1
|
MacArthur JAL, Yong GL, Dweck MR, Fairbairn TA, Weir-McCall J, Puyol-Antón E, Meldrum J, Blakelock P, Khan S, Morrice L, Sudlow CLM, Williams MC. Cardiovascular imaging research priorities. Open Heart 2023; 10:e002378. [PMID: 37586846 PMCID: PMC10432634 DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Two interlinked surveys were organised by the British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, which aimed to establish national priorities for cardiovascular imaging research. METHODS First a single time point public survey explored their views of cardiovascular imaging research. Subsequently, a three-phase modified Delphi prioritisation exercise was performed by researchers and healthcare professionals. Research questions were submitted by a diverse range of stakeholders to the question 'What are the most important research questions that cardiovascular imaging should be used to address?'. Of these, 100 research questions were prioritised based on their positive impact for patients. The 32 highest rated questions were further prioritised based on three domains: positive impact for patients, potential to reduce inequalities in healthcare and ability to be implemented into UK healthcare practice in a timely manner. RESULTS The public survey was completed by 354 individuals, with the highest rated areas relating to improving treatment, quality of life and diagnosis. In the second survey, 506 research questions were submitted by diverse stakeholders. Prioritisation was performed by 90 researchers or healthcare professionals in the first round and 64 in the second round. The highest rated questions were 'How do we ensure patients have equal access to cardiovascular imaging when it is needed?' and 'How can we use cardiovascular imaging to avoid invasive procedures'. There was general agreement between healthcare professionals and researchers regarding priorities for the positive impact for patients and least agreement for their ability to be implemented into UK healthcare practice in a timely manner. There was broad overlap between the prioritised research questions and the results of the public survey. CONCLUSIONS We have identified priorities for cardiovascular imaging research, incorporating the views of diverse stakeholders. These priorities will be useful for researchers, funders and other organisations planning future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Guo Liang Yong
- Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Marc R Dweck
- Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Timothy A Fairbairn
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jonathan Weir-McCall
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Radiology, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Esther Puyol-Antón
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Julian Meldrum
- British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, London, UK
| | - Phillip Blakelock
- British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, London, UK
| | - Samaira Khan
- British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, London, UK
| | - Lynn Morrice
- British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, London, UK
| | - Cathie L M Sudlow
- British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, London, UK
| | - Michelle C Williams
- British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, London, UK
- Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee K, Famiglietti ML, McMahon A, Wei CH, MacArthur JAL, Poux S, Breuza L, Bridge A, Cunningham F, Xenarios I, Lu Z. Scaling up data curation using deep learning: An application to literature triage in genomic variation resources. PLoS Comput Biol 2018; 14:e1006390. [PMID: 30102703 PMCID: PMC6107285 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Revised: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Manually curating biomedical knowledge from publications is necessary to build a knowledge based service that provides highly precise and organized information to users. The process of retrieving relevant publications for curation, which is also known as document triage, is usually carried out by querying and reading articles in PubMed. However, this query-based method often obtains unsatisfactory precision and recall on the retrieved results, and it is difficult to manually generate optimal queries. To address this, we propose a machine-learning assisted triage method. We collect previously curated publications from two databases UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot and the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog, and used them as a gold-standard dataset for training deep learning models based on convolutional neural networks. We then use the trained models to classify and rank new publications for curation. For evaluation, we apply our method to the real-world manual curation process of UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot and the GWAS Catalog. We demonstrate that our machine-assisted triage method outperforms the current query-based triage methods, improves efficiency, and enriches curated content. Our method achieves a precision 1.81 and 2.99 times higher than that obtained by the current query-based triage methods of UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot and the GWAS Catalog, respectively, without compromising recall. In fact, our method retrieves many additional relevant publications that the query-based method of UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot could not find. As these results show, our machine learning-based method can make the triage process more efficient and is being implemented in production so that human curators can focus on more challenging tasks to improve the quality of knowledge bases. As the volume of literature on genomic variants continues to grow at an increasing rate, it is becoming more difficult for a curator of a variant knowledge base to keep up with and curate all the published papers. Here, we suggest a deep learning-based literature triage method for genomic variation resources. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on the triage task. Moreover, our model does not require any laborious preprocessing or feature engineering steps, which are required for traditional machine learning triage methods. We applied our method to the literature triage process of UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot and the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog for genomic variation by collaborating with the database curators. Both the manual curation teams confirmed that our method achieved higher precision than their previous query-based triage methods without compromising recall. Both results show that our method is more efficient and can replace the traditional query-based triage methods of manually curated databases. Our method can give human curators more time to focus on more challenging tasks such as actual curation as well as the discovery of novel papers/experimental techniques to consider for inclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyubum Lee
- National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | | | - Aoife McMahon
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Chih-Hsuan Wei
- National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Jacqueline Ann Langdon MacArthur
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sylvain Poux
- Swiss-Prot Group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lionel Breuza
- Swiss-Prot Group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alan Bridge
- Swiss-Prot Group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Fiona Cunningham
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ioannis Xenarios
- Center for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne Switzerland.,Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Zhiyong Lu
- National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|