Global validation of the WSES Sepsis Severity Score for patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a prospective multicentre study (WISS Study)

BACKGROUND

To validate a new practical Sepsis Severity Score for patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) including the clinical conditions at the admission (severe sepsis/septic shock), the origin of the cIAIs, the delay in source control, the setting of acquisition and any risk factors such as age and immunosuppression.

METHODS

The WISS study (WSES cIAIs Score Study) is a multicenter observational study underwent in 132 medical institutions worldwide during a four-month study period (October 2014-February 2015). Four thousand five hundred thirty-three patients with a mean age of 51.2 years (range 18-99) were enrolled in the WISS study.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis has shown that all factors that were previously included in the WSES Sepsis Severity Score were highly statistically significant between those who died and those who survived (p < 0.0001). The multivariate logistic regression model was highly significant (p < 0.0001, R2 = 0.54) and showed that all these factors were independent in predicting mortality of sepsis. Receiver Operator Curve has shown that the WSES Severity Sepsis Score had an excellent prediction for mortality. A score above 5.5 was the best predictor of mortality having a sensitivity of 89.2 %, a specificity of 83.5 % and a positive likelihood ratio of 5.4.

CONCLUSIONS

WSES Sepsis Severity Score for patients with complicated Intra-abdominal infections can be used on global level. It has shown high sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio that may help us in making clinical decisions.

A proposal for a CT driven classification of left colon acute diverticulitis

Computed tomography (CT) imaging is the most appropriate diagnostic tool to confirm suspected left colonic diverticulitis. However, the utility of CT imaging goes beyond accurate diagnosis of diverticulitis; the grade of severity on CT imaging may drive treatment planning of patients presenting with acute diverticulitis. The appropriate management of left colon acute diverticulitis remains still debated because of the vast spectrum of clinical presentations and different approaches to treatment proposed. The authors present a new simple classification system based on both CT scan results driving decisions making management of acute diverticulitis that may be universally accepted for day to day practice.

Complicated intra-abdominal infections in Europe: a comprehensive review of the CIAO study

The CIAO Study (“Complicated Intra-Abdominal infection Observational” Study) is a multicenter investigation performed in 68 medical institutions throughout Europe over the course of a 6-month observational period (January-June 2012).

Patients with either community-acquired or healthcare-associated complicated intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) were included in the study.

2,152 patients with a mean age of 53.8 years (range: 4–98 years) were enrolled in the study. 46.3% of the patients were women and 53.7% were men. Intraperitoneal specimens were collected from 62.2% of the enrolled patients, and from these samples, a variety of microorganisms were collectively identified.

The overall mortality rate was 7.5% (163/2.152).

According to multivariate analysis of the compiled data, several criteria were found to be independent variables predictive of patient mortality, including patient age, the presence of an intestinal non-appendicular source of infection (colonic non-diverticular perforation, complicated diverticulitis, small bowel perforation), a delayed initial intervention (a delay exceeding 24 hours), sepsis and septic shock in the immediate post-operative period, and ICU admission.

Given the sweeping geographical distribution of the participating medical centers, the CIAO Study gives an accurate description of the epidemiological, clinical, microbiological, and treatment profiles of complicated intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) throughout Europe.

Complicated intra-abdominal infections in Europe: preliminary data from the first three months of the CIAO Study

The CIAO Study is a multicenter observational study currently underway in 66 European medical institutions over the course of a six-month study period (January-June 2012).

This preliminary report overviews the findings of the first half of the study, which includes all data from the first three months of the six-month study period.

Patients with either community-acquired or healthcare-associated complicated intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) were included in the study.

912 patients with a mean age of 54.4 years (range 4–98) were enrolled in the study during the first three-month period. 47.7% of the patients were women and 52.3% were men. Among these patients, 83.3% were affected by community-acquired IAIs while the remaining 16.7% presented with healthcare-associated infections. Intraperitoneal specimens were collected from 64.2% of the enrolled patients, and from these samples, 825 microorganisms were collectively identified.

The overall mortality rate was 6.4% (58/912). According to univariate statistical analysis of the data, critical clinical condition of the patient upon hospital admission (defined by severe sepsis and septic shock) as well as healthcare-associated infections, non-appendicular origin, generalized peritonitis, and serious comorbidities such as malignancy and severe cardiovascular disease were all significant risk factors for patient mortality.

White Blood Cell counts (WBCs) greater than 12,000 or less than 4,000 and core body temperatures exceeding 38°C or less than 36°C by the third post-operative day were statistically significant indicators of patient mortality.

Impartial long-term review of vertical banded gastroplasty in a low volume community hospital practice

BACKGROUND

There is some concern whether bariatric surgery can be done well at low volumes or in a community hospital setting. This paper reports an impartial assessment of 25 vertical banded gastroplasties (VBG) over 13 years in a 228-bed non-teaching community hospital.

METHODS

Charts were reviewed and patients interviewed by an independent investigator. Complications, weight loss, satisfaction and quality of life were assessed.

RESULTS

There were no fatalities, no splenic tears, no stomal stenosis and no symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux. Two reoperations and five incisional hernias were noted. Hypertension was eliminated in 57% and dyspnea in 55%. BMI fell from 44.3 to 34.9 kg/m2 after 6.2 years. BMI decreased more than 10 kg/m2 (10-30) for 15 patients and less than 10 kg/m2 for 10 patients (4-10 for 7, 0 for 1 and a gain for 2). 56% of patients were fully satisfied with the results. Quality of life indicated excellent physical function, physical role and lack of body pain, good general health, social function, emotional role and mental health, but lower vitality. 100% felt better than a year ago.

CONCLUSION

Results from a low-volume community hospital general surgical practice are similar to those from specialized series. Obesity is so common, its non-surgical treatment so ineffective and the VBG so well established, that excluding this intervention from community hospitals is untenable.

Hip fracture as a complication of hospitalization

This work seeks to assess the possible contribution of hospitalization to hip fractures sustained in an acute care hospital and to determine the need for hospital care for these patients at the time of the fracture. Between 1988 and 1997 there was an average of 399 falls and four in-hospital hip fractures per year. For 14 percent, no predisposing factors for falling were noted, 38 percent of the fractures occurred within the first three days and 47 percent during the first week of hospitalization. Original admission did not seem warranted for 10 percent and 48 percent no longer required inpatient care at the time of the fracture. Most fractures occur early during hospitalization; some patients seem to have no predisposing factors for falling and about one-half may not require hospitalization at the time, all implicating hospitalization as a causative factor.