Reproducibility of consecutive automated telemetric noctodiurnal IOP profiles as determined by an intraocular implant

BACKGROUND

Intraocular pressure (IOP) monitoring in glaucoma management is evolving with novel devices. We investigated the reproducibility of 24 hour profiles on two consecutive days and after 30 days of self-measurements via telemetric IOP monitoring.

METHODS

Seven primary patients with open-angle glaucoma previously implanted with a telemetric IOP sensor in one eye underwent automatic measurements throughout 24 hours on two consecutive days ('day 1' and 'day 2'). Patients wore an antenna adjacent to the study eye connected to a reader device to record IOP every 5 min. Also, self-measurements in six of seven patients were collected for a period of 30 days. Analysis included calculation of hourly averages to correlate time-pairs of day 1 versus day 2 and the self-measurements vers day 2.

RESULTS

The number of IOP measurements per patient ranged between 151 and 268 on day 1, 175 and 268 on day 2 and 19 and 1236 during 30 days of self-measurements. IOP time-pairs of automatic measurements on day 1 and day 2 were significantly correlated at the group level (R=0.83, p<0.001) and in four individual patients (1, 2, 6 and 7). IOP time-pairs of self-measurements and day 2 were significantly correlated at the group level (R=0.4, p<0.001) and in four individual patients (2, 5, 6 and 7).

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-four hour automatic measurements of IOP are correlated on consecutive days and, though to a lesser degree, with self-measurements. Therefore a virtual 24-hour IOP curve might be constructed from self-measurements. Both options provide an alternative to frequent in-office IOP measurements.

Effect of eyelid muscle action and rubbing on telemetrically obtained intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma with an IOP sensor implant

BACKGROUND

Patients with glaucoma on topical glaucoma medication are often affected by dry eye symptoms and thus likely to rub or squeeze their eyelids. Here, we telemetrically measure peak intraocular pressure (IOP) during eyelid manoeuvres and eyelid rubbing.

METHODS

Eleven patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) previously implanted with a telemetric IOP sensor (Eyemate-IO) were instructed to look straight ahead for 1 min as a baseline measurement. Next, 6 repeats of blinking on instruction with 10 s intervals in between were performed. In addition, 5 repeats of eyelid closure (n=9), eyelid squeezing and eyelid rubbing (n=7) were performed with 15 s intervals in between. IOP was recorded via an external antenna placed around the study eye. Average peak IOP increases from baseline were analysed and tested against zero (no change) with one-sample t-tests.

RESULTS

For eyelid rubbing, the average peak ∆ IOP increase (mean±SEM) was 59.1±9.6 mm Hg (p<0.001) from baseline. It was 42.2±5.8 mm Hg (p<0.0001) for eyelid squeezing, 3.8±0.6 mm Hg (n=9, p<0.01) for eyelid closure and 11.6±2.4 mm Hg (p<0.001) for voluntary blinking. No IOP change except for a short irregularity in the ocular pulse was observed during involuntary blinking.

CONCLUSION

Eyelid manoeuvres in patients with POAG elicited brief increases in IOP that were particularly large with squeezing and rubbing. Further investigation of the potential implications for glaucoma progression is warranted.

Implanted Microsensor Continuous IOP Telemetry Suggests Gaze and Eyelid Closure Effects on IOP-A Preliminary Study

Purpose

To explore the effect of gaze direction and eyelid closure on intraocular pressure (IOP).

Methods

Eleven patients with primary open-angle glaucoma previously implanted with a telemetric IOP sensor were instructed to view eight equally-spaced fixation targets each at three eccentricities (10°, 20°, and 25°). Nine patients also performed eyelid closure. IOP was recorded via an external antenna placed around the study eye. Differences of mean IOP between consecutive gaze positions were calculated. Furthermore, the effect of eyelid closure on gaze-dependent IOP was assessed.

Results

The maximum IOP increase was observed at 25° superior gaze (mean ± SD: 4.4 ± 4.9 mm Hg) and maximum decrease at 25° inferonasal gaze (-1.6 ± 0.8 mm Hg). There was a significant interaction between gaze direction and eccentricity (P = 0.003). Post-hoc tests confirmed significant decreases inferonasally for all eccentricities (mean ± SEM: 10°: -0.7 ± 0.2, P = 0.007; 20°: -1.1 ± 0.2, P = 0.006; and 25°: -1.6 ± 0.2, P = 0.006). Eight of 11 eyes showed significant IOP differences between superior and inferonasal gaze at 25°. IOP decreased during eyelid closure, which was significantly lower than downgaze at 25° (mean ± SEM: -2.1 ± 0.3 mm Hg vs. -0.7 ± 0.2 mm Hg, P = 0.014).

Conclusions

Our data suggest that IOP varies reproducibly with gaze direction, albeit with patient variability. IOP generally increased in upgaze but decreased in inferonasal gaze and on eyelid closure. Future studies should investigate the patient variability and IOP dynamics.

Use of a novel telemetric sensor to study interactions of intraocular pressure and ganglion-cell function in glaucoma

Aims

(1) To test the feasibility of simultaneous steady-state pattern electroretinogram (ssPERG) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements with an implanted IOP sensor. (2) To explore the scope of this approach for detecting PERG changes during IOP manipulation in a model of lateral decubitus positioning (LDP; lateral position).

Methods

15 healthy controls and 15 treated glaucoma patients participated in the study. 8 patients had an IOP sensor (Eyemate-IO, Implandata Ophthalmic Products GmbH) in the right eye (GLAIMP) and 7 had no sensor and with glaucoma in the left eye. (1) We compared PERGs with and without simultaneous IOP read-out in GLAIMP. (2) All participants were positioned in the following order: sitting1 (S1), right LDP (LDR), sitting2 (S2), left LDP (LDL) and sitting3 (S3). For each position, PERG amplitudes and IOP were determined with rebound tonometry (Icare TA01i) in all participants without the IOP sensor.

Results

Electromagnetic intrusions of IOP sensor read-out onto ssPERG recordings had, due to different frequency ranges, no relevant effect on PERG amplitudes. IOP and PERG measures were affected by LDP, for example, IOP was increased during LDR versus S1 in the lower eyes of GLAIMP and controls (5.1±0.6 mmHg, P0.025=0.00004 and 1.6±0.6 mmHg, P0.025=0.02, respectively) and PERG amplitude was reversibly decreased (−25±10%, P0.025=0.02 and −17±5%, P0.025, respectively).

Conclusions

During LDP, both IOP and PERG changed predominantly in the lower eye. IOP changes induced by LDP may be a model for studying the interaction of IOP and ganglion-cell function.

Clinical and neurohumoral associates of variations in plasma Na+in the PREVEND cohort

Plasma Na+concentration is regulated within narrow limits. Yet, substantial interindividual differences exist even in the normal range. The determinants of these differences are not well understood. We therefore investigated the clinical and neurohumoral associates of plasma Na+. We studied 2,364 men (age: 48 ± 12 yr) and 2,710 women (age: 47 ± 12 yr) from the prospective Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-Stage Disease (PREVEND) cohort study. In the present study, we investigated the neurohumoral factors NH2-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and aldosterone as volume markers and copeptin as a marker for osmoregulation. Clinical associating variables of plasma Na+were age, sex, and plasma glucose. Furthermore, plasma Na+levels were associated with log2copeptin (men: standardized β = 0.18, P < 0.001; women: standardized β = 0.17, P < 0.001), log2NT-proBNP (men: standardized β = 0.07, P = 0.008; women: standardized β = 0.12, P < 0.001), and log2aldosterone (men: standardized β = −0.06, P = 0.005; women: standardized β = −0.09, P < 0.001). Copeptin and NT-proBNP showed an interaction in their association with plasma Na+. Thus, our data 1) support that osmoregulation, as estimated from copeptin levels, is a main associate of plasma Na+; 2) show a consistent association with volume markers, with higher NT-proBNP and lower aldosterone in individuals with higher plasma Na+; and 3) show that the interaction between copeptin and NT-proBNP illustrates that osmoregulation and volume regulation act in concert in the regulation of plasma Na+.