Risk factors in developing retinal vein occlusion in subject with obstructive sleep apnea

BACKGROUND

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have a higher risk of developing vascular diseases. In this study, we evaluated the clinical profile of patients with OSA who develop retinal vein occlusion (RVO) compared with a population of OSA patients without RVO.

METHODS

We analyzed patients with OSA diagnosed with RVO (21 cases; mean of age 61 years. range 44-87 years. 67% men), belonging to a large cohort of people with long-term follow-up for RVO (up to 12 years). We compared them with 21 patients with OSA, without RVO, matched by age and gender, selected from the Sleep Unit Registry (control group).

RESULTS

There were no differences in the prevalence of arterial hypertension (AHT) or Diabetes mellitus (DM), but the RVO patients presented a higher diastolic blood pressure compared to controls (87.6±12.6 mmHg vs. 77.9±10.1 mmHg respectively). The polygraphic parameters were similar in both groups. The Apnea-Hypopnea Index (IHA) similar in both groups (30.4±20.9 RVO vs. 33.7±22.1 controls). In addition, RVO patients had a less favorable lipid profile, with higher total cholesterol (218±52 mg/dL vs. 179±41 mg/dL), higher LDL cholesterol (139±47 mg/dL vs. 107±32 mg/dL) and higher atherogenic indices: LDL/HDL (2.78±0.95 RVO vs. 2.03±0.67 controls) and total cholesterol/HDL (4.37±1.08 vs. 3.45±0.84). Among the cases, 81% had peripheral RVO (superior temporal branch in 20 out of 21 cases) and 19% had central RVO. A percentage of 62% of the cases received intravitreal antiangiogenic therapy and dexamethasone implants and 33% received argon laser photocoagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor control of cardiovascular risk factors, particularly dyslipidemias, in patients with OSA may lead to the development of this ocular complication.

Adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score (aGAPSS) is useful to predict relapses in patients with retinal vein occlusion

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) are antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) carriers. Relapsing disease occurs in nearly 10 % of cases and the role of aPL has not been established. The adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score (aGAPSS) was developed to assess the risk of clinical events in aPL carriers and its role in the management of RVO patients is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the values of aGAPSS in a large cohort of patients with RVO and population-based controls, and to assess its usefulness to predict RVO relapses.

METHODS

Case-control study of RVO patients and population-based controls of similar age and sex. We have assessed and compared the aPL profile and the aGAPSS score in patients with and without relapsing disease and controls.

RESULTS

Four-hundred and seventy-two RVO patients and 346 controls were included. Fifty-seven RVO patients had antiphospholipid syndrome (RVO-APS). Of them, 75.4 % had a high-risk profile compared to 3 % in controls (p = 0.0001). The median aGAPSS values were 8 [7-13], 3 [1-4], and 3 [0-4], in RVO-APS, RVO no-APS, and controls. Nineteen patients had had a recurrence of RVO before inclusion and 8 during the follow-up. APS was more prevalent in relapsing patients. In the adjusted multivariable regression model, the best predictor for RVO recurrence during the follow-up was an aGAPSS score ≥6 (OR 5.5, CI95% 1.3-23.7; p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with RVO, once the control of vascular risk factors has been optimized, the aGAPSS might help to identify those at risk of relapsing disease.

Antiphospholipid syndrome and antiphospholipid antibody profile in patients with retinal vein occlusion

INTRODUCTION

Data on prevalence, association with vascular risk factors, clinical management and outcome of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) are scarce.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with RVO at a tertiary-care hospital, and two additional groups; population-based controls and patients with APS (RVO-APS) were studied. Prevalence, association with vascular risk factors, antiphospholipid antibody profile, clinical management, genetic thrombophilia profile, carotid ultrasound and outcome of RVO-APS patients were assessed and compared with controls.

RESULTS

Some 331 consecutive patients with RVO and 281 controls were included. Overall, aPLs were more prevalent in RVO-patients than in controls (33, 10% vs. 12, 4.3%; adjusted OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.25-4.88; p = 0.009). Patients with RVO-APS showed a high-risk "aPL profile" (lupus anticoagulant or triple-positive). We did not find any difference regarding classic vascular risk factors, hyperhomocysteinemia, prior vascular events, and carotid plaque, in RVO-patients with or without APS. The phenotype of RVO-APS also differed from APS. Seven patients received anticoagulation and 24 were on low-dose aspirin. After a median follow-up of 62 months, 7 patients suffered a RVO relapse (4 of them had APLs) and no RVO-APS patient had a new thrombotic or vascular event outside the retina.

CONCLUSIONS

aPLs were more prevalent in RVO-patients than in controls, and in all patients, APS was not associated with any connective-tissue disease. RVO in the setting of APS seems not only related to atherosclerosis, but also to the "aPL profile". In most of our RVO-patients with APS, low-dose aspirin was effective to prevent new or recurrent thrombotic events outside the retinal vessels. In these patients, we suggest that RVO could behave as an organ-specific manifestation of APS.

The role of coagulation disorders in patients with retinal vein occlusion

BACKGROUND

The role of a hypercoagulable state in the pathogenesis of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) has not been conclusively established.

AIM

To analyse the prevalence of thrombophilia in RVO.

DESIGN

Prospective case-control study.

METHODS

All the patients diagnosed with RVO were referred to an Internal Medicine clinic and compared with sex- and age-matched individuals from a population-based cohort. Demographic, clinical and laboratory variables (including a thrombophilia panel) were analysed.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy patients (93 men and 77 women; 68 ± 11 years) and 170 controls (80 men and 90 women; 67 ± 10 years) were included. RVO was peripheral in 113 cases. Genetic thrombophilia was detected in 13% of patients. Acquired thrombophilia was observed in 10% of cases and 4.7 % of controls (P < 0.01). Sixty-three percent of cases and 24.6% of controls had serum hyperhomocysteinemia (odds ratio [OR] 5.2, IC 95% 2.7-10.1; P < 0.0001) : In RVO patients aged <50 years (n = 11), 36.4% had genetic thrombophilia (P = 0.04), as well as 50% of those without vascular risk factors (n = 18; P = 0.01). Forty-one (24%) patients with RVO received antiplatelet agents and 13 (7.6%) were on anticoagulants due to preexistent atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that, in patients with RVO, hyperhomocysteinemia and antiphospholipid syndrome should be ruled out. Moreover, a study of genetic thrombophilia should only be considered in those aged <50 years or without cardiovascular risk factors. Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin is probably the treatment of choice of RVO, to reduce the overall vascular risk. Anticoagulation should only be considered in patients with high-risk thrombophilia.

[Differential factors of tumor etiology for iron deficiency anemia of probable gastrointestinal origin]

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) of probably gastrointestinal (GI) tract origin is a difficult task for the clinician.

OBJECTIVE

To know the incidence of GI lesions in our setting; the possibility to predict cancer with clinical and laboratory parameters; the diagnostic utility of capsule endoscopy, and the follow-up in those patients.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We performed a prospective study in our Internal Medicine Department, from April 2005 to December 2007, of patients with IDA.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients (42 men, 87 women) were studied. There was 27 (20.9%) malignancies (21 colon, 5 stomach, 1 esophagus ); 39 (30.2%) benign upper GI lesions; 12 (9.3%) benign lower GI disorders; 16(12.4%) synchronous GI lesions; 2 (1.6%) celiac sprue, and 33 (25.6%) without identifiable lesions. We found significant differences between patients with and without malignancy in NSAID use, weight loss, leukocyte and platelet count, and alkaline phosphatase levels. Diagnosis sensitivity of capsule endoscopy in obscure GI bleeding was 27%. We did not found any malignancy during the follow-up of patients without an initial diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In IDA, colonoscopy (or contrast barium enema in certain circumstances) is the most important exploration to rule out malignancy. Only NSAID use is useful to exclude cancer. Patients without identifiable lesions have a favorable prognosis. A moderate frequency of synchronous lesions was found. We recommend a complete conventional GI endoscopic study if no evident bleeding lesion is found during the initial endoscopic procedure. Capsule endoscopy and celiac disease serology are useful in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.