1
|
Fagien S, Avelar RL, Cox SE, Joseph JH, Kaufman-Janette J, Marcus KA. Safety and Duration of Effect of 40U PrabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines in Adult Patients: A Phase II, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double Blind, Active-Controlled Trial. Aesthet Surg J 2024:sjae051. [PMID: 38506148 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjae051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extending the duration of effect of botulinum toxins - by administering doses beyond those of the approved labels - has been an area of increasing interest in the field of aesthetics. OBJECTIVES To investigate the safety and duration of effect of 40U prabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs (twice the approved dose and concentration) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines. METHODS 154 adult patients were randomized 1:1:1 to a single treatment of either 40U prabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs (PRA 40, 5 injections of 8U/0.05 mL), or 20U of either prabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs (PRA 20) or onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA 20). Both 20U controls were administered as 5 injections of 4U/0.1 mL. Efficacy and safety were assessed on Days 2, 7 (by phone), 30 and every 30 days thereafter up to 365 days or until the patient had returned to Baseline. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the duration of effect (estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis), defined as the number of days from Treatment Day (Baseline) to the day that glabellar line severity at maximum frown by investigator assessment returned to the baseline value. RESULTS Patients had a mean age of 47 years (20-72 years); 69.5% had severe glabellar lines at Baseline. Of the 36 adverse events, 32 (88.9%) were mild and 4 (11.1%) were moderate in severity; none were serious. The median durations of effect were estimated to be 183, 149 and 148 days for PRA 40-, PRA 20- and ONA 20-treated patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In this Phase II pilot study, 40U prabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs was observed to be safe and had a duration of 6 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Fagien
- Oculoplastic surgeon in private practice, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | | | - Sue Ellen Cox
- Department of Dermatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - John H Joseph
- Plastic surgeon in private practice, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Keith A Marcus
- Plastic surgeon in private practice, Redondo Beach, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Taylor S, Weinkle S, Kaufman-Janette J, Gallagher CJ, Kooken K, Brown J. Effectiveness and Safety of Resilient Hyaluronic Acid (RHA) Dermal Fillers for the Correction of Moderate-to-Severe Nasolabial Folds in People of Color: Post Hoc Subgroup Analyses of US Pivotal Clinical Data. Aesthet Surg J 2024; 44:412-420. [PMID: 37556827 PMCID: PMC10942799 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjad251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People of color (POC) are often underrepresented in clinical studies evaluating the safety and effectiveness of aesthetic products, including hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers, for which there is to date limited clinical data in POC. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of a new line of dynamic resilient HA fillers (RHA; Revance, Nashville, TN) for treating moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds (NLFs) in POC vs non-POC. METHODS Post hoc subgroup analyses compared the efficacy and safety of POC vs non-POC subjects treated with RHA2, RHA3, or RHA4 for correction of moderate-to-severe NLFs in the pooled per-protocol population (N = 217) in 2 clinical trials. Evaluated population cohorts were classified by Fitzpatrick skin type (FST) (high FST [IV-VI] vs low FST [I-III]) and by subject-reported race (non-White vs White) relative to baseline at 6, 9, 12, and 15 months. RESULTS POC consistently showed greater improvement in wrinkle severity and higher responder rates compared with non-POC, which reached statistical significance at several measured time points. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores and subject satisfaction ratings were similar for POC and non-POC and remained high throughout the course of the study. Treatment-related adverse event rates were generally lower for high FSTs vs low FSTs, with no reported cases of keloidal scarring. CONCLUSION The RHA line of dynamic fillers is well tolerated and effective for the correction of moderate-to-severe NLFs in POC and can be confidently used in this important and growing patient population.See the abstract translated into Hindi, Portuguese, Korean, German, Italian, Arabic, Chinese, and Taiwanese online here: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad251. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Taylor
- Corresponding Author: Dr Susan Taylor, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, South Tower 7-768, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cox SE, Kaufman-Janette J, Cohen JL, Gold M, Joseph J, Nestor MS, Rzany B, Taylor S, Zhou J, Cecerle M, Pueraro E, Irvine R, Dayan S. LetibotulinumtoxinA Attenuates the Psychological Burden of Glabellar Lines and Is Associated With High Subject Satisfaction in Phase 3 Clinical Trials. Dermatol Surg 2024:00042728-990000000-00722. [PMID: 38470985 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000004152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hyperfunctional glabellar frown lines can transmit facial miscues that adversely affect emotional communication, increase perceptions of age, and diminish self-esteem. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of letibotulinumtoxinA in mitigating the negative psychological impact associated with moderate to severe glabellar lines and to assess subject satisfaction with treatment outcome in the BLESS phase 3 clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS Baseline and posttreatment assessments were made using validated subject-administered instruments: Modified Skindex-16 Glabellar Line Quality of Life (GL-QoL) Scale, Facial Assessment and Cosmetic Evaluation Questionnaire (FACE-Q) Appraisal of Lines Between Eyebrows Scale, FACE-Q Age Appraisal Visual Analog Scale, and FACE-Q Satisfaction with Outcome Scale. An integrated analysis using pooled BLESS data was conducted on these secondary end points. RESULTS Among enrolled and treated subjects (N = 1,272), 85.5% had moderate to severe psychological impact at baseline. LetibotulinumtoxinA subjects experienced significant improvements compared with placebo on all measures. Mean improvement to Week 4 for the Modified Skindex-16 GL-QoL Scale overall score was -33.84 for letibotulinumtoxinA subjects compared with -1.37 for placebo subjects (p < .001). Attenuation of psychological burden was highly correlated with improvement in glabellar line severity (p < .0001). CONCLUSION LetibotulinumtoxinA significantly improved the psychosocial burden associated with glabellar lines across all trials. Treated subjects experienced improved quality of life, younger perceived age, and satisfaction with treatment outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joel L Cohen
- AboutSkin Dermatology and DermSurgery, Greenwood Village, Colorado
| | - Michael Gold
- Gold Skin Care Center, Tennessee Clinical Research Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - John Joseph
- Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills, Beverly Hills, California
| | - Mark S Nestor
- Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research, Aventura, Florida
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery and the Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Berthold Rzany
- Private Practice, Berlin, Germany. Dr. Rzany now with the Medizin am Hauptbahnhof, Vienna, Austria
| | - Susan Taylor
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jihao Zhou
- JZ Consulting, Orange County, California
| | | | | | - Ryan Irvine
- Hugel America, Inc., Newport Beach, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gold M, Taylor S, Mueller DS, Adelglass J, Kaufman-Janette J, Cox SE, Cecerle M, Frank K, Nestor M. Efficacy and Safety of LetibotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Moderate and Severe Glabellar Lines in Females 35 to 50 Years of Age: Post Hoc Analyses of the Phase 3 Clinical Study Data. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum 2024; 6:ojae010. [PMID: 38486835 PMCID: PMC10937618 DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojae010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections continue to be widely used as a common treatment for both males and females. According to a recent survey conducted by the International Society of Plastic Aesthetic Surgeons, the majority of patients receiving these injections are females between the ages 35 and 50. Objectives A post hoc analysis was conducted to examine whether there were variances in the effectiveness and safety of letibotulinumtoxinA for treating vertical glabellar lines between the broader female study population and a particularly defined group of female participants aged 35 to 50. Methods For this post hoc analysis, data from females aged 35 to 50 were extracted and analyzed from the BLESS III study. In this Phase 3 clinical trial, 355 participants with moderate-to-severe glabella frown lines received either 20 U of letibotulinumtoxinA or a placebo. The study evaluated Glabella Line Severity (GLS) score, treatment onset, duration of effects, time to retreatment, and adverse events. A positive response was determined by achieving a GLS score of 0 or 1, as assessed by both patients and investigators, along with at least a 2-point improvement in GLS score relative to baseline at Week 4 after the injections. Results Composite responder rates for patients aged 35 to 50 receiving active treatment were significantly higher than for the remaining female population receiving active treatment at Weeks 1, 2, and 4. Females aged 35 to 50 showed higher rates of GLS improvement of ≥1 at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 compared with the remaining female population receiving active treatment. At Week 4, a higher percentage of females aged 35 to 50 achieved a GLS score of 0 upon maximum frowning compared with the remaining females. Females aged 35 to 50 had a shorter median time to onset of GLS improvement compared with the remaining female population. Safety assessments showed a low incidence of treatment-related adverse events in females aged 35 to 50. Conclusions LetibotulinumtoxinA showed significantly higher response rates in females aged 35 to 50 compared with other female patients at Weeks 1, 2, and 4. Response rates remained higher up to Week 16. The treatment demonstrated efficacy and safety in treating vertical glabellar lines in this patient group. Level of Evidence 2
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Konstantin Frank
- Corresponding Author: Dr Konstantin Frank, Avenida Ramon y Cáyal 7, 29601 Marbella, Andalucia, Spain. E-mail:
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kaufman-Janette J, Cazzaniga A, Jacobson A, Eaton Jankov LL, Copeland K, Behfar A, Wyles S. Effect of Topical Platelet Extract Daily Serum as a Cosmetic Product to Reduce Facial Redness. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2023; 16:48-51. [PMID: 37915335 PMCID: PMC10617900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
Objective The primary objective of this pilot study was to demonstrate the benefits of topical human platelet extract (plated)™ serum for the improvement of persistent facial redness. Methods This single-center, open-label pilot study evaluated six subjects using (plated)™ serum containing human platelet extract (HPE) with Renewosome™ technology twice daily for six weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was a reduction in the Clinical Erythema Assessment (CEA) grade, and a reduction in Patient Subjective Assessment grade at six weeks. Secondary endpoints included an improvement in quality of life related to facial redness, and a reduction in redness by Mexameter™ spectrometry measurement. Safety data included monitoring for adverse events. Results Topical HPE serum demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in facial redness at Week 9 when averaging the Mexameter™ spectrometry results across nine regions of the face (p=0.0052). The primary and secondary endpoints were achieved. CEA grade at Week 6 demonstrated that all subjects improved by at least one grade, while one subject improved by two grades. One patient reported dryness. No other adverse effects were observed. Limitations Study limitations included a small sample size and lack of darker skin types (Fitzpatrick IV-VI). Conclusion This study demonstrates that topical HPE with Renewosome™ technology provides statistically significant reduction in facial redness and is safe and well-tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joely Kaufman-Janette
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette, Mr. Cazzaniga, and Dr. Jacobson are with Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
| | - Alex Cazzaniga
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette, Mr. Cazzaniga, and Dr. Jacobson are with Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
| | - Andrew Jacobson
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette, Mr. Cazzaniga, and Dr. Jacobson are with Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
| | | | - Karen Copeland
- Dr. Copeland is with Boulder Biostatistics in Steamboat Springs, Colorodo
| | - Atta Behfar
- Drs. Behfar and Wyles are with Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Saranya Wyles
- Drs. Behfar and Wyles are with Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alexiades M, Palm MD, Kaufman-Janette J, Papel I, Cross SJ, Abrams S, Chawla S. A Randomized, Multicenter, Evaluator-blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of VYC-12L Treatment for Skin Quality Improvements. Dermatol Surg 2023; 49:682-688. [PMID: 37163665 PMCID: PMC10292578 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Skin quality may be assessed by degrees of skin smoothness, fine lines, and hydration. VYC-12L is a recently developed hyaluronic acid filler to improve skin quality. OBJECTIVE This was a randomized, evaluator-blind study assessing safety and effectiveness of intradermal VYC-12L treatment for improving cheek skin smoothness, fine lines, and hydration. METHODS Participants (≥22 years) with moderate-to-severe investigator-assessed Allergan Cheek Smoothness Scale (ACSS) scores were randomized in 2:1 ratio to receive VYC-12L or control (no treatment with optional treatment). Effectiveness was assessed 1 month after last injection (initial or touch-up) by a responder rate (≥1-grade improvement from baseline on both cheeks) using investigator-rated ACSS and Allergan Fine Lines Scale (AFLS), and tissue dielectric constant probe-measured skin hydration. Safety was evaluated throughout. RESULTS Participants (VYC-12L, n = 131; control, n = 71) were 86.1% female with a median age of 58.0 years. At month 1, ACSS and AFLS responder rates were statistically significantly higher in the VYC-12L group (57.9%, 58.3%, respectively) than in the untreated controls (4.5%, 5.4%, respectively; p < .001). VYC-12L ACSS and AFLS responder rates remained consistent throughout the 6-month follow-up. Six participants reported treatment-related adverse events; none led to study discontinuation. CONCLUSION VYC-12L is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for lasting improvement of cheek skin smoothness, fine lines, and hydration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Macrene Alexiades
- Associate Clinical Professor, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
- Dermatology & Laser Surgery Center of New York, New York
| | | | | | - Ira Papel
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moradi A, Dayan S, Joseph J, Lorenc ZP, Coleman K, Ablon G, Kaufman-Janette J, Cox SE, Campbell A, Munavalli G. Subject Satisfaction With AbobotulinumtoxinA for Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Dose-Escalation, Double-Blind Study. Toxicon 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.11.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|
8
|
Mueller DS, Prinz V, Adelglass J, Cox SE, Gold MH, Kaufman-Janette J, Nestor MS, Taylor S, Frank K. Efficacy and Safety of Letibotulinumtoxin A in the Treatment of Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study. Aesthet Surg J 2022; 42:677-688. [PMID: 35092418 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjac019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Letibotulinumtoxin A (Hugel, Inc., Chuncheon, Republic of Korea and CROMA Pharma, Leobendorf, Austria) is a newly manufactured neurotoxin derived from Clostridium botulinum strain CBFC26. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of letibotulinumtoxin A in reducing glabellar line severity (GLS) and to evaluate long-term safety and efficacy following repeated injections. METHODS In this prospective, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled Phase III clinical trial, 355 subjects with moderate to severe glabella frown lines received injections of 20 U of letibotulinumtoxin A or placebo. GLS, onset and duration of effect, time to retreatment, and adverse events were evaluated. Response to treatment was defined as a GLS score of 0 or 1 (assessed by the subject and the investigator) and an improvement at Week 4 of ≥2 points in GLS score relative to baseline. RESULTS At 4 weeks, 78.6% of the active treatment subjects were responders based on the investigator's assessment and 68.8% based on the subject's assessment, resulting in a composite responder rate of 64.7% for the active treatment group, whereas the corresponding rate was 0.0% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Subjects noted a substantial improvement in GL severity as early as Day 2, with the median time to onset of effect being 3 days. The mean [standard deviation] time until first retreatment for the letibotulinumtoxin A group was 127.26 [65.6] days. Letibotulinumtoxin A was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Letibotulinumtoxin A demonstrates high efficacy and a convincing safety profile in the treatment of glabellar lines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Michael H Gold
- Tennessee Clinical Research Center , Nashville, TN , USA
| | | | - Mark S Nestor
- Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research , Aventura, FL , USA
| | - Susan Taylor
- Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dayan S, Joseph J, Moradi A, Lorenc ZP, Coleman K, Ablon G, Kaufman-Janette J, Cox SE, Campbell A, Munavalli G, Prygova I. Subject Satisfaction and Psychological Well-being with Escalating AbobotulinumtoxinA Injection Dose for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines. J Cosmet Dermatol 2022; 21:2407-2416. [PMID: 35266281 PMCID: PMC9322427 DOI: 10.1111/jocd.14906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Previous studies indicate that the efficacy and durability of a single AbobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) treatment for moderate to severe glabellar lines may be enhanced with increasing dose, while safety outcomes remain consistent with those of the licensed dose (50 U). Aims Evaluation of subject‐reported indicators of treatment efficacy, satisfaction, and psychological well‐being with ABO dose escalation. Methods A Phase 2, 36‐week, multicenter, randomized, dose‐ranging, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study was conducted in adults with moderate to severe glabellar lines. Subjects received a single ABO treatment, dosed at 50, 75, 100, or 125 U, or placebo. Efficacy endpoints comprised subject‐assessed improvement in line severity of ≥1‐grade from baseline at maximum frown, global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) grade, FACE‐Q™ appraisal of lines, psychological well‐being and age, and subject satisfaction. Results The study included 399 subjects (88.2% were female). Respective responder rates (≥1‐grade improvement) with ABO 50–125 U doses ranged between 96.3%–100% at Week 4, 65.0%–67.9% at Week 24, and 33.8%–44.4% at Week 36. GAIS responder rate and FACE‐Q appraisal of lines showed a similar pattern of change. Satisfaction was high and psychological well‐being was improved from Week 4 through Week 36, with natural, youthful, and refreshed appearance reported for all ABO doses. Conclusions A single ABO treatment (dosed at 50–125 U) provided significant and sustained improvements in glabellar line severity over durations up to 36 weeks, versus placebo. Treatment satisfaction was high with all doses. Participants reported natural and youthful appearance, alongside improvements in psychological well‐being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John Joseph
- Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills, Encino, CA, USA
| | | | - Z Paul Lorenc
- Lorenc Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Center, New York, USA
| | - Kyle Coleman
- Etre Cosmetic Dermatology and Laser Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Glynis Ablon
- Ablon Skin Institute and Research Center, Manhattan Beach, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Girish Munavalli
- Dermatology, Laser & Vein Specialists of the Carolinas, PLLC, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kaufman-Janette J, Katz BE, Vijayan S, Xiang Q, Kaminer MS. Evaluation of Five Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum-aaes Injection Techniques For the Treatment of Cellulite on the Buttock or Thigh. J Cosmet Dermatol 2022; 21:1448-1453. [PMID: 35150194 PMCID: PMC9305772 DOI: 10.1111/jocd.14842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background Given differences in buttock versus thigh cellulite, collagenase clostridium histolyticum‐aaes (CCH‐aaes) injection technique may impact treatment effects at these sites. Aim To evaluate efficacy and safety of 5 CCH‐aaes injection techniques. Methods A phase 2A, open‐label trial enrolled women with mild‐to‐severe cellulite (Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale) on both buttocks or thighs. CCH‐aaes 0.84 mg was administered as 12 injections in each of two buttock or two thigh treatment areas (total dose, 1.68 mg) during three treatment sessions (Days 1, 22, 43). On Day 1, women were sequentially assigned to: Technique A = shallow injection/3 aliquots; Technique B = shallow injection/1 aliquot; Technique C = deep injection/1 aliquot; Technique D = deep and shallow injections/5 aliquots; or Technique E = shallow injection/4 aliquots. Change from baseline in Hexsel Cellulite Severity Scale (CSS) depression depth (range, 0 [no depressions] to 3 [deep depressions]) was assessed at Day 71. Safety was evaluated via adverse events. Results Sixty‐three women with buttock (n = 31) or thigh (n = 32) cellulite received ≥1 CCH‐aaes dose. For buttock cellulite, CCH‐aaes injection Technique A resulted in the greatest baseline‐adjusted improvement in CSS score on Day 71 (least‐squares mean, 1.17‐point improvement). For thigh cellulite, CSS score improvement was greatest with Technique D (least‐squares mean, 1.40‐point improvement). CCH injection Techniques A, D, and E were associated with more favorable safety profiles than Techniques B and C. Conclusion Different CCH‐aaes injection techniques are required with buttock (Technique A) versus thigh (Technique D) cellulite to optimize treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bruce E Katz
- dermatologist in private practice in New York, NY, USA
| | - Saji Vijayan
- Research and Development Strategy at Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Malvern, PA, USA
| | - Qinfang Xiang
- Biometrics at Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Malvern, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Trévidic P, Kaufman-Janette J, Weinkle S, Wu R, Dhillon B, Antunes S, Macé E, Maffert P. Injection Guidelines for Treating Midface Volume Deficiency With Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: The ATP Approach (Anatomy, Techniques, Products). Aesthet Surg J 2022; 42:920-934. [PMID: 35039828 PMCID: PMC9373948 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjac007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Midface rejuvenation is among the most valuable indications of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers, because malar projection and full upper cheeks significantly contribute to a youthful appearance. Hyaluronic acid fillers have evolved over the past 2 decades to meet specific clinical needs such as strong projection capacity and adaptability to facial dynamism. As a result, they now represent the treatment of choice for midface rejuvenation throughout age ranges by offering the potential for noninvasive treatment, immediate results, and minimal downtime. Because the 5-layered structure of the midface plays a central role in the human face, injecting the midface area may also indirectly improve other aesthetic concerns such as infraorbital hollowing and nasolabial folds. Nonetheless, midface rejuvenation requires a tailored treatment approach and a thorough knowledge of anatomy to minimize procedural risks and achieve natural-looking results. This article provides an extensive anatomical description of the midface and of the usual course and depth of vascular structures circulating nearby to delineate a treatment area and minimize procedural risks. Furthermore, considering the differential mobility and mechanical constraints of each layer of the midface, a multilayer treatment algorithm is proposed for adapting the treatment strategy to patient specificities (including age, gender, skin type, and morphology). Emphasis is also placed on desirable filler properties to create deep structural support on the one hand and accompany facial movement on the other hand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Stéphanie Antunes
- Clinical and Medical Affairs Department, Teoxane SA, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Emilie Macé
- Clinical and Medical Affairs Department, Teoxane SA, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Pauline Maffert
- Clinical and Medical Affairs Department, Teoxane SA, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sundaram H, Shamban A, Schlessinger J, Kaufman-Janette J, Joseph JH, Lupin M, Draelos Z, Carey W, Smith S, Eaton L. Efficacy and Safety of a New Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Filler in the Correction of Moderate-to-Severe Dynamic Perioral Rhytides: A 52-Week Prospective, Multicenter, Controlled, Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded Study. Dermatol Surg 2022; 48:87-93. [PMID: 34608092 PMCID: PMC8667798 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The perioral region is highly mobile and subject to multifactorial changes during aging. Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Redensity (RHAR), an RHA filler, was developed with the aim of optimizing outcomes in dynamic facial areas. OBJECTIVE This randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical study aimed to demonstrate superiority of RHAR over no-treatment control for correction of moderate-to-severe dynamic perioral rhytides. MATERIALS AND METHODS Blinded live evaluator assessments of efficacy included improvement in perioral rhytides severity using a proprietary scale (Perioral Rhytids Severity Rating Scale [PR-SRS]) and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. Subjects self-assessed their results with FACE-Q, a validated patient-reported outcome measure, and satisfaction scales. Safety was monitored throughout the study based on common treatment responses (CTRs) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS The primary efficacy end point was achieved, with the treatment group showing statistically significant superiority over the control group at Week 8 (80.7% vs 7.8% responder rate by PR-SRS, p < .0001). Most patients (66%) were still responders at Week 52 (study completion). Most AEs were CTRs after perioral injection of a dermal filler, and none was a clinically significant treatment-related AE. CONCLUSION Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Redensity is effective and safe for the correction of dynamic perioral rhytides in all Fitzpatrick phototypes, with marked durability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hema Sundaram
- Dermatology, Cosmetic, and Laser Surgery Center, Rockville, Maryland and Fairfax, Virginia
| | - Ava Shamban
- ATS Clinical Research, Santa Monica, California
| | | | | | - John H. Joseph
- Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills, Beverly Hills, California
| | - Mark Lupin
- Cosmedica Laser Center, Victoria, Canada;
| | - Zoe Draelos
- Dermatology Consulting Services, High Point, North Carolina
| | - Wayne Carey
- Siena Medical Research Corporation, Montreal, Canada;
| | - Stacy Smith
- California Dermatology & Clinical Research Institute, Encinitas, California
| | - Laura Eaton
- UltaMed Corporation, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kaufman-Janette J, Avelar RL, Biesman BS, Draelos ZD, Gross JE, Jones DH, Lupo MP, Maas CS, Schlessinger J, Shamban AT, Sundaram H, Weinkle SH, Young VL. The First of Two One-Year, Multicenter, Open-Label, Repeat-Dose, Phase II Safety Studies of PrabotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines in Adult Patients. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41:1409-1422. [PMID: 33944905 PMCID: PMC8598194 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaa383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background PrabotulinumtoxinA is a 900-kDa botulinum toxin type A produced by Clostridium
botulinum. Objectives The authors sought to investigate the safety of prabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of
glabellar lines. Methods This was a multicenter, open-label, repeat-dose, 1-year phase II safety study. Adults
with moderate to severe glabellar lines at maximum frown, as assessed by the
investigator on the validated 4-point photonumeric Glabellar Line Scale (0 = no lines, 1
= mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), were enrolled. On day 0, patients received an initial
treatment of 20 U prabotulinumtoxinA (4 U/0.1 mL freeze-dried formulation injected into
5 target glabellar sites). On and after day 90, patients received a repeat treatment
(RT) if their Glabellar Line Scale score was ≥2 at maximum frown by investigator
assessment. Safety was evaluated throughout the study. Results The 352 study patients received a median total dose of 60 U, that is, 3 treatments per
year. Fifty-one patients (14.5%) experienced adverse events (AEs) assessed as possibly
study drug related; 11.1% experienced study drug-related AEs after the initial
treatment. With each RT, progressively lower percentages of patients experienced study
drug-related AEs. Six patients (1.7%) experienced study drug-related AEs of special
interest: 3 eyelid ptosis (0.9%), 2 speech disorder (0.6%), and 1 blepharospasm (0.3%).
Seven patients (2.0%) experienced serious AEs; none were study drug related. Of the 2393
samples tested, 2 patients (0.6%) tested positive for antibotulinum toxin antibodies at
a single postbaseline visit. Conclusions The safety of RTs of 20 U of prabotulinumtoxinA for moderate to severe glabellar lines
was first established in this early phase II study based on a broad range of
outcomes. Level of Evidence: 2
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joely Kaufman-Janette
- Corresponding Author: Dr Joely Kaufman-Janette, 4425 Ponce de Leon Blvd.,
Suite 200, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA. E-mail: ; Twitter: @SFLSkin
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lorenc ZP, Adelglass JM, Avelar RL, Baumann L, Beer KR, Cohen JL, Cox SE, Dayan SH, Dover JS, Downie JB, Draelos ZD, Goldman MP, Gross JE, Joseph JH, Kaufman-Janette J, Moy RL, Nestor M, Schlessinger J, Smith SR, Weiss RA. Corrigendum to: The Second of Two One-Year, Multicenter, Open-Label, Repeat-Dose, Phase II Safety Studies of PrabotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines in Adult Patients. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41:1494-1495. [PMID: 34189562 PMCID: PMC8598192 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjab230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
15
|
Kaufman-Janette J, Avelar RL, Biesman BS, Draelos ZD, Gross JE, Jones DH, Lupo MP, Maas CS, Schlessinger J, Shamban AT, Sundaram H, Weinkle SH, Young VL. Corrigendum to: The First of Two One-Year, Multicenter, Open-Label, Repeat-Dose, Phase II Safety Studies of PrabotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines in Adult Patients. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41:1494. [PMID: 34309676 PMCID: PMC8598191 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjab229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
16
|
Lorenc ZP, Adelglass JM, Avelar RL, Baumann L, Beer KR, Cohen JL, Cox SE, Dayan SH, Dover JS, Downie JB, Draelos ZD, Goldman MP, Gross JE, Joseph JH, Kaufman-Janette J, Moy RL, Nestor M, Schlessinger J, Smith SR, Weiss RA. The Second of Two One-Year, Multicenter, Open-Label, Repeat-Dose, Phase II Safety Studies of PrabotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines in Adult Patients. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41:1423-1438. [PMID: 33944913 PMCID: PMC8598184 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaa382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND PrabotulinumtoxinA is a 900-kDa botulinum toxin type A produced by Clostridium botulinum. OBJECTIVES The authors sought to investigate the safety of prabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of glabellar lines. METHODS This was a multicenter, open-label, repeat-dose, 1-year phase II safety study. Adults with moderate to severe glabellar lines at maximum frown, as independently assessed by both investigator and patient on the validated 4-point photonumeric Glabellar Line Scale (0 = no lines, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), were enrolled. On day 0, patients received an initial treatment (IT) of 20 U prabotulinumtoxinA (4 U/0.1 mL final vacuum-dried formulation injected into 5 glabellar sites). On and after day 90, patients received a repeat treatment (RT) if their Glabellar Line Scale score was ≥2 at maximum frown by investigator assessment. Safety outcomes were evaluated throughout the study. RESULTS The 570 study patients received a median total dose of 60 U, that is, 3 treatments. Sixty-one patients (10.7%) experienced adverse events (AEs) assessed as possibly study drug related; 6.5% experienced study drug-related AEs after the IT. With each RT, progressively lower percentages of patients experienced study drug-related AEs. Eight patients (1.4%) experienced study drug-related AEs of special interest: 5 experienced eyelid ptosis (0.9%), 3 eyebrow ptosis (0.5%), 1 blepharospasm (0.2%), and 1 blurred vision (0.2%). Seven patients (1.2%) experienced serious AEs, but none were study drug related. A total of 4060 serum samples were tested for antibotulinum toxin antibodies; no seroconversion was observed. CONCLUSIONS The safety of RTs of 20 U of prabotulinumtoxinA for moderate to severe glabellar lines was confirmed in this second phase II study based on a broad range of outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Paul Lorenc
- Corresponding Author: Dr Z. Paul Lorenc, 983 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10028, USA. E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fabi SG, Carruthers J, Joseph J, Cox SE, Yoelin S, Few J, Kaufman-Janette J, Dayan S. High-Dose Neuromodulators: A Roundtable on Making Sense of the Data in Real-World Clinical Practice. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum 2021; 3:ojab036. [PMID: 34708202 PMCID: PMC8545706 DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojab036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For aesthetic treatment with botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNTA), interest in maximizing treatment duration and efficacy has prompted study of doses higher than those used in registration studies. As data emerge, it is important that physicians understand how to apply study findings to their own practice so that patient demand is satisfied. OBJECTIVES To bring together leading experts in neuromodulators for a roundtable discussion on the implications of high-dose BoNTA studies for patient care. METHODS The authors reviewed and discussed recent data from high-dose BoNTA studies for abobotulinum toxin A, incobotulinum toxin A, and Oonobotulinumtoxin A. RESULTS Discussion focused on the challenges of data interpretation and extrapolation of study findings for real-world patient care. The authors participated in a candid discussion of whether the observed improvements in treatment duration and patient satisfaction warrant treatment with high-dose regimens delivered as high-concentration injections. Safety was also discussed, as well as economic considerations for both practices and patients. Of note, for BoNTA products, the registration dose, when administered in a smaller total volume, appears to give rise to more durable results than those observed in pivotal trials, implicating product concentration as an important consideration. Importantly, at higher doses, extended duration of effect does not appear to be at the expense of natural-looking results. CONCLUSIONS While the authors provide considerations for the development of individual clinical practice, there is no one-size-fits-all recommendation. It may be that "high-dose" BoNTA is in reality the optimal dose; however, important economic considerations may prevent rapid uptake for all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Guillen Fabi
- Corresponding Author: Dr Sabrina Guillen Fabi, 9339 Genesee Ave Unit 300, San Diego, CA 92121, USA. E-mail:
| | - Jean Carruthers
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - John Joseph
- Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills, Encino, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Steven Dayan
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rohrich R, Bank DE, Bertucci V, Biesman BS, Dayan S, Humphrey S, Jones D, Kaufman-Janette J, Muhn CY, Rivers JK, Tong W. 28036 Phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of onabotulinumtoxina for the treatment of platysma prominence. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
19
|
Joseph J, Moradi A, Lorenc ZP, Coleman K, Ablon G, Kaufman-Janette J, Cox SE, Campbell A, Dayan S, Berg AK, Munavalli G. AbobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Dose-Escalating, Double-Blind Study. J Drugs Dermatol 2021; 20:980-987. [PMID: 34491016 DOI: 10.36849/jdd.6263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) dose escalation in the correction of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines. DESIGN Phase 2, 36-week, multicenter, randomized, dose-ranging, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. METHODS Adults with moderate-to-severe glabellar lines received a single ABO treatment, dosed at 50, 75, 100, or 125 U, or placebo. Primary endpoint was week 4 composite ≥2-grade responder rate among those achieving a severity score of 0 (none) or 1 (mild) at maximum frown, evaluated using concurrent investigator and subject assessments. Secondary endpoints included ≥1-grade severity improvement, duration of effect, and reporting of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS Overall, 399 subjects were included (88.2% were female). Week 4 composite ≥2-grade ABO responder rate was 80.0% (50 U), 88.8% (75 U), 90.0% (100 U) and 95.1% (125 U), versus 2.6% with placebo (P<0.001). Responder rate (≥1-grade) ranged between 53% (50 U) and 69% (125 U) at week 24 and between 18% (50 U) and 31% (125 U) at week 36. Median time (weeks) to return to baseline severity/worse, among those scoring 0 (none) or 1 (mild), was 32.3 (50 U), 34.3 (75 U), 36.0 (100 U) and 36.6 (125 U), versus 23.7 (placebo). ABO-related TEAEs were reported in 4% of subjects (80% were mild). No seroconversion to ABO neutralizing antibodies was seen. CONCLUSION A single ABO treatment provided rapid and effective improvements in glabellar line severity at all doses. Higher doses tended to demonstrate elevated response rates and longer duration of effect. All ABO doses were well-tolerated with low TEAE incidence. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(9):980-987. doi:10.36849/JDD.6263.
Collapse
|
20
|
Cohen JL, Kaufman-Janette J, Meckfessel M, Nogueira A, Coquis-Knezek S. 25878 Brow shape and height after treatment with abobotulinumtoxinA in the glabellar lines. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
21
|
Joseph J, Moradi A, Lorenc ZP, Coleman K, Ablon G, Kaufman-Janette J, Cox SE, Campbell A, Dayan S, Munavalli G. 25773 A randomized, dose-escalating, double-blind study to evaluate abobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
22
|
Gold MH, McLane MP, Vijayan S, Xiang Q, Kaufman-Janette J. 27528 Safety and durability of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum-aaes treatment of cellulite in women: 6-month results of a 5-year phase 3b open-label extension study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
23
|
Kaufman-Janette J, Cox SE, Dayan S, Joseph J. Botulinum Toxin Type A for Glabellar Frown Lines: What Impact of Higher Doses on Outcomes? Toxins (Basel) 2021; 13:494. [PMID: 34357966 PMCID: PMC8310242 DOI: 10.3390/toxins13070494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Botulinum toxin serotype-A (BoNT-A) preparations are widely used to improve the appearance of wrinkles. While effective and well tolerated, patients require retreatment over time to re-establish the effects. There is growing interest from patients as to whether higher doses can prolong response without significantly increasing side effects. We reviewed the efficacy and safety evidence for high-dose BoNT-A treatment of glabellar lines, by evaluating high-dose studies published since 2015. Toxins approved for glabellar line treatment in the US or Europe were considered. "High-dose" indicated doses above the licensed dose for each BoNT-A preparation. Five studies met the inclusion criteria and most were randomized, double-blind trials; designs and population sizes varied. Findings suggested that higher-dose BoNT-A treatment is feasible and may improve response duration without increased safety issues. Around 9 months' median duration was achieved with a 2-2.5-fold increase of the abobotulinumtoxinA on-label dose, or with a 5-fold increase in incobotulinumtoxinA dose. A 2-4-fold increase of the onabotulinumtoxinA on-label dose yielded a median duration of around 6 months. Importantly, patient satisfaction and natural look remained with increasing abobotulinumtoxinA doses. While more data are needed, these findings may lead to more effective, individually tailored treatment plans to meet patient expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joely Kaufman-Janette
- Skin Associates of South Florida, Skin Research Institute, 4425, Ponce De Leon Boulevard, Suite 200, Coral Gables, FL 33146-1871, USA
| | | | | | - John Joseph
- Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills, Encino, CA 91436, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kaufman-Janette J, Joseph JH, Kaminer MS, Clark J, Fabi SG, Gold MH, Goldman MP, Katz BE, Peddy K, Schlessinger J, Young VL, Davis M, Hurley D, Liu G, McLane MP, Vijayan S, Bass LS. Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum-aaes for the Treatment of Cellulite in Women: Results From Two Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials. Dermatol Surg 2021; 47:649-656. [PMID: 33840781 PMCID: PMC8078112 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000002952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fibrous septae play a role in contour alterations associated with cellulite. OBJECTIVE To assess collagenase clostridium histolyticum-aaes (CCH) for the treatment of cellulite. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two identically designed phase 3, double-blind, randomized studies (RELEASE-1 and RELEASE-2) were conducted. Adult women with moderate/severe cellulite (rating 3-4 on the Patient Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale [PR-PCSS] and Clinician Reported PCSS [CR-PCSS]) on the buttocks received up to 3 treatment sessions of subcutaneous CCH 0.84 mg or placebo per treatment area. Composite response (≥2-level or ≥1-level improvement from baseline in both PR-PCSS and CR-PCSS) was determined at Day 71. RESULTS Eight hundred forty-three women received ≥1 injection (CCH vs placebo: RELEASE-1, n = 210 vs n = 213; RELEASE-2, n = 214 vs n = 206). Greater percentages of CCH-treated women were ≥2-level composite responders versus placebo in RELEASE-1 (7.6% vs 1.9%; p = .006) and RELEASE-2 (5.6% vs 0.5%; p = .002) and ≥1-level composite responders in RELEASE-1 (37.1% vs 17.8%; p < .001) and RELEASE-2 (41.6% vs 11.2%; p < .001). Most adverse events (AEs) in the CCH group were injection site related; few CCH-treated women discontinued because of an AE (≤4.3%). CONCLUSION Collagenase clostridium histolyticum-aaes significantly improved cellulite appearance and was generally well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John H. Joseph
- John H. Joseph Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beverly Hills, California
| | | | - James Clark
- Charlottesville Medical Research, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Sabrina G. Fabi
- Cosmetic Laser Dermatology and University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Michael H. Gold
- Department of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, Tennessee Clinical Research Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Mitchel P. Goldman
- Cosmetic Laser Dermatology and University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California
| | | | - Kappa Peddy
- The Education & Research Foundation, Lynchburg, Virginia
| | | | | | - Matthew Davis
- Research and Development, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc, Malvern, Pennsylvania
| | - David Hurley
- Medical Affairs, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc, Malvern, Pennsylvania
| | - Genzhou Liu
- Biostatistics, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc, Malvern, Pennsylvania; and
| | | | - Saji Vijayan
- Research and Development, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc, Malvern, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Weiss R, Beer K, Cox SE, Palm M, Kaufman-Janette J, Bassichis B, Biesman B, Joseph J, Almegård B, Nilsson A, Edwartz C. A Randomized, Controlled, Evaluator-Blinded, Multi-Center Study of Hyaluronic Acid Filler Effectiveness and Safety in Lip Fullness Augmentation. Dermatol Surg 2021; 47:527-532. [PMID: 33587369 PMCID: PMC8021234 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000002856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND HARK was recently approved in the US for lip augmentation and correction of upper perioral rhytids. OBJECTIVE To demonstrate noninferiority of HARK versus a control (HAJV) in lip fullness augmentation at Week 8 after last injection (blinded evaluation). Secondary objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of HARK in lip fullness augmentation and correction of upper perioral rhytids. METHODS AND MATERIALS Treatment with HARK or control (randomized 2:1) was administered on Day 1 in this 48-week, evaluator-blinded study with optional touch-up at Week 4. Primary endpoint was change from baseline to Week 8 in lip fullness. Secondary endpoints included lip fullness, wrinkle severity, aesthetic improvement, subject satisfaction, adverse events, and local tolerability (subject diary entries). RESULTS The primary objective was met; HARK was noninferior to control in lip fullness augmentation at Week 8. Lip fullness and wrinkle severity improvement persisted at Week 48, and was accompanied by high aesthetic improvement and subject satisfaction scores. The mean volume of HARK injected was approximately 20% lower than control. Treatment-related adverse events and local tolerability symptoms were predominantly mild and transient. CONCLUSION HARK was noninferior to control in lip fullness augmentation at Week 8, well-tolerated, and effective throughout this 48-week study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Weiss
- Maryland Dermatology, Laser, Skin and Vein Institute, Hunt Valley, Maryland
| | - Kenneth Beer
- Research Institute of SouthEast, West Palm Beach, Florida
| | - Sue E. Cox
- Aesthetic Solutions, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | - John Joseph
- Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills, Encino, California
| | | | - Anna Nilsson
- Galderma Aesthetics, Clinical Development, Uppsala, Sweden;
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Beer K, Kaufman-Janette J, Bank D, Biesman B, Dayan S, Kim W, Chawla S, Schumacher A. Safe and Effective Chin Augmentation With the Hyaluronic Acid Injectable Filler, VYC-20L. Dermatol Surg 2021; 47:80-85. [PMID: 33347003 PMCID: PMC7752233 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000002795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND VYC-20L is a hyaluronic acid soft tissue filler with lidocaine designed to restore facial volume. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VYC-20L in patients with chin retrusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS Adults with chin retrusion were randomized (3:1) to receive VYC-20L in the chin at study onset (treatment group) or 6 months later (control group). The primary effectiveness end point was ≥1-point improvement on the Allergan Chin Retrusion Scale (ACRS) from baseline at Month 6. Safety assessments included injection site responses (ISRs) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS VYC-20L was administered to 192 participants (treatment group, n = 144; control group, n = 48). At Month 6, significantly more participants had an ACRS response in the treatment versus control group (56.3% vs 27.5%; p = .0019). Effectiveness was also demonstrated by the proportion of participants with improved/much improved Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores and responses on the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Chin questionnaire and FACE-Q Psychological Wellbeing module. Treatment benefit remained evident at Month 12. Most common ISRs were tenderness (81.1%) and firmness (75.1%). One participant (0.5%) discontinued the study due to 2 treatment-related serious AEs of facial cellulitis and injection site inflammation, both resolved without sequelae. CONCLUSION VYC-20L significantly improved an ACRS response and was generally safe and well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David Bank
- The Center for Dermatology, Cosmetic & Laser Surgery, Mount Kisco, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kaufman-Janette J, Andriopoulos B, Nogueira A. 14423 Efficacy and safety of two injection volumes of abobotulinumtoxinA in treatment of glabellar lines: Data from two studies. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
28
|
Kaufman-Janette J, Redaelli A, Landau M, Gubanova E, Smit R, Goodman GJ, Chao Y, Molina B, Prygova I, Nogueira A. 15476 Systematic literature review examining satisfaction with abobotulinumtoxinA for esthetic indications. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
29
|
Bertucci V, Solish N, Kaufman-Janette J, Yoelin S, Shamban A, Schlessinger J, Snyder D, Gallagher C, Liu Y, Shears G, Rubio RG. DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection has a prolonged duration of response in the treatment of glabellar lines: Pooled data from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2). J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 82:838-845. [PMID: 31791824 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.06.1313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Revised: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 06/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI) is a novel botulinum toxin type A in clinical development. Phase 2 data have shown it offers a more prolonged duration of response than onabotulinumtoxinA. OBJECTIVE To further evaluate the efficacy, duration of response, and safety of 40 U DAXI compared with placebo in the treatment of glabellar lines. METHODS Two identical, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies were performed (NCT03014622 and NCT03014635 on www.clinicaltrials.gov). Participants with moderate or severe glabellar lines were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive 40 U DAXI or placebo into the corrugator/procerus muscles. Glabellar line severity was assessed by investigators and participants for up to 36 weeks (≥24 weeks). RESULTS Among 609 participants enrolled (405 DAXI, 204 placebo), 92% completed. DAXI was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing glabellar line severity and maintained none or mild glabellar line severity for a median of 24.0 weeks. It was also generally well tolerated-treatment-related adverse effects were most commonly headache (6.4% vs 2.0%) and injection site pain (3.7% vs 3.9%). LIMITATIONS The study population was predominantly female and white and received only a single treatment. CONCLUSIONS DAXI offers a prolonged duration of response for glabellar line reduction and is well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vince Bertucci
- Division of Dermatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; private practice, Woodbridge, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Nowell Solish
- Division of Dermatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joely Kaufman-Janette
- Skin Associates of South Florida, Coral Gables, and Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Yan Liu
- Revance Therapeutics, Inc, Newark, California
| | - Gill Shears
- Write on Target Ltd, Leighton Buzzard, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Alexis A, Del Rosso JQ, Desai SR, Downie JB, Draelos ZD, Feser C, Forconi R, Fowler JF, Gold M, Kaufman-Janette J, Lain E, Lee M, Ling M, Shamban AT, Werschler WP, Daniels A. BPX-01 Minocycline Topical Gel Shows Promise for the Treatment of Moderate-to-severe Inflammatory Acne Vulgaris. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2018; 11:25-35. [PMID: 30588271 PMCID: PMC6303111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Background and objectives: Acne vulgaris is a highly prevalent and multifactorial skin disorder that can adversely impact health-related quality of life. Factors that contribute to the pathogenesis of acne include pilosebaceous proliferation of proinflammatory Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) bacteria, presence of circulating androgens, excess sebum production, abnormal follicular keratinization, and multiple inflammatory cascades. Oral tetracyclines-especially doxycycline and minocycline-are frequently prescribed for the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne, given their anti-inflammatory properties and their effect on P. acnes reduction. Notwithstanding their established efficacy in the management of acne vulgaris, there is a desire to limit systemic exposure to antibiotics given growing concerns regarding bacterial resistance as well as the potential for serious side effects. This report describes outcomes of two randomized, vehicle-controlled trials (Phases IIa and IIb) of BPX-01, a topical minocycline gel, in the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne. Methods: In Study 1 (NCT02709096), at a single center, 33 subjects with highly fluorescing facial skin were randomized 2:1 to BPX-01 1% or vehicle control once-daily treatment for four weeks. Changes in P. acnes quantitative bacteriological cultures were assessed, as well as cutaneous tolerance to the study drug by both subjects and the investigator. In Study 2 (NCT02815332), subjects with moderate-to-severe inflammatory nonnodular acne (n=226) at 15 centers were randomized 1:1:1 to treatment with BPX-01 1%, BPX-01 2%, or vehicle control once-daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was reduction in the number of inflammatory lesions; other endpoints included the number of noninflammatory lesions, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of severity, and subjective ratings (investigator and subject) of acne. In both studies, cutaneous tolerability and safety were assessed, and plasma minocycline levels were tracked with a highly sensitive assay. Results: In Study 1, BPX-01 treatment reduced P. acnes colonization by 90.9 percent, which exceeded the reduction in the vehicle control group (65.53%; p=0.020). In Study 2, treatment with BPX-01 2% reduced the number of inflammatory lesions by 58.5 percent, exceeding the reduction in the vehicle control group (43.8%; p=0.0256). Trends toward an improvement preferential to BPX-01 2% were observed in the other endpoints. Across both studies, BPX-01 treatment was well-tolerated, with no photosensitivity, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, or skin discoloration reported. A single subject (out of 259 study participants ) was identified to have detectable levels of plasma minocycline at low levels (42ng/mL) after 12 weeks of treatment but had no signs or symptoms associated with systemic administration of minocycline. Conclusion: BPX-01 appears to exhibit an effectiveness profile for reduction of inflammatory (nonnodular) acne lesions similar to that of oral minocycline formulations. However, because BPX-01 is topical and exhibits negligible systemic exposure, the likelihood of adverse events associated with oral minocycline use is much lower. These results demonstrate effectiveness of BPX-01 topical minocycline gel in reducing P. acnes colonization, suggesting that the BPX-01 2% formulation is a promising treatment for moderate-to-severe nonnodular, inflammatory acne vulgaris in both reduction of inflammatory lesions and also overall improvement in facial acne according to IGA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Alexis
- Dr. Alexis is with Mount Sinai St. Luke's in New York, New York
- Dr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada
- Dr. Desai is with ACRC Trials/Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas
- Dr. Downie is with Image Dermatology in Montclair, New Jersey
- Dr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services in High Point, North Carolina. Drs. Feser and Forconi are with International Clinical Research in Sanford, Florida
- Dr. Fowler is with DS Research in Louisville, Kentucky
- Dr. Gold is with the Tennessee Clinical Research Center in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette is with the Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
- Dr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Heatherwilde, Texas
- Dr. Lee is with Progressive Clinical Research in San Antonio, Texas
- Dr. Ling is with MedaPhase in Newnan, Georgia
- Dr. Shamban is with Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology in Santa Monica, California
- Dr. Werschler is with Premier Clinical Research in Spokane, Washington. Ms. Daniels is with BioPharmX in Menlo Park, California
| | - James Q Del Rosso
- Dr. Alexis is with Mount Sinai St. Luke's in New York, New York
- Dr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada
- Dr. Desai is with ACRC Trials/Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas
- Dr. Downie is with Image Dermatology in Montclair, New Jersey
- Dr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services in High Point, North Carolina. Drs. Feser and Forconi are with International Clinical Research in Sanford, Florida
- Dr. Fowler is with DS Research in Louisville, Kentucky
- Dr. Gold is with the Tennessee Clinical Research Center in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette is with the Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
- Dr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Heatherwilde, Texas
- Dr. Lee is with Progressive Clinical Research in San Antonio, Texas
- Dr. Ling is with MedaPhase in Newnan, Georgia
- Dr. Shamban is with Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology in Santa Monica, California
- Dr. Werschler is with Premier Clinical Research in Spokane, Washington. Ms. Daniels is with BioPharmX in Menlo Park, California
| | - Seemal R Desai
- Dr. Alexis is with Mount Sinai St. Luke's in New York, New York
- Dr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada
- Dr. Desai is with ACRC Trials/Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas
- Dr. Downie is with Image Dermatology in Montclair, New Jersey
- Dr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services in High Point, North Carolina. Drs. Feser and Forconi are with International Clinical Research in Sanford, Florida
- Dr. Fowler is with DS Research in Louisville, Kentucky
- Dr. Gold is with the Tennessee Clinical Research Center in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette is with the Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
- Dr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Heatherwilde, Texas
- Dr. Lee is with Progressive Clinical Research in San Antonio, Texas
- Dr. Ling is with MedaPhase in Newnan, Georgia
- Dr. Shamban is with Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology in Santa Monica, California
- Dr. Werschler is with Premier Clinical Research in Spokane, Washington. Ms. Daniels is with BioPharmX in Menlo Park, California
| | - Jeanine B Downie
- Dr. Alexis is with Mount Sinai St. Luke's in New York, New York
- Dr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada
- Dr. Desai is with ACRC Trials/Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas
- Dr. Downie is with Image Dermatology in Montclair, New Jersey
- Dr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services in High Point, North Carolina. Drs. Feser and Forconi are with International Clinical Research in Sanford, Florida
- Dr. Fowler is with DS Research in Louisville, Kentucky
- Dr. Gold is with the Tennessee Clinical Research Center in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette is with the Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
- Dr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Heatherwilde, Texas
- Dr. Lee is with Progressive Clinical Research in San Antonio, Texas
- Dr. Ling is with MedaPhase in Newnan, Georgia
- Dr. Shamban is with Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology in Santa Monica, California
- Dr. Werschler is with Premier Clinical Research in Spokane, Washington. Ms. Daniels is with BioPharmX in Menlo Park, California
| | - Zoe Diana Draelos
- Dr. Alexis is with Mount Sinai St. Luke's in New York, New York
- Dr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada
- Dr. Desai is with ACRC Trials/Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas
- Dr. Downie is with Image Dermatology in Montclair, New Jersey
- Dr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services in High Point, North Carolina. Drs. Feser and Forconi are with International Clinical Research in Sanford, Florida
- Dr. Fowler is with DS Research in Louisville, Kentucky
- Dr. Gold is with the Tennessee Clinical Research Center in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette is with the Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
- Dr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Heatherwilde, Texas
- Dr. Lee is with Progressive Clinical Research in San Antonio, Texas
- Dr. Ling is with MedaPhase in Newnan, Georgia
- Dr. Shamban is with Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology in Santa Monica, California
- Dr. Werschler is with Premier Clinical Research in Spokane, Washington. Ms. Daniels is with BioPharmX in Menlo Park, California
| | - Christina Feser
- Dr. Alexis is with Mount Sinai St. Luke's in New York, New York
- Dr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada
- Dr. Desai is with ACRC Trials/Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas
- Dr. Downie is with Image Dermatology in Montclair, New Jersey
- Dr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services in High Point, North Carolina. Drs. Feser and Forconi are with International Clinical Research in Sanford, Florida
- Dr. Fowler is with DS Research in Louisville, Kentucky
- Dr. Gold is with the Tennessee Clinical Research Center in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette is with the Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
- Dr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Heatherwilde, Texas
- Dr. Lee is with Progressive Clinical Research in San Antonio, Texas
- Dr. Ling is with MedaPhase in Newnan, Georgia
- Dr. Shamban is with Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology in Santa Monica, California
- Dr. Werschler is with Premier Clinical Research in Spokane, Washington. Ms. Daniels is with BioPharmX in Menlo Park, California
| | - Rion Forconi
- Dr. Alexis is with Mount Sinai St. Luke's in New York, New York
- Dr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada
- Dr. Desai is with ACRC Trials/Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas
- Dr. Downie is with Image Dermatology in Montclair, New Jersey
- Dr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services in High Point, North Carolina. Drs. Feser and Forconi are with International Clinical Research in Sanford, Florida
- Dr. Fowler is with DS Research in Louisville, Kentucky
- Dr. Gold is with the Tennessee Clinical Research Center in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette is with the Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
- Dr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Heatherwilde, Texas
- Dr. Lee is with Progressive Clinical Research in San Antonio, Texas
- Dr. Ling is with MedaPhase in Newnan, Georgia
- Dr. Shamban is with Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology in Santa Monica, California
- Dr. Werschler is with Premier Clinical Research in Spokane, Washington. Ms. Daniels is with BioPharmX in Menlo Park, California
| | - Joseph F Fowler
- Dr. Alexis is with Mount Sinai St. Luke's in New York, New York
- Dr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada
- Dr. Desai is with ACRC Trials/Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas
- Dr. Downie is with Image Dermatology in Montclair, New Jersey
- Dr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services in High Point, North Carolina. Drs. Feser and Forconi are with International Clinical Research in Sanford, Florida
- Dr. Fowler is with DS Research in Louisville, Kentucky
- Dr. Gold is with the Tennessee Clinical Research Center in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette is with the Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
- Dr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Heatherwilde, Texas
- Dr. Lee is with Progressive Clinical Research in San Antonio, Texas
- Dr. Ling is with MedaPhase in Newnan, Georgia
- Dr. Shamban is with Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology in Santa Monica, California
- Dr. Werschler is with Premier Clinical Research in Spokane, Washington. Ms. Daniels is with BioPharmX in Menlo Park, California
| | - Michael Gold
- Dr. Alexis is with Mount Sinai St. Luke's in New York, New York
- Dr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada
- Dr. Desai is with ACRC Trials/Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas
- Dr. Downie is with Image Dermatology in Montclair, New Jersey
- Dr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services in High Point, North Carolina. Drs. Feser and Forconi are with International Clinical Research in Sanford, Florida
- Dr. Fowler is with DS Research in Louisville, Kentucky
- Dr. Gold is with the Tennessee Clinical Research Center in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette is with the Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
- Dr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Heatherwilde, Texas
- Dr. Lee is with Progressive Clinical Research in San Antonio, Texas
- Dr. Ling is with MedaPhase in Newnan, Georgia
- Dr. Shamban is with Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology in Santa Monica, California
- Dr. Werschler is with Premier Clinical Research in Spokane, Washington. Ms. Daniels is with BioPharmX in Menlo Park, California
| | - Joely Kaufman-Janette
- Dr. Alexis is with Mount Sinai St. Luke's in New York, New York
- Dr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada
- Dr. Desai is with ACRC Trials/Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas
- Dr. Downie is with Image Dermatology in Montclair, New Jersey
- Dr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services in High Point, North Carolina. Drs. Feser and Forconi are with International Clinical Research in Sanford, Florida
- Dr. Fowler is with DS Research in Louisville, Kentucky
- Dr. Gold is with the Tennessee Clinical Research Center in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette is with the Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
- Dr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Heatherwilde, Texas
- Dr. Lee is with Progressive Clinical Research in San Antonio, Texas
- Dr. Ling is with MedaPhase in Newnan, Georgia
- Dr. Shamban is with Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology in Santa Monica, California
- Dr. Werschler is with Premier Clinical Research in Spokane, Washington. Ms. Daniels is with BioPharmX in Menlo Park, California
| | - Edward Lain
- Dr. Alexis is with Mount Sinai St. Luke's in New York, New York
- Dr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada
- Dr. Desai is with ACRC Trials/Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas
- Dr. Downie is with Image Dermatology in Montclair, New Jersey
- Dr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services in High Point, North Carolina. Drs. Feser and Forconi are with International Clinical Research in Sanford, Florida
- Dr. Fowler is with DS Research in Louisville, Kentucky
- Dr. Gold is with the Tennessee Clinical Research Center in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette is with the Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
- Dr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Heatherwilde, Texas
- Dr. Lee is with Progressive Clinical Research in San Antonio, Texas
- Dr. Ling is with MedaPhase in Newnan, Georgia
- Dr. Shamban is with Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology in Santa Monica, California
- Dr. Werschler is with Premier Clinical Research in Spokane, Washington. Ms. Daniels is with BioPharmX in Menlo Park, California
| | - Mark Lee
- Dr. Alexis is with Mount Sinai St. Luke's in New York, New York
- Dr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada
- Dr. Desai is with ACRC Trials/Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas
- Dr. Downie is with Image Dermatology in Montclair, New Jersey
- Dr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services in High Point, North Carolina. Drs. Feser and Forconi are with International Clinical Research in Sanford, Florida
- Dr. Fowler is with DS Research in Louisville, Kentucky
- Dr. Gold is with the Tennessee Clinical Research Center in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette is with the Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
- Dr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Heatherwilde, Texas
- Dr. Lee is with Progressive Clinical Research in San Antonio, Texas
- Dr. Ling is with MedaPhase in Newnan, Georgia
- Dr. Shamban is with Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology in Santa Monica, California
- Dr. Werschler is with Premier Clinical Research in Spokane, Washington. Ms. Daniels is with BioPharmX in Menlo Park, California
| | - Mark Ling
- Dr. Alexis is with Mount Sinai St. Luke's in New York, New York
- Dr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada
- Dr. Desai is with ACRC Trials/Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas
- Dr. Downie is with Image Dermatology in Montclair, New Jersey
- Dr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services in High Point, North Carolina. Drs. Feser and Forconi are with International Clinical Research in Sanford, Florida
- Dr. Fowler is with DS Research in Louisville, Kentucky
- Dr. Gold is with the Tennessee Clinical Research Center in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette is with the Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
- Dr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Heatherwilde, Texas
- Dr. Lee is with Progressive Clinical Research in San Antonio, Texas
- Dr. Ling is with MedaPhase in Newnan, Georgia
- Dr. Shamban is with Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology in Santa Monica, California
- Dr. Werschler is with Premier Clinical Research in Spokane, Washington. Ms. Daniels is with BioPharmX in Menlo Park, California
| | - Ava T Shamban
- Dr. Alexis is with Mount Sinai St. Luke's in New York, New York
- Dr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada
- Dr. Desai is with ACRC Trials/Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas
- Dr. Downie is with Image Dermatology in Montclair, New Jersey
- Dr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services in High Point, North Carolina. Drs. Feser and Forconi are with International Clinical Research in Sanford, Florida
- Dr. Fowler is with DS Research in Louisville, Kentucky
- Dr. Gold is with the Tennessee Clinical Research Center in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette is with the Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
- Dr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Heatherwilde, Texas
- Dr. Lee is with Progressive Clinical Research in San Antonio, Texas
- Dr. Ling is with MedaPhase in Newnan, Georgia
- Dr. Shamban is with Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology in Santa Monica, California
- Dr. Werschler is with Premier Clinical Research in Spokane, Washington. Ms. Daniels is with BioPharmX in Menlo Park, California
| | - Wm Philip Werschler
- Dr. Alexis is with Mount Sinai St. Luke's in New York, New York
- Dr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada
- Dr. Desai is with ACRC Trials/Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas
- Dr. Downie is with Image Dermatology in Montclair, New Jersey
- Dr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services in High Point, North Carolina. Drs. Feser and Forconi are with International Clinical Research in Sanford, Florida
- Dr. Fowler is with DS Research in Louisville, Kentucky
- Dr. Gold is with the Tennessee Clinical Research Center in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette is with the Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
- Dr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Heatherwilde, Texas
- Dr. Lee is with Progressive Clinical Research in San Antonio, Texas
- Dr. Ling is with MedaPhase in Newnan, Georgia
- Dr. Shamban is with Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology in Santa Monica, California
- Dr. Werschler is with Premier Clinical Research in Spokane, Washington. Ms. Daniels is with BioPharmX in Menlo Park, California
| | - Annamarie Daniels
- Dr. Alexis is with Mount Sinai St. Luke's in New York, New York
- Dr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada
- Dr. Desai is with ACRC Trials/Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas
- Dr. Downie is with Image Dermatology in Montclair, New Jersey
- Dr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services in High Point, North Carolina. Drs. Feser and Forconi are with International Clinical Research in Sanford, Florida
- Dr. Fowler is with DS Research in Louisville, Kentucky
- Dr. Gold is with the Tennessee Clinical Research Center in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Kaufman-Janette is with the Skin Research Institute in Coral Gables, Florida
- Dr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Heatherwilde, Texas
- Dr. Lee is with Progressive Clinical Research in San Antonio, Texas
- Dr. Ling is with MedaPhase in Newnan, Georgia
- Dr. Shamban is with Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology in Santa Monica, California
- Dr. Werschler is with Premier Clinical Research in Spokane, Washington. Ms. Daniels is with BioPharmX in Menlo Park, California
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Alexis A, Del Rosso J, Desai SR, Downie J, Draelos ZD, Feser C, Forconi R, Fowler J, Gold M, Kaufman-Janette J, Lain E, Lee M, Ling M, Shamban A, Werschler W, Daniels A. Rapid Improvement with BPX-01 Minocycline Topical Gel in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Inflammatory Acne Vulgaris: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017. [DOI: 10.25251/skin.1.supp.52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Abstract Not Available Study supported by BioPharmX.
Collapse
|