The role of thermography in assessment of wounds. A scoping review

Assessment of wounds based on visual appearance has poor inter- and intra-rater reliability and it is difficult to differentiate between inflammation and infection. Thermography is a user-friendly quantitative image technique that collects the skin surface temperature pattern of the wound area and immediately visualizes the temperatures as a rainbow coloured diagram. The aim of this scoping review is to map and summarize the existing evidence on how thermography has been used to assess signs of inflammation in humans and animals with surgical or traumatic wounds. The method follows the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. The databases searched were PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library. 3798 sources were identified, 2666 were screened on title and abstract, 99 on full text and 19 studies were included for review. We found that the literature is diverse and originates from a variety of scientific fields. Thermography has been used to detect and predict inflammation and infection in surgical wounds. Grading systems based on the visual appearance correlate to temperature patterns detected with thermography. The general tendency is that thermography detects the temperature in a wound with inflammation to be warmer than a reference area or the same skin area before surgery. In a surgical wound the temperature is elevated 1-2 weeks after surgery due to natural physiological inflammation that induces healing, after 2 weeks the temperature of the wound area slowly and steady decreases to baseline over 1-3 months. If a secondary temperature peak happens during the healing phase of a surgical wound, it is likely that infection has occurred. Modern handheld thermographic cameras might be a promising tool for the clinician to quickly quantify the temperature pattern of surgical wounds to distinguish between inflammation and infection. However, firm evidence supporting infection thermography surveillance of surgical wounds as a technique is missing.

Staples, tension-band plates, and percutaneous epiphysiodesis screws used for leg-length discrepancy treatment: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the success rate of 3 different epiphysiodesis techniques with implant usage for the treatment of leg-length discrepancy (LLD) in the pediatric population. The secondary aim was to address effectiveness (final LLD) and the reported complications of staples, tension-band plates (TBP), and percutaneous epiphysiodesis screws (PETS).

METHODS

In this systematic review we searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus for studies on skeletally immature patients with LLD treated with epiphysiodesis with an implant. The extracted outcome categories were effectiveness of epiphysiodesis (LLD measurements pre-/postoperatively, successful/unsuccessful) and complications that were graded on severity.

RESULTS

44 studies (2,184 patients) were included. 455 underwent epiphysiodesis with PETS, 578 patients with TBP, and 1,048 with staples. Successful epiphysiodesis was reported in 76% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61-89) with PETS (9 studies), 67% (CI 54-79) with TBP (10 studies), and 51% (CI 28-65) with Blount staples (8 studies). From pooled analysis, the severe complications rate was 7% for PETS, 17% for TBP, and 16% for Blount staples. Angular deformity was reported in 4% after PETS, 10% after TBP, and 17% after Blount staples.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that epiphysiodesis with PETS implants was the most successful technique. PETS had a higher success rate, fewer severe complications, and a lower proportion with angular deformity.

Are percutaneous epiphysiodesis and Phemister technique effective in the treatment of leg-length discrepancy? A systematic review

Epiphysiodesis is considered the preferred treatment for children predicted to have leg length discrepancies (LLDs) 2-5 cm at maturity. The aim of this study was to systematically review the existing literature on the effectiveness of permanent epiphysiodesis for LLD treatment, and secondarily to address the reported complications of permanent epiphysiodesis techniques. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus for studies on skeletally immature patients with LLD treated with permanent epiphysiodesis. The extracted outcome categories were effectiveness of epiphysiodesis (LLD measurements pre/post-operatively, successful/unsuccessful), physeal fusion/arrest, and complications that were graded on severity. Forty-nine studies (3051 patients) were included, 1550 underwent Phemister/modified Phemister epiphysiodesis and 1501 percutaneous epiphysiodesis (PE). Total successful permanent epiphysiodesis surgeries (16 studies) were 73.7% (516/700). Only 13 out of 23 studies had a mean final LLD of less than 1.5 cm. In total, 17.5% (513/2936) of complications were reported. 57 angular deformities were reported (1.9%). Phemister technique had higher percentage of complications (39%) than PE (19.1%) in total, but when failure to achieve adequate reduction in LLD was not included, complication rates for both were close to 14%. However, severe complications were 10.2% for Phemister group and 5.1% for PE. The high complication rates and the relative low success rate call for optimization of the timing and the applied techniques when treating LLD with permanent epiphysiodesis. Phemister technique was found to have higher percentage of severe complications than PE. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023435177).

Outcomes and outcome measurement instruments in lower-limb lengthening surgery: a scoping review to inform core outcome set development

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

 The heterogeneous outcomes used in lower-limb lengthening surgery (LLLS) complicate evidence synthesis, weakening systematic reviews and clinical recommendations, and reducing research impact. This scoping review maps the outcomes and outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) used in LLLS.

METHODS

This pre-registered review systematically identified studies reporting outcomes in adults or children who underwent LLLS. Outcomes and OMIs were extracted verbatim, and experts grouped outcome terms under headings using the COMET taxonomy.

RESULTS

 The search found 5,308 unique hits, including 149 studies from 2020-2024. They reported 2,939 verbatim outcomes, which were consolidated into 92 outcome headings and 27 subheadings. "Life impact" accounted for 13%, while "Clinical outcomes" represented 83% of all outcomes. Among the clinical outcomes, "Musculoskeletal and connective tissue" was the most reported outcome domain (68% of all outcomes). The most frequently reported outcomes were "Lengthening," "Bone healing," "Range of motion," "Limb alignment", and "Complications."

CONCLUSION

 Outcomes reported for people undergoing LLLS are heterogeneous and vary widely in the definitions and measurement tools used to collect them. Outcomes likely to be important to patients (life impact outcomes), such as quality of life and measures of physical function, are rarely reported.