1
|
Rao SM, Galioto R, Sokolowski M, McGinley M, Freiburger J, Weber M, Dey T, Mourany L, Schindler D, Reece C, Miller DM, Bethoux F, Bermel RA, Williams JR, Levitt N, Phillips GA, Rhodes JK, Alberts J, Rudick RA. Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test: validation of self-administered neuroperformance modules. Eur J Neurol 2020; 27:878-886. [PMID: 32009276 DOI: 10.1111/ene.14162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The purpose was to determine the test-retest reliability, practice effects, convergent validity and sensitivity to multiple sclerosis (MS) disability of neuroperformance subtests from the patient self-administered Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT) designed to assess low contrast vision (Contrast Sensitivity Test, CST), upper extremity motor function (Manual Dexterity Test, MDT) and lower extremity motor function (Walking Speed Test, WST) and to introduce the concept of regression-based norms to aid clinical interpretation of performance scores using the MSPT cognition test (Processing Speed Test, PST) as an example. METHODS Substudy 1 assessed test-retest reliability, practice effects and convergent validity of the CST, MDT and WST in 30 MS patients and 30 healthy controls. Substudy 2 examined sensitivity to MS disability in over 600 MS patients as part of their routine clinic assessment. Substudy 3 compared performance on the PST in research volunteers and clinical samples. RESULTS The CST, MDT and WST were shown to be reliable, valid and sensitive to MS outcomes. Performance was comparable to technician-administered testing. PST performance was poorer in the clinical sample compared with the research volunteer sample. CONCLUSIONS The self-administered MSPT neuroperformance modules produce reliable, objective metrics that can be used in clinical practice and support outcomes research. Published studies which require patient voluntary consent may underestimate the rate of cognitive dysfunction observed in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Rao
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - R Galioto
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - M Sokolowski
- Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - M McGinley
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - J Freiburger
- Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - M Weber
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - T Dey
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Learner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - L Mourany
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - D Schindler
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Qr8Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - C Reece
- Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - D M Miller
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - F Bethoux
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - R A Bermel
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - J Alberts
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rhodes JK, Schindler D, Rao SM, Venegas F, Bruzik ET, Gabel W, Williams JR, Phillips GA, Mullen CC, Freiburger JL, Mourany L, Reece C, Miller DM, Bethoux F, Bermel RA, Krupp LB, Mowry EM, Alberts J, Rudick RA. Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test: Technical Development and Usability. Adv Ther 2019; 36:1741-1755. [PMID: 31054035 PMCID: PMC6824297 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-019-00958-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Introduction In the clinic, the assessment of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is typically qualitative and non-standardized. Objectives To describe the MS Performance Test (MSPT), an iPad Air® 2 (Apple, Cupertino, CA, USA)-based neurological assessment platform allowing patients to input relevant information without the aid of a medical technician, creating a longitudinal, clinically meaningful, digital medical record. To report results from human factor (HF) and usability studies, and the initial large-scale implementation in a practice setting. Methods The HF study examined use-error patterns in small groups of MS patients and healthy controls (n = 14), the usability study assessed the effectiveness of patient interaction with the tool by patients with a range of MS disability (n = 60) in a clinical setting, and the implementation study deployed the MSPT across a diverse population of patients (n = 1000) in a large MS center for routine clinical care. Results MSPT assessments were completed by all users in the HF study; minor changes to design were recommended. In the usability study, 73% of patients with MS completed the MSPT, with an average administration time of 32 min; 85% described their experience with the tool as satisfactory. In the initial implementation for routine care, 84% of patients with MS completed the MSPT, with an average administration time of 28 min. Conclusion Patients with MS with varying disability levels completed the MSPT with minimal or no supervision, resulting in comprehensive, efficient, standardized, quantitative, clinically meaningful data collection as part of routine medical care, thus allowing for large-scale, real-world evidence generation. Funding Biogen. Trial Registration NCT02664324. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-00958-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Schindler
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Qr8 Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen M Rao
- Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jaime L Freiburger
- Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lyla Mourany
- Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Christine Reece
- Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Deborah M Miller
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Francois Bethoux
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Robert A Bermel
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lauren B Krupp
- New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Jay Alberts
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rhodes JK, Chandrasekaran S, Andrews PJ. Early Changes in Brain Oxygen Tension May Predict Outcome Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2016; 122:9-16. [PMID: 27165868 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
We report on the change in brain oxygen tension (PbtO2) over the first 24 h of monitoring in a series of 25 patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and relate this to outcome. The trend in PbtO2 for the whole group was to increase with time (mean PbtO2 17.4 [1.75] vs 24.7 [1.60] mmHg, first- vs last-hour data, respectively; p = 0.002). However, a significant increase in PbtO2 occurred in only 17 patients (68 %), all surviving to intensive care unit discharge (p = 0.006). Similarly, a consistent increase in PbtO2 with time occurred in only 13 patients, the correlation coefficient for PbtO2 versus time being ≥0.5 for all survivors. There were eight survivors and four non-survivors, with low correlation coefficients (<0.5). Significantly more patients with a correlation coefficient ≥0.5 for PbtO2 versus time survived in intensive care (p = 0.039). The cumulative length of time that PbtO2 was <20 mmHg was not significantly different among these three groups. In conclusion, although for the cohort as a whole PbtO2 increased over the first 24 h, the individual trends of PbtO2 were related to outcome. There was a significant association between improving PbtO2 and survival, despite these patients having cumulative durations of hypoxia similar to those of non-survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J K Rhodes
- Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - S Chandrasekaran
- Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - P J Andrews
- Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|