Interprofessional, multitiered daily rounding management in a high-acuity hospital

PURPOSE

The purpose of this explanatory case study is to explain the implementation of interprofessional, multitiered lean daily management (LDM) and to quantitatively report its impact on hospital safety.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH

This case study explained the framework for LDM implementation and changes in quality metrics associated with the interprofessional, multitiered LDM, implemented at Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center (SFHMC) at the end of 2018. Concepts from lean, Total Quality Management (TQM) and high reliability science were applied to develop the four tiers and gemba rounding components of LDM. A two-tailed t-test analysis was utilized to determine statistical significance for serious safety events (SSEs) comparing the intervention period (January 2019-December 2019) to the baseline period (calendar years 2017 and 2018). Other quality and efficiency metrics were also tracked.

FINDINGS

LDM was associated with decreased SSEs in 2019 compared to 2017 and 2018 (p ≤ 0.01). There were no reportable central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) or catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) for first full calendar quarter in the hospital's history. Hospital-acquired pressure injuries were at 0.2 per 1,000 patient days, meeting the annual target of <0.5 per 1,000 patient days. Outcomes for falls with injury, hand hygiene and patient experience also trended toward target. These improvements occurred while also observing a lower observed to expected length of stay (O/E LOS), which is the organizational marker for hospital's efficiency.

RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS

LDM may contribute greatly to improve safety outcomes. This observational study was performed in an urban, high-acuity, low cost hospital which may not be representative of other hospitals. Further study is warranted to determine whether this model can be applied more broadly to other settings.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

LDM can be implemented quickly to achieve an improvement in hospital safety and other health-care quality outcomes. This required a redistribution of time for hospital staff but did not require any significant capital or other investment.

SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS

As hospital systems move from a volume-based to value-based health-care delivery model, dynamic interventions using LDM can play a pivotal role in helping all patients, particularly in underserved settings where lower cost care is required for sustainability, given limited available resources.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE

While many hospital systems promote organizational rounding as a routine quality improvement process, this study shows that a dynamic, intense LDM model can dramatically improve safety within months. This was done in a challenging urban environment for a high-acuity population with limited resources.

Impact of noninvasive prenatal testing in regionally dispersed medical centers in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Noninvasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA is a new alternative to screen for common fetal aneuploidies. It is not known what impact regional location may play on noninvasive prenatal testing implementation and downstream invasive prenatal procedure use in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN

Six different regionally based centers collected data on noninvasive prenatal testing indication and results between February and November 2012, as well as their invasive prenatal procedure rates before and after offering noninvasive prenatal testing. Statistical analyses were performed using the 2-proportion Z-test.

RESULTS

Of 1477 patients who underwent noninvasive prenatal testing; 693 (47%) were from centers in the West; 522 (35.3%) from centers in the East; and 262 (17.7%) from 1 center in the Midwest. Statistically significant differences were observed between West Coast and nonWest Coast sites for gestational age (14.1 weeks; P ≤ .0001). Advanced maternal age (AMA-only) was the most frequent indication in 5 of 6 sites (range, 21.8-62.9%) A total of 98 invasive prenatal procedures performed on 94 (6.4%) patients of which 64 (65.3%) were performed at centers in the West. More invasive procedures were performed following negative noninvasive prenatal testing results (n = 61) than abnormal noninvasive prenatal testing results (n = 30). The overall rate of patients undergoing invasive procedure after an abnormal noninvasive prenatal testing result was 32.6% (30 of 92). All 6 centers reported a decrease in invasive procedure volume after noninvasive prenatal testing introduction.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates differences in clinical implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing across regionally dispersed centers in the United States, suggesting patient demographics and views toward prenatal testing influence use as well as downstream management.

Efficacy of the genetic sonogram in a stepwise sequential protocol for down syndrome screening

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the genetic sonogram in Down syndrome screening for women who have received the stepwise sequential test.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included women with singleton pregnancies who underwent stepwise sequential (first-trimester combined and second-trimester serum) screening and then had a genetic sonogram between March 2005 and January 2010. Stepwise sequential Down syndrome risks were multiplied by either a positive or negative likelihood ratio based on the second-trimester sonographic findings to determine the final Down syndrome risk. A final Down syndrome risk of 1:270 or higher was considered screen positive.

RESULTS

A total of 6286 women fulfilled our criteria, including 17 with Down syndrome-affected fetuses. After stepwise sequential testing, the Down syndrome detection rate was 88.2% (15 of 17), and after the genetic sonogram, there was a non-significant reduction in detection to 82.4% (14 of 17; P > .05). For the 6269 unaffected pregnancies, the genetic sonogram converted 58 screen-negative results (1%) to positive and 183 screen-positive results (3.1%) to negative. The net effect was a change in the false-positive rate from 6.2% (390 of 6269) after stepwise sequential screening to 4.2% (266 of 6269) after the genetic sonogram.

CONCLUSIONS

The genetic sonogram should be applied cautiously for women who have received prior prenatal screening tests. Women with screen-positive results need to be counseled that a negative sonographic result can be falsely reassuring. Conversely, for women with screen-negative results who have a risk close to the cutoff, a sonographic examination could assist in the decision of whether to accept or reject amniocentesis.

State mandated prenatal human immunodeficiency virus screening at a large community hospital

PURPOSE

To describe the initial experience of state mandated prenatal HIV screening at a large community hospital.

METHODS

HIV screening was provided to all pregnant women as of October 1, 1999. All HIV-positive women identified received aggressive antiretroviral therapy to reduce the likelihood for vertical transmission. Neonates were screened for HIV at zero, six, and 12 months of age.

RESULTS

Seven pregnant women (0.3%) and two additional family members tested positive for HIV. All seven infants born to the identified HIV-positive women have tested negative for infection. We estimated that six of nine cases of HIV infection identified would have been missed under a policy of voluntary HIV screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Universal screening for HIV in pregnancy is achievable and desirable and provides the best opportunity to minimize the number of new neonatal HIV infections.

Cytogenetic evaluation of fetal death: the role of amniocentesis

Fetal death can be associated with chromosomal abnormalities. Because of the degree of tissue maceration and autolysis seen in stillborn fetuses, it is often impossible to successfully culture these tissues for cytogenetic studies. We performed genetic amniocentesis in four cases of fetal death and were successful in obtaining cytogenetic results in all four, whereas the culture of fetal tissues for cytogenetics was successful in only one case. Chromosomal abnormalities were found in three of the four cases, including two fetuses with Down's syndrome and one fetus with Turner's syndrome. Because of the importance of cytogenetic studies in most cases of fetal death, we recommend amniocentesis at the time of diagnosis rather than waiting for delivery of fetal tissues, when postmortem changes may make it impossible to successfully culture fetal cells.