The impact of an Advanced Practice Radiation Therapist contouring for a CBCT-based adaptive radiotherapy program

We successfully implemented an APRT specializing in CBCT-guided online adaptive contouring. These data show statistical improvements in contouring time with APRT-led vs non-APRT led ART contouring, suggesting that an APRT specifically trained to manage the ART process may reduce physician workload and patient treatment time.

The Use of MR-Guided Radiation Therapy for Liver Cancer

The role of radiotherapy in the management of primary and metastatic liver malignancies has expanded in recent years due to advances such as IGRT and SBRT. MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has arisen as an excellent option for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and liver metastases due to the ability to combine improved hepatic imaging with conformal treatment planning paradigms like adaptive radiotherapy and advanced motion management techniques. Herein we review the data for MRgRT for liver malignancies, as well as describe workflow and technical considerations for the 2 commercially available MRgRT delivery platforms.

Temporospatial Feathering of Hot Spots for Computed Tomography-Guided Stereotactic Adaptive Radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the Ultra-Central Thorax

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

SBRT to the ultra-central thorax is limited by potential toxicity. It has been demonstrated that exposing proximal bronchial tree or pulmonary arteries to high dose per fraction (fx) treatment may induce bronchopulmonary hemorrhage, amongst other serious complications. Online adaptive radiotherapy is a technique that adjusts a treatment plan to the anatomy-of-the-day and benefits have been demonstrated in ultra-central thoracic disease. In addition, feathering is a treatment planning technique that generates several plans to avoid consistent organ-at-risk (OAR) doses throughout treatment. With daily adaptation, it may be possible to adjust the position of a hot spot (>120% prescription (Rx)) within the tumor each fx (temporospatial feathering) while respecting hard OAR constraints. We investigated the feasibility and plan quality of using CBCT-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for ultra-central lung tumors with hotspot temporospatial feathering.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Seven patients with ultra-central thoracic disease (6 patients with parenchymal tumors in contact with the trachea, proximal bronchial tree, great vessels, esophagus, or heart; 1 patient with a subcarinal lymph node) receiving standard of care radiotherapy were enrolled on an imaging study. An in-silico planning study first generated an SBRT plan (in silico Rx: 55 Gy in 5fx) that used a GTV_OPT (GTV minus OAR plus a safety margin) to optimize the location of the plan hotspot. Five spherical boost structures were manually created inside of the GTV_OPT structure. The same planning template was used except the boost structures were iteratively used in plan optimization instead of the GTV_OPT structure, to simulate the five CT-STAR fx hotspot temporospatially feathering. The five-plan composite was compared to the initial plan.

RESULTS

All plans generated met strict OAR constraints. Table 1 shows the mean difference in PTV, GTV, and OARs percent coverage by various isodose levels. Feathering the hotspot had negligible impact on target coverage by 50 Gy and 55 Gy isodose lines as well as OAR doses compared to the base SBRT plan. The feathered plan sum resulted in 14.7% increase in V66 Gy of the GTV. One patient saw a decrease in V66 Gy coverage to all target structures, though V50 Gy and V55 Gy were not affected.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated the feasibility and utility of temporospatially adapting the hotspot for central lung SBRT, which safely increases the amount of tumor receiving more than 120% Rx.

Impact of Stomach Deformability on PTV Coverage in Patients with Gastric MALTs Treated with Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) and Daily CT-based Image-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT)

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Patients with extranodal marginal zone lymphomas of the stomach (gastric MALTs) have excellent prognoses. DIBH with CT-based IGRT is used to minimize unwanted dose to heart and lungs. However, the stomach presents unique challenges for RT given its deformability, which may not be adequately compensated by standard 6-dimensional shifts. We conducted a dosimetry study to evaluate our hypothesis that DIBH, CT-based IGRT, and fasting after midnight may not be sufficient to compensate for stomach deformability.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients included were treated with DIBH and had daily IGRT with cone-beam CTs (CBCTs). All patients were simulated in alpha cradles with arms up. The CTV consisted of stomach with a 1.0 to 1.5cm CTV to PTV margin. Patients were instructed to fast after midnight. CBCTs used for daily image guidance prior to RT were collected. The stomach was contoured on each CBCT and then overlayed on the simulation scan. The stomach volume outside the PTV was calculated both in absolute volume and as a percentage of daily stomach volume. The relative location of the volume of stomach outside the PTV was also recorded.

RESULTS

Five patients with biopsy-proven gastric MALTs who received definitive dose RT were included. Patients were followed for at least 11 months (range: 11 - 20 mo.), and all achieved a complete pathological response. Seventy daily CBCTs were used in the analysis. Across all images, the daily stomach volume was smaller than the CTV by a mean 99.3cc (range: <305.3cc - >108.9cc). The mean volume of stomach outside the PTV was 7.8cc (range: 0 - 75.5cc). This represented 3.1% of the daily stomach volume (range: 0 - 18.7%). Per patient, the mean percent volume outside the PTV ranged from 0.4% to 6.9%. In 3 of the 5 patients, the percent volume outside the PTV was <2.5%. The stomach was most often anterior to the PTV (31.4% of images). Medial and posterior extensions were the next most frequent, representing 21.4% and 14.3% of images, respectively. Of all the daily stomach contours, 15.7% remained wholly within the PTV.

CONCLUSION

DIBH with daily IGRT in patients with gastric MALTs may result in moderate underdosing of the stomach due to its deformability. Daily stomach volumes were different in size from the CTV, and patients had an average of 0.4% to 6.9% of stomach volume outside the PTV. Regions of decreased coverage were most frequently seen anteriorly. Future dosimetry studies may suggest non-isometric PTV expansions to better cover these areas.

An In Silico study of a One-Day One-Machine Workflow for Definitive Radiotherapy Cases on a Novel Simulation and Treatment Platform

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The workflow in Radiotherapy (RT) has largely unchanged for the past three decades, despite increasing evidence suggesting that delayed access to RT, including the wait time between consultation, simulation, and treatment appointments, can negatively impact clinical outcomes. In this pilot study, we present preliminary results of an in silico study that demonstrate the feasibility of a novel RT platform, which integrates simulation into the treatment process and enables patients to receive immediate RT after their initial RT consultation.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A prospective clinical study has been approved to assess the capabilities of a novel RT platform with a high quality CBCT system for imaging guidance as well as planning. This new platform enables a novel clinical workflow that allows clinicians to review contours and plans created on diagnostic CT images prior to the initial RT consultation and allow them to approve new plans adapted on the actual simulation dataset acquired on the first treatment fraction. Four patients receiving standard of care RT (three abdomen and one thorax) consented for this study and underwent additional experimental CBCT simulation on the new platform in addition to their standard CT simulation. The CBCT simulation was taken in two setups: with a specific mold on a flat couch and without a mold on a curved couch. To demonstrate the equivalence of the new workflow to the current standard of care, the plan created on the most recent diagnostic CT images was compared to the plans adapted on the experimental simulation images and the standard CT simulation images, using a knowledge-based model. Contours were propagated from approved datasets to the new datasets through deformable image registration.

RESULTS

All experimental simulations were completed between 14 and 21 minutes with the assistance of two therapists. The contouring, editing, and replanning process took less than one hour in all cases, in line with our experience and peer-reviewed literature. Despite notable anatomical changes observed, the dose-volume histograms (DVH) were consistent, as shown in Table 1.

CONCLUSION

The novel workflow presented herein was feasible and demonstrates that the integration of simulation with image-guided RT on one single platform may unlock the potential of accelerating the RT workflow and reducing the wait time for treatment from weeks to hours.

The Impact of Intra-Fraction Bowel Motion on Luminal Gastrointestinal Organ at Risk Dosimetry When Using Stereotactic Adaptive Radiotherapy for Abdominal Malignancies

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Daily online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) provides inter-fraction motion management of the luminal gastrointestinal (GI) structures when delivering abdominal SBRT. One potential drawback of ART is the time-consuming process, and intra-fraction GI changes from completion of the ART process to the end of treatment delivery have not been thoroughly evaluated. We explored intra-fraction bowel motion for patients receiving abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (sART) MATERIALS/METHODS: Six patients with abdominal malignancies treated with CT-guided sART on a prospective feasibility trial had additional CBCT's acquired post-treatment (pTx-CBCT). All patients were prescribed to 50 Gy/5 fractions (fx), and the constraint for all GI OARs was V33≤0.5 cc. Time from initial CBCT (I-CBCT) used for adaptive planning to pTx-CBCT was collected. The luminal GI OAR (stomach (S), duodenum (D), small bowel (SB), and large bowel (LB)) were retrospectively contoured on pTx-CBCT. The OAR doses were compared between the I-CBCT and pTx-CBCT. The adaptive plan (PA) and initial plan (PI) doses were overlayed on the pTx-CBCT contours. The PA pTx-CBCT OAR doses were then compared to the PI pTx-CBCT OAR doses. A Boolean OAR structure of all GI OARs was evaluated to remove potential differences in structure definitions between providers. The T-test was used to compare differences in instances of D0.5cc ≥ 33 and 50 Gy. Patient charts were reviewed for grades (G) ≥ 3 toxicity.

RESULTS

Thirty fractions (fx) of sART were delivered and pTx-CBCT were acquired in 26 fx. Mean time from I-CBCT to pTx-CBCT acquisition was 66 min (38-98 min). On average at 0.5 cc the PA overdosed the S by 1.74 Gy based on pTx-CBCT anatomy compared to 2.35 Gy by the PI, the D by 0.47 Gy (PA) vs .84 Gy (PI), the SB by 1.14 Gy (PA) vs 1.43 Gy (PI), and the LB by 0.13 Gy (PA) vs 0.60 Gy (PI). The dose to the Boolean OAR structure was on average 2.51 Gy/fx higher than expected when overlaying the PA on the pTx-CBCT compared to 3.38 Gy/fx higher when overlaying the PI on the pTx-CBCT. There was no significant difference in the instance of the PA exceeding D0.5 cc ≥33 Gy vs the PI (p = 0.083), but the PA significantly reduced the instances of D0.5cc≥50 Gy (p = 0.001) compared to the PI. No patient experienced G≥3 toxicity at a median follow-up of 8 months (3-12).

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate sART led to a significant decrease in dose to GI OARs, particularly for prescription dose or greater, even after accounting for intra-fractional bowel motion. While both the PI and the PA violated the V33 luminal GI OAR constraint in approximately ½ of pTx-CBCTs, the fraction of OARs receiving at least 50 Gy was significantly higher when overlaying the PI compared to the PA. While no G3 toxicities were reported in this small cohort, further studies are needed to characterize if the increased dose to GI OARs over the expected dose is clinically significant.

Patient Selection is Critical When Evaluating Candidates for 5-Fraction Stereotactic MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy (SMART) for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Stereotactic magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) allows for the safe delivery of biologically effective doses (BED10 ∼ 100 Gy) to patients with pancreatic cancer who otherwise have limited therapeutic avenues. In this study, we analyze long-term outcomes in the largest cohort of patients with borderline-resectable (BR), locally advanced (LA), or medically inoperable (MI) pancreatic cancer treated with a 5-fraction SMART technique.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A single institution analysis of patients with BR, LA, or MI pancreatic cancer treated with SMART between 2015 and 2021 was performed. Patients with locally recurrent disease, non-adenocarcinoma histology, de-novo metastatic disease, or who did not receive induction chemotherapy were excluded. Baseline and treatment characteristics were collected. Local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and factors associated with outcomes were evaluated using Cox regression analyses. Oncologic outcomes measured from time of initial diagnosis; local control defined as freedom from local progression.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients were reviewed. Median age at diagnosis was 67 years. The majority were male (60%) and White (84%). 23% of patients had an ECOG 2. Most patients had LA disease (66%), followed by BR (20%) and MI (14%). Median follow up was 17.0 months (6-61 months). Median LC was not reached, and LC was 81%, 54%, and 48% at 1, 2, and 3-years, respectively. Median PFS was 12.9 months [95% confidence interval 11.8-14.71] with 1, 2, and 3-year PFS of 60%, 20%, and 7%, respectively. Median OS was 17.7 months [15.7-19.7] with 1, 2, and 3-year OS of 78%, 28%, 11%, respectively. On univariate analysis, increased duration of induction chemotherapy had a statistically significant impact on PFS and OS. Those receiving equal to or greater than 4 months of induction chemotherapy had a median OS of 19.2 months [17.2-21.2] as compared to 13.6 [11.9-15.3] for those with less than 4 months.

CONCLUSION

In this patient population which included a large portion of patients with ECOG of 2 or greater and those deemed MI, a 5-fraction SMART regimen yielded durable long-term LC. The impact of increasing duration of induction chemotherapy underlies the importance of patient selection and improved understanding of tumor-specific biology when selecting patient's with locally advanced pancreatic cancer for aggressive local therapy.

Initial clinical experience building a dual CT- and MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy program

Introduction

Our institution was the first in the world to clinically implement MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) in 2014. In 2021, we installed a CT-guided adaptive radiotherapy (CTgART) unit, becoming one of the first clinics in the world to build a dual-modality ART clinic. Herein we review factors that lead to the development of a high-volume dual-modality ART program and treatment census over an initial, one-year period.

Materials and Methods

The clinical adaptive service at our institution is enabled with both MRgART (MRIdian, ViewRay, Inc, Mountain View, CA) and CTgART (ETHOS, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) platforms. We analyzed patient and treatment information including disease sites treated, radiation dose and fractionation, and treatment times for patients on these two platforms. Additionally, we reviewed our institutional workflow for creating, verifying, and implementing a new adaptive workflow on either platform.

Results

From October 2021 to September 2022, 256 patients were treated with adaptive intent at our institution, 186 with MRgART and 70 with CTgART. The majority (106/186) of patients treated with MRgART had pancreatic cancer, and the most common sites treated with CTgART were pelvis (23/70) and abdomen (20/70). 93.0% of treatments on the MRgART platform were stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), whereas only 72.9% of treatments on the CTgART platform were SBRT. Abdominal gated cases were allotted a longer time on the CTgART platform compared to the MRgART platform, whereas pelvic cases were allotted a shorter time on the CTgART platform when compared to the MRgART platform. Our adaptive implementation technique has led to six open clinical trials using MRgART and seven using CTgART.

Conclusions

We demonstrate the successful development of a dual platform ART program in our clinic. Ongoing efforts are needed to continue the development and integration of ART across platforms and disease sites to maximize access and evidence for this technique worldwide.

Clinical outcomes of patients with unresectable primary liver cancer treated with MR-guided stereotactic body radiation Therapy: A Six-Year experience

Purpose

Magnetic resonance-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) with optional online adaptation has shown promise in delivering ablative doses to unresectable primary liver cancer. However, there remain limited data on the indications for online adaptation as well as dosimetric and longer-term clinical outcomes following MRgSBRT.

Methods and Materials

Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and combined biphenotypic hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) who completed MRgSBRT to 50 Gy in 5 fractions between June of 2015 and December of 2021 were analyzed. The necessity of adaptive techniques was evaluated. The cumulative incidence of local progression was evaluated and survival and competing risk analyses were performed.

Results

Ninety-nine analyzable patients completed MRgSBRT during the study period and 54 % had planning target volumes (PTVs) within 1 cm of the duodenum, small bowel, or stomach at the time of simulation. Online adaptive RT was used in 53 % of patients to correct organ-at-risk constraint violation and/or to improve target coverage. In patients who underwent adaptive RT planning, online replanning resulted in superior target coverage when compared to projected, non-adaptive plans (median coverage ≥ 95 % at 47.5 Gy: 91 % [IQR: 82-96] before adaptation vs 95 % [IQR: 87-99] after adaptation, p < 0.01). The median follow-up for surviving patients was 34.2 months for patients with HCC and 10.1 months for patients with CCA/cHCC-CCA. For all patients, the 2-year cumulative incidence of local progression was 9.8 % (95 % CI: 1.5-18 %) for patients with HCC and 9.0 % (95 % CI: 0.1-18) for patients with CCA/cHCC-CCA. Grade 3 through 5 acute and late clinical gastrointestinal toxicities were observed in < 10 % of the patients.

Conclusions

MRgSBRT, with the option for online adaptive planning when merited, allows delivery of ablative doses to primary liver tumors with excellent local control with acceptable toxicities. Additional studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of MRgSBRT in the treatment of primary liver cancer are warranted.

Circumferential Resection Margin as Predictor of Nonclinical Complete Response in Nonoperative Management of Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Short-course radiation therapy and consolidation chemotherapy with nonoperative intent has emerged as a novel treatment paradigm for patients with rectal cancer, but there are no data on the predictors of clinical complete response.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the predictors of clinical complete response and survival.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTINGS

National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center.

PATIENTS

Patients with stage I to III rectal adenocarcinoma treated between January 2018 and May 2019 (n = 86).

INTERVENTIONS

Short-course radiation therapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Logistic regression was performed to assess for predictors of clinical complete response. The end points included local regrowth-free survival, regional control, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

A positive (+) circumferential resection margin by MRI at diagnosis was a significant predictor of nonclinical complete response (OR: 4.1, p = 0.009) when adjusting for CEA level and primary tumor size. Compared to patients with a negative (-) pathologic circumferential resection margin, patients with a positive (+) pathologic circumferential resection margin had inferior local regrowth-free survival (29% vs 87%, p < 0.001), regional control (57% vs 94%, p < 0.001), distant metastasis-free survival (43% vs 95%, p < 0.001), and overall survival (86% vs 95%, p < 0.001) at 2 years. However, the (+) and (-) circumferential resection margin by MRI subgroups in patients who had a clinical complete response both had similar regional control, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival of more than 90% at 2 years.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design, modest sample size, short follow-up, and the heterogeneity of treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Circumferential resection margin involvement by MRI at diagnosis is a strong predictor of nonclinical complete response. However, patients who achieve a clinical complete response after short-course radiation therapy and consolidation chemotherapy with nonoperative intent have excellent clinical outcomes regardless of the initial circumferential resection margin status. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C190 .

EL MARGEN DE RESECCIN CIRCUNFERENCIAL COMO PREDICTOR NO CLNICO DE RESPUESTA COMPLETA EN EL MANEJO CONSERVADOR DEL CNCER DE RECTO

ANTECEDENTES:La radioterapia de corta duración y la quimioterapia de consolidación en el manejo conservador, han surgido como un nuevo paradigma de tratamiento, para los pacientes con cáncer de recto, lastimosamente no hay datos definitivos sobre los predictores de una respuesta clínica completa.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los predictores de respuesta clínica completa y de la sobrevida.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo de cohortes.AJUSTES:Centro oncológico designado por el NCI.PACIENTES:Adenocarcinomas de recto estadio I-III tratados entre 01/2018 y 05/2019 (n = 86).INTERVENCIONES:Radioterapia de corta duración seguida de quimioterapia de consolidación.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se realizó una regresión logística para evaluar los predictores de respuesta clínica completa. Los criterios de valoración incluyeron la sobrevida libre de recidiva local, el control regional, la sobrevida libre de metástasis a distancia y la sobrevida general.RESULTADOS:Un margen de resección circunferencial positivo (+) evaluado por imagenes de resonancia magnética nuclear en el momento del diagnóstico fue un predictor no clínico muy significativo de respuesta completa (razón de probabilidades/ OR: 4,1, p = 0,009) al ajustar el nivel de antígeno carcinoembrionario y el tamaño del tumor primario. Comparando con los pacientes que presetaban un margen de resección circunferencial patológico negativo (-), los pacientes con un margen de resección circunferencial patológico positivo (+) tuvieron una sobrevida libre de recidiva local (29% frente a 87%, p < 0,001), un control regional (57% frente a 94%, p < 0,001), una sobrevida libre de metástasis a distancia (43% frente a 95%, p < 0,001) y una sobrevida global (86% frente a 95%, p < 0,001) inferior en 2 años de seguimiento. Sin embargo, los subgrupos de margen de resección circunferencial (+) y (-) evaluados por imágenes de resonancia magnética nuclear en pacientes que tuvieron una respuesta clínica completa tuvieron un control regional similar, una sobrevida libre de metástasis a distancia y una sobrevida general >90% en 2 años de seguimiento.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo, tamaño modesto de la muestra, seguimiento corto y heterogeneidad de tratamientos.CONCLUSIONES:La afectación del margen de resección circunferencial evaluado por resonancia magnética nuclear al momento del diagnóstico es un fuerte factor predictivo no clínico de respuesta completa. Sin embargo, los pacientes que logran una respuesta clínica completa después de un curso corto de radioterapia y quimioterapia de consolidación como manejo conservador tienen excelentes resultados clínicos independientemente del estado del margen de resección circunferencial inicial. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C190 . (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Knowledge-based adaptive planning quality assurance using dosimetric indicators for stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to develop knowledge-based tools for robust adaptive radiotherapy (ART) planning to determine on-table adaptive DVH metric variations or planning process errors for stereotactic pancreatic ART. We developed volume-based dosimetric identifiers to identify deviations of ART plans from simulation plans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two patient cohorts who were treated on MR-Linac for pancreas cancer were included in this retrospective study; a training cohort and a validation cohort. All patients received 50 Gy in 5 fractions. PTV-OPT was generated by subtracting the critical organs plus a 5 mm-margin from PTV. Several metrics that potentially can identify failure-modes were calculated including PTV & PTV_OPT V95% and PTV & PTV_OPT D95%/D5%. The difference between each DVH metric in each adaptive plan with the DVH metric in simulation plan was calculated. The 95% confidence interval (CI) of the variations in each DVH metric was calculated for the patient training cohort. Variations in DVH metrics that exceeded the 95% CI for all fractions in training and validation cohort were flagged for retrospective investigation for root-cause analysis to determine their predictive power for identifying failure-modes.

RESULTS

The CIs for the PTV & PTV_OPT V95% and PTV & PTV_OPT D95%/D5% were ± 13%, ± 5%, ± 0.1, ± 0.03, respectively. We estimated the positive predictive value and negative predictive value of our method to be 77% and 89%, respectively, for the training cohort, and 80% for both in the validation cohort.

DISCUSSION

We developed dosimetric indicators for ART planning QA to identify population-based deviations or planning errors during online adaptive process for stereotactic pancreatic ART. This technology may be useful as an ART clinical trial QA tool and improve overall ART quality at an institution.

Ablative radiotherapy for colorectal liver metastases and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

The role of radiation therapy in the management of liver cancers, both primary and metastatic, has changed drastically over the past several decades. Although conventional radiation was limited by technology, the advent of advanced image-guided radiotherapy and the rise in evidence for and popularity of stereotactic body radiotherapy have expanded the indications for radiation in these two distinct disease types. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiation therapy, daily online adaptive radiotherapy, and proton radiotherapy are some of many modern radiotherapy techniques that allow for increasingly efficacious treatment of intrahepatic disease while simultaneously allowing for increased normal tissue sparing, including sparing of the normal liver and the radiosensitive luminal gastrointestinal tract. Modern radiation therapy should be considered along with approaches such as surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for the management of liver cancers of diverse histologies. Herein we describe the use of modern radiotherapy in two example settings, colorectal liver metastases and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and how external beam radiotherapy provides options within multidisciplinary discussions to elect optimal patient-specific treatments.

First treatments for Lattice stereotactic body radiation therapy using magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy

Two abdominal patients were treated with Lattice stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy (MRgRT). This is one of the first reported treatments of Lattice SBRT with the use of MRgRT. A description of the treatment approach and planning considerations were incorporated into this report. MRgRT Lattice SBRT delivered similar planning quality metrics to established dosimetric parameters for Lattice SBRT. Increased signal intensity were seen in the MRI treatments for one of the patients during the course of treatment.

An Analysis of Major Target Deviations in Craniospinal Irradiation Treatment Plans for Patients With Intermediate-Risk Medulloblastoma Within a Phase 3 Clinical Trial (Children's Oncology Group Study ACNS0331)

Purpose

Craniospinal irradiation remains an essential and yet difficult part of the treatment of patients with medulloblastoma. Whereas technological advances offer promise of increased conformity, realiance on advanced technology is not without risk, and it remains critical to carefully delineate targets. We describe examples of target deviations (TDs) in craniospinal irradiation treatment plans for postoperative patients with medulloblastoma in a phase 3 clinical trial (ACNS 0331).

Methods and Materials

The principal investigator independently performed a review of the treatment plans and portal films of enrolled patients and evaluated the plans for TDs. TDs of dose, dose uniformity, and volume were defined as major or minor deviations. Major TDs scored as protocol violations. The effect of major TDs on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using the stratified Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Of the 549 patients enrolled, 461 were available for this analysis. Thirty-two (7%) plans did not have data sufficient for TD evaluation. Major TDs were found in 32 of the 461 plans (7%). Of those, 21 were deviations of target volume alone, 7 were deviations of target dose alone, and 4 were deviations of both target volume and dose. The 25 patients with TDs of volume involved 29 sites. The most common major TDs of volume involved the brain (9 of 29) and the posterior fossa (9 of 29). On Cox proportional hazards modeling, the presence of a major TD did not statistically significantly affect EFS (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-2.11; P = .9541) or OS (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-2.38; P = .8113).

Conclusions

Although intensity modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy are promising in improving conformity and sparing organs at risk, technology does not substitute for careful anatomic definition of target volumes. The study was not powered to evaluate the effect of TDs on EFS and OS; therefore, the statistical analysis presented in this study must be interpreted with caution.

A pilot study of same-day MRI-only simulation and treatment with MR-guided adaptive palliative radiotherapy (MAP-RT)

We conducted a prospective pilot study evaluating the feasibility of same day MRI-only simulation and treatment with MRI-guided adaptive palliative radiotherapy (MAP-RT) for urgent palliative indications (NCT#03824366). All (16/16) patients were able to complete 99% of their first on-table attempted fractions, and no grades 3-5 toxicities occurred.

Simulation-Free Radiation Therapy: An Emerging Form of Treatment Planning to Expedite Plan Generation for Patients Receiving Palliative Radiation Therapy

Purpose

Herein we report the clinical and dosimetric experience for patients with metastases treated with palliative simulation-free radiation therapy (SFRT) at a single institution.

Methods and Materials

SFRT was performed at a single institution. Multiple fractionation regimens were used. Diagnostic imaging was used for treatment planning. Patient characteristics as well as planning and treatment time points were collected. A matched cohort of patients with conventional computed tomography simulation radiation therapy (CTRT) was acquired to evaluate for differences in planning and treatment time. SFRT dosimetry was evaluated to determine the fidelity of SFRT. Descriptive statistics were calculated on all variables and statistical significance was evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and t test methods.

Results

Thirty sessions of SFRT were performed and matched with 30 sessions of CTRT. Seventy percent of SFRT and 63% of CTRT treatments were single fraction. The median time to plan generation was 0.88 days (0.19-1.47) for SFRT and 1.90 days (0.39-5.23) for CTRT (P = .02). The total treatment time was 41 minutes (28-64) for SFRT and 30 minutes (21-45) for CTRT (P = .02). In the SFRT courses, the maximum and mean deviations in the actual delivered dose from the approved plans for the maximum dose were 4.1% and 0.07%, respectively. All deliveries were within a 5% threshold and deemed clinically acceptable.

Conclusions

Palliative SFRT is an emerging technique that allowed for a statistically significant lower time to plan generation and was dosimetrically acceptable. This benefit must be weighed against increased total treatment time for patients receiving SFRT compared with CTRT, and appropriate patient selection is critical.

The first reported case of a patient with pancreatic cancer treated with cone beam computed tomography-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR)

BACKGROUND

Online adaptive stereotactic radiotherapy allows for improved target and organ at risk (OAR) delineation and inter-fraction motion management via daily adaptive planning. The use of adaptive SBRT for the treatment of pancreatic cancer (performed until now using only MRI or CT on rails-guided adaptive radiotherapy), has yielded promising outcomes. Herein we describe the first reported case of cone beam CT-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 61-year-old female with metastatic pancreatic cancer presented for durable palliation of a symptomatic primary pancreatic mass. She was prescribed 35 Gy/5 fractions utilizing CT-STAR. The patient was simulated utilizing an end-exhale CT with intravenous and oral bowel contrast. Both initial as well as daily adapted plans were created adhering to a strict isotoxicity approach in which coverage was sacrificed to meet critical luminal gastrointestinal OAR hard constraints. Kilovoltage cone beam CTs were acquired on each day of treatment and the radiation oncologist edited OAR contours to reflect the patient's anatomy-of-the-day. The initial and adapted plan were compared using dose volume histogram objectives, and the superior plan was delivered. Use of the initial treatment plan would have resulted in nine critical OAR hard constraint violations. The adapted plans achieved hard constraints in all five fractions for all four critical luminal gastrointestinal structures.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the successful treatment of a patient with pancreatic cancer treated with CT-STAR. Prior to this treatment, the delivery of ablative adaptive radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer was limited to clinics with MR-guided and CT-on-rails adaptive SBRT technology and workflows. CT-STAR is a promising modality with which to deliver stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

Simulated computed tomography-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We conducted a prospective, in silico imaging clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility and potential dosimetric benefits of computed tomography-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight patients with LAPC received five additional CBCTs on the ETHOS system before or after their standard of care radiotherapy treatment. Initial plans were created based on their initial simulation anatomy (P_I) and emulated adaptive plans were created based on their anatomy-of-the-day (P_A). The prescription was 50 Gy/5 fractions. Plans were created under a strict isotoxicity approach, in which organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints were prioritized over planning target volume coverage. The P_I was evaluated on the patient's anatomy-of-the-day, compared to the daily P_A, and the superior plan was selected. Feasibility was defined as successful completion of the workflow in compliance with strict OAR constraints in ≥80% of fractions.

RESULTS

CT-STAR was feasible in silico for LAPC and improved OAR and/or target dosimetry in 100% of fractions. Use of the P_I based on the patient's anatomy-of-the-day would have yielded a total of 94 OAR constraint violations and ≥1 hard constraint violation in 40/40 fractions. In contrast, 39/40 P_A met all OAR constraints. In one fraction, the P_A minimally exceeded the large bowel constraint, although dosimetrically improved compared to the P_I. Total workflow time per fraction was 36.28 minutes (27.57-55.86).

CONCLUSION

CT-STAR for the treatment of LAPC cancer proved feasible and was dosimetrically superior to non-adapted CT-stereotactic body radiotherapy.

In Silico Trial of Computed Tomography-Guided Stereotactic Adaptive Radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the Treatment of Abdominal Oligometastases

PURPOSE

We conducted a prospective, in silico clinical imaging study (NCTXXXX) to evaluate the feasibility of cone-beam computed tomography-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the treatment of abdominal oligometastases. We hypothesized that CT-STAR produces improved dosimetry compared to non-adapted CT-stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS/MATERIALS

Eight patients receiving SBRT for abdominal oligometastatic disease received five additional kV cone beam CTs (CBCTs) on the ETHOS system. These additional CBCTs were used for imaging during an emulator treatment session. Initial plans were created based on their simulation (P_I) and emulated adaptive plans (P_A) were based on anatomy-of-the-day. The prescription was 50 Gy/5 fractions. Organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints were prioritized over planning target volume coverage under a strict isotoxicity approach. The P_I was applied to the patient's anatomy-of-the-day and compared to the re-optimized P_A using dose volume histogram metrics, with selection of the superior plan. Feasibility was defined as completion of the adaptive workflow and compliance with strict OAR constraints in ≥80% of fractions. Fractions were performed under time pressures by a physician and physicist to mimic the adaptive process.

RESULTS

CT-STAR was feasible, with successful workflow completion in 38/40 (95%) fractions. P_I application to daily anatomy created OAR constraint violations in 30/40 (75%) fractions. There were 8 stomach, 18 duodenum, 16 small bowel, and 11 large bowel P_I OAR constraint violations. In contrast, OAR violations occurred in 2/40 (5%) P_A (both small bowel violations, both improved from the P_I). CT-STAR also improved GTV V100 and D95 coverage in 25/40 (63%) and 20/40 (50%) fractions, respectively. 0/40 (0%) fractions were deemed non-feasible due to poor image quality and/or inability to delineate structures. Adaptation time per fraction was a median of 22.59 minutes (10.97-47.23).

CONCLUSIONS

CT-STAR resolved OAR hard constraint violations and/or improved target coverage in silico when compared to non-adapted CT-guided SBRT for the ablation of abdominal oligometastatic disease. While limitations of this study include its small sample size and in silico design, the consistently high quality CBCT images captured and comparable timing metrics to prior adaptive studies suggest that CT- STAR is a viable treatment paradigm for the ablation of abdominal oligometastatic disease. Clinical trials are in development to further evaluate CT-STAR in the clinic.

Overall survival in patients with FIGO stage IVA cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

FIGO stage IVA cervical cancer is a unique diagnosis that conveys a poor prognosis. Despite the use of PET/CT for staging, concurrent chemotherapy, and image-guided brachytherapy, overall survival (OS) in these patients is low. Treatment requires aggressive use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. We report results of a prospective observational cohort study for patients with de novo stage IVA cervical cancer treated at a single institution.

METHODS

Patients with a new diagnosis of stage IVA cervical cancer treated at an academic institution between 1997 and 2020 were prospectively monitored. Staging was retroactively assigned using the 2018 FIGO staging system. All patients had a PET/CT prior to treatment and were treated with definitive intent radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. The primary outcome of interest was OS. Secondary outcomes were local control, progression-free survival (PFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS).

RESULTS

32 patients with de novo stage IVA cervical cancer were treated with definitive intent radiotherapy. Median follow-up time was 4.27 years (1.31-10.35). 22/32 (69%) of patients received brachytherapy as a part of their definitive treatment, and 28/32 (88%) received chemotherapy concurrently with radiotherapy. 14/32 (44%) of patients had no evidence of disease at last follow-up. The 5-year local control, PFS, DFS, and OS estimates were 79%, 49%, 53%, and 48%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, complete metabolic response was associated with a statistically significant improvement in PFS (HR = 0.256, 95% CI = 0.078-0.836, p = 0.024) and OS (HR = 0.273, 95% CI 0.081-0.919).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate a robust OS in patients with stage IVA cervical cancer when treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

A Rational Approach to Unilateral Neck RT for Head and Neck Cancers in the Era of Immunotherapy

Radiotherapy plays an important role in the definitive and adjuvant treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, standard courses of radiation therapy may contribute to the depletion of circulating lymphocytes and potentially attenuate optimal tumor antigen presentation that may be detrimental to the efficacy of novel immunotherapeutic agents. This review explores the advantages of restricting radiation to the primary tumor/tumor bed and ipsilateral elective neck as it pertains to the evolving field of immunotherapy.