathway activity, one patient treated at the 1000 mg dose level and three at the 1400 mg dose. The degree of pathway suppression was associated with pre-treatment pathway levels and decreases of ER and Ki67 protein levels.

Conclusions: We report here evidence of consistent reduction of ESR1 and PIK3CA ctDNA in patients treated with GDC-0927. ER pathway suppression was observed at both the transcript and protein level confirming pharmacodynamic activity of the SERD.

Citation Format: Spoerke JM, Daemen A, Chang C-W, Giltnane J, Metcalfe C, Dickler MN, Bardia A, Perez Fidalgo JA, Mayer IA, Boni V, Winer EP, Hamilton EP, Bellet M, Urruticoechea A, Gonzalez Martin A, Cortes J, Martin M, Gates M, Cheeti S, Fredrickson J, Wang X, Friedman LS, Liu L, Li R, Chan IT, Mueller L, Milan S, Lauchle J, Humke EW, Lackner MR. Phamacodynamic and circulating tumor DNA evaluation in a phase I study of GDC-0927, a selective estrogen receptor antagonist/ degrader (SERD) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-01.

Abstract PD5-10: A first-in-human phase I study to evaluate the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), GDC-0927, in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (BC)

Background: Modulation of estrogen activity and/or synthesis is the mainstay therapeutic strategy in the treatment of ER+ BC. However, despite the effectiveness of available endocrine therapies, many patients ultimately relapse or develop resistance to these agents via estrogen-dependent and estrogen-independent mechanisms, including mutations in ESR1 affecting the ER ligand binding domain that drive ER-dependent transcription and proliferation in the absence of estrogen. ER antagonists that are efficacious against ligand-dependent and ligand-independent, constitutively active ESR1 mutant tumors may be of substantial therapeutic benefit. GDC-0927 (formerly known as SRN-927) is a novel, potent, non-steroidal, orally bioavailable, selective ER antagonist/ER degrader (SERD) that induces tumor regression in ER+ BC patient-derived xenograft models.

Methods: A phase I dose escalation study with 3+3 design was conductedin postmenopausal women with ER+ (HER2-) metastatic BC (progressing ≥ 6 months on endocrine therapy and with ≤ 2 prior chemotherapies in the advanced or metastatic setting) to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of GDC-0927. Pharmacodynamic (PD) activity was assessed with [18F]-fluoroestradiol (FES)-PET scans. Plasma PK samples (after single dose and at steady state), CT scans, and when feasible, pre and on-study tumor biopsies were obtained

Results: From March 16, 2015 to March 17, 2017 patients (pts) with a median age of 53 years (range 44-69) and a median number of prior therapies for MBC 4 (range 1-7) were enrolled at 3 total daily dose levels (600, 1000, 1400 mg) once daily (QD) given orally with fasting (n = 12). Increases in GDC-0927 exposure were approximately dose proportional. Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were all grade 1 or 2. The most common treatment-related AEs were nausea (54%, n = 7), diarrhea (46%, n = 6), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (39%, n = 5) and anemia, constipation, (each 31%, n = 4). Treatment interruption was required for 2 pts due to nausea and vomiting. Of those pts with FES-PET avid disease at baseline (9 of 12), all post-therapy scans showed complete or near complete (> 90%) suppression of FES uptake to background levels, including pts with ESR1 mutations. Evidence of reduced ER levels and Ki67 staining was observed in on-treatment biopsies. Five of 12 pts (1 at 600 mg and 4 at 1400 mg) were on study ≥ 24 weeks (CBR = 41.6 %) with the best overall response of stable disease with 1 patient (ESR1 mt+ D538G) on study for over 490 days. There were no dose limiting toxicities and no SAEs related to study drug. R2PD was 1400 mg and was selected for single arm dose-expansion which is now complete with last patient enrolled on March 17, 2017. Updated results from dose-escalation and dose-expansion will be presented at the meeting (N = 43).

Conclusions: GDC-0927 appears well-tolerated to date with PK exposure supporting QD dosing, evidence of robust PD target engagement, and encouraging anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated pts with advanced or metastatic ER+ BC, including pts with ESR1 mutations.

Citation Format: Dickler MN, Villanueva R, Perez Fidalgo JA, Mayer IA, Boni V, Winer EP, Hamilton EP, Bellet M, Urruticoechea A, Gonzalez-Martin A, Cortes J, Martin M, Giltnane J, Gates M, Cheeti S, Fredrickson J, Wang X, Friedman LS, Spoerke JM, Metcalfe C, Liu L, Li R, Morley R, McCurry U, Chan IT, Mueller L, Milan S, Lauchle J, Humke EW, Bardia A. A first-in-human phase I study to evaluate the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), GDC-0927, in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-10.

Abstract P6-07-08: The complete spectrum of ESR1 mutations from 7590 breast cancer tumor samples

Background: Approximately 70% of newly diagnosed breast cancers express estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), and are treated with agents that block ER signaling. Acquired mutations in ESR1, the gene that encodes ERα, have been associated with resistance to aromatase inhibitor therapy in patients with ER positive metastatic breast cancer (ER+ mBC). The most frequently occurring ESR1 mutations are clustered between amino acids 536 to 538 within the ligand binding domain (LBD), although limited data exists characterizing the full mutation profile in a large number of breast cancer samples.

Methods: We surveyed the Foundation Medicine dataset of 7590 primary and metastatic breast cancer tumor samples for ESR1 short variants and copy number alterations. Hormone receptor status was unavailable, therefore two assumptions were made to provide an estimate of prevalence in the ER+ HER2- population: 70% of the tumor samples are from ER+ HER2- patients, and all ESR1 mutations from non-HER2 amplified metastatic sites are from ER+ HER2- patients. In a separate cohort of 48 ER+ mBC patients, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was analyzed for ESR1 mutations using the BEAMing method by Sysmex and with Foundation Medicine's sequencing assay, FoundationACT (Assay for Circulating Tumor DNA).

Results: The prevalence of mutations in ER+ HER2- breast cancer was estimated to be 22% in samples from metastatic sites but less than 3% in samples from primary sites. ESR1 amplification was rare in samples from both primary and metastatic disease sites at 1.3% and 2.0% respectively. A total of 153 unique short variants of known and unknown status were identified. In addition to hotspot mutations at 537 and 538, previously undescribed rare mutations were identified throughout the entire length of the LBD, although 10 alterations at amino acids 380, 463, 536, 537, and 538 account for 86% of all ESR1 mutations in the ER+ HER2- metastatic sites. We also characterized the overlap of ESR1 alterations with commonly altered and clinically relevant genes in breast cancer, including PIK3CA mutations and HER2 amplification, and we report here a landscape of co-occurring alterations. In the cohort of patient samples where ctDNA was analyzed, BEAMing and FoundationAct assays both detected ESR1 mutations in 19 out of 48 samples, and overall concordance of mutation status (wild-type vs mutant) was 100%. A total of 51 individual mutations were detected with the BEAMing assay, 42 of which were detected with the FoundationACT assay. Seven mutations that were undetected by FoundationACT had mutant allele frequencies less than 0.1%. Ten ESR1 mutations were detected only by FoundationACT, 9 of which are not covered with the BEAMing assay. Alterations in PIK3CA, CDH1, TP53, ERBB2, and other breast cancer relevant genes were also detected with FoundationACT.

Conclusions: Understanding the mutational landscape of ESR1 and co-occurring alterations is important for diagnostic development in conjunction with the clinical development of novel anti-endocrine therapies. Our data demonstrate a large spectrum of mutations in the LBD in addition to known hotspot mutations. In addition, the FoundationACT assay offers a robust NGS-based method to screen for mutations in ctDNA that is highly concordant with digital PCR methods.

Citation Format: Spoerke JM, Schleifman E, Clark TA, Young G, Nahas M, Kennedy M, Young L, Chmielecki J, Otto GA, Lipson D, Wilson TR, Gendreau S, Lackner MR. The complete spectrum of ESR1 mutations from 7590 breast cancer tumor samples [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-07-08.

Abstract PD6-03: High prevalence and clonal heterogeneity of ESR1 mutations (mt) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients (pts) enrolled in FERGI, a randomized phase II study testing pictilisib (GDC-0941) in combination with fulvestrant (F) in pts that failed a prior aromatase inhibitor (AI)

Background: Mutations in the ligand binding domain of the estrogen receptor gene (ESR1) have been associated with resistance to AI therapy in pts with ER+ breast cancer. To assess if ESR1 status has prognostic or predictive significance in the post-AI metastatic setting ESR1 mutation status was analyzed in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from 168 pts enrolled on the FERGI study (NCT01437566; Krop et al., SABCS 2014).

Methods: Baseline and longitudinal mutational analysis for hotspot mutations in ESR1 (E380Q, S463P, V534E, P535H, L536R/H/P, L536Q, Y537N/S/C, D538G) and PIK3CA (C420R, E542K, E545K/G, Q546K, M1043I, H1047Y/R/L) was performed using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) on ctDNA derived from plasma. Archival tissue was analyzed via RT-PCR and ddPCR.

Results: Baseline ctDNA analysis demonstrated a total of 62/156 (40%) and 57/153 (37%) pts with PIK3CA and ESR1 mutations, respectively. The most common ESR1 mutations are D538G, Y537S, and E380Q, representing 54%, 33% and 26% of the pts with a detectable ESR1 mutation at baseline, respectively. There was a numeric increase of ESR1 mutations in patients with LumA (41/99, 41%) vs LumB disease (14/44, 31%). PIK3CA mutations in asynchronously collected archival tissue were 85% concordant with plasma ctDNA mutations (sensitivity 78%, specificity 91%). PIK3CA mutations in baseline ctDNA showed a higher median allele frequency (AF) than ESR1 mutations (3.6% vs 0.46%), consistent with PIK3CA being an early event and ESR1 mutations occurring later in pts with recurrent disease. Of the pts with a detectable ESR1 mutation at baseline (n=57), 23 (40%) pts had multiple ESR1 mutations and 10 (18%) had ≥3 ESR1 mutations. The PFS outcomes for patients with and without ESR1 mutations detected at baseline are summarized below, indicating no obvious prognostic or predictive effect for combination of F with pictilisib compared with F in these underpowered subsets.

ArmESR1 MT - mPFS (mo)ESR1 WT - mPFS (mo)HR (95% CI)F + placebo5.4 (30 pts, 24 events)3.7 (40 pts, 31 events)1.06 (0.62, 1.81)F+pictilisib5.8 (27 pts, 20 events)6.7 (56 pts, 34 events)1.36 (0.78, 2.38)

PIK3CA and ESR1 ctDNA analysis on serial plasma samples from 40 pts and the assessment of ESR1 mutation status in the patient's tumor sample by ddPCR is currently in progress and will be reported.

Conclusions: Mutations in ESR1 detected by ddPCR in patient plasma samples occur in nearly 40% of pts that failed a prior AI. The polyclonal nature of ESR1 mutations is consistent with the convergent evolution of multiple AI resistant subclones. While these conclusions should be interpreted with caution due to the relatively small sample size and post hoc nature of the analysis, this data does not support a prognostic or predictive PFS hypothesis for ESR1 mutations with F or in combination with pictilisib.

Citation Format: Spoerke J, Gendreau S, Johnston S, Schmid P, Krop I, Qui J, Derynck M, Chan I, Walter K, Amler L, Hampton G, Lackner M. High prevalence and clonal heterogeneity of ESR1 mutations (mt) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients (pts) enrolled in FERGI, a randomized phase II study testing pictilisib (GDC-0941) in combination with fulvestrant (F) in pts that failed a prior aromatase inhibitor (AI). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-03.

Abstract P6-05-09: Development of a predictive biomarker gene expression signature for the PIK3CA inhibitor, GDC-0032, in breast cancer cells

Introduction

The PI3-Kinase pathway is one of the most commonly mutated pathways in cancer and plays a major role in cell proliferation and survival. Mutations in PIK3CA, the gene encoding the p110 subunit of PI3K, are among the most common alterations in breast cancer, occurring in approximately 45% of luminal A, 30% of luminal B, 30% of HER2 positive and 8% of triple negative breast cancers. Additional pathway activating alterations include loss of PTEN, AKT mutations and overexpression of PIK3CA and HER2. Development of a pharmacodynamic biomarker is challenging with the more isoform specific PI3K inhibitors as multiple upstream pathways can funnel into common downstream immunohistochemical evaluable endpoints. In addition, phosphorylated epitopes are often labile and do not always lend themselves to immunohistochemical evaluation in the clinical setting. GDC-0032, which is currently under clinical investigation, is a class I PI3K inhibitor with 30-fold less inhibition on PI3K beta relative to PI3K alpha, and the development of a predictive and on-study pharmacodynamic signature may prove informative as compared to traditional IHC endpoints.

Methods

We screened a panel of 53 breast cancer cell lines, incorporating all subtypes, to GDC-0032 using the cell proliferation assay cell titer glo. To determine if there was a relationship between pathway activation and sensitivity to GDC-0032, we correlated response to PIK3CA mutations, loss of PTEN and HER2 overexpression. Using RNA sequencing, we compared the baseline gene expression between the sensitive and refractory cell lines. Next, to identify an on-study pharmacodynamic gene expression signature, we treated both sensitive and refractory cell lines with GDC-0032 and ran an in-house custom designed 800 gene NanoString breast cancer gene set that incorporated published PI3K pathway signatures, intrinsic subtyping genes and immunological related genes. Finally, the GDC-0032 signature was applied to a set of 160 FFPE breast cancer samples and overlaid with relevant biomarkers.

Results and Conclusions

Sensitivity to GDC-0032 correlated strongly with PI3K pathway activation including PIK3CA mutations and HER2 overexpression in breast cancer cells. Comparing baseline whole genome RNA expression of GDC-0032 sensitive and refractory cell lines, we identified 293 genes that were differentially expressed. Applying a more stringent statistical cutoff (greater than 2 fold difference and t-test less than 0.01) refined the gene list to 51 genes, which defined the baseline GDC-0032 sensitivity signature. Applying the 800 gene breast cancer NanoString panel to a set of 160 FFPE breast cancer samples, the GDC-0032 sensitivity signature correlated with luminal status and was enriched in PIK3CA mutant tumors. In conclusion, our in-house designed GDC-0032 sensitivity signature correlated strongly with PIK3CA mutations in clinical specimens. However the lack of complete correlation may identify tumors that have an activated PI3K pathway outside of PIK3CA mutations and/or HER2 amplification that may derive clinical benefit from GDC-0032.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-05-09.

Abstract P6-09-01: Central Ki67 analysis as a predictor for adjuvant capecitabine efficacy in early breast cancer (EBC) subtypes in US oncology trial 01062

Background: USON 01062 (O’Shaughnessy J, et al. Proc SABCS, 2010, abst S4-2) showed no improvement in the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) (median FU 5 yrs: HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.67-1.05; p = 0.125) with the addition of capecitabine (X) to standard adjuvant chemotherapy, but showed improvement in OS (HR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51-0.92; p = 0.011). Exploratory analysis of local pathology-assessed Ki67 suggested benefit from adjuvant X in pts with more highly proliferative cancers with Ki67 ≥ 10% (Pippen J et al. Proc ASCO, 2011, abst 500). The objective of this study is to determine whether centrally-performed Ki67 IHC results corroborate or refute this finding.

Methods: 2610 pts with resected high risk EBC were randomized to receive 4 cycles of AC (doxorubicin 60mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2) IV every 3 wks for 4 cycles followed by either docetaxel 100mg/m2 IV or docetaxel 75mg/m2 IV plus X 825mg/m2 PO bid for 14 days every 3 wks for 4 cycles. Archival primary breast cancer tissue was collected on 2000 pts for predictive biomarker analyses. Central Ki67 IHC was performed using the anti-Ki67 monoclonal antibody SP6 and was read by one pathologist (HK) according to published recommendations (Dowsett M, et al. JNCI 103:1-9, 2011).

Results: Central Ki67 IHC has been performed on 1440 pts who had centrally-validated informed consents. The distribution of% Ki67-positive cells by locally-assessed ER/HER2 subtype is shown below. 45% of HR+ HER2- BCs had a Ki67 ≤ 10%, while 24% had a Ki67 11% to 20%, and 31% had a Ki67 > 20%. The concordance between the local vs central Ki67 results was low at 46% for Ki67 <10%, 49% for Ki67 10%-20%, and 76% for Ki67 > 20%. The central Ki67 results tended to be higher than the local testing results. Central mRNA classifiers were developed for ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67 using Fluidigm Microfluidics Dynamic Arrays and correlate highly with central IHC assessment of these markers.

Conclusions: HR+ HER2- EBC is enriched for cancers with a low proliferative rate, a group of pts unlikely to benefit from the cell cycle-specific cytotoxic agent, capecitabine. Analyses of the impact of adjuvant X added to AC/T in EBC pts according to ER status, and according to Ki67 (analyzed as a binary and continuous variable) will be performed prior to SABCS, 2013.

Number of Patients% Ki67 Pos CellsTotal *HR+TNHER2+/HR+HER2+/ HR-0-104163622222711-151391066151016-20126871615821-3018411539201031-1005751403423555Total144081042510790*Totals do not equal sum of subtype categories due to missing HER2 information

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-09-01.

EGO-1 is related to RNA-directed RNA polymerase and functions in germ-line development and RNA interference in C. elegans

BACKGROUND

Cell-fate determination requires that cells choose between alternative developmental pathways. For example, germ cells in the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans choose between mitotic and meiotic division, and between oogenesis and spermatogenesis. Germ-line mitosis depends on a somatic signal that is mediated by a Notch-type signaling pathway. The ego-1 gene was originally identified on the basis of genetic interactions with the receptor in this pathway and was also shown to be required for oogenesis. Here, we provide more insight into the role of ego-1 in germ-line development.

RESULTS

We have determined the ego-1 gene structure and the molecular basis of ego-1 alleles. Putative ego-1 null mutants had multiple, previously unreported defects in germ-line development. The ego-1 transcript was found predominantly in the germ line. The predicted EGO-1 protein was found to be related to the tomato RNA-directed RNA polymerase (RdRP) and to Neurospora crassa QDE-1, two proteins implicated in post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS). For a number of germ-line-expressed genes, ego-1 mutants were resistant to a form of PTGS called RNA interference.

CONCLUSIONS

The ego-1 gene is the first example of a gene encoding an RdRP-related protein with an essential developmental function. The ego-1 gene is also required for a robust response to RNA interference by certain genes. Hence, a protein required for germ-line development in C. elegans may be a component of the RNA interference/PTGS machinery.

High-throughput isolation of Caenorhabditis elegans deletion mutants

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is the first animal whose genome is completely sequenced, providing a rich source of gene information relevant to metazoan biology and human disease. This abundant sequence information permits a broad-based gene inactivation approach in C. elegans, in which chemically mutagenized nematode populations are screened by PCR for deletion mutations in a specific targeted gene. By handling mutagenized worm growth, genomic DNA templates, PCR screens, and mutant recovery all in 96-well microtiter plates, we have scaled up this approach to isolate deletion mutations in >100 genes to date. Four chemical mutagens, including ethyl methane sulfonate, ethlynitrosourea, diepoxyoctane, and ultraviolet-activated trimethylpsoralen, induced detectable deletions at comparable frequencies. The deletions averaged approximately 1400 bp in size when using a approximately 3 kb screening window. The vast majority of detected deletions removed portions of one or more exons, likely resulting in loss of gene function. This approach requires only the knowledge of a target gene sequence and a suitable mutagen, and thus provides a scalable systematic approach to gene inactivation for any organism that can be handled in high density arrays.