A New and Effective Procedure for Advanced Oral Cancer Therapy: The Potential of a Cancer Stem Cell Assay in Guiding Chemotherapy

Introduction

Ineffective anticancer therapy can result in unnecessary toxicity and the development of resistant clones. Many types of solid tumors, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, have been found to contain a small population of cancer stem cells (CSCs) that contribute to tumor propagation, maintenance, and treatment resistance.

Materials and methods

Selectively enriched CSCs from primary cancer cell cultures can be used in a chemosensitivity assay for a functional test (ChemoID) that uses patients' live tumor cells to indicate which chemotherapy agent (or "combinations") will kill not only the bulk of tumor cells but also the CSCs that are known to cause cancer to recur. This study aimed to show the potential of testing the sensitivity of CSCs enriched from oral cancer patients' biopsies to conventional chemotherapies. A case series of eleven patients affected by advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) have been included in this study. We compared the results of the CSC assay among all the patients and found that there was variability in the chemotherapy response predicted by the assay.

Results

Variability in chemotherapy response was found by the CSC assay in advanced OSCC patients suggesting more precise and personalized therapies to the Oncologist.

Conclusions

Variability in chemosensitivity for OSCC warrants the need to investigate further the use of the assay in larger cohorts to gain a broader understanding of the utility of the clinical test.

Cancer stem cell assay-guided chemotherapy improves survival of patients with recurrent glioblastoma in a randomized trial

Therapy-resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) contribute to the poor clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) who fail standard of care (SOC) therapy. ChemoID is a clinically validated assay for identifying CSC-targeted cytotoxic therapies in solid tumors. In a randomized clinical trial (NCT03632135), the ChemoID assay, a personalized approach for selecting the most effective treatment from FDA-approved chemotherapies, improves the survival of patients with rGBM (2016 WHO classification) over physician-chosen chemotherapy. In the ChemoID assay-guided group, median survival is 12.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.2-14.7) compared with 9 months (95% CI, 4.2-13.8) in the physician-choice group (p = 0.010) as per interim efficacy analysis. The ChemoID assay-guided group has a significantly lower risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81; p = 0.008). Results of this study offer a promising way to provide more affordable treatment for patients with rGBM in lower socioeconomic groups in the US and around the world.

Treatment of unmethylated MGMT-promoter recurrent glioblastoma with cancer stem cell assay-guided chemotherapy and the impact on patients' healthcare costs

Background

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a lethal disease. At least in part, the recurrence of GBM is caused by cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are resistant to chemotherapy. Personalized anticancer therapy against CSCs can improve treatment outcomes. We present a prospective cohort study of 40 real-world unmethylated Methyl-guanine-methyl-transferase-promoter GBM patients treated utilizing a CSC chemotherapeutics assay-guided report (ChemoID).

Methods

Eligible patients who underwent surgical resection for recurrent GBM were included in the study. Most effective chemotherapy treatments were chosen based on the ChemoID assay report from a panel of FDA-approved chemotherapies. A retrospective chart review was conducted to determine OS, progression-free survival, and the cost of healthcare costs. The median age of our patient cohort was 53 years (24-76).

Results

Patients treated prospectively with high-response ChemoID-directed therapy, had a median overall survival (OS) of 22.4 months (12.0-38.4) with a log-rank P = .011, compared to patients who could be treated with low-response drugs who had instead an OS of 12.5 months (3.0-27.4 months). Patients with recurrent poor-prognosis GBM treated with high-response therapy had a 63% probability to survive at 12 months, compared to 27% of patients who were treated with low-response CSC drugs. We also found that patients treated with high-response drugs on average had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $48,893 per life-year saved compared to $53,109 of patients who were treated with low-response CSC drugs.

Conclusions

The results presented here suggest that the ChemoID Assay can be used to individualize chemotherapy choices to improve poor-prognosis recurrent GBM patient survival and to decrease the healthcare cost that impacts these patients.

CTNI-17. A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING ASSAY - GUIDED CHEMOTHERAPY WITH PHYSICIAN-CHOICE TREATMENT FOR RECURRENT HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA (NCT03632135)

The presence of therapy-resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) in recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) patients contributes to poor clinical outcomes. The ChemoID functional anti-cancer assay targets cancer stem cells along with the bulk of the tumor cells. This trial aims to determine if ChemoID assay-guided treatment improves survival rates for recurrent HGG patients compared to the empirically physician-selected treatment. Patients with grade-III/IV recurrent glioma who failed standard of care (SOC) therapy were randomized (1:1) between two intervention groups. They received one of fourteen mono or combination chemotherapies based on the ChemoID assay or physician choice. The study met the primary outcome in the first interim analysis of 50 patients as per protocol. The ChemoID group had an improved survival rate (vs physician-choice). Median OS (mOS) was 12.5 months in the ChemoID group (95% CI, 10.2-14.7) vs 9 months in the physician-choice (95% CI, 4.2-13.8; log-rank P = .010). Mortality risk was lower in the ChemoID group (HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81; P = .008). Median progression-free survival was 10.1 months in the ChemoID group vs 3.5 months in the physician choice (95% CI, 4.8-15.4 vs 1.9-5.1; log-rank < 0.001). Risk of progression was lower in the ChemoID group (HR = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.44; P < 0.001). The intention to treat (ITT) analysis of 78 patients showed substantially improved OS. The ChemoID group had a statistically significant longer median survival of 4.5 months. mOS was 12.0 months in the ChemoID group (95% CI, 10.8-13.2) vs 7.5 in the physician-choice group (95% CI, 3.5-11.5; log-rank P = .009). The ChemoID group had a decreased mortality risk (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81; P = .008). Compared with the physician-choice, the ChemoID group had a significantly longer OS in the ITT population. Our findings support that screening standard cytotoxic chemotherapies with a patient-specific anti-cancer assay improves survival outcomes in recurrent HGG patients.

SYST-01 MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING CANCER STEM CELL-TARGETED VS PHYSICIAN-CHOICE TREATMENTS IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS (NCT03632135)

BACKGROUND

Clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) remain poor. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been implicated in metastasis, treatment resistance and recurrence of HHGs. We have shown in several clinical studies that anti-CSC-directed therapy provides benefits in many cancer types; however, this is the first report of a randomized clinical trial evaluating it for recurrent HGGs.

OBJECTIVE

Determine whether CSC-targeted cytotoxic agents selected by ChemoID assay-guided therapy improves survival in patients with recurrent HGG.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this parallel-group, randomized, phase-3 clinical trial, patients at 13 clinical sites in the USA with grade-III/IV recurrent glioma (2016 WHO guidelines) were randomized 1:1 to either ChemoID assay-guided therapy or physician-choice therapy, and then treated and followed until unacceptable toxic effects, hospice, or death.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Combined median follow-up was 9 months. Median OS (mOS) was 12.5 months (95% CI, 10.2-14.7) in the ChemoID assay-guided group vs 9 months (95% CI, 4.2-13.8) in the physician-choice group (log-rank P = .010). Risk of death was significantly lower in the ChemoID assay group (HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81; P = .008). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.1 vs 3.5 months (95% CI, 4.8-15.4 vs 1.9-5.1) (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.44; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Primary endpoint was met in this randomized clinical trial. The mOS was 3.5 months longer in the ChemoID assay-guided group vs the physician-choice group.

Abstract CT224: Multi-institutional randomized phase-3 trial comparing cancer stem cell-targeted vs physician-choice treatments in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (NCT03632135)

Background: Clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) remain poor. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been implicated in metastasis, treatment resistance and recurrence of HHGs. We have shown in several clinical studies that anti-CSC-directed therapy provides benefits in many cancer types; however, this is the first report of a randomized clinical trial evaluating it for recurrent HGGs. Objective: Determine whether CSC-targeted cytotoxic agents selected by ChemoID assay-guided therapy improves survival in patients with recurrent HGG.

Design, Settings, and Participants: In this parallel-group, randomized, phase-3 clinical trial, patients at 13 clinical sites in the USA with grade-III/IV recurrent glioma (2016 WHO guidelines) were randomized 1:1 to either ChemoID assay-guided therapy or physician-choice therapy, and then treated and followed until unacceptable toxic effects, hospice, or death.

Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

Results: Combined median follow-up was 9 months. Median OS (mOS) was 12.5 months (95% CI, 10.2-14.7) in the ChemoID assay-guided group vs 9 months (95% CI, 4.2-13.8) in the physician-choice group (log-rank P = .010). Risk of death was significantly lower in the ChemoID assay group (HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81; P = .008). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.1 vs 3.5 months (95% CI, 4.8-15.4 vs 1.9-5.1) (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.44; P &lt; .001).

Conclusions and Relevance: Primary endpoint was met in this randomized clinical trial. The mOS was 3.5 months longer in the ChemoID assay-guided group vs the physician-choice group demonstrating the clinical advantage of treating HGG patients using CSC personalized therapy.

Citation Format: Tulika Ranjan, Soma Sengupta, Alexander Yu, Candace M. Howard, Ricky Chen, Rekha Chaudhary, Nicholas Marko, Dawit Aregawi, Michael Glantz, Jon Glass, Richard M. Green, Christine Lu-Emerson, Aaron Mammoser, Hugh Moulding, Steven Jubelirer, Jason Schroeder, Mark Anderson, Frances Chow, Seth Lirette, Krista Denning, Anthony Alberico, Jagan Valluri, Pier Paolo Claudio. Multi-institutional randomized phase-3 trial comparing cancer stem cell-targeted vs physician-choice treatments in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (NCT03632135) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT224.

Cancer stem cell assay for identification of effective treatments for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer

e17584

Background: Disease recurrence and progression of ovarian cancer is a common event, which is accompanied by the development of platinum-resistant or refractory disease. The presence of chemo-resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) contributes to tumor propagation, maintenance, and treatment resistance of this difficult to treat disease. The choice of appropriate chemotherapy is critical to the management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. We developed a CSCs assay (ChemoID) that identifies the most effective chemotherapy for individual patients from a panel of FDA-approved chemotherapies. Methods: Ascites or interventional radiology biopsies were collected under physician order from 85 consecutive patients affected by 3rd relapsed ovarian cancer. Test results from the assay were used to treat patients with the highest cell kill drugs, taking into consideration their health status and using dose reductions, if needed. Our study assessed the correlation of the ChemoID test results to treatment outcomes independently of other biomarkers. A retrospective chart analysis and review of CT and PET scans were performed to determine patients’ outcomes for tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: We observed that recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with high-cell kill chemotherapy agents guided by the ChemoID drug response assay had an improvement in their median PFS and OS when compared to historical median PFS and OS and/or when compared to patients who could not receive high cell kill chemotherapies (PFS low cell kill 3.5 months vs. high cell kill 12.0 months; OS low cell kill 6.0 months vs. high cell kill 15.0 months). Conclusions: The current evidence strongly suggests that the ChemoID assay predicted the effectiveness of specific therapies, as well as improved outcomes for patients treated with assay-sensitive therapies.

Multi-institutional randomized phase 3 trial comparing cancer stem cell-targeted versus physician-choice treatments in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (NCT03632135)

2028

Background: Clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) remain poor. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been implicated in metastasis, treatment resistance and recurrence of HHGs. We have shown in several clinical studies that anti-CSC-directed therapy selected by ChemoID assay provides benefits in many cancer types; however, this is the first report of a randomized clinical trial evaluating whether CSC-targeted cytotoxic agents selected by ChemoID assay-guided therapy improves survival in patients with recurrent HGG. Methods: In this parallel-group, randomized, phase-3 clinical trial, patients at 13 clinical sites in the USA with grade-III/IV recurrent glioma (2016 WHO guidelines) were randomized 1:1 to either ChemoID assay-guided therapy or physician-choice therapy, and then treated and followed until unacceptable toxic effects, hospice, or death. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: Combined median follow-up was 9 months. Median OS (mOS) was 12.5 months (95% CI, 10.2-14.7) in the ChemoID assay-guided group vs 9 months (95% CI, 4.2-13.8) in the physician-choice group (log-rank P =.010). Risk of death was significantly lower in the ChemoID assay group (HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81; P =.008). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.1 vs 3.5 months (95% CI, 4.8-15.4 vs 1.9-5.1) (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.44; P <.001). Conclusions: Primary endpoint was met in this randomized clinical trial. The mOS was 3.5 months longer in the ChemoID assay-guided group vs the physician-choice group. Clinical trial information: NCT03632135.

Cancer Stem Cell Assay for the Treatment of Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND

Disease recurrence and progression of ovarian cancer is a common event, which is accompanied by the development of platinum-resistant or refractory disease. The presence of chemo-resistant Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) contribute to tumor propagation, maintenance, and treatment resistance of this difficult to treat disease. We have developed ChemoID, a cytotoxic synergy assay against CSCs that identifies the most effective chemotherapy treatment from a panel of FDA-approved chemotherapies using fresh cancer biopsies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ascites or interventional radiology biopsies were collected under physician order from 78 consecutive patients affected by 3rd relapsed ovarian cancer. Test results from the assay were used when possible to treat patients with the highest cell kill drugs, taking into consideration their health status and using dose reductions, if needed. A chart analysis and review of CT and PET scans were performed to determine patients' outcomes for tumor response, Progression-Free Survival (PFS), and Overall Survival (OS).

RESULTS

We observed that recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with high-cell kill chemotherapy agents guided by the CSCs drug response assay had an improvement in their median PFS and OS when compared to historical median PFS and OS and/or when compared to patients who could not receive high cell kill chemotherapies (PFS low cell kill 3.5 months vs. high cell kill 12.0 months; OS low cell kill 6.0 months vs. high cell kill 15.0 months).

CONCLUSION

This data indicates that the drug cytotoxicity assay aimed at targeting CSCs may be a useful tool for optimizing treatment selection when first-line therapy fails, and when there are multiple clinically-acceptable and -equivalent treatments available.

STEM-21. CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF CANCER STEM CELL CYTOTOXICITY ASSAY IN GUIDING TREATMENT FOR GLIOBLASTOMA

BACKGROUND. The prognosis of glioblastoma (GBM) treated with standard-of-care regimens remains very poor with a median time to recurrence of 7-9 months, and a median survival of 15-18 months. GBMs contain a small, but resilient population of cancer stem cells (CSCs) that contribute to tumor initiation, maintenance, and therapy resistance. For these reasons, its is extremely important to determine the sensitivity of CSCs to chemotherapeutic agents, with the intent of identifying more effective treatment protocols which would then translate into improved clinical survival. METHODS. We have used a novel CLIA and CAP-accredited Cancer Stem Cell Cytotoxicity Assay (ChemoID) to guide treatment for 55 Grade III and Grade IV glioma patients with the most efficacious chemotherapy treatments from a panel of FDA approved drugs or their combinations. Patients were evaluated by MRI scans and response was assessed according to RANO criteria. RESULTS: We report here a prospective clinical investigation using the ChemoID assay to measure the sensitivity and resistance of CSCs and bulk of tumor cells cultured from 55 GBM clinical specimens challenged with several chemotherapy agents, which were also correlated to the clinical response of the treated patients, independently of other biomarkers. The median recurrence time was 15 months for patients with a sensitive (&gt;40% cell kill) CSCs test versus only 6 months for patients with a resistant CSCs test. CONCLUSIONS. The data suggests that GBM patients treated with CSC Cytotoxicity Assay-guided responsive drugs have delayed time to recurrence and the assay has the potential to help tailor chemotherapy choices to improve clinical outcomes.

Clinical relevance of cancer stem cell chemotherapeutic assay for recurrent ovarian cancer

Introduction

Disease recurrence and progression of ovarian cancer is common with the development of platinum-resistant or refractory disease. This is due in large part to the presence of chemo-resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) that contribute to tumor propagation, maintenance, and treatment resistance. We developed a CSCs drug cytotoxicity assay (ChemoID) to identify the most effective chemotherapy treatment from a panel of FDA approved chemotherapies.

Methods

Ascites and pleural fluid samples were collected under physician order from 45 consecutive patients affected by 3rd-5th relapsed ovarian cancer. Test results from the assay were used to treat patients with the highest cell kill drugs, taking into consideration their health status and using dose reductions, as needed. A retrospective chart review of CT and PET scans was used to determine patients' outcomes for tumor response, time to recurrence, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

We observed that recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with high-cell kill chemotherapy agents guided by the CSCs drug response assay had an improvement in the median PFS corresponding to 5.4 months (3rd relapse), 3.6 months (4th relapse), and 3.9 months (5th relapse) when compared to historical data. Additionally, we observed that ovarian cancer patients identified as non-responders by the CSC drug response assay had 30 times the hazard of death compared to those women that were identified as responders with respective median survivals of 6 months vs. 13 months. We also found that ChemoID treated patients on average had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between -$18,421 and $7,241 per life-year saved (LYS).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated improved PFS and OS for recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with assay-guided chemotherapies while decreasing the cost of treatment.

•

Ovarian cancer progression and recurrence is mostly attributed to the presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are chemo-resistant.

•

Eliminating CSCs is a strategy that could improve patients' outcome.

•

We developed a CSC drug cytotoxicity assay to identify the most effective chemotherapy treatment from a panel of FDA approved chemotherapies.

•

Recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with high-cell kill chemotherapy agents guided by the CSCs drug response assay had an improvement in the median PFS when compared to historical data.

Cancer Stem Cell Chemotherapeutics Assay for Prospective Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma and Progressive Anaplastic Glioma: A Single-Institution Case Series

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-resistant cancer stem cells (CSC) may lead to tumor recurrence in glioblastoma (GBM). The poor prognosis of this disease emphasizes the critical need for developing a treatment stratification system to improve outcomes through personalized medicine. METHODS: We present a case series of 12 GBM and 2 progressive anaplastic glioma cases from a single Institution prospectively treated utilizing a CSC chemotherapeutics assay (ChemoID) guided report. All patients were eligible to receive a stereotactic biopsy and thus undergo ChemoID testing. We selected one of the most effective treatments based on the ChemoID assay report from a panel of FDA approved chemotherapy as monotherapy or their combinations for our patients. Patients were evaluated by MRI scans and response was assessed according to RANO 1.1 criteria. RESULTS: Of the 14 cases reviewed, the median age of our patient cohort was 49 years (21–63). We observed 6 complete responses (CR) 43%, 6 partial responses (PR) 43%, and 2 progressive diseases (PD) 14%. Patients treated with ChemoID assay-directed therapy, in combination with other modality of treatment (RT, LITT), had a longer median overall survival (OS) of 13.3 months (5.4-NA), compared to the historical median OS of 9.0 months (8.0–10.8 months) previously reported. Notably, patients with recurrent GBM or progressive high-grade glioma treated with assay-guided therapy had a 57% probability to survive at 12 months, compared to the 27% historical probability of survival observed in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented here suggest that the ChemoID Assay has the potential to stratify individualized chemotherapy choices to improve recurrent and progressive high-grade glioma patient survival.

Importance of the Study

Glioblastoma (GBM) and progressive anaplastic glioma are the most aggressive brain tumor in adults and their prognosis is very poor even if treated with the standard of care chemoradiation Stupp's protocol. Recent knowledge pointed out that current treatments often fail to successfully target cancer stem cells (CSCs) that are responsible for therapy resistance and recurrence of these malignant tumors. ChemoID is the first and only CLIA (clinical laboratory improvements amendment) -certified and CAP (College of American Pathologists) -accredited chemotherapeutic assay currently available in oncology clinics that examines patient's derived CSCs susceptibility to conventional FDA (Food and Drugs Administration) -approved drugs. In this study we observed that although the majority of our patients (71.5%) presented with unfavorable prognostic predictors (wild type IDH-1/2 and unmethylated MGMT promoter), patients treated with ChemoID assay-directed therapy had an overall response rate of 86% and increased median OS of 13.3 months compared to the historical median OS of 9.1 months (8.1–10.1 months) previously reported [1] suggesting that the ChemoID assay may be beneficial in personalizing treatment strategies.

STEM-13. CANCER STEM CELL CYTOTOXICITY ASSAY-GUIDED TREATMENT IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA AND PROGRESSIVE ANAPLASTIC GLIOMA

BACKGROUND

The presence of chemotherapy-resistant cancer stem cells (CSC) leading to tumor recurrence is postulated to be one of the major factors in the poor response to the current standard of care treatments in progressive high-grade gliomas. Unfortunately, in spite of several new drug discoveries for other tumor types, not many advances have been reported for this disease and therefore recurrent and progressive high-grade glioma survival remains dismal.

METHODS

We have used a CLIA and CAP accredited Cancer Stem Cell Cytotoxicity Assay(ChemoID) to guide most effective chemotherapy treatments from a panel of FDA approved drugs or their combinations for 12 recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients and 2 progressive anaplastic gliomas, all eligible to receive a stereotactic biopsy. Patients were evaluated by MRI scans and response was assessed according to RANO criteria.

RESULTS

The median age of our patient cohort was 49 years (21–63), with 11 males (79%) and 3 females (21%). We observed 6 complete responses (CR) 43%, 6 partial responses (PR) 43%, and 2 progressive diseases (PD) 14%. Of note, the two PD were observed in patients that could not be treated with assay recommended therapy due to their health status. Patients treated with ChemoID assay-directed therapy had a longer median overall survival (OS) of 13.3 months (5.4-NA) compared to the historical median OS of 9.0 months (8.0–10.8 months) previously reported (1). Notably, our recurrent and progressive high-grade glioma patient cohort treated with assay-guided therapy had a 57% probability to survive at 12 months, compared to the 27% historical probability of survival at 12 months observed in previous studies (1).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggests that the ChemoID Cancer Stem Cell Cytotoxicity Assay has the potential to help guide individualized chemotherapy choices to improve recurrent and progressive high-grade glioma patient outcome. 1) Friedman, H.S. et. al. JCO2009 27:28, 4733–4740.

Effect of ghost pepper on cell proliferation, apoptosis, senescence and global proteomic profile in human renal adenocarcinoma cells

Chili peppers are an important constituent of many foods and contain medicinally valuable compounds, such as capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin. As various dietary botanicals have anticancer properties, this study was aimed to examine the effect of Ghost pepper (Bhut Jolokia), one of the hottest chili peppers in the world, on cell proliferation, apoptosis, senescence and the global proteomic profile in human renal cell adenocarcinoma in vitro. 769-P human renal adenocarcinoma cells were cultured on RPMI-1640 media supplemented with fetal bovine serum (10%) and antibiotic-antimycotic solution (1%). Treatment stock solutions were prepared in ethanol. Cell proliferation was tested with phenol red-free media with capsaicin (0-400 μM), dihydrocapsaicin (0-400 μM), capsaicin + dihydrocapsaicin (5:1), and dry Ghost peppers (0-3 g L-1) for 24, 48 and 72 h. Polycaspase and senescence associated-beta-galactosidase (SA-beta-gal) activities were tested with capsaicin (400 μM), dihydrocapsaicin (400 μM), capsaicin (400 μM) + dihydrocapsaicin (80 μM), and ghost pepper (3 g L-1) treatments. Global proteomic profile of cells in control and ghost pepper treatment (3 g L-1) was analyzed after 6 h by a shotgun proteomic approach using tandem mass spectrometry. At 24 h after treatment (24 HAT), relative to control, cell proportion with capsaicin (400 μM), dihydrocapsaicin (400 μM), capsaicin (400 μM) + dihydrocapsaicin (80 μM), and ghost pepper (3 g L-1) treatments was reduced to 36%, 18%, 33% and 20%, respectively, and further reduced at 48 and 72 HAT. All treatments triggered an early polycaspase response. SA-beta-gal activity was normal or suppressed with all treatments. About 68,220 protein isoforms were identified by shotgun proteomic approach. Among these, about 8.2% were significantly affected by ghost pepper. Ghost pepper regulated various proteins involved in intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways, Ras, Rb/E2F, p53, TGF-beta, WNT-beta catenin, and calcium induced cell death pathways. Ghost pepper also induced changes in proteins related to methylation, acetylation, genome stability, cell cycle check points, carbohydrate, protein and other metabolism and cellular mechanisms. Ghost pepper exhibited antiproliferation activity by inducing apoptosis through a complex network of proteins in human renal cell adenocarcinoma in vitro.

Analysis of chemo-predictive assay for targeting cancer stem cells in 41 glioblastoma patients

e13544

Background: We have developed a drug response assay (ChemoID) that identifies effective chemotherapy against cancer stem cells (CSCs) vs. bulk of tumor cells from of a panel of potential treatments. A prospective study was conducted evaluating the use of the CSC drug response assay in glioblastoma patients treated with standard-of-care. Methods: 41 glioblastoma patients were enrolled in an IRB-approved protocol. Patients were all treated with standard-of-care TMZ plus radiation with or without maximal surgery. Patients were prospectively monitored for tumor response, time to recurrence, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: For every 5% increase in in-vitro CSC cell kill by TMZ, 12-month patient response (non-recurrence of cancer) increased 2-fold, OR=2.2 (p=0.016). Similar associations with the bulk tumor test were seen, OR=2.75 (p=0.07) for each 5% bulk tumor cell kill by TMZ. Combining CSC and bulk tumor assay results in a single model yielded a statistically supported CSC association, OR=2.36 (p=0.036) but a much attenuated remaining bulk tumor association, OR=1.46 (p=0.472). Areas under the curve (AUC) and [sensitivity/specificity] at optimal outpoints (>40% CSC cell kill and >55% bulk tumor cell kill) were AUC=0.989 [Sens=100/Spec=97], 0.972 [100/89] and 0.989 [100/97] for the CSC only, bulk tumor only, and combined models, respectively. Risk categorization of patients was improved by 11% when using the CSC test in conjunction with the bulk test (risk reclassification non-event NRI and overall NRI = 0.111, p=0.030). Median recurrence time was 20 months for patients with a positive (>40% cell kill) CSC test versus only 3 months with a negative CSC test, whereas median recurrence time was 13 months versus 4 months for patients with a positive (>55% cell kill) bulk test versus negative. Similar favorable results for the CSC test were observed for PFS and OS. Results across 14 potential other treatments indicated that 34/41 (83%) and 27/41 (66%) potentially more optimal alternative therapies may have been chosen using CSC results and Bulk results, respectively. Conclusions: The ChemoID assay has the potential to increase the accuracy of bulk tumor assays.

Analysis of Chemopredictive Assay for Targeting Cancer Stem Cells in Glioblastoma Patients

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of glioblastoma (GBM) treated with standard-of-care maximal surgical resection and concurrent adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ)/radiotherapy remains very poor (less than 15 months). GBMs have been found to contain a small population of cancer stem cells (CSCs) that contribute to tumor propagation, maintenance, and treatment resistance. The highly invasive nature of high-grade gliomas and their inherent resistance to therapy lead to very high rates of recurrence. For these reasons, not all patients with similar diagnoses respond to the same chemotherapy, schedule, or dose. Administration of ineffective anticancer therapy is not only costly but more importantly burdens the patient with unnecessary toxicity and selects for the development of resistant cancer cell clones. We have developed a drug response assay (ChemoID) that identifies the most effective chemotherapy against CSCs and bulk of tumor cells from of a panel of potential treatments, offering great promise for individualized cancer management. Providing the treating physician with drug response information on a panel of approved drugs will aid in personalized therapy selections of the most effective chemotherapy for individual patients, thereby improving outcomes. A prospective study was conducted evaluating the use of the ChemoID drug response assay in GBM patients treated with standard of care.

METHODS

Forty-one GBM patients (mean age 54 years, 59% male), all eligible for a surgical biopsy, were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol, and fresh tissue samples were collected for drug sensitivity testing. Patients were all treated with standard-of-care TMZ plus radiation with or without maximal surgery, depending on the status of the disease. Patients were prospectively monitored for tumor response, time to recurrence, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Odds ratio (OR) associations of 12-month recurrence, PFS, and OS outcomes were estimated for CSC, bulk tumor, and combined assay responses for the standard-of-care TMZ treatment; sensitivities/specificities, areas under the curve (AUCs), and risk reclassification components were examined.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 8 months (range 3-49 months). For every 5% increase in in vitro CSC cell kill by TMZ, 12-month patient response (nonrecurrence of cancer) increased two-fold, OR=2.2 (P=.016). Similar but somewhat less supported associations with the bulk tumor test were seen, OR=2.75 (P=.07) for each 5% bulk tumor cell kill by TMZ. Combining CSC and bulk tumor assay results in a single model yielded a statistically supported CSC association, OR=2.36 (P=.036), but a much attenuated remaining bulk tumor association, OR=1.46 (P=.472). AUCs and [sensitivity/specificity] at optimal outpoints (>40% CSC cell kill and >55% bulk tumor cell kill) were AUC=0.989 [sensitivity=100/specificity=97], 0.972 [100/89], and 0.989 [100/97] for the CSC only, bulk tumor only, and combined models, respectively. Risk categorization of patients was improved by 11% when using the CSC test in conjunction with the bulk test (risk reclassification nonevent net reclassification improvement [NRI] and overall NRI=0.111, P=.030). Median recurrence time was 20 months for patients with a positive (>40% cell kill) CSC test versus only 3 months for those with a negative CSC test, whereas median recurrence time was 13 months versus 4 months for patients with a positive (>55% cell kill) bulk test versus negative. Similar favorable results for the CSC test were observed for PFS and OS outcomes. Panel results across 14 potential other treatments indicated that 34/41 (83%) potentially more optimal alternative therapies may have been chosen using CSC results, whereas 27/41 (66%) alternative therapies may have been chosen using bulk tumor results.

CONCLUSIONS

The ChemoID CSC drug response assay has the potential to increase the accuracy of bulk tumor assays to help guide individualized chemotherapy choices. GBM cancer recurrence may occur quickly if the CSC test has a low in vitro cell kill rate even if the bulk tumor test cell kill rate is high.

A new complementary procedure for patients affected by head and neck cancer: Chemo-predictive assay

•

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) resist chemotherapy, thereby causing relapse of the disease.

•

A new chemotherapy drug response assay (ChemoID), which measures the sensitivity of CSCs to a variety of chemotherapy agents has been developed.

•

The ChemoID assay may assist an oncologist in making treatment decisions.

•

The ChemoID procedure may lower treatment costs by eliminating ineffective chemotherapies and unnecessary toxicity.

Introduction

Administration of ineffective anticancer therapy is associated with unnecessary toxicity and development of resistant clones. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) resist chemotherapy, thereby causing relapse of the disease. Thus, development of a test that identifies the most effective chemotherapy management offers great promise for individualized anticancer treatments. We have developed an ex vivo chemotherapy drug response assay (ChemoID^®), which measures the sensitivity of CSCs as well as the bulk of tumor cells to a variety of chemotherapy agents to assist an oncologist in making treatment decisions.

Methods

Three patients affected by oral cancer were referred.

Results

Biopsy showed a well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (G1) in case 1, a G2 adenocarcinoma in case 2 and a G3 squamous cell carcinoma in case 3. In all of the three cases, after clinical inspection and suspicion of a diagnosis of cancer, a double biopsy was performed. One specimen was sent to the ChemoID laboratory for chemosensitivity assay and the other for histological analysis. Chemotherapy dose response curves were generated, and grouped in 3 categories: 1. No response (less than 30% cell kill), Intermediate (30–60% cell kill), and 3. Sensitive (60% cell kill or above).

Conclusions

This procedure may be useful in helping physicians choose an effective chemotherapy regimen for head and neck cancer patients and lower treatment costs by eliminating ineffective chemotherapies and unnecessary toxicity particularly in elderly patients.

Chemopredictive assay for patients with primary brain tumors

2089

Background: Cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs) in primary brain tumors can resist certain chemotherapies, thereby causing relapse of the disease. Thus, development of a test that identifies the most effective chemotherapy management offers great promise for personalized anticancer treatments. Methods: We have developed an ex vivo ChemoID assay designed to predict the sensitivity and resistance of CSLCs and bulk of tumor cells of a given patient's solid tumor to a variety of chemotherapy agents by measuring the percentage of cell death. In a retrospective study of five patients with malignancies of the central nervous system, we assessed the correlation between the results of the ChemoID assay and clinical response. Two anaplastic WHO grade-III ependymomas, two IDH-1 negative WHO grade 4 glioblastomas, and one medulloblastoma were tested. Tumors were classified as responsive (50-100% cell kill), intermediately responsive (30-50% cell kill), and nonresponsive (0-30% cell kill) to chemotherapy. Treatment selection was blinded to assay results. MRI and CT scan determined response to therapy. Results: The ChemoID assay performed on the tumor bulk produced a correct prediction in 4 out of 5 cases (p = 0.4, Fisher's Exact Test; PPV = 75%, NPV = 100%) when compared to the drugs received. The same assay performed on the CSLCs produced a correct prediction in all 5 cases (p = 0.1, Fisher's Exact Test; PPV=NPV=100%). Conclusions: An assay such as ChemoID that measures cell death of CSLCs and bulk of tumor cells appears to be beneficial in selecting specific standard chemotherapy agents ex vivo for patients with malignancies of the central nervous system.

ChemoID assay for anaplastic spinal ependymoma

e13040

Background: Cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs) can resist certain chemotherapies, thereby causing relapse of the disease. Thus, development of a test that identifies the most effective chemotherapy management offers great promise for individualized anticancer treatments. Methods: We have developed ChemoID, an in vitro chemotherapy assay, designed to predict the sensitivity and resistance of a given patient’s CSLCs and bulk of tumor cells to a variety of chemotherapy agents. Results: A 5-month female (Patient A), and a 21-year old male (Patient B), both affected by anaplastic WHO grade 3 ependymoma were screened using the ChemoID assay. A range of concentrations flanking the clinical doses for vincristine, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin, methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, avastin, procarbazine, lomustine, and busulfan were tested. The CSLCs and bulk of tumor ependymoma cells of Patient A were found moderately sensitive (30% cell kill) to only cisplatin and procarbazine, both as single agents and in combination. Following 6 cycles of vincristine, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin in various combinations, Patient A rapidly progressed and proton beam therapy was recommended. The CSLCs and bulk of tumor ependymoma cells of Patient B were found highly sensitive (80% cell kill) to the combination of irinotecan and avastin, which resulted in 18 months free of disease progression. After recurrence, chemotherapies were tested in combination with benzyl-isothiocyanate (BITC), a bioactive natural food component contained in extracts from cruciferous vegetables. BITC greatly increased the chemosensitivity in Patient B to the combination of irinotecan and avastin, resulting in average 90% CSLCs and bulk of tumor ependymoma cell eradication. MRI scan of Patient B showed over 50% tumor regression after two months of treatment with a combination of irinotecan, avastin, and supplements containing BITC. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that no patients are alike in their chemotherapy response. ChemoID assay that measures cell death of CSLCs and bulk of tumor cells from patient biopsies to standard chemotherapy agents in vitro is a feasible approach to personalized anticancer treatments.

Targeting a newly established spontaneous feline fibrosarcoma cell line by gene transfer

Fibrosarcoma is a deadly disease in cats and is significantly more often located at classical vaccine injections sites. More rare forms of spontaneous non-vaccination site (NSV) fibrosarcomas have been described and have been found associated to genetic alterations. Purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of adenoviral gene transfer in NVS fibrosarcoma. We isolated and characterized a NVS fibrosarcoma cell line (Cocca-6A) from a spontaneous fibrosarcoma that occurred in a domestic calico cat. The feline cells were karyotyped and their chromosome number was counted using a Giemsa staining. Adenoviral gene transfer was verified by western blot analysis. Flow cytometry assay and Annexin-V were used to study cell-cycle changes and cell death of transduced cells. Cocca-6A fibrosarcoma cells were morphologically and cytogenetically characterized. Giemsa block staining of metaphase spreads of the Cocca-6A cells showed deletion of one of the E1 chromosomes, where feline p53 maps. Semi-quantitative PCR demonstrated reduction of p53 genomic DNA in the Cocca-6A cells. Adenoviral gene transfer determined a remarkable effect on the viability and growth of the Cocca-6A cells following single transduction with adenoviruses carrying Mda-7/IL-24 or IFN-γ or various combination of RB/p105, Ras-DN, IFN-γ, and Mda-7 gene transfer. Therapy for feline fibrosarcomas is often insufficient for long lasting tumor eradication. More gene transfer studies should be conducted in order to understand if these viral vectors could be applicable regardless the origin (spontaneous vs. vaccine induced) of feline fibrosarcomas.