Propranolol exhibits activity against hemangiomas independent of beta blockade

Propranolol is a widely used beta blocker that consists of a racemic mixture of R and S stereoisomers. Only the S stereoisomer has significant activity against the beta-adrenergic receptor. A fortuitous clinical observation was made in an infant who received propranolol for cardiac disease, and regression of a hemangioma of infancy was noted. This has led to the widespread use of propranolol for the treatment of large and life-threatening hemangiomas of infancy. Infants receiving propranolol require monitoring to ensure that they do not suffer from side effects related to beta blockade. The exact mechanism of activity of propranolol in hemangioma of infancy is unknown. In this study, we treated hemangioma stem cells with both beta blockade active S- and inactive R-propranolol and looked for genes that were coordinately regulated by this treatment. Among the genes commonly downregulated, Angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4) was among the most regulated. We confirmed that propranolol isomers downregulated ANGPTL4 in endothelial cells, with greater downregulation of ANGPTL4 using the beta blockade inactive R-propranolol. ANGPTL4 is present in human hemangiomas of infancy. Finally, R-propranolol inhibited the growth of bEnd.3 hemangioma cells in vivo. The implication of this is that hemangioma growth can be blocked without the side effects of beta blockade. Given that humans have been exposed to racemic propranolol for decades and thus to R-propranolol, clinical development of R-propranolol for hemangiomas of infancy and other angiogenic diseases is warranted.

Lineage tracing of stem and progenitor cells of the murine corneal epithelium

Accumulating evidence supports the dogma that the corneal epithelium is regenerated by stem cells located exclusively in the limbal niche, at the corneal periphery. Accordingly, limbal stem cells (LSCs) give rise to progenitors that proliferate and migrate centripetally to repopulate the corneal epithelium, which has a short turnover. Moreover, LSC loss leads to corneal opacity and blindness, while limbal grafting restores patients' vision. However, contradicting data suggested that the limbus does not participate in corneal homeostasis and that the cornea contains stem cells. As of today, only indirect evidence for limbal cell migration under homeostasis or injury has been demonstrated. Here, we performed lineage tracing experiments using R26R-Confetti mice to follow K14+ limbal/corneal epithelial cells stochastically induced to express one out of four fluorescent genes. In homeostasis, radial limbal stripes of slow migrating cells proceeded toward the corneal center while, infrequently, slow cycling limbal clones resembling quiescent stem cells were observed. Additionally, rare corneal clones that did not migrate centripetally, but survived for over 4 months, were inspected. In contrast to limbal stripes, corneal clusters had minor contribution to tissue replenishment in homeostasis. Corneal cells, however, significantly contributed to mild wound repair while large limbal streaks appeared within a week following severe wounding that coincided with partial loss of corneal transparency. This data suggest that the mouse limbus largely contributes to corneal renewal while corneal progenitor cells have a long turnover and, therefore, may be able to maintain the corneal epithelium for several months.