'Low' faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer: a 4-year comparison of the Nottingham '4F' protocol with FIT10 in symptomatic patients

AIM

The aim of this work was to evaluate colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes after 'low' (sub-threshold) faecal immunochemical test (FIT) results in symptomatic patients tested in primary care.

METHOD

This work comprised a retrospective audit of 35 289 patients with FIT results who had consulted their general practitioner with lower gastrointestinal symptoms and had subsequent CRC diagnoses. The Rapid Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis pathway was introduced in November 2017 to allow incorporation of FIT into clinical practice. The local '4F' protocol combined FIT results with blood tests and digital rectal examination (DRE): FIT, full blood count, ferritin and finger [DRE]. The outcome used was detection rates of CRC, missed CRC and time to diagnosis in local 4F protocols for patients with a subthreshold faecal haemoglobin (fHb) result compared with thresholds of 10 and 20 μg Hb/g faeces.

RESULTS

A single threshold of 10 μg Hb/g faeces identifies a population in whom the risk of CRC is 0.2%, but this would have missed 63 (10.5%) of 599 CRCs in this population. The Nottingham 4F protocol would have missed fewer CRCs [42 of 599 (7%)] despite using a threshold of 20 μg Hb/g faeces for patients with normal blood tests. Subthreshold FIT results in patients subsequently diagnosed with a palpable rectal tumour yielded the longest delays in diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

A combination of FIT with blood results and DRE (the 4F protocol) reduced the risk of missed or delayed diagnosis. Further studies on the impact of such protocols on the diagnostic accuracy of FIT are expected. The value of adding blood tests to FIT may be restricted to specific parts of the fHb results spectrum.

Prevalence and risk factors for nerve injury following shoulder dislocation

BACKGROUND

The glenohumeral joint dislocation can be associated with major nerve injury. The reported prevalence and risk factors for major nerve injury are variable and this injury can have a severe and life-long impact on the patient. The objectives of this study were to analyse the prevalence of major nerve injury following shoulder dislocation and examine risk factors. Management and outcomes of nerve injury were explored.

METHODS

A 1 year retrospective cohort study of 243 consecutive adults who presented with a shoulder dislocation was performed. Data were collected on patient demographics, timings of investigations, treatment, follow-up, and nerve injury prevalence and management. The primary outcome measure was prevalence of nerve injury. Risk factors for this were analysed using appropriate tests with Stata SE15.1.

RESULTS

Of 243 patients with shoulder dislocation, 14 (6%) had neurological deficit. Primary dislocation (p = 0.004) and older age (p = 0.02) were significantly associated with major nerve injury. Sex, time to successful reduction and force of injury were not associated with major nerve injury in this cohort. Patients with nerve injury made functional recovery to varying degrees. Recurrent shoulder dislocation was common accounting for 133/243 (55%) attendances.

CONCLUSIONS

Shoulder dislocation requires careful assessment and timely management in the ED. A 6% rate of nerve injury following shoulder dislocation was at the lower border of reported rates (5-55%), and primary dislocation and older age were identified as risk factors for nerve injury. We emphasise the importance of referring patients with suspected major nerve injury to specialist services.

Childhood-Onset Lupus Nephritis in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry: Short-Term Kidney Status and Variation in Care

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to characterize short-term kidney status and describe variation in early care utilization in a multicenter cohort of patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) and nephritis.

METHODS

We analyzed previously collected prospective data from North American patients with cSLE with kidney biopsy-proven nephritis enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry from March 2017 through December 2019. We determined the proportion of patients with abnormal kidney status at the most recent registry visit and applied generalized linear mixed models to identify associated factors. We also calculated frequency of medication use, both during induction and ever recorded.

RESULTS

We identified 222 patients with kidney biopsy-proven nephritis, with 64% class III/IV nephritis on initial biopsy. At the most recent registry visit at median (interquartile range) of 17 (8-29) months from initial kidney biopsy, 58 of 106 patients (55%) with available data had abnormal kidney status. This finding was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR] 3.88, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.21-12.46) and age at cSLE diagnosis (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01-1.49). Patients with class IV nephritis were more likely than class III to receive cyclophosphamide and rituximab during induction. There was substantial variation in mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab ever use patterns across rheumatology centers.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort with predominately class III/IV nephritis, male sex and older age at cSLE diagnosis were associated with abnormal short-term kidney status. We also observed substantial variation in contemporary medication use for pediatric lupus nephritis between pediatric rheumatology centers. Additional studies are needed to better understand the impact of this variation on long-term kidney outcomes.

Stimulator of interferon genes is required for Toll-Like Receptor-8 induced interferon response

The innate immune system is equipped with multiple receptors to detect microbial nucleic acids and induce type I interferon (IFN) to restrict viral replication. When dysregulated these receptor pathways induce inflammation in response to host nucleic acids and promote development and persistence of autoimmune diseases like Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). IFN production is regulated by the Interferon Regulatory Factor (IRF) transcription factor family of proteins that function downstream of several innate immune receptors such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING). Although both TLRs and STING activate the same downstream molecules, the pathway by which TLRs and STING activate IFN response are thought to be independent. Here we show that STING plays a previously undescribed role in human TLR8 signaling. Stimulation with the TLR8 ligands induced IFN secretion in primary human monocytes, and inhibition of STING reduced IFN secretion from primary monocytes from 8 healthy donors. We demonstrate that TLR8-induced IRF activity was reduced by STING inhibitors. Moreover, TLR8-induced IRF activity was blocked by inhibition or loss of IKKε, but not TBK1. Bulk RNA transcriptomic analysis supported a model where TLR8 induces transcriptional responses associated with SLE that can be downregulated by inhibition of STING. These data demonstrate that STING is required for full TLR8-to-IRF signaling and provide evidence for a new framework of crosstalk between cytosolic and endosomal innate immune receptors, which could be leveraged to treat IFN driven autoimmune diseases.

Background

High levels of type I interferon (IFN) is characteristic of multiple autoimmune diseases, and while TLR8 is associated with autoimmune disease and IFN production, the mechanisms of TLR8-induced IFN production are not fully understood.

Results

STING is phosphorylated following TLR8 signaling, which is selectively required for the IRF arm of TLR8 signaling and for TLR8-induced IFN production in primary human monocytes.

Conclusion

STING plays a previously unappreciated role in TLR8-induced IFN production.

Significance

Nucleic acid-sensing TLRs contribute to development and progression of autoimmune disease including interferonopathies, and we show a novel role for STING in TLR-induced IFN production that could be a therapeutic target.

Novel imaging techniques in refractory pituitary adenomas

Accurate localization of the site(s) of active disease is key to informing decision-making in the management of refractory pituitary adenomas when autonomous hormone secretion and/or continued tumor growth challenge conventional therapeutic approaches. In this context, the use of non-standard MR sequences, alternative post-acquisition image processing, or molecular (functional) imaging may provide valuable additional information to inform patient management.

A186 ASSOCIATION OF ULCERATIVE COLITIS BOWEL URGENCY IMPROVEMENT WITH CLINICAL RESPONSE AND REMISSION

Background

Ulcerative colitis (UC) can result in a high prevalence of bowel movement urgency (BU), significantly reducing patient quality of life.

Purpose

Early BU improvement association with later clinical endpoint improvements was examined in moderately-to-severely active UC patients (pts) treated with mirikizumab (miri).

Method

BU was evaluated in Phase 3 randomized placebo (PBO)-controlled 12-week induction (LUCENT-1, NCT03518086) and 40-week maintenance (LUCENT-2, NCT03524092) trials with miri. Pts received IV miri 300mg or PBO during induction. Week (W)12 miri responders were rerandomized at LUCENT-2 baseline (BL) to subcutaneous miri 200mg or PBO. BU was measured with 11-point Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (UNRS) from 0 (no urgency) to 10 (worst possible). Pts’ UNRS scores were an average from 7 consecutive days prior to visit. Association of pts with BU Clinically Meaningful Improvement (CMI) or BU remission between BL and W4 with the proportion of pts achieving clinical response, and clinical, endoscopic, or symptomatic remission at end of W12 was assessed. For pts who achieved clinical response at W12, the analyses were repeated for the end of maintenance based on W12 BU status. Logistic regression models with treatment, urgency (BU CMI or BU Remission), treatment-by-urgency group interaction, and stratification factors were fitted to examine the association between early urgency improvement and later clinical endpoints.

Result(s)

Treatment-by-urgency group interactions were not statistically significant across clinical outcomes for induction and maintenance. For induction, treatment and urgency status were statistically significant. Pts experiencing BU CMI or BU remission at W4 were consistently more likely to achieve clinical response, and clinical, endoscopic, or symptomatic remission at W12 for both treatment groups. For remission, only treatment main effect was statistically significant. Among miri induction clinical responders (an enriched population), BU CMI or BU Remission at end of induction (W12) was not associated with later maintenance efficacy outcomes (W52). Miri-treated pts achieved higher rates of clinical response, and clinical, endoscopic, or symptomatic remission at W52 than with PBO regardless of BU CMI or BU Remission at W12 (Table).

Image

Conclusion(s)

Early BU Improvement, CMI or Remission, was associated with better clinical outcomes during induction for miri and PBO pts, showing BU is a sensitive predictor of early clinical outcomes. Among miri induction responders, miri consistently provided better maintenance of response and remission rates than PBO.

Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below

Other

Please indicate your source of funding;

Eli Lilly and Company

Disclosure of Interest

D. Clemow Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, C. Sapin Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, T. Hibi Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, ActivAid, Alfresa Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., JMDC, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer Japan, and Takeda, Consultant of: AbbVie, Apo Plus Station, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, EA Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Kyorin, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Nichi-Iko Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Takeda, and Zeria Pharmaceutical, Speakers bureau of: AbbVie, Aspen Japan K.K., Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, JIMRO, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Takeda, M. Dubinsky Shareholder of: Trellus Health, Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, Janssen, Pfizer, and Prometheus Biosciences, Consultant of: AbbVie, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Pfizer, Prometheus Therapeutics and Diagnostics, Takeda, and UCB Pharma, S. Vermeire Consultant of: AbbVie, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Avaxia Biologics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Dr. Falk Pharma, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Galapagos NV, Genentech/Roche, Gilead Sciences, Hospira, Janssen, Mundipharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, ProDigest, Progenity, Prometheus Therapeutics and Diagnostics, Robarts Clinical Trials, Second Genome, Shire, Takeda, Theravance Biopharma, and Tillots Pharma AG, Speakers bureau of: AbbVie, Dr. Falk Pharma, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Galapagos NV, Genentech/Roche, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Pfizer, Robarts Clinical Trials, and Takeda, S. Schreiber Grant / Research support from: personal fees and/or travel support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly and Company, Dr. Falk Pharma, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos NV, Gilead Sciences, I-MAB Biopharma, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Protagonist Therapeutics, Provention Bio, Roche, Sandoz/Hexal, Shire, Takeda, Theravance Biopharma, and UCB Pharma, T. Gibble Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, L. Peyrin-Biroulet Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, Fresenius Kabi, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Takeda, Consultant of: AbbVie, Alimentiv, Allergan, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly and Company, Enthera, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos NV, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Gossamer Bio, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Inotrem, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mylan, Norgine, Ono Pharmaceutical, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pandion Therapeutics, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sandoz, Takeda, Theravance Biopharma, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tillots Pharma AG, Viatris, and Vifor Pharma, M. Watanabe Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, Alfresa Pharma, EA Pharma, Kissei, Kyorin, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Takeda, and Zeria Pharmaceutical, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, EA Pharma, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Gilead Sciences, Nippon, and Takeda, Speakers bureau of: EA Pharma, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Gilead Sciences, Janssen, JIMRO, Kissei, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan, Takeda, and Zeria Pharmaceutical, R. Panaccione Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Pfizer, and Takeda, Consultant of: Abbott, AbbVie, Alimentiv, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Cosmo Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Elan Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Galapagos NV, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Oppilan Pharma, Pandion Therapeutics, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz, Satisfai Health, Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda, Theravance Biopharma, and UCB Pharma, J. Jones: None Declared

A90 IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL GUIDELINES ON THE MANAGEMENT OF VACCINE PREVENTABLE ILLNESS IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: PERCEIVED BARRIERS AND INTERVENTION FUNCTIONS AMONGST GASTROENTEROLOGISTS

Background

Vaccination uptake amongst patients with IBD remains suboptimal. Studies evaluating effectiveness of interventions designed to improve vaccine uptake have not assessed perceived barriers and solutions related to implementation of evidence-based guidelines for vaccine preventable illness (VPI).

Purpose

The aim of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators for evidence-based management of VPI in IBD.

Method

A semi-structured interview was conducted with gastroenterologists. Interview questions were developed and guided by the COM-B and TDF evidence-based implementation science frameworks. A brief intake questionnaire was administered to collect participant demographic and clinical practice information. Gastroenterologists were recruited through direct local contact via email by the investigators. Sixty minute interviews were recorded and transcribed for data analysis. Using thematic analysis, codes from the study data will be generated to identify themes. The data will be categorized into the coding scheme and themes created using an inductive coding approach.

Result(s)

As of October 2022, 5 interviews were conducted. Mean participant age was 47.8 years, with 60% identifying practice in an urban/academic setting compared to a rural/community setting (20%). Preliminary major themes included 1) assessing vaccination status and recommending appropriate vaccines are the responsibility of the gastroenterologist 2) gastroenterologists need more support to administer vaccines in clinical practice 3) barriers to implementation of VPI guidelines include lack of access to a family physician, limited time, vaccine hesitancy, and incomplete understanding of coverage/access to vaccines and 4) intervention themes include use of clinical decision support tools embedded into the workflow of healthcare providers, need for support from allied healthcare providers, increased need for third party support, and more education/CME relating to management of VPI in clinical practice. Specific knowledge gaps include 1) uncertainty relating to what vaccines are covered financially 2) lack of knowledge of risk factors for specific VPI such as pneumococcus and meningococcus and 3) how to administer live vaccines in patients already on immunosuppressants.

Conclusion(s)

Preliminary qualitative themes suggest that although gastroenterologists acknowledge the importance of managing VPI in patients with IBD, perceived resource, policy, and educational barriers exist. The qualitative data from this study will be used to design and implement customized, evidence-based implementation strategies for managing VPI that are sensitive to the local environment.

Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below

None

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

A201 EFFECT OF MIRIKIZUMAB ON BOWEL URGENCY CLINICALLY MEANINGFUL IMPROVEMENT AND REMISSION: RESULTS FROM THE PHASE 3 LUCENT INDUCTION AND MAINTENANCE STUDIES

Background

Bowel urgency (BU) was assessed in mirikizumab (miri) Phase 3 LUCENT studies in moderately-to-severely active UC using the validated Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (UNRS). UNRS measures BU severity in the past 24 hours from 0 (no urgency) to 10 (worst possible urgency). Psychometric evaluation of the UNRS showed Clinically Meaningful Improvement (CMI) is >3 point change; Remission is a score of 0 or 1.

Purpose

This analysis evaluated the proportions of patients in LUCENT studies achieving BU CMI and BU remission.

Method

The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population (patients receiving ≥1 dose of miri or placebo (PBO); N= 1281) was randomized at induction study baseline in a 3:1 ratio to IV doses of 300mg miri or PBO every 4 weeks (Q4W) during induction (W0, 4, and 8). Patients achieving Clinical Response, measured by Modified Mayo Score (MMS), to miri during induction were re-randomized at W0 of the maintenance study in a 2:1 ratio to subcutaneous (SC) 200mg miri or PBO Q4W through W40 (52 weeks of treatment). Patients recorded their UNRS score daily in an e-diary. Mean weekly UNRS scores were calculated from diary data if ≥4 days of data were available. Rates of BU CMI and BU remission in the miri v PBO groups were compared at W12 (induction) in the mITT population with a baseline UNRS score ≥3, and W52 (maintenance) among miri clinical responders at W12 with a baseline UNRS score ≥3. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests with non-responder imputation for missing values were used for all treatment comparisons.

Result(s)

Patient population: mean age 43 years, 60% male, disease duration 7 years; 63.0% left-sided colitis; 36.3% pancolitis; 46.7% moderate disease (MMS 4-6); 53.2% severe disease (MMS 7-9). Significantly higher proportions of miri versus PBO patients achieved BU CMI (48.7% v 32.2%) and BU remission (22.1% v 12.3%) at W12 (both p<0.001; Table) in the induction study. Similarly, at W40 of maintenance, significantly greater proportion of miri patients achieved BU CMI (65.2% v 41.9%) and BU remission (42.9% v 25.0%) compared to PBO among miri induction responders (both p<0.001; Table).

Image

Conclusion(s)

Miri had a highly significant and clinically meaningful benefit on reducing bowel urgency, one of the most disruptive UC symptoms. The Urgency Numeric Rating Scale usefully quantified the baseline level and change in bowel urgency after treatment across a spectrum of severity.

Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below

Other

Please indicate your source of funding;

Eli Lilly and Company

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

A185 SUSTAINED SYMPTOM CONTROL WITH MIRIKIZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH MODERATELY TO SEVERELY ACTIVE ULCERATIVE COLITIS IN THE LUCENT-2 MAINTENANCE TRIAL

Background

Mirikizumab (miri) improved symptom control in a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled induction study at Week (W)12, in patients (pts) with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC; LUCENT-1).

Purpose

This analysis assessed sustained symptom control during the maintenance phase through W40 (W52 of continuous therapy), among pts who were induced into clinical response with miri.

Method

During the 40W maintenance study (LUCENT-2), pts (N=544) who achieved clinical response to miri 300mg Q4W by W12 of induction, were re-randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous (SC) miri 200mg (n=365) or PBO Q4W (n=179). We evaluated sustained control of stool frequency (SF), rectal bleeding (RB), bowel movement urgency (BU) and abdominal pain (AP). The proportion of pts achieving SF Remission (defined as SF=0, or SF=1 with a ≥1-point decrease from induction baseline [BL]), RB Remission (RB=0), Symptomatic Remission (both SF and RB Remission), Stable Maintenance of Symptomatic Remission (defined as pts in Symptomatic Remission for at least 7 out of 9 visits from W4 to W36 and also at Week 40 among pts in Symptomatic Remission and Clinical Response at the end of LUCENT-1), and AP Improvement (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] pain score ≥30% improvement from BL in pts with baseline AP NRS ≥3) were assessed. BU NRS change from baseline, and the proportion of pts achieving BU Remission (NRS 0 or 1 in pts with BU NRS ≥3 at baseline) were evaluated.

Result(s)

A greater proportion of miri-treated pts achieved SF Remission, RB Remission and Symptomatic Remission compared to PBO at W40 (Table), with significant differences observed from W8 of LUCENT-2 (p=0.042; p=0.004; p=0.036, respectively) and maintained through W40. Miri-treated pts had a significantly higher percentage of Stable Maintenance of Symptomatic Remission (p<0.001). Pts in the miri-treatment group had a significantly greater mean reduction in BU NRS change from induction BL starting at W12 (p=0.034) onwards compared to PBO (Table). Pts assigned to miri accrued an additional 13.6 percentage-point benefit in BU Remission during the first 8W of maintenance therapy and achieved a significant greater improvement at W40 compared to PBO (p<0.001, Table). Similarly, AP was significantly improved for the miri-treated group starting at W16 (p=0.034) onwards compared to PBO.

Image

Conclusion(s)

Miri provides sustained control of UC symptoms including BU, RB, and SF compared to PBO in pts with moderately to severely active UC.

Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below

Other

Please indicate your source of funding;

Eli Lilly and Company

Disclosure of Interest

A. Dignass Consultant of: AbbVie, Abivax, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb (Celgene), Celltrion, Dr. Falk Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Roche, Sandoz/Hexal, Takeda, Tillotts Pharma AG, and Vifor Pharma; has received lecture fees or honoraria from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dr. Falk Pharma, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Galapagos, High5Md, Janssen, Materia, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Sandoz, Takeda, Tillotts Pharma AG, and Vifor Pharma, S. Danese Consultant of: AbbVie, Alimentiv, Allergan, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Athos Therapeutics, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Dr. Falk Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Enthera, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Hospira, Inotrem, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Mylan, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz Sublimity, Takeda, TiGenix, UCB Pharma, and Vifor Pharma, Speakers bureau of: AbbVie, Amgen, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Mylan, Pfizer, and Takeda, K. Matsuoka Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, EA Pharma, JIMRO, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kyorin, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Mochida Pharmaceutical, and Zeria Pharmaceutical Nippon; lecture fees from: AbbVie, EA Pharma, JIMRO, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kyorin, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Takeda, and Zeria Pharmaceutical Nippon, M. Ferrante Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Janssen Cilag, Pfizer, Takeda, and Viatris, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen Cilag, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sandoz, Takeda, and Thermo Fisher Scientific, Speakers bureau of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Dr. Falk Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Lamepro, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mylan, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Sandoz, Takeda, and Thermo Fisher Scientific, M. Long Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calibr, Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Roche, Takeda, TARGET PharmaSolutions, and Theravance Biopharma, I. Redondo Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, T. Gibble Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, R. Moses Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, X. Li Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, N. Morris Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, C. Milch Employee of: Former employee, was employed at Eli Lilly and Company at the time of study, M. Abreu Grant / Research support from: Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, and Takeda, Consultant of: AbbVie, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Microba Life Sciences, Prometheus Biosciences, UCB Pharma, and WebMD, Speakers bureau of: Alimentiv, Intellisphere LLC (HCP Live Institutional Perspectives in GI), Janssen, Prime CME, and Takeda, J. Jones: None Declared

A31 MIRIKIZUMAB IMPROVES QUALITY OF LIFE IN MODERATELY-TO-SEVERELY ACTIVE UC: IMPROVEMENT IN IBDQ SCORES IN PARTICIPANTS OF LUCENT-1 AND LUCENT-2 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PHASE 3 TRIALS

Background

The inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ) is a measure of health-related quality of life (QoL), with higher scores indicating greater QoL. In a prior phase 2 study (NCT02589665), mirikizumab, an anti-IL23p19 antibody, demonstrated efficacy and improvement in IBDQ scores in participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC).

Purpose

This analysis evaluated effect of mirikizumab (miri) vs placebo (PBO) on IBDQ scores in patients (pts) with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) who had failed prior conventional or biologic therapy in a Phase 3, double-blind, 12-week (W) induction study (LUCENT-1) followed by a 40W maintenance study (LUCENT-2) for a total of 52W continuous therapy.

Method

Pts (N=1162) in LUCENT-1 were randomized 3:1 to receive 300mg miri or PBO intravenously once every four weeks (Q4W). 544 pts who achieved Modified Mayo Score Clinical Response to miri by W12 of induction were rerandomized 2:1 in LUCENT-2 to subcutaneous miri 200mg or PBO Q4W in maintenance period. Randomization was stratified by previous biologic therapy failure, baseline corticosteroid use, and region. LUCENT-1 stratification included baseline (BL) disease activity, and LUCENT-2 included LUCENT-1 clinical remission status. The least squares mean change from BL in IBDQ scores at W12 of induction and W40 of maintenance was determined using analysis of covariance models. BL was W0 of therapy and stratification factors and BL scores were used as covariates. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) was defined as an improvement of ≥16 points in total IBDQ score (IBDQ response) and IBDQ remission as a total score ≥170 points. IBDQ response and remission were calculated using non-responder imputations. Treatments were compared using the common risk difference (risk diff).

Result(s)

Miri treatment resulted in significantly greater improvement from BL in IBDQ total and domain scores vs PBO at both W12 of induction and W40 of maintenance (52W treatment) (Table). The proportions of pts who achieved an IBDQ response was significantly greater for miri treated pts vs PBO at W12 (risk diff =17.1[95%CI:10.7, 23.5]) and W40 (29.5 [21.0, 37.9]). Significantly greater proportions of pts receiving miri achieved IBDQ remission at W12 (18.1 [11.8, 24.4]) and W40 (28.5 [20.1, 37.0]) vs PBO (all evaluations and timepoints: p<0.001).

Image

Conclusion(s)

Pts reported significantly greater improvements in IBDQ scores at induction and maintenance with miri compared to PBO. Over 75% of pts achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in QoL, as measured by IBDQ response, at the end of the 52 weeks of miri treatment.

Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below

Other

Please indicate your source of funding;

Eli Lilly and Company

Disclosure of Interest

B. Sands Consultant of: Abivax, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Artugen Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bacainn Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calibr, Celltrion, ClostraBio, Eli Lilly and Company, Enthera, Evommune, Galapagos NV, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Gossamer Bio, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Innovation Pharmaceuticals, Inotrem, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Kaleido Biosciences, Kallyope, MiroBio, Morphic Therapeutic, MRM Health, Pfizer, Progenity, Prometheus Therapeutics and Diagnostics, Protagonist Therapeutics, Q32 Bio, Surrozen, Takeda, Teva, TLL Pharmaceutical, USWM Enterprises, and Viela Bio, B. Feagan Shareholder of: Gossamer Bio, Consultant of: AbbVie, AdMIRx, AgomAb Therapeutics, Akebia Therapeutics, Alivio Therapeutics, Allakos, Amgen, Applied Molecular Transport, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Avir Pharma, Azora Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Connect BioPharma, Cytoki Pharma, Disc Medicine, Ecor1 Capital, Eli Lilly and Company, Equillium, Everest Clinical Research, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Galapagos NV, Galen/Atlantica, Genentech/Roche, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Gossamer Bio, HotSpot Therapeutics, Imhotex, ImmuNext, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Intact Therapeutics, Janssen, Japan Tobacco, Kaleido Biosciences, Leadiant Biosciences, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, MiroBio, Morphic Therapeutics, Mylan, Novartis, OM Pharma, Origo Biopharma, Otsuka, Pandion Therapeutics, Pfizer, Progenity, Prometheus Therapeutics and Diagnostics, PTM Therapeutics, Q32 Bio, Rebiotix, RedHill, Biopharma, Redx Pharma, Sandoz, Sanofi, Seres Therapeutics, Surrozen, Takeda, Teva, Thelium Therapeutics, Theravance Biopharma, TiGenix, Tillotts Pharma AG, UCB Pharma, VHsquared, Viatris, Ysios Capital, and Zealand Pharma, T. Gibble Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, K. Traxler Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, N. Morris Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, X. Li Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, S. Schreiber Grant / Research support from: personal fees and/or travel support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly and Company, Dr. Falk Pharma, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos NV, Gilead Sciences, I-MAB Biopharma, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Protagonist Therapeutics, Provention Bio, Roche, Sandoz/Hexal, Shire, Takeda, Theravance Biopharma, and UCB Pharma, V. Jairath Consultant of: AbbVie, Alimentiv, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Asieris Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly and Company, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Flagship Pioneering, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos NV, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Pandion Therapeutics, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Protagonist Therapeutics, Reistone Biopharma, Roche, Sandoz, Second Genome, Shire, Takeda, Teva, Topivert, Ventyx Biosciences, and Vividion Therapeutics, A. Armuzzi Consultant of: AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly and Company, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Galapagos NV, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sandoz, Takeda, and TiGenix, J. Jones: None Declared

A190 THE IMPACT OF BOWEL URGENCY ON THE LIVES OF PATIENTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS IN THE US AND EUROPE: COMMUNICATING NEEDS AND FEATURES OF IBD EXPERIENCES (CONFIDE) SURVEY

Background

Moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) exerts a significant burden on patients’ lives. Patients with UC report that bowel urgency has a substantial negative impact on their quality of life and psychosocial functioning, however, this symptom is missing from most disease activity indices.

Purpose

The Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) study aims to increase understanding of the impact of symptoms, including bowel urgency, on the lives of patients (pts) with moderate to severe UC and Crohn’s disease in the United States (US), Europe (EUR), and Japan. These data focus on pts in the US and EUR.

Method

Online, quantitative, cross-sectional surveys of pts with moderate to severe UC were conducted in the US and EUR (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and UK). Data included pt perspectives on their UC symptoms and the impact on their daily lives. Moderate to severe UC was defined based on treatment, steroid use, and/or hospitalization history. Descriptive statistics summarise the data.

Result(s)

200 US pts (62% male, mean age 40.4 years) and 556 EUR pts (57% male, mean age 38.9 years) completed the survey, with 77% and 54% currently receiving advanced therapies (biologic or novel oral therapy), respectively. The top 3 symptoms currently (past month) experienced by US and EUR pts were diarrhoea (63% and 50%), bowel urgency (47% and 30%) and increased stool frequency (39% and 30%). In past 3 months, pts who have ever experienced bowel urgency or urge incontinence reported bowel urgency (93% US, 89% EUR) and urge incontinence (86% US, 71% EUR) at least once a month (Table). 69% and 65% of all US and EUR pts, respectively, reported wearing a diaper/pad/protection at least once a month in the past 3 months due to fear/anticipation of urge incontinence. For pts receiving advanced therapies, similar patterns were observed. Among both US and EUR pts, the most common UC-related reasons for declining participation in social events were bowel urgency (43% and 30%) and fear of urge incontinence (40% and 32%). Similarly, the most common reasons for declining participation in work/school and sports/physical exercise were bowel urgency and fear of urge incontinence.

Image

Conclusion(s)

Bowel urgency, which was the second-most frequently reported symptom, has an extensive impact on the lives of pts with moderate to severe UC. In this younger pt population, including pts receiving advanced therapies, almost two thirds of US and EUR pts reported wearing diapers/pads/protection at least once a month in the past 3 months due to fear/anticipation of urge incontinence. Both US and EUR pts reported bowel urgency and fear of urge incontinence as the top reasons for declining participation in social events, work/school, and sports/physical exercise.

Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below

Other

Please indicate your source of funding;

Eli Lilly and Company

Disclosure of Interest

S. Schreiber Grant / Research support from: personal fees and/or travel support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly and Company, Dr. Falk Pharma, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos NV, Gilead Sciences, I-MAB Biopharma, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Protagonist Therapeutics, Provention Bio, Roche, Sandoz/Hexal, Shire, Takeda, Theravance Biopharma, and UCB Pharma, A. Bleakman Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, M. Dubinsky Shareholder of: Trellus Health, Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, Janssen, Pfizer, and Prometheus Biosciences, Consultant of: AbbVie, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Pfizer, Prometheus Therapeutics and Diagnostics, Takeda, and UCB Pharma, D. Rubin Grant / Research support from: Takeda, Consultant of: AbbVie, Allergan, AltruBio, American College of Gastroenterology, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Athos Therapeutics, Bellatrix Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene/Syneos Health, Cornerstones Health (non-profit), Eli Lilly and Company, Galen/Atlantica, Genentech/Roche, Gilead Sciences, GoDuRn, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Iterative Scopes, Janssen, Materia Prima, Pfizer, Prometheus Therapeutics and Diagnostics, Reistone Biopharma, Takeda, and TechLab, T. Hibi Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, Activaid, Alfresa Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., JMDC, Nippon Kayaku, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan, and Takeda, Consultant of: AbbVie, Apo Plus Station, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, EA Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Kyorin, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Nichi-Iko Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Takeda, and Zeria Pharmaceutical, Speakers bureau of: AbbVie, Aspen Japan K.K., Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, JIMRO, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Takeda, R. Panaccione Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Pfizer, and Takeda, Consultant of: Abbott, AbbVie, Alimentiv, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Cosmo Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Elan Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Galapagos NV, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Oppilan Pharma, Pandion Therapeutics, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz, Satisfai Health, Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda, Theravance Biopharma, and UCB Pharma, T. Gibble Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, C. Kayhan Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, E. Flynn Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, C. Sapin Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, C. Atkinson Consultant of: Eli Lilly and Company in connection with the development of this publication, Employee of: Adelphi Real World, S. Travis Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, BUHLMANN Diagnostics, ECCO, Eli Lilly and Company, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Normal Collision Foundation, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Schering-Plough, Takeda, UCB Pharma, Vifor Pharma, and Warner Chilcott, J. Jones: None Declared

A35 FORECASTING THE INCIDENCE AND PREVALENCE OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: A CANADIAN NATION-WIDE ANALYSIS

Background

Canada is currently in the third epidemiological stage in the evolution of IBD: compounding prevalence. A high incidence of IBD, in conjunction with low mortality, leads to a steadily rising prevalence over time. By understanding historical epidemiological trends, we can forecast incidence and prevalence into the future to inform healthcare systems in Canada of the rising burden of IBD to society.

Purpose

To analyze past epidemiological trends in order to forecast the overall incidence and prevalence of IBD, Crohn’s disease (CD), and ulcerative colitis (UC) and stratified by age (<18, 18-64, 65+).

Method

Canadian population-based administrative data was acquired from: AB, BC, SK, MB, QC, and ON. Data were age and sex standardized to the matching year and provincial data aggregated into a representative sample of the Canadian population for prevalence (2002-2014) and incidence (2007-2014: 5-year washout period). Incidence and prevalence (per 100,000 persons) were calculated, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), using Canadian population estimates from Statistics Canada for IBD, CD, UC (IBD-unclassifiable+UC). Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average models were created, and rates forecasted from 2014 to 2035 with 95% prediction intervals (PI). Poisson (or negative binomial) for incidence and log binomial regression for prevalence estimated the Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC), with 95% CIs, of the forecasted data.

Result(s)

The 2014 incidence of IBD in Canada was 28.4 per 100,000 (95%CI: 27.8, 29.0) and forecasted to significantly increase (AAPC: 0.58%; 95%CI: 0.04, 1.04) from 30.0 per 100,000 in 2023 to 32.1 (95%PI: 27.9, 36.3) in 2035. Pediatric onset IBD was 13.9 per 100,000 (95%CI: 13.0, 14.9) in 2014 and is forecasted to significantly increase to 18.0 per 100,000 (95%PI: 15.7, 20.2) in 2035 with an AAPC of 1.23% (95%CI: 0.76, 1.63). Adult and elderly onset incidence rates were forecasted to remain stable. Prevalence of IBD increased between 2002 (389 per 100,000) and 2014 (636 per 100,000) and is forecasted to continue to climb by an AAPC of 2.44% (95%CI: 2.34, 2.53). In 2023, the prevalence of IBD is 825 per 100,000. By 2035 prevalence is forecasted to climb to 1075 per 100,000 (95%PI: 1047, 1103) with 470,000 Canadians living with IBD. Prevalence across all age strata were forecasted to significantly increase. The highest AAPC was seen in the elderly (2.76%; 95%CI: 2.73, 2.79) with a prevalence of 841 per 100,000 (95%CI: 834, 849) in 2014 and forecasted to climb to 1534 per 100,000 (95%PI: 1519, 1550) in 2035.

Image

Conclusion(s)

Incidence of IBD continues to rise in Canada, driven by pediatric-onset IBD. In 2023, over 320,000 Canadians (0.83%) will be living with IBD. By 2035 prevalence will exceed 1% of the population with approximately 470,000 individuals in Canada with IBD. Future research should establish the environmental determinates of IBD that may influence temporal trends in the incidence of IBD, while healthcare systems adapt to the compounding prevalence of IBD.

Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below

CIHR, Other

Please indicate your source of funding;

The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust

Disclosure of Interest

S. Coward: None Declared, E. Benchimol Consultant of: Hoffman La-Roche Limited and Peabody & Arnold LLP for matters unrelated to medications used to treat inflammatory bowel disease and McKesson Canada and the Dairy Farmers of Ontario for matters unrelated to medications used to treat inflammatory bowel disease., C. Bernstein Grant / Research support from: Unrestricted educational grants from Abbvie Canada, Janssen Canada, Pfizer Canada, Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, and Takeda Canada. Has received research grants from Abbvie Canada, Amgen Canada, Pfizer Canada, and Sandoz Canada and contract grants from Janssen, Abbvie and Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie Canada, Amgen Canada, Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, JAMP Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Canada, Pfizer Canada, Sandoz Canada, and Takeda., Speakers bureau of: Abbvie Canada, Janssen Canada, Pfizer Canada and Takeda Canada, J. A. Avina-Zubieta: None Declared, A. Bitton: None Declared, L. Hracs: None Declared, J. Jones Consultant of: Janssen, Abbvie, Pfizer, Takeda, Speakers bureau of: Janssen, Abbvie, Pfizer, Takeda, E. Kuenzig: None Declared, L. Lu: None Declared, S. Murthy: None Declared, Z. Nugent: None Declared, A. Otley Grant / Research support from: Unrestricted educational grants from AbbVie Canada and Janssen Canada, Consultant of: Advisory boards of AbbVie Canada, Janssen Canada and Nestle, R. Panaccione Consultant of: Abbott, AbbVie, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Cosmos Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Elan, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo-Smith Kline, JAMP Bio, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Oppilan Pharma, Organon, Pandion Pharma, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz, Satisfai Health, Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Theravance Biopharma, Trellus, Viatris, UCB. Advisory Boards for: AbbVie, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo-Smith Kline, JAMP Bio, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Oppilan Pharma, Organon, Pandion Pharma, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Speakers bureau of: AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, Organon, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Shire, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, J.-N. Pena-Sanchez: None Declared, H. Singh Consultant of: Pendopharm, Amgen Canada, Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, Roche Canada, Sandoz Canada, Takeda Canada, and Guardant Health, Inc., L. Targownik Grant / Research support from: Investigator initiated funding from Janssen Canada, Consultant of: [Advisory board] AbbVie Canada, Takeda Canada, Merck Canada, Pfizer Canada, Janssen Canada, Roche Canada, and Sandoz Canada, J. Windsor: None Declared, G. Kaplan Grant / Research support from: Ferring, Janssen, AbbVie, GlaxoSmith Kline, Merck, and Shire, Consultant of: Gilead, Speakers bureau of: AbbVie, Janssen, Pfizer, Amgen, and Takeda

A216 BOWEL URGENCY COMMUNICATION GAP BETWEEN HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS AND PATIENTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS IN THE US AND EUROPE: COMMUNICATING NEEDS AND FEATURES OF IBD EXPERIENCES (CONFIDE) SURVEY

Background

The Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) study aims to increase understanding of the impact of symptoms on patients with moderate to severe UC and Crohn’s disease and to investigate gaps in communication with healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the United States (US), Europe (EUR), and Japan.

Purpose

This report focuses on patients with moderate to severe UC and HCPs from the US and EUR.

Method

Online, quantitative, cross-sectional surveys of patients with UC and HCPs were conducted in the US and EUR (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and UK). HCP surveys included physicians and non-physician HCPs responsible for making prescribing decisions. Moderate to severe UC was defined based on treatment, steroid use, and/or hospitalization history. Data collected included perspectives on the experience of patients with UC.

Result(s)

A total of 200 US (62% male, mean age 40.4 years) and 556 EUR patients (57% male, mean age 38.9 years), and 200 US and 503 EUR HCPs completed the survey. According to US and EUR patients, the top 3 symptoms currently (past month) experienced were diarrhoea (63% and 50%), bowel urgency (47% and 30%) and increased stool frequency (39% and 30%). Blood in stool was reported as currently experienced by 27% and 24% of US and EUR patients, respectively. Among patients currently experiencing bowel urgency, 47% of US and 27% of EUR patients discuss this symptom at every appointment. Among those who do not discuss bowel urgency at every appointment, 74% and 75% of US and EUR patients would like to discuss this symptom more frequently with their HCP. A total of 30% and 43% of US and EUR patients that ever experienced bowel urgency were not comfortable reporting it to their HCP, with 62% and 58% of these US and EUR patients feeling embarrassed talking about this symptom (Table). HCPs in both the US and EUR ranked diarrhoea (74% and 65%), blood in stool (69% and 65%) and increased stool frequency (38% and 34%) as the top 3 symptoms most reported by patients. According to US and EUR HCPs, the top 4 symptoms proactively discussed in routine appointments were blood in stool (93% and 94%), diarrhoea (90% and 91%), increased stool frequency (82% and 82%) and bowel urgency (76% and 82%). Among HCPs who did not proactively discuss bowel urgency, 47% of US and 40% of EUR HCPs expect patients to bring this up if it is an issue.

Image

Conclusion(s)

Communication gaps were similar between US and EUR patients and HCPs. Bowel urgency is the second-most reported symptom by patients with moderate to severe UC. However, this symptom is not among the HCP-perceived top 3 most reported symptoms. Although a substantial proportion of patients reported a desire to discuss bowel urgency more frequently with their HCP, some patients reported feeling embarrassed talking about it. Many HCPs who do not proactively discuss this symptom expect patients to bring this up. A communication gap was identified and highlights the under-appreciation of bowel urgency as an important symptom of UC.

Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below

Other

Please indicate your source of funding;

Eli Lilly and Company

Disclosure of Interest

S. Travis Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, BUHLMANN Diagnostics, ECCO, Eli Lilly and Company, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Normal Collision Foundation, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Schering-Plough, Takeda, UCB Pharma, Vifor Pharma, and Warner Chilcott, A. Bleakman Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, D. Rubin Grant / Research support from: Takeda, Consultant of: AbbVie, Allergan, AltruBio, American College of Gastroenterology, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Athos Therapeutics, Bellatrix Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene/Syneos Health, Cornerstones Health (non-profit), Eli Lilly and Company, Galen/Atlantica, Genentech/Roche, Gilead Sciences, GoDuRn, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Iterative Scopes, Janssen, Materia Prima, Pfizer, Prometheus Therapeutics and Diagnostics, Reistone Biopharma, Takeda, and TechLab, M. Dubinsky Shareholder of: Trellus Health, Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, Janssen, Pfizer, and Prometheus Biosciences, Consultant of: AbbVie, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Pfizer, Prometheus Therapeutics and Diagnostics, Takeda, and UCB Pharma, R. Panaccione Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Pfizer, and Takeda, Consultant of: Abbott, AbbVie, Alimentiv, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Cosmo Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Elan Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Galapagos NV, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Oppilan Pharma, Pandion Therapeutics, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz, Satisfai Health, Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda, Theravance Biopharma, and UCB Pharma, T. Hibi Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, Activaid, Alfresa Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., JMDC, Nippon Kayaku, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan, and Takeda, Consultant of: AbbVie, Apo Plus Station, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, EA Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Kyorin, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Nichi-Iko Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Takeda, and Zeria Pharmaceutical, Speakers bureau of: AbbVie, Aspen Japan K.K., Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, JIMRO, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Takeda, T. Gibble Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, C. Kayhan Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, E. Flynn Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, C. Sapin Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, C. Atkinson Consultant of: Eli Lilly and Company in connection with the development of this publication, Employee of: Adelphi Real World, S. Schreiber Grant / Research support from: personal fees and/or travel support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly and Company, Dr. Falk Pharma, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos NV, Gilead Sciences, I-MAB Biopharma, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Protagonist Therapeutics, Provention Bio, Roche, Sandoz/Hexal, Shire, Takeda, Theravance Biopharma, and UCB Pharma, J. Jones: None Declared

A184 EARLY SYMPTOM CONTROL WITH MIRIKIZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH MODERATELY TO SEVERELY ACTIVE ULCERATIVE COLITIS IN THE LUCENT-1 INDUCTION TRIAL

Background

Mirikizumab (miri), an anti-IL23/p19 monoclonal antibody, demonstrated efficacy compared with placebo (PBO) in the Phase 3, multicentre, randomized, double-blind LUCENT-1 induction study in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC, NCT03518086).

Purpose

This analysis assessed early onset of symptomatic improvement and symptomatic control during induction.

Method

During the 12-week (W) induction study, 1162 adult patients (pts) with inadequate response, loss of response, or were intolerant to conventional therapy or biologic or tofacitinib therapy for UC, received miri IV Q4W (N=868) or PBO (N=294). We evaluated improvement for symptoms of stool frequency (SF), rectal bleeding (RB) and bowel movement urgency (BU), abdominal pain and fatigue. BU Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) change from baseline (BL), BU Clinical Meaningful Improvement (CMI), BU Remission, Fatigue NRS change from BL, Abdominal Pain Improvement, as well as SF Remission, RB Remission, Symptomatic Response and Symptomatic Remission were assessed.

Result(s)

As early as W2, miri-treated pts achieved a significantly greater reduction in RB subscores (p=0.001) and in SF subscores (p=0.035). From W2 and W4, a significantly greater percentage achieved SF Remission and RB Remission, respectively compared to PBO. A significantly greater percentage of miri-treated pts achieved Symptomatic Response compared to PBO from W2 (p=0.003) and of Symptomatic Remission compared with PBO from W4 (p<0.001). Miri-treated pts showed a significantly greater mean reduction in BU NRS scores as early as W2 compared to PBO (p=0.004). From W4, a significantly greater percentage of miri-treated pts achieved BU CMI versus PBO (p=0.044). From W7 onwards, a significantly greater percentage achieved BU Remission (p=0.002). The pts showed a significantly greater mean reduction in Fatigue NRS scores from W2 compared to PBO (p=0.014). As early as W4, a significant reduction of at least 30% in Abdominal Pain NRS score from BL was observed in the miri-treated pts compared with PBO (p=0.007). At W12, a significantly greater proportion of miri-treated pts achieved Symptomatic Response, Symptomatic Remission, RB Remission, SF Remission, BU change from BL, BU CMI and Remission, as well as Fatigue and Abdominal Pain Improvement, compared to PBO (Table).

Image

Conclusion(s)

Miri provides rapid control of UC symptoms, including BU and fatigue, as early as W2 compared with PBO in pts with moderately to severely active UC.

Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below

Other

Please indicate your source of funding;

Eli Lilly and Company

Disclosure of Interest

S. Danese Consultant of: AbbVie, Alimentiv, Allergan, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Athos Therapeutics, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Dr. Falk Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Enthera, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Hospira, Inotrem, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Mylan, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz Sublimity, Takeda, TiGenix, UCB Pharma, and Vifor Pharma, Speakers bureau of: AbbVie, Amgen, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Mylan, Pfizer, and Takeda, A. Dignass Consultant of: AbbVie, Abivax, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb (Celgene), Celltrion, Dr. Falk Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Roche, Sandoz/Hexal, Takeda, Tillotts Pharma AG, and Vifor Pharma, Speakers bureau of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dr. Falk Pharma, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Galapagos, High5Md, Janssen, Materia, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Sandoz, Takeda, Tillotts Pharma AG, and Vifor Pharma, K. Matsuoka Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, EA Pharma, JIMRO, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kyorin, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Mochida Pharmaceutical, and Zeria Pharmaceutical Nippon, Speakers bureau of: AbbVie, EA Pharma, JIMRO, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kyorin, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Takeda, and Zeria Pharmaceutical Nippon, M. Ferrante Grant / Research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Janssen Cilag, Pfizer, Takeda, and Viatris, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen Cilag, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sandoz, Takeda, and Thermo Fisher Scientific, Speakers bureau of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Dr. Falk Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Lamepro, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mylan, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Sandoz, Takeda, and Thermo Fisher Scientific, M. Long Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calibr, Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Roche, Takeda, TARGET PharmaSolutions, and Theravance Biopharma, I. Redondo Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, T. Gibble Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, R. Moses Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, N. Morris Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, X. Li Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, C. Milch Employee of: former employee, was employed at Eli Lilly and Company at the time of study, M. Abreu Grant / Research support from: Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, and Takeda, Consultant of: AbbVie, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Microba Life Sciences, Prometheus Biosciences, UCB Pharma, and WebMD, Speakers bureau of: Alimentiv, Intellisphere LLC (HCP Live Institutional Perspectives in GI), Janssen, Prime CME, and Takeda, J. Jones: None Declared

A210 THE BURDEN OF IBD HOSPITALIZATION IN CANADA: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE CURRENT AND FUTURE BURDEN IN A NATION-WIDE ANALYSIS

Background

Hospitalizations pose a significant burden on both the individual and the healthcare system. Those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of hospitalization as compared to the general population due to flaring of disease activity and complications related to IBD. The advent of biologics over the past twenty years may have influenced the rates of hospitalization for IBD.

Purpose

To assess current and forecast the overall hospitalization rates of those with IBD stratified by types of hospitalizations (all cause hospitalizations, IBD-related, and IBD-specific).

Method

Population-based administrative data on hospitalization of IBD (2002-2014) were obtained from: AB, BC, MB, and SK. Data were age and sex standardized to the matching year and aggregated into a representative sample of the Canadian population. Hospitalization rates were assessed as follows: 1. All cause hospitalizations: all admissions regardless of indication; 2. IBD-specific: an admission directly resulting from IBD (e.g., IBD-flare); 3. IBD-related: an admission for IBD, or a symptom or comorbidity associated with IBD (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis). Using prevalence estimates from the provinces, hospitalization rates (per 100 persons with IBD) were calculated, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average models were created to estimate number of hospitalizations and corresponding prevalence to forecast hospitalization rates to 2030 with 95% prediction intervals (PI). Poisson (or negative binomial) regression estimated the Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC), with 95% CIs, of the forecasted data.

Result(s)

In 2002 there were 35.3 per 100 (95%CI: 34.7, 35.9) all cause hospitalizations for IBD patients and this decreased to 24.9 per 100 (24.5, 25.2) in 2014. Similar trends were seen for IBD-specific hospitalizations [16.8 per 100 (95%CI: 16.4, 17.2) in 2002 to 8.7 per 100 (95%CI: 8.5, 9.0) in 2014] and IBD-related (22.6 per 100 (95%CI: 22.1, 23.1) in 2002 to 13.4 per 100 (95%CI: 13.2, 13.7) in 2014). When forecasted out to 2030 all hospitalization types were significantly decreasing—the AAPC for all cause hospitalizations was -2.12% (95%CI: -2.31, -1.93), -3.77% (95%CI: -4.63, -3.08) for IBD-specific, and -3.09% (95%CI: -3.65, -2.62) for IBD-related. By 2030, the rates of hospitalization are forecasted to be 17.0 per 100 (95%PI: 16.2, 17.9), 4.6 per 100 (95%PI: 3.7, 5.4), and 7.9 per 100 (95%PI: 6.9, 8.9) for all cause, IBD-specific, and IBD-related, respectively.

Image

Conclusion(s)

In Canada, rates of hospitalizations for those with IBD have decreased from 2002 to 2014. The use of anti-TNF therapy in conjunction with the evolution of clinical monitoring, management and guidelines, likely has contributed to dropping hospitalization rates. Forecast models estimate a continued drop in hospitalization rates out to 2030. Importantly, healthcare resource planning should account for the shift from hospital-based to clinic-centric models of IBD care.

Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below

CIHR

Disclosure of Interest

S. Coward: None Declared, E. Benchimol Consultant of: Hoffman La-Roche Limited and Peabody & Arnold LLP for matters unrelated to medications used to treat inflammatory bowel disease and McKesson Canada and the Dairy Farmers of Ontario for matters unrelated to medications used to treat inflammatory bowel disease., C. Bernstein Grant / Research support from: Unrestricted educational grants from Abbvie Canada, Janssen Canada, Pfizer Canada, Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, and Takeda Canada. Has received research grants from Abbvie Canada, Amgen Canada, Pfizer Canada, and Sandoz Canada and contract grants from Janssen, Abbvie and Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie Canada, Amgen Canada, Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, JAMP Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Canada, Pfizer Canada, Sandoz Canada, and Takeda., Speakers bureau of: Abbvie Canada, Janssen Canada, Pfizer Canada and Takeda Canada, J. A. Avina-Zubieta: None Declared, A. Bitton: None Declared, L. Hracs: None Declared, J. Jones Consultant of: Janssen, Abbvie, Pfizer, Takeda, Speakers bureau of: Janssen, Abbvie, Pfizer, Takeda, E. Kuenzig: None Declared, L. Lu: None Declared, S. Murthy: None Declared, Z. Nugent: None Declared, A. Otley Grant / Research support from: Unrestricted educational grants from AbbVie Canada and Janssen Canada, Consultant of: Advisory boards of AbbVie Canada, Janssen Canada and Nestle, R. Panaccione Consultant of: Abbott, AbbVie, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Cosmos Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Elan, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo-Smith Kline, JAMP Bio, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Oppilan Pharma, Organon, Pandion Pharma, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz, Satisfai Health, Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Theravance Biopharma, Trellus, Viatris, UCB. Advisory Boards for: AbbVie, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo-Smith Kline, JAMP Bio, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Oppilan Pharma, Organon, Pandion Pharma, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Speakers bureau of: AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, Organon, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Shire, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, J.-N. Pena-Sanchez: None Declared, H. Singh Consultant of: Pendopharm, Amgen Canada, Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, Roche Canada, Sandoz Canada, Takeda Canada, and Guardant Health, Inc.,, L. Targownik Grant / Research support from: Investigator initiated funding from Janssen Canada, Consultant of: [Advisory board] AbbVie Canada, Takeda Canada, Merck Canada, Pfizer Canada, Janssen Canada, Roche Canada, and Sandoz Canada, J. Windsor: None Declared, G. Kaplan Grant / Research support from: Ferring, Janssen, AbbVie, GlaxoSmith Kline, Merck, and Shire, Consultant of: Gilead, Speakers bureau of: AbbVie, Janssen, Pfizer, Amgen, and Takeda

A157 FIT-POSITIVE COLONOSCOPY FINDINGS IN NOVA SCOTIA STRATIFIED BY SEX, RACE, AND REGIONAL POPULATION DENSITY

Background

Population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs aim to minimize disparities in CRC rates through universal access. However, Canadian CRC mortality rates remain inversely associated with socioeconomic status and rural residence. In the United States some racialized groups have higher rates of advanced adenomas and CRC. Little is known about pre-cancerous findings or CRC mortality amongst racialized groups in Canada because race and ethnicity data are not routinely collected.

Purpose

To determine whether FIT-positive colonoscopy incident adenomas and CRC differ on the basis of sex, race, and regional population density in a provincial CRC screening program.

Method

In this retrospective cohort study drawn from the Nova Scotia Colon Cancer Prevention Program database, we identified adults who had a positive FIT from 2011 to 2021. This report describes incident adenomas and CRC, stratified by sex, race (white vs. racialized groups), and regional population density (urban vs. rural). Racialized groups included those who self-identified as Black/African Canadian, Asian, Middle Eastern and Indigenous. Urban was defined as population centers with more than 5000 individuals. Colonoscopy findings were categorized as no findings, low-risk adenoma (LRA), high-risk adenoma (HRA), or CRC. Comparison between categorical variables was performed with a chi-square test and a t-test for continuous variables. P-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Result(s)

41,209 adults (mean age 63.9) had a positive FIT and 34,636 went on to have a colonoscopy offered by the screening program. The FIT-positive colonoscopy participation rate was 84%. Of the 16% overall with a positive FIT but no screening program colonoscopy, 83% had a program consultation but did not proceed with endoscopy for unspecified reasons, 9% declined, and 8.2% are unknown. The overall rate of CRC was 2.4% (n=825) and the adenoma-detection rate was 60.4% (n=20,932). CRC (mean age 65.4) and HRA (mean age 64.6) were associated with older age (p <0.01). Males were more likely to have HRA (38.4% of males) or LRA (26.6% of males) identified compared to females, and females were more likely to have no colonoscopy findings (47.8% of females). CRC was more likely to be identified in urban (2.8%) than rural sub-populations (2.0%). No difference in adenomas or CRC incident rates were noted between white and racialized sub-groups.

Image

Conclusion(s)

This analysis of a provincial CRC screening program suggests that males and urban sub-populations had more high-risk findings during FIT-positive colonoscopies. In the first reported Canadian data, incident rates of adenomas and CRC were similar in white and racialized sub-groups.

Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below

None

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

A220 ONTARIO POPULATION TRENDS IN INTESTINAL AND EXTRA-INTESTINAL CANCERS OVER 25 YEARS AMONG PERSONS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES AND MATCHED CONTROLS

NOT PUBLISHED AT AUTHOR’S REQUEST

A169 THE DIRECT COSTS OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE IN CANADA: A POPULATION-BASED ANALYSIS OF HISTORICAL AND CURRENT COSTS

Background

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a costly disease to manage due to hospitalizations, regular ambulatory monitoring, and expensive pharmaceutical therapies. While hospitalization rates have fallen, the increased use of biologics have escalated the cost of care to the healthcare system.

Purpose

To assess historical direct healthcare costs of the IBD population in Canada.

Method

Population-based administrative costing data were obtained from: Alberta, British Columbia, and Manitoba. Costs were calculated based on administrative data (2009 to 2016) which captured: hospitalizations, physician costs, ambulatory care such as: emergency visits, day surgery, and colonoscopy (AB only), and medication costs of IBD-specific medications, such as: mesalamine, biologics, steroids, and immunomodulators. Costs were converted to 2020 dollars using the consumer price index. Average annual cost per person (ACPP) was calculated for each province. Using province specific IBD prevalence estimates these ACPP were meta-analyzed to obtain the annual weighted costs, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and these costs underwent meta-regression to ascertain the average annual change in cost per year. An Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average model was created to estimate the ACPP in 2023 with 95% prediction intervals (PI). Canada-wide total direct care costs of IBD patients, in billions (B), were calculated using the ACPP, Canada-specific IBD prevalence estimates (historical and forecasted), and total Canadian population calculations from Statistics Canada (historical and forecasted).

Result(s)

In 2009 the ACPP was $7000 (95%CI: 5389, 8610), representing $1.18B (95%CI: 0.91B, 1.45B) in direct healthcare costs in Canada for all IBD patients. The ACPP in 2016 was increased to $10,336 (95%CI: 6803, 13869), which equates to $2.37B (95%CI: 1.56B, 3.18B) per year in direct healthcare costs. From 2009 to 2016, the ACPP increased an average of $450 (95%CI: 132, 767) per year. If these historical trends continue to 2023 the ACPP is forecasted to be $13,333 (95%PI: 12827, 13839) per person per year. The largest contributor to these costs is medications—accounting for an estimated 50% of the total costs of IBD patients.

Image

Conclusion(s)

The direct healthcare cost of IBD has risen steadily from 2009 to 2016 when the healthcare system spent over $10,000 per person with IBD and $2.37B nationwide. The primary driver of costs is medical management. Forecast models estimate that the annual cost may be over $13,000 per person in 2023. However, these estimates do not account for advent and increased uptake of novel biologics and small molecules, nor the downward cost pressure of biosimilars. These costs are those paid directly by the healthcare system and do not account for those born by the individual—it is estimated that the true cost of IBD (direct and indirect) is much higher.

Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below

CIHR

Disclosure of Interest

S. Coward: None Declared, E. Benchimol Consultant of: Hoffman La-Roche Limited and Peabody & Arnold LLP for matters unrelated to medications used to treat inflammatory bowel disease and McKesson Canada and the Dairy Farmers of Ontario for matters unrelated to medications used to treat inflammatory bowel disease., C. Bernstein Grant / Research support from: Unrestricted educational grants from Abbvie Canada, Janssen Canada, Pfizer Canada, Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, and Takeda Canada. Has received research grants from Abbvie Canada, Amgen Canada, Pfizer Canada, and Sandoz Canada and contract grants from Janssen, Abbvie and Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie Canada, Amgen Canada, Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, JAMP Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Canada, Pfizer Canada, Sandoz Canada, and Takeda., Speakers bureau of: Abbvie Canada, Janssen Canada, Pfizer Canada and Takeda Canada, J. A. Avina-Zubieta: None Declared, A. Bitton: None Declared, L. Hracs: None Declared, J. Jones Consultant of: Janssen, Abbvie, Pfizer, Takeda, Speakers bureau of: Janssen, Abbvie, Pfizer, Takeda, E. Kuenzig: None Declared, L. Lu: None Declared, S. Murthy: None Declared, Z. Nugent: None Declared, A. Otley Grant / Research support from: Unrestricted educational grants from AbbVie Canada and Janssen Canada, Consultant of: Advisory boards of AbbVie Canada, Janssen Canada and Nestle, R. Panaccione Consultant of: Abbott, AbbVie, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Cosmos Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Elan, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo-Smith Kline, JAMP Bio, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Oppilan Pharma, Organon, Pandion Pharma, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz, Satisfai Health, Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Theravance Biopharma, Trellus, Viatris, UCB. Advisory Boards for: AbbVie, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo-Smith Kline, JAMP Bio, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Oppilan Pharma, Organon, Pandion Pharma, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Speakers bureau of: AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, Organon, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Shire, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, J.-N. Pena-Sanchez: None Declared, H. Singh Consultant of: Pendopharm, Amgen Canada, Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, Roche Canada, Sandoz Canada, Takeda Canada, and Guardant Health, Inc.,, L. Targownik Grant / Research support from: Investigator initiated funding from Janssen Canada, Consultant of: [Advisory board] AbbVie Canada, Takeda Canada, Merck Canada, Pfizer Canada, Janssen Canada, Roche Canada, and Sandoz Canada, J. Windsor: None Declared, G. Kaplan Grant / Research support from: Ferring, Janssen, AbbVie, GlaxoSmith Kline, Merck, and Shire, Consultant of: Gilead, Speakers bureau of: AbbVie, Janssen, Pfizer, Amgen, and Takeda

A Stress Test of Artificial Intelligence: Can Deep Learning Models Trained From Formal Echocardiography Accurately Interpret Point-of-Care Ultrasound?

OBJECTIVES

To test if a deep learning (DL) model trained on echocardiography images could accurately segment the left ventricle (LV) and predict ejection fraction on apical 4-chamber images acquired by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS).

METHODS

We created a dataset of 333 videos from cardiac POCUS exams acquired in the emergency department. For each video we derived two ground-truth labels. First, we segmented the LV from one image frame and second, we classified the EF as normal, reduced, or severely reduced. We then classified the media's quality as optimal, adequate, or inadequate. With this dataset we tested the accuracy of automated LV segmentation and EF classification by the best-in-class echocardiography trained DL model EchoNet-Dynamic.

RESULTS

The mean Dice similarity coefficient for LV segmentation was 0.72 (N = 333; 95% CI 0.70-0.74). Cohen's kappa coefficient for agreement between predicted and ground-truth EF classification was 0.16 (N = 333). The area under the receiver-operating curve for the diagnosis of heart failure was 0.74 (N = 333). Model performance improved with video quality for the tasks of LV segmentation and diagnosis of heart failure, but was unchanged with EF classification. For all tasks the model was less accurate than the published benchmarks for EchoNet-Dynamic.

CONCLUSIONS

Performance of a DL model trained on formal echocardiography worsened when challenged with images captured during resuscitations. DL models intended for assessing bedside ultrasound should be trained on datasets composed of POCUS images. Such datasets have yet to be made publicly available.

Dental procedures in children with or without intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder in a hospital setting

BACKGROUND

This population-based cohort study investigated dental procedures in the hospital setting in Western Australian children with or without intellectual disability (ID) and/or autism spectrum disorder (ASD) aged up to 18 years. Considering previously reported disparities in dental disease between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian children, this study also investigated the effect of Indigenous status on dental procedures.

METHODS

Data on Western Australian live births from 1983 to 2010 from the Midwives Notification System were linked to the Intellectual Disability Exploring Answers database and the Hospital Morbidity Data collection. Primary admissions for relevant dental diagnoses were identified, and treatment procedures for dental hospitalization were investigated. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's chi-squared test of independence were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 76 065 episodes of dental hospitalization were recorded. Amongst children with ID and/or ASD, Indigenous children experienced more extractions and fewer restorations (68.7% and 16.2%) compared to non-Indigenous children (51.5% and 25.9%). After 6 years, extraction occurred less often in children with ID and/or ASD than in those without, where most surgical dental extractions were in the age group of 13-18 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates a need for further improvements in access to dental services and the quality of care provided in hospitals for children with ID/ASD. There is also concern that more vulnerable Indigenous and all disadvantaged children are receiving an inadequate level of dental services resulting in more emergency dental hospitalization and invasive treatment.

Intraarticular steroids as DMARD-sparing agents for juvenile idiopathic arthritis flares: Analysis of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry

BACKGROUND

Children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who achieve a drug free remission often experience a flare of their disease requiring either intraarticular steroids (IAS) or systemic treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). IAS offer an opportunity to recapture disease control and avoid exposure to side effects from systemic immunosuppression. We examined a cohort of patients treated with IAS after drug free remission and report the probability of restarting systemic treatment within 12 months.

METHODS

We analyzed a cohort of patients from the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry who received IAS for a flare after a period of drug free remission. Historical factors and clinical characteristics and of the patients including data obtained at the time of treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 46 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of those with follow up data available 49% had restarted systemic treatment 6 months after IAS injection and 70% had restarted systemic treatment at 12 months. The proportion of patients with prior use of a biologic DMARD was the only factor that differed between patients who restarted systemic treatment those who did not, both at 6 months (79% vs 35%, p < 0.01) and 12 months (81% vs 33%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

While IAS are an option for all patients who flare after drug free remission, it may not prevent the need to restart systemic treatment. Prior use of a biologic DMARD may predict lack of success for IAS. Those who previously received methotrexate only, on the other hand, are excellent candidates for IAS.

Direct oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of left ventricular thrombi

Background

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) complicates around one in six cases of acute and chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction and is associated with an increased risk of stroke, major systemic embolism and death, believed to be ameliorated by anticoagulation. Off-label use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for LVT has steadily increased, largely based on favourable outcomes in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism, but the safety and efficacy of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for LVT remains uncertain.

Purpose

The main aim of our study was to compare treatment of LVT with VKA to DOAC, focusing on all-cause mortality, stroke, major systemic emboli and major bleeding.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational longitudinal study of patients presenting to two large quaternary centres between 2011 and 2021 with a diagnosis of LVT. Patients were eligible if they had a documented LVT and received anticoagulation with either VKA or DOAC. Baseline data, thrombus characteristics, treatment type and duration, follow up imaging and clinical events were recorded using electronic health care records. Outcome measures included thrombus resolution, stroke and systemic embolism (SSE), major bleeding and mortality.

Results

A total of 955 patients were identified, of whom 901 received treatment with either a VKA (567 pts, 62.9%) or a DOAC (334 pts, 37.1%) and were included in the analysis. Underlying aetiologies included acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (38.3%), chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy (38.0%) and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (23.7%). Rivaroxaban (43.4%) was the most frequently prescribed DOAC followed by apixaban (35.9%), and the remaining on edoxaban (20.7%). AMI related LVT was more commonly treated with DOAC (53.0%) and chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy with VKA (72.9%).

There was a lower baseline LVEF in the VKA cohort (29.5±13.2 vs 33.1±14.2, p&lt;0.0001). Other demographic features were comparable. Median follow up was 2.5 years (IQR: 1–3.5). There were no differences in follow up duration between the two treatments (p=0.17). Greater rates of thrombus resolution were seen in the DOAC group compared to VKA (1 year: 78.4% vs 51.4%, p&lt;0.0001), with higher rates of persistent thrombus over the follow-up period seen in the VKA group (25.1% vs 12.9%, p&lt;0.0001). Rates of stroke and systemic embolization were similar between the groups (VKA 9.3% vs 9.6% DOAC, p=0.93). Higher rates of bleeding (BARC &gt;3, 8.1% VKA, 3.6% DOAC, p=0.031) (Figure 1A) and mortality (VKA 18.5%, DOAC 10.2%, p=0.001) (Figure 1B) were seen in the VKA group over the follow-up period.

Conclusions

In a large multi-centre registry of LVT of mixed aetiology, anticoagulation with DOAC was associated with earlier and greater rates of thrombus resolution and consequential reduced adverse events (major bleeding and mortality) during follow up. A funding application to support a multi-centre randomised control trial is underway.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by the British Heart Foundation (Fellowship FS/CRTF/21/24190 to HM) and the National Institute for Health Research (Biomedical Research Centre Award to Guy's and St Thomas' NHS FT and King's College London).

Modern imaging in Cushing's disease

Management of Cushing's disease is informed by dedicated imaging of the sella and parasellar regions. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the investigation of choice, a significant proportion (30-50%) of corticotroph tumours are so small as to render MRI indeterminate or negative when using standard clinical sequences. In this context, alternative MR protocols [e.g. 3D gradient (recalled) echo, with acquisition of volumetric data] may allow detection of tumors that have not been previously visualized. The use of hybrid molecular imaging (e.g. ¹¹C-methionine positron emission tomography coregistered with volumetric MRI) has also been proposed as an additional modality for localizing microadenomas.

176 A Retrospective Analysis of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Follow-Up Using Flexible Cystoscopy and the Role of the Charlson Co-Morbidity Index (CCI) in Improving Follow Up

Aim

1. A retrospective analysis of NMIBC follow-up using flexible cystoscopy during COVID-19.

2. Charlson Co-Morbidity Index (CCI) as a method of improving follow up.

Method

Online patient records were reviewed for 153 patients who attended Ayr University Hospital between 01/02/2020 and 01/05/ 2020 for check cystoscopy. We recorded the patients risk category and the number of months lapsed since their previous scope. Follow up schedules were compared with current NICE guidelines. CCI for each patient was calculated.

Results

The majority of the patients sampled had follow up adherent to NICE guidelines. Deviations were secondary to ‘allocation to an incorrect follow up schedule’, ‘late follow up’ and ‘non-compliance’. Incorrect allocation was due to both human error and clinical judgement. Clinical judgement included frail patients thought not to benefit from their current intensive schedule and patients with areas of suspicion warranting an earlier check. CCI scores ranged from 2–11. 25% of had a Charlson score of >6 - this predicts a 0% 10-year survival.

Conclusions

We hypothesise that patients with a CCI > 6 should be considered for less intensive follow up. Their co-morbid status makes them likely unsuitable for intervention if reoccurrence was identified.We are pleased with our current adherence to NICE guidelines. We recognise areas for improvement and have raised these at local meetings. We hope that the CCI can be used to ensure we practice realistic medicine and act in the best of the patient when deciding to follow up.

29 The Surgical Trainee Personality: Selected or Shaped?

Aim

This study aims to describe the personality differences between trainees at different stages prior to and during surgical training.

Method

The Mental Muscle Diagram Indicator was distributed electronically to doctors in training in South West London. A total of 553 trainees completed the personality questionnaire. Specifically, there were general surgery specialty (n = 53), core surgical (n = 254), and foundation trainees (n = 246). 52% of trainees were female.

Results

Women scored significantly higher in the Extraversion, Sensing and Judging personality domains (p &lt; 0.0001), there were no significant differences between genders for ‘Thinking’. One-way ANOVA only showed a significant difference in the ‘Judging’ domain between grades. Tukey's test was performed showing the difference arose from FT to CST (p = 0.008). Two-way ANOVA showed an interaction between gender and grade for ‘Judging’ and as such simple main effects were performed, with alpha = 0.017 to control for type 1 errors. Significant differences were found in the Judging domain between genders during in FT (p=0.002) and CST (p=0.002), and there was no significant difference for SpRs (p=0.15).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated differences in personality types between trainee stages and gender. These differences appear to decrease as trainees progress through their training, although the cause of this is unclear.

11C-methionine PET aids localization of microprolactinomas in patients with intolerance or resistance to dopamine agonist therapy

PURPOSE

To assess the potential for ¹¹C-methionine PET (Met-PET) coregistered with volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (Met-PET/MR^CR) to inform clinical decision making in patients with poorly visualized or occult microprolactinomas and dopamine agonist intolerance or resistance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirteen patients with pituitary microprolactinomas, and who were intolerant (n = 11) or resistant (n = 2) to dopamine agonist therapy, were referred to our specialist pituitary centre for Met-PET/MR^CR between 2016 and 2020. All patients had persistent hyperprolactinemia and were being considered for surgical intervention, but standard clinical MRI had shown either no visible adenoma or equivocal appearances.

RESULTS

In all 13 patients Met-PET/MR^CR demonstrated a single focus of avid tracer uptake. This was localized either to the right or left side of the sella in 12 subjects. In one patient, who had previously undergone surgery for a left-sided adenoma, recurrent tumor was unexpectedly identified in the left cavernous sinus. Five patients underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal selective adenomectomy, with subsequent complete remission of hyperprolactinaemia and normalization of other pituitary function; three patients are awaiting surgery. In the patient with inoperable cavernous sinus disease PET-guided stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was performed with subsequent near-normalization of serum prolactin. Two patients elected for a further trial of medical therapy, while two declined surgery or radiotherapy and chose to remain off medical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with dopamine agonist intolerance or resistance, and indeterminate pituitary MRI, molecular (functional) imaging with Met-PET/MR^CR can allow precise localization of a microprolactinoma to facilitate selective surgical adenomectomy or SRS.

O022 Application of customised 3D printed models to aid undergraduate teaching and surgical planning in hepatobiliary surgery

Introduction

3D-printing in maxillofacial surgery has been used for several years to construct bespoke prostheses prior to surgical procedures. This work aims to assess whether its role can be

expanded into undergraduate teaching and surgical planning in hepatobiliary surgery.

Methods

Four patient CT scans with liver and renal pathology were deemed eligible for printing. A computer aided design was constructed for each scan, segmenting the organ, lesion, and vasculature. One kidney and three liver models were printed. Production time of the models ranged from 31 to 106 hours. One liver model with the associated CT scan was shown to 20 doctors of varying experience. They were asked to complete a survey evaluating its potential in surgery, aiding patient education, and anatomy education. The remaining models were used in an anatomy tutorial for 6 medical students, who were requested to complete a pre-and-post-session survey evaluating the potential for the 3D models in anatomy education.

Results

An average rating from the NHS-staff survey was 6.9 for pre-operative planning, 8.65 for aiding anatomy education, and 9.15 for potential use in patient education. Following the tutorial with the models, 4 of the 6 students felt their overall understanding of liver anatomy improved. In particular, all students expressed increased confidence in hepatic segmentation anatomy.

Conclusion

Our work shows that 3D-printed models can provide benefit in aiding clinical teaching and patient information. Future work will focus on use of the models as an aid to patient education in an outpatient setting.

Take-home message

3D-printed models have a future in aiding anatomy education and hepatobiliary surgical planning. Further research can consolidate their applications.

The effect of lifestyle and risk factor modification on occlusive peripheral arterial disease outcomes: standard healthcare vs structured programme: a pilot randomised controlled study

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Atherosclerotic risk factor modification plays an important role in reducing adverse outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic disease1. Despite the high prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and strong association with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, patients with PAD are less likely to receive structured treatment for their atherosclerotic risk factors than patients with coronary artery disease2,3.

Purpose

We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of a lifestyle and risk factor modification intervention programme in achieving treatment goals for PAD risk factors.

Methods

This is a pilot randomised controlled study comparing a risk factor modification intervention programme to standard healthcare, for the reduction of modified risk factors in PAD patients. Patients randomised to the intervention arm underwent a 12-week supervised programme adjusting their risk factors. Primary outcome was patients reaching target risk factor improvement.

Results

Seventy-five patients were randomised. 36 were allocated to Standard Healthcare. 39 completed a 12-week Structured Programme. There was no significant difference between groups in baseline demographics, incidence and severity of risk factors, mobility and quality of life.

At 12-weeks the intervention group showed a significant improvement in target body weight (6.7±9.57 p=0.002), waist circumference (7.4±9.5 p=0.001), HbA1c (4.12±7.22 p=0.009), total cholesterol (0.63±0.99 p=0.004), low-density lipoprotein (0.59±1.040 p=0.00), triglycerides (0.24±0.38 p=0.005), Mediterranean diet score (2.48±1.35 p=0.0001), Absolute Walking Distance (8.2±7.8 p=0.0001), Claudication Distance (9.2±7.4 p=0.0001). There was no significant difference in the change of any of the other risk factors.

Conclusion

Risk factor modification intervention programme can significantly aid PAD patients reach their target risk factor improvement goals.

683 UNDERSTANDING HOW DISCHARGE SERVICES FOR OLDER PATIENTS CAN BRIDGE THE GAP BETWEEN HOSPITAL, COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL CARE

Introduction

UK policy recommends that discharge support is provided by hospital, community and social care staff. However, there is a lack of understanding regarding how these multiagency hospital discharge services work in practice, how they can be sustained and what service stakeholder experiences of them are. This research aimed to understand how integrated discharge services work and the views and experiences of stakeholders.

Method

A qualitative case study of a supported integrated hospital discharge service (SIHDS) for older people was undertaken, which involved interviews with service staff (hospital, community and social care), patients and carers. Staff, patients and carers were interviewed on their experiences of SIHDS. Staff also took part in a process mapping exercise to understand how the service works. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Ethical approval was obtained for this research.

Results

A variety of staff (n = 14) and patients aged over 60 years (n = 11) and their informal carers/family members (n = 4) were interviewed. Three main staff themes emerged from the findings: 1. Preparedness for discharge and impact of discharge service; 2. Integration and impact on patient pathway and 3. Organisational aspects. The three main patient/carer themes were: 1. Support for patients; 2. Patient Outcomes and 3. Information exchange. The findings demonstrated that: SIHDS was seen as important to allow patients to be discharged home in a timely and safe manner; that communication is important at all levels of a SIHDS and SIHDS need to continuously evolve to provide patient centred care.

Conclusion

The findings from this qualitative case study allow the complexities involved in SIHDS to be understood from the experiences and perspectives of multiagency staff, patients and carers. It shows SIHDS are complex, but useful to overcome gaps between services. However, to effectively sustain a patient centred service it is important to regularly review and develop SIHDS.

682 IMPACT OF DISCHARGE INTERVENTIONS FOR OLDER PATIENTS LEAVING HOSPITAL: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF REVIEWS

Introduction

The UK has an aging population and there is an increasing need for additional care and support services for elderly patients discharged from hospital. Despite a large evidence base on different discharge services there is inconsistent findings on their effectiveness. This systematic review of reviews aimed to evaluate the impact of a variety of discharge interventions on older people leaving hospital.

Method

Ten databases were searched (including Medline and The Cochrane Library) using multiple key search terms related to ‘systematic reviews’, ‘older people’ and ‘discharge’. Only systematic reviews of interventions for people aged over 60 years that provided additional support or adapted their discharge processes were included. Outcomes of interest included mortality, readmissions, length of hospital stay, patient health status and costs. Abstract, title and full-text screening was conducted independently by two reviewers. Interventions were categorised by intervention type and a narrative synthesis was conducted on data extracted.

Results

Of the 8,748 title and abstracts reviewed, 859 full texts were assessed for eligibility, of these 91 were taken forward to quality assessment and 66 moderate or high-quality reviews were included in the final synthesis. Interventions were categorised into 10 types and had varying impact on outcomes. A statistically significant positive impact on the outcomes of interest was found for: Interventions providing ‘rehabilitation, therapy or care at home (or in the community) around the time of discharge’ reducing length of stay; ‘primary care interventions’, ‘Discharge planning/coordination or case management’ and ‘patient education’.

Conclusion

This systematic review of reviews shows that different types and configurations of discharge interventions can benefit older patients in multiple ways when compared to usual care and highlights which intervention types make no difference or have negative impacts. These findings will help to inform the development of new discharge interventions and the direction of future research.

676 OPTIMISING ENGAGEMENT OF OLDER ADULTS IN AN ONLINE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY PROGRAMME TO IMPROVE COGNITION: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Introduction

Maintaining physical activity is a modifiable risk factor for cognitive impairment. However, despite numerous public health interventions, older adults do not routinely meet activity guidelines. Online interventions offer an alternative means of engaging with this group. The role of an online intervention holds particular value in the context of a global pandemic where people have become accustomed to digital living. Furthermore, such an intervention negates barriers frequently faced by older adults in attending face to face interventions, whilst providing an economically viable option. This study explored the factors which maximise engagement in an online programme to promote physical activity.

Methods

A qualitative study was conducted with adults aged 50 and over. Individual were recruited through the online UK PROTECT study cohort. Four focus groups (n = 21) examined key contributors to engagement with a digital programme to promote physical activity. Iterative Categorization was utilised to identify categories and themes of the focus group data. Semi-structured interviews were subsequently conducted (n = 5) whereby participants were asked to comment on a concept-stage online intervention.

Results

Four major themes emerged from the focus group data: interaction at the fore, incentives as foundations, fitting around me and identity is critical. The semi-structured interviews identified further key areas of programme acceptability and specific needs for enhancing engagement.

Conclusions

Older adults are open to using digital physical activity programmes, with the recent COVID-19 pandemic driving an appetite for online delivery. Any intervention must be tailored to individual usability preferences and take account of the fitness, health and lifestyle needs specific to older adults. Furthermore, the conceptual-stage intervention used in this study was found to be acceptable, with key changes needed to maximise engagement.

Social determinants of health influence disease activity and functional disability in Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health (SDH) greatly influence outcomes during the first year of treatment in rheumatoid arthritis, a disease similar to polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA). We investigated the correlation of community poverty level and other SDH with the persistence of moderate to severe disease activity and functional disability over the first year of treatment in pJIA patients enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry.

METHODS

In this cohort study, unadjusted and adjusted generalized linear mixed effects models analyzed the effect of community poverty and other SDH on disease activity, using the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score-10, and disability, using the Child Health Assessment Questionnaire, measured at baseline, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

One thousand six hundred eighty-four patients were identified. High community poverty (≥20% living below the federal poverty level) was associated with increased odds of functional disability (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.28-2.60) but was not statistically significant after adjustment (aOR 1.23, 95% CI 0.81-1.86) and was not associated with increased disease activity. Non-white race/ethnicity was associated with higher disease activity (aOR 2.48, 95% CI: 1.41-4.36). Lower self-reported household income was associated with higher disease activity and persistent functional disability. Public insurance (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06-2.29) and low family education (aOR 1.89, 95% CI 1.14-3.12) was associated with persistent functional disability.

CONCLUSION

High community poverty level was associated with persistent functional disability in unadjusted analysis but not with persistent moderate to high disease activity. Race/ethnicity and other SDH were associated with persistent disease activity and functional disability.

A139 EQUITY IN ACCESS TO COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING IN NOVA SCOTIA

Background

Population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs aim to minimize inequities in participation through universal access, however, there remain disparities associated with low education, socio-economic status, and population centre. In the United States racialized groups have lower screening participation, and Black and Indigenous adults have higher CRC mortality. There is no Canadian data on racialized group participation in CRC screening because racial and ethnic data is not routinely collected. The Nova Scotia Colon Cancer Prevention Program (NSCCPP) mails fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) biennially to all residents aged 50–74 and allows for optional self-identified race and ethnicity.

Aims

To determine whether participation rates in the NSCCPP differ on the basis of race/ethnicity, age, sex, or population centre. In this preliminary analysis we report screening participation on the basis of race/ethnicity.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed using the NSCCPP database to identify screen-eligible adults who returned a FIT to the program (i.e. participated) from 2011 to 2021. Racialized groups were identified based on self-identification form results allowing for multiple category selections. Race/Ethnicity was categorized as White, Black/African Canadian, Indigenous, Asian, Middle Eastern. The 2016 Canadian census was used to estimate the screen-eligible population (age 50–74) and race/ethnicity group population sizes. Unique participants were identified as individuals who returned one or more FITs in the study period. Unique participants were compared to the screen-eligible population to estimate participation over the 10-year study period.

Results

508,533 FITs were returned over 10 years by 208,702 unique participants. The number of annual FITs returned ranged from 14,066 in 2011 to 65,746 in 2019. Participants were 56% female, 44% male, with a mean age 62.8 (± 7.0). FIT status was 89% negative, 7% positive, and 4% indeterminate. 96% (n=490,398) of participants provided self-identification data. Table 1 provides the screen-eligible population, unique participants, and FIT participation over the 10-year study period all characterized by race/ethnicity. Over 10 years, 59% of the eligible population participated in CRC screening by returning at least one FIT.

Conclusions

CRC screening participation by race/ethnicity in Canada is unknown. This analysis of the NSCCPP suggests that participation by racialized individuals including Black/African Canadian, Asian, and Indigenous, are lower relative to White individuals. Further analyses will explore race/ethnicity and gender in terms of temporal and geographic trends.

Table 1.

Funding Agencies

None

A26 DECONSTRUCTING DISTRESS: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT FOR EVIDENCE-BASED, PATIENT-CENTERED INTERVENTIONS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF IBD-ASSOCIATED PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS

Background

The growing prevalence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) along with increasing complexity of providing high-quality, patient-centered care within a resource-constrained healthcare environment presents a major challenge. IBD-related psychological distress (IBD-PD) is the emotional impact of IBD and is associated with mental health disorders, increased disease severity, and premature mortality. With estimates of nearly 90% of IBD patients experiencing PD, the inability to provide high-quality, person-centered care for IBD-PD that is proportionate to clinical need is a significant care gap in the Canadian healthcare system.

Aims

To generate stakeholder-derived data to inform the design and development of stepped-intensity, cognitive behavioral therapy-based interventions for IBD-PD using evidence-based, patient–centered interventions and implementation strategies.

Methods

Virtual semi-structured interviews were conducted from September to October 2021. The interview guide was developed iteratively by researchers, IBD care providers, and patient research partners and guided by the COM-B Model of Behaviour and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Questions assessed perceptions, experiences, barriers, and facilitators to accessing IBD-PD care. Adults diagnosed with IBD were recruited from academic centers across Canada. Interviews were co-facilitated by a researcher and patient research partner, audio recorded, and transcribed. Using thematic analysis, codes were generated to identify themes using an inductive approach.

Results

As of October 2021, six interviews have been completed, with data collection ongoing. The mean participant age was 34.3 years (range 21–55 years) with 100% of respondents being female. The majority of participants worked full time (4/6, 67%) and all had completed at least high school. Diagnoses of Crohn’s Disease (3/6, 50%) and ulcerative colitis (3/6, 50%) were evenly distributed. Thematic analyses identified five major themes: 1) Lack of holistic care and acknowledgement of IBD-PD; 2) System-level and financial barriers to psychological support; 3) Lack of psychological support from providers with an understanding of IBD; 4) Preference for individualized virtual-based support; 5) Heavy reliance on informal support structures (caregivers) due to lack of access to formal psychological support.

Conclusions

As part of human-centered design, stakeholder engagement is key to understanding behavioral, social, attitudinal, and environmental barriers and facilitators for accessing IBD-PD care. Interviews are ongoing and specific intervention functions will be defined and incorporated into patient-centered implementation strategies.

Funding Agencies

None

A96 RAPID IMPLEMENTATION OF AN EVIDENCE-BASED, VIRTUAL COVID-19 VACCINE EDUCATION CLINIC AT NOVA SCOTIA COLLABORATIVE INFLAMMATORY DISEASE CLINIC (NSCIBD)

Background

Rapid adaptation of clinical management as well as policy decisions in relation to implementation of COVID-19 vaccination programs for persons living with IBD has been required throughout the pandemic.

Aims

To meet the need for public health-mandated COVID-19 vaccine education for patients living with IBD in Nova Scotia a novel, evidence-based, virtual COVID-19 vaccine educational intervention was developed, implemented, and evaluated.

Methods

An observational, cross sectional, implementation-effectiveness study was conducted at the NSCIBD program between April and July, 2021. The educational intervention consisted of a standardized evidence-based letter describing risks and benefits of COVID-19 vaccine emailed to patients in advance of a virtual clinic appointment. Virtual appointments were offered to all patients contacting the NSCIBD program with questions or concerns about vaccination. During these virtual visits standardized, evidence-based information was provided by a gastroenterologist (n=2) or IBD nurse practitioners (n=2) and patients were provided with an opportunity to address specific disease and treatment related concerns. Following the session, a link to an anonymous questionnaire was distributed via email to evaluate key implementation metrics including satisfaction, appropriateness, usefulness, perceived impact on knowledge and vaccine hesitancy, and recommendations for improvement. Data analysis was descriptive. Group means were expressed as proportions for categorical variables and means for numerical variables.

Results

A total of 298 patients participated in a virtual patient education session of which 265 provided a valid email address and invited to participate in the on-line survey. The response rate was 49% (131/265). Before the session, 48.9% (64/131) expressed vaccine hesitancy. Twenty-six percent (35/131) expressed concerns relating to risks versus benefits of COVID-19 vaccines. Ninety-one percent (119/131) of respondents found the education program helpful. The proportion of those willing to get vaccinated rose from 61% (pre) to 86.3% (post). Only 1.5% (2/131) indicated they would not get vaccinated. Seventy-seven percent (101/131) found the written and virtually administered educational content to be satisfactory. Eighty-eight percent (115/131) of respondents were willing to participate in similar types of virtual education offerings in the future.

Conclusions

Implementation of an evidence-based, multidisciplinary, virtual COVID-19 vaccination education intervention was perceived to be feasible, acceptable, and effective by IBD patients. Further research on innovative, evidence-based, multidisciplinary educational interventions and the impact of these interventions on IBD clinical outcomes are needed.

Funding Agencies

None

A77 IMPLEMENTATION OF GUT LINK-IBS; RESULTS OF A SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEW OF PRIMARY CARE PROVIDERS

Background

The Division of Digestive Care and Endoscopy in Halifax, Nova Scotia has had longstanding challenges with GI referral volume outstripping divisional capacity resulting in limited access to specialist care. Many referrals for functional bowel disorders (FBD) are returned to referring providers. Although this helps rationalize limited system resources, it often impairs access to appropriate and necessary GI care. The co-development and implementation of clinical care pathways across gastroenterology and primary care may help to improve access to high-quality GI care.

Aims

The project aimed to engage primary healthcare providers (PHCPs) to identify environmental and behavioral barriers and facilitators for managing undifferentiated lower GI disorders in primary care. Data generated from stakeholder engagement will be used to develop, implement, and evaluate strategies for referral and management of FBD. A real-world, functional clinical care pathway that supports the implementation of evidence-based practices in the diagnosis and management of functional GI conditions within primary care will enhance care and timely access to specialist.

Methods

This is a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews of PHCPs working in Nova Scotia. Interview questions were developed and guided by the evidence-based implementation science frameworks. Physicians were recruited through existing primary care networks. Participants were offered a Zoom™virtual semi-structured interview. A brief intake questionnaire was administered to collect baseline demographics. Interviews were recorded and transcribed for data analysis. Data were categorized into coding schemes and themes were created using an inductive coding approach.

Results

As of October 2021, 9 interviews have been conducted. Average participant age was 44 years, with the majority identifying practice in a group or collaborative care setting (n=7, 78%). Five worked in urban practice settings and the remainder in rural areas. Preliminary major themes included:

1. A lack of satisfaction with access to gastrointestinal care, with most physicians noting it to be worse than access to other specialist services.

2. Management of FBDs were felt to be within the scope of primary care practice

3. Access to diagnostic tests like fecal calprotectin with appropriate education on its use as a diagnostic tool would be useful.

4. PHCP’s suggested care pathways be easy to use, require minimal time, and ideally be implemented within their pre-existing EMR or in paper form.

Conclusions

PHCPs acknowledge a significant burden of undifferentiated lower GI complaints in their practice and poor access to gastroenterology services. All participants were open to helping develop and use a clinical care pathway for the investigation and management of undifferentiated lower GI symptoms. Data collection and analysis are ongoing.

Funding Agencies

None

A84 SECURE ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT SIGNING UPTAKE IN BIOLOGIC PRESCRIBING FOR IMMUNE MEDIATED DISEASES

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic drastically impacted workflows in gastroenterology practice. Physicians managing immune-mediated diseases (IMDs) must complete special authorization (SA) and prescription renewal (Rx) forms for patients on biologic therapy. This adds significant administrative burden potentially leading to delays in therapy initiation and care continuity. Historically, document completion has largely been paper-based, with forms faxed between patient support programs (PSPs) and physician offices. Disruption of normal office processes during the pandemic necessitated the movement of existing paper-based workflows online. The use of secure electronic document signing (SEDS) platforms has allowed physicians to receive and complete documents digitally.

Aims

To evaluate the impact of SEDS-based biologic documentation on clinical practice. Objectives were 1) to determine if the use of SEDS platforms increased timeliness of document returns compared to traditional workflows 2) assess whether SEDS usage is acceptable and sustainable and 3) assess MD satisfaction with SEDS platforms.

Methods

This was a retrospective audit of SEDS and paper-based biologic document workflows from a single PSP (Abbvie Care). Outcomes of interest were the number of documents completed monthly using SEDS, new monthly users, and the number of active monthly users between April 1, 2020-March 31, 2021. Time (days) to SEDS completion (vs. paper process) was determined by reviewing timepoint data for SA and Rx documents from May 2019-January 2020 (‘pre- SEDS’) and for SEDS documents from May 2020-January 2021(‘SEDS’). The return time (RT) was defined as the time between date sent to a physician’s office by the PSP to the date returned to the PSP. Documents in the pre-SEDS cohort with a RT exceeding 30 days were excluded

Results

In totality, 5573 SA and Rx documents were completed by 383 physicians using the SEDS platform from April 2020-March 2021. A mean of 14.6 (sd 21.8) documents were signed per physician. The number of monthly electronic documents processed increased from 104 in April 2020 to 800 in March 2021. Active monthly users increased from 24 in April 2020 to 213 in March 2021 (31 new users monthly). A total of 19,387 paper documents were processed during the ‘pre-SEDS’ period and 3,317 electronic documents processed in the ‘SEDS’ period. The mean RT in the ‘pre-SEDS’ period was 8.03 days (Sd 8.2) and the ‘SEDS’ period was 1.11 days (sd 2.6).

Conclusions

This data demonstrates acceptability, appropriateness, and improved processing efficiency of a SEDS platform improving timeliness of patient care. Next steps in this research include surveying physicians to understand the work-flow impact of SEDS, functionality, long-term sustainability, satisfaction and impacts on disease related outcomes.

Funding Agencies

None