Mosnaim GS, Li H, Damitz M, Sharp LK, Li Z, Talati A, Mirza F, Richardson D, Rachelefsky G, Africk J, Powell LH. Evaluation of the Fight Asthma Now (FAN) program to improve asthma knowledge in urban youth and teenagers.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2011;
107:310-6. [PMID:
21962090 DOI:
10.1016/j.anai.2011.07.008]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2011] [Revised: 06/23/2011] [Accepted: 07/20/2011] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
School-based asthma education programs targeting disadvantaged youth and teens with asthma are lacking.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the impact of the Fight Asthma Now (FAN) educational program among 2 populations of predominantly low-income minority students: youth (3(rd)-6(th) graders) and teens (7(th)-8(th) graders).
METHODS
Chicago-area elementary schools were invited to participate in this stratified 2-arm study. Eligible schools were assigned to participate either in the intervention or in the control arm. Within each participating school, eligible students were recruited and grouped (stratified by grade and age) to form teen or youth classes. Participants completed a pre- and post-intervention asthma knowledge questionnaire and observation for spacer technique competency. The treatment group received the FAN curriculum between the evaluations.
RESULTS
A sample of 26 low-income, predominantly minority-serving schools was recruited. Most participating schools were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to form 25 youth classes (19 intervention and 6 control group) and 16 teen classes (11 intervention and 5 control group), resulting in 275 vs 69 youth and 141 vs 51 teens in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Stratified analyses were performed, and clustering within the school and class was taken into consideration in analyses. Multilevel models adjusting for school, class, ethnicity, sex, and pretest score indicate that the FAN intervention significantly increased both knowledge and spacer competency test scores, among both the youth and teen participants (P = .011 with respect to knowledge score among teen students, P < .0001 for all other cases).
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that FAN significantly increases asthma knowledge and spacer technique competency within this high-risk population.
Collapse