119. A Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Protein (RSVPreF3) Candidate Vaccine Administered in Older Adults in a Phase I/II Randomized Clinical Trial Is Well Tolerated

Background

RSV is a common cause of respiratory acute illness in older adults (OA). We evaluated safety and reactogenicity of RSVPreF3 candidate vaccine in young adults (YA) and OA.

Methods

In this phase I/II, placebo-controlled, multi-country trial (NCT03814590), YA aged 18–40 years were randomized 1:1:1:1 and received 2 doses of Low-, Medium- or High-dose of RSVPreF3 non-adjuvanted vaccine, or placebo, 2 months apart. Following favorable safety evaluation, a staggered enrolment with 2 steps followed in OA aged 60–80 years, who were randomized 1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1 to receive 1 of the 9 RSV vaccine formulations containing Low-, Medium- or High-dose of RSVPreF3 non-adjuvanted or adjuvanted with AS01_E or AS01_B, or placebo (same schedule). Safety/reactogenicity up to 1 month post-dose 1 are reported here.

Results

Exposed set was comprised of 48 YA and 1005 OA. Within 7 days post-dose 1, any solicited/unsolicited adverse event (AE) ranged from 58.3% to 83.3% across YA vaccinees (placebo YA: 58.3%) and from 29.9% to 84.2% across OA vaccinees (placebo OA: 33.7%) (Fig 1). Pain was the most common solicited local AE, being reported in ≤ 58.3% of YA (placebo YA: 0.0%) and at higher rates in the adjuvanted groups (≤ 75.7%) vs non-adjuvanted groups of OA (≤ 14.1%) and placebo OA (4.1%) (Fig 2A). Of solicited general AEs, fatigue (YA: ≤ 41.7% in vaccinees vs 50.0% in placebo; OA: ≤ 48.5% in vaccinees vs 16.3% in placebo) and headache (YA: ≤ 33.3% in vaccinees vs 16.7% in placebo; OA: ≤ 27.7% in vaccinees vs 8.2% in placebo) were most commonly reported (Fig 2B), while fever ≥ 38.0 °C was observed in ≤ 3.0% of OA vaccinees (placebo OA: 0.0%). Grade 3 solicited local and general AEs were observed in OA only, with erythema (≤ 4.9% in vaccinees vs 0.0% in placebo) and fatigue (≤ 2.0% in vaccinees vs 1.0% in placebo) being most common (Fig 2). No serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in YA. A number of 11 OA reported a SAE within 1 month post-dose 1, but none was fatal or assessed as vaccine-related. No clinically significant abnormalities occurred in hematological/biochemical parameters in any group.

Figure 1. Percentage of participants presenting at least one type of solicited/unsolicited adverse event (AE) within 7 days post-dose 1

Figure 2. Percentage of participants with at least one type of solicited adverse event (AE) within 7 days post-dose 1

Conclusion

First dose of RSVPreF3 candidate vaccine is well tolerated. AE rates tended to be higher after AS01_B-adjuvanted formulations compared to other vaccine formulations. No safety concerns were raised.

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA

Disclosures

Jelena Tica, PhD, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Javier Ruiz Guiñazú, MD MSc, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Charles P. Andrews, MD, GSK group of companies (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Charles Fogarty, MD, GSK group of companies (Grant/Research Support) Edward Kerwin, MD, Amphastar (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)AstraZeneca (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Boehringer Ingelheim (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Chiesi (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Cipla (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)GSK group of companies (Employee, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Mylan (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Novartis (Employee, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)other around 40 pharmaceutical companies (Other Financial or Material Support, conducted multicenter clinical research trials)Pearl (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Sunovion (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Theravance (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau) Isabel Leroux-Roels, MD PhD, GSK group of companies (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Corinne Vandermeulen, MD PhD, GSK group of companies (Other Financial or Material Support, My university only received Grant/Research Support) Marie-Pierre David, MSc, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Nancy Dezutter, PhD, PharmD, RPh, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Laurence Fissette, MSc, GSK group of companies (Employee) Juliane Koch, MD, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Narcisa Mesaros, MD, MSc, GSK group of companies (Employee)

121. A Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Protein (RSVPreF3) Candidate Vaccine Administered in Older Adults in a Phase I/II Randomized Clinical Trial Is Immunogenic

Background

RSV causes significant disease burden in older adults, since reinfections are common and may lead to severe disease presentations while only supportive treatment is available. We present immunogenicity of different formulations of an investigational vaccine (RSVPreF3) in young and older adults.

Methods

This is a phase I/II, placebo-controlled, multi-country trial (NCT03814590). Healthy adults aged 18–40 years were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive 2 doses of either Low-, Medium- or High-dose of RSVPreF3 non-adjuvanted vaccine or placebo, 2 months apart. Following favorable safety outcomes, adults aged 60–80 years were randomized 1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1 in a 2-step staggered manner to receive 1 of the 9 RSV vaccine formulations containing Low-, Medium- or High-dose of RSVPreF3, non-adjuvanted or adjuvanted with AS01_E or AS01_B, or placebo (same schedule). Humoral and cellular-mediated immune responses are assessed before and after each dose; results up to 1 month post-dose 1 are shown here.

Results

Of 48 adults aged 18–40 years and 1005 aged 60–80 years included in the exposed set, 42 and 933, respectively, were part of per-protocol set at 1 month post-dose 1. RSVPreF3 IgG geometric mean antibody concentrations were 8.4–13.5 and 7.2–12.8 fold-higher at 1 month post-dose 1 vs baseline in the 18–40- and 60–80-year-old vaccinees, respectively (Fig 1A). RSV-A neutralization activity significantly increased in all RSV vaccinees, geometric mean antibody titers being 7.5–13.7 and 5.6–9.9 fold-higher in 18–40- and 60–80-year-olds, respectively, at 1 month post-dose 1 vs baseline (Fig 1B). Geometric mean ratios of the fold increase between RSVPreF3 IgG antibody concentrations and RSV-A neutralizing antibody titers ranged between 0.9–1.1 in 18–40-year-old and 1.3–1.5 in 60–80-year-old vaccinees. A robust RSVPreF3-specific CD4+ T-cell response was elicited at 1 month post-dose 1 vs baseline in both 18–40- and 60–80-year-olds (Fig 2).

Figure 1. RSVPreF3 IgG geometric mean antibody concentrations (GMCs, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, panel A), RSV-A neutralizing geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs, neutralization assay, panel B)

Figure 2. RSVPreF3-specific CD4+ T-cells identified as expressing ≥2 markers among IL2, CD40L, TNF-□, IFN-□ (intracellular cytokine staining assay)

Conclusion

One dose of RSVPreF3 candidate vaccine boosted humoral and cellular immune responses in all vaccinees. In older adults, higher humoral response, mostly neutralizing, was observed with increased RSVPreF3 antigen dosage and a tendency of higher cellular response was observed after adjuvanted formulations.

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA

Disclosures

Javier Ruiz Guiñazú, MD MSc, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Jelena Tica, PhD, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Charles P. Andrews, MD, GSK group of companies (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Charles Fogarty, MD, GSK group of companies (Grant/Research Support) Edward Kerwin, MD, Amphastar (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)AstraZeneca (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Boehringer Ingelheim (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Chiesi (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Cipla (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)GSK group of companies (Employee, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Mylan (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Novartis (Employee, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)other around 40 pharmaceutical companies (Other Financial or Material Support, conducted multicenter clinical research trials)Pearl (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Sunovion (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Theravance (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau) Isabel Leroux-Roels, MD PhD, GSK group of companies (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Corinne Vandermeulen, MD PhD, GSK group of companies (Other Financial or Material Support, My university only received Grant/Research Support) Marie-Pierre David, MSc, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Nancy Dezutter, PhD, PharmD, RPh, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Nathalie De Schrevel, PhD, GSK group of companies (Employee) Laurence Fissette, MSc, GSK group of companies (Employee) Narcisa Mesaros, MD, MSc, GSK group of companies (Employee)

Efficacy of pneumococcal nontypable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) in young Latin American children: A double-blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The relationship between pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-induced antibody responses and protection against community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and acute otitis media (AOM) is unclear. This study assessed the impact of the ten-valent pneumococcal nontypable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) on these end points. The primary objective was to demonstrate vaccine efficacy (VE) in a per-protocol analysis against likely bacterial CAP (B-CAP: radiologically confirmed CAP with alveolar consolidation/pleural effusion on chest X-ray, or non-alveolar infiltrates and C-reactive protein ≥ 40 µg/ml); other protocol-specified outcomes were also assessed.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This phase III double-blind randomized controlled study was conducted between 28 June 2007 and 28 July 2011 in Argentine, Panamanian, and Colombian populations with good access to health care. Approximately 24,000 infants received PHiD-CV or hepatitis control vaccine (hepatitis B for primary vaccination, hepatitis A at booster) at 2, 4, 6, and 15-18 mo of age. Interim analysis of the primary end point was planned when 535 first B-CAP episodes, occurring ≥2 wk after dose 3, were identified in the per-protocol cohort. After a mean follow-up of 23 mo (PHiD-CV, n = 10,295; control, n = 10,201), per-protocol VE was 22.0% (95% CI: 7.7, 34.2; one-sided p = 0.002) against B-CAP (conclusive for primary objective) and 25.7% (95% CI: 8.4%, 39.6%) against World Health Organization-defined consolidated CAP. Intent-to-treat VE was 18.2% (95% CI: 5.5%, 29.1%) against B-CAP and 23.4% (95% CI: 8.8%, 35.7%) against consolidated CAP. End-of-study per-protocol analyses were performed after a mean follow-up of 28-30 mo for CAP and invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) (PHiD-CV, n = 10,211; control, n = 10,140) and AOM (n = 3,010 and 2,979, respectively). Per-protocol VE was 16.1% (95% CI: -1.1%, 30.4%; one-sided p = 0.032) against clinically confirmed AOM, 67.1% (95% CI: 17.0%, 86.9%) against vaccine serotype clinically confirmed AOM, 100% (95% CI: 74.3%, 100%) against vaccine serotype IPD, and 65.0% (95% CI: 11.1%, 86.2%) against any IPD. Results were consistent between intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. Serious adverse events were reported for 21.5% (95% CI: 20.7%, 22.2%) and 22.6% (95% CI: 21.9%, 23.4%) of PHiD-CV and control recipients, respectively. There were 19 deaths (n = 11,798; 0.16%) in the PHiD-CV group and 26 deaths (n = 11,799; 0.22%) in the control group. A significant study limitation was the lower than expected number of captured AOM cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy was demonstrated against a broad range of pneumococcal diseases commonly encountered in young children in clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00466947.

A prospective, multicentric scoring system to predict mortality in febrile neutropenic children with cancer

BACKGROUND

Many studies have succeeded in identifying a subset of children with febrile neutropenia (FN) who are at lower risk of infectious complications and eventual death. Conversely, to the authors' knowledge, no scoring system has been published to date with which to assess the risk of mortality for the whole group of children with neutropenia and fever.

METHODS

Between March 2000 and July 2004, 1520 episodes of FN in 981 children were included in a multicentric prospective study to evaluate a scoring system that was designed to identify high mortality risk at the onset of an FN episode in children with cancer.

RESULTS

In the derivation set (714 episodes), 18 patients died (2.5%). A multivariate analysis yielded the following significant mortality-related risk factors: advanced stage of underlying malignant disease (odds ratio [OR], 3122.1; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.0001-5.2), associated comorbidity (OR, 25.3; 95% CI, 7.7-83.2), and bacteremia (OR, 7.2; 95% CI, 2.4-22.0). A mortality score could be built with 3 points scored for the presence of advanced-stage underlying malignant disease, 2 points scored for the presence of associated comorbidity, and 1 point scored for bacteremia. If patients collected 4 points of the risk score at onset, then their risk of mortality was 5.8%; if patients had a score of 5 points, then their risk of mortality was 15.4%; and, if they reached the maximum score of 6 points, then their risk of mortality was raised to 40%. The sensitivity of the scoring system was 100%, and it had a specificity of 84.2%. In the validation set (806 episodes), 19 children died (2.3%). For children with scores >3, the scoring system had a sensitivity of 84.2%, a specificity of 83.2%, and a negative predictive value of 99.54% for predicting mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a mortality score for high-risk patients was validated statistically by the current results. This is a major prognostic approach to categorize patients with high-risk FN at onset. A better initial predictive approach may allow better therapeutic decisions for these children, with an eventual impact on reducing mortality.

Comparative analysis of outcome and clinical features in children with pleural empyema caused by penicillin-nonsusceptible and penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical characteristics of pleural empyema in children caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae nonsusceptible to penicillin and compare their clinical outcome with pleural empyemas caused by penicillin-susceptible organisms.

METHODS

Records of 109 children with complicated pleural effusions between January 1996 and December 1998 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Pathogens were recovered in 45 of these cases. Streptococcus pneumoniae represented 71% of the isolates, with 20 (62%) and 12 (38%) of the strains proving susceptible and nonsusceptible to penicillin, respectively. The average age for children with penicillin-nonsusceptible infections was 18.3 months compared with an average age of 40.9 months for those with penicillin-susceptible infections (P = 0.03). Previous antibiotic treatment was more frequent in children with penicillin-nonsusceptible organisms (P = 0.05). No significant differences were found between the two groups for gender, underlying diseases, duration of fever and tachypnea, need of surgical treatment, bacteremia incidence, mean duration of therapy, or length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Pleural empyemas caused by penicillin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae appear to be associated with younger age and previous antibiotic treatment. By contrast, the outcome was not influenced by the penicillin susceptibility of the pneumococcus strains.