Development of a Tool to Determine Excellence in the Provision of Physical Therapist Clinical Education: A Modified Delphi Study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to create a Site of Excellence in Clinical Education (SECE-PT) tool with the essential criteria used to determine excellence in the provision of physical therapist clinical education at a clinical site using a consensus-building approach.

METHODS

The development of the SECE-PT tool was divided into 2 parts. Part 1 involved the development of an initial set of proposed criteria, whereas part 2 employed a modified Delphi approach for consensus building. Purposive selection and snowball sampling techniques were used to recruit clinical instructors, recent graduates, site coordinators of clinical education, and directors of clinical education who met the inclusion criteria for the modified Delphi study. Three web-based survey rounds were used to achieve consensus, defined as a mean score of ≥7 on the 11-point Likert scale. The first round gathered demographic information on participants and collected information about clarity and redundancy in the criteria provided, the second gathered information once again about clarity and redundancy on the revised criteria provided, and the third asked participants to rate how essential it was for a site of excellence to demonstrate each of the final criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 123 participants, equally representing clinical and academic perspectives, completed the demographic survey and round 1. Ninety-four participants completed round 2, and 80 participants completed the third and final round. Consensus revealed that 44 criteria were deemed essential for a SECE-PT to demonstrate.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a measure to evaluate clinical sites providing clinical education. The SECE-PT tool should be widely adopted to evaluate the quality of the clinical site providing the education to student physical therapists.

IMPACT

The SECE-PT tool can be used by clinical sites for self-assessment to examine aspects of their clinical education programs and determine whether parts of their program should be further developed. This can provide a framework for discussion and collaboration between clinical and academic partners, as well as regional consortia.

A Call to Shift to Competency-Based Education

This column explores the concept of competency-based education (CBE). A shift to CBE is a key trend for the future of health care education. Health care professions that have adopted, or started to adopt, a CBE framework include physical therapy, speech-language pathology, social work, medicine, nursing, pharmacology, and dentistry. Internationally, many occupational therapy programs are in the process of shifting to, or have shifted to, a CBE model. This column discusses how although select occupational therapy programs in the United States may individually be considering shifting to, or have shifted to, a CBE framework, there is no national movement to explore adopting the model for occupational therapy or a consensus on defined outcomes for the profession.

Competency-Based Education and Practice in Physical Therapy: It's Time to Act!

Competency-based education (CBE) is a concept, a philosophy, and an approach to educational design where learner progression occurs when competency is demonstrated. It assumes a set of standard defined performance outcomes for any level of professional practice-students, residents, or practicing physical therapists. Those outcomes are based on the health needs of society and guide the curricular design, implementation, and evaluation of health professions education programs. Lack of a CBE framework-with no required demonstration of competence throughout one's career-has the potential to lead to variation in physical therapists' skills and to unwarranted variation in practice, potentially hindering delivery of the highest quality of patient care. CBE requires a framework that includes a commonly understood language; standardized, defined performance outcomes at various stages of learner development; and a process to assess whether competence has been demonstrated. The purpose of this perspective article is to (1) highlight the need for a shared language, (2) provide an overview of CBE and the impetus for the change, (3) propose a shift toward CBE in physical therapy, and (4) discuss the need for the profession to adopt a mindset requiring purposeful practice across one's career to safely and most efficiently practice in a given area. Utilizing a CBE philosophy throughout one's career should ensure high-quality and safe patient care to all-patient care that can adapt to the changing scope of physical therapist practice as well as the health care needs of society. The physical therapy profession is at a point at which we must step up the transition to a competency-based system of physical therapist education.

Essential competencies for physical therapist managing individuals with spinal muscular atrophy: A delphi study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

With the availability and development of disease-modifying therapies for individuals with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), new emerging phenotypes must be characterized, and potential new treatment paradigms tested. There is an urgent demand to develop an educational program that provides physical therapists (PTs) worldwide the necessary knowledge and training to contribute to best-practice care and clinical research. A competency based education framework is one that would focus on outcomes not process and where progression of learners would occur only after competencies are demonstrated. The first step toward such a framework is defining outcomes. The purpose of this Delphi study was to develop consensus on those competencies deemed essential within the SMA PT community.

METHODS

Purposive selection and snowball sampling techniques were used to recruit expert SMA PTs. Three web-based survey rounds were used to achieve consensus, defined as agreement among >80% of respondents. The first round gathered demographic information on participants as well as information on clarity and redundancy on a list of competencies; the second round, collected the same information on the revised list and whether or not participants agreed if the identified domains captured the essence of a SMA PT as well as the definitions for each; and the third asked participants to rank their agreement with each competency.

RESULTS

Consensus revealed 35 competencies, organized under 6 domains, which were deemed essential for a PT working with persons with SMA.

DISCUSSION

In order to develop a curriculum to meet the physical therapy needs of persons with SMA, it is imperative to establish defined outcomes and to achieve consensus on those outcomes within the SMA community.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified essential competencies that will help to provide guidance in development of a formal education program to meet these defined outcomes. This can foster best-practice care and clinical decision-making for all PTs involved in the care of persons with SMA in a clinical and research setting.