Tarp-Assisted Cooling for Exertional Heat Stroke Treatment in Wildland Firefighting

INTRODUCTION

Exertional heat stroke is a life-threatening emergency necessitating immediate treatment with rapid body cooling. A field-expedient alternative may be tarp-assisted cooling, requiring only water and a tarp. The objective of this study was to compare core temperature (Tc) cooling rates of tarp-assisted cooling using the limited resources available to a wildland firefighter and the current standard care provided in wilderness settings.

METHODS

This cross-over, randomized control trial of 17 healthy individuals consisted of exercise in a 42±1°C, 32±4% relative humidity environment while wearing wildland firefighter attire, followed by cooling. Body cooling consisted of either pouring 11 L of 25±1°C water over the torso while lying supine on a tarp configured to hold water close to the individual (Tarp) or dousing the water on the participant followed by lying supine with a light breeze, current standard care in the wilderness (Current Care). Cooling occurred until Tc reached 38°C.

RESULTS

Participants walked until a similar Tc was achieved in Tarp (39.59±0.04°C) and Current Care (39.55±0.22°C; P=0.36). Core temperature cooling rate was not different between Tarp (0.076±0.042°C·min-1) and Current Care (0.088±0.046°C·min-1; P=0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

In hyperthermic individuals, Tarp did not provide a faster cooling rate compared to the current exertional heat stroke care provided in the wilderness, and both provided a slower cooling rate than that provided by the traditional method of cold water immersion (>0.20°C·min-1) to treat exertional heat stroke patients.

Kidney injury risk during prolonged exposure to current and projected wet bulb temperatures occurring during extreme heat events in healthy young men

Wet bulb temperatures (Twet) during extreme heat events are commonly 31°C. Recent predictions indicate that Twet will approach or exceed 34°C. Epidemiological data indicate that exposure to extreme heat events increases kidney injury risk. We tested the hypothesis that kidney injury risk is elevated to a greater extent during prolonged exposure to Twet = 34°C compared with Twet = 31°C. Fifteen healthy men rested for 8 h in Twet = 31 (0)°C and Twet = 34 (0)°C. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP-2), and thioredoxin 1 (TRX-1) were measured from urine samples. The primary outcome was the product of IGFBP7 and TIMP-2 ([IGFBP7·TIMP-2]), which provided an index of kidney injury risk. Plasma interleukin-17a (IL-17a) was also measured. Data are presented at preexposure and after 8 h of exposure and as mean (SD) change from preexposure. The increase in [IGFBP7·TIMP-2] was markedly greater at 8 h in the 34°C [+26.9 (27.1) (ng/mL)2/1,000) compared with the 31°C [+6.2 (6.5) (ng/mL)2/1,000] trial (P < 0.01). Urine TRX-1, a marker of renal oxidative stress, was higher at 8 h in the 34°C [+77.6 (47.5) ng/min] compared with the 31°C [+16.2 (25.1) ng/min] trial (P < 0.01). Plasma IL-17a, an inflammatory marker, was elevated at 8 h in the 34°C [+199.3 (90.0) fg/dL; P < 0.01] compared with the 31°C [+9.0 (95.7) fg/dL] trial. Kidney injury risk is exacerbated during prolonged resting exposures to Twet experienced during future extreme heat events (34°C) compared with that experienced currently (31°C), likely because of oxidative stress and inflammatory processes.NEW AND NOTEWORTHY We have demonstrated that kidney injury risk is increased when men are exposed over an 8-h period to a wet bulb temperature of 31°C and exacerbated at a wet bulb temperature of 34°C. Importantly, these heat stress conditions parallel those that are encountered during current (31°C) and future (34°C) extreme heat events. The kidney injury biomarker analyses indicate both the proximal and distal tubules as the locations of potential renal injury and that the injury is likely due to oxidative stress and inflammation.