A multistate outbreak of hepatitis A associated with semidried tomatoes in Australia, 2009

BACKGROUND

A large outbreak of hepatitis A affected individuals in several Australian states in 2009, resulting in a 2-fold increase in cases reported to state health departments compared with 2008. Two peaks of infection occurred (April-May and September-November), with surveillance data suggesting locally acquired infections from a widely distributed food product.

METHODS

Two case-control studies were completed. Intensive product trace-back and food sampling was undertaken. Genotyping was conducted on virus isolates from patient serum and food samples. Control measures included prophylaxis for close contacts, public health warnings, an order by the chief health officer under the Victorian Food Act 1984, and trade-level recalls on implicated batches of semidried tomatoes.

RESULTS

A multijurisdictional case-control study in April-May found an association between illness and consumption of semidried tomatoes (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; 95% CI 1.4-6.7). A second case-control study conducted in Victoria in October-November also implicated semidried tomatoes as being associated with illness (OR, 10.3; 95% CI, 4.7-22.7). Hepatitis A RNA was detected in 22 samples of semidried tomatoes. Hepatitis A virus genotype IB was identified in 144 of 153 (94%) patients tested from 2009, and partial sequence analysis showed complete identity with an isolate found in a sample of semidried tomatoes.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of both case-control studies and food testing implicated the novel vehicle of semidried tomatoes as the cause of this hepatitis A outbreak. The outbreak was extensive and sustained despite public health interventions, the design and implementation of which were complicated by limitations in food testing capability and complex supply chains.

Rescreening of a group at high risk for colorectal neoplasia using immunochemical tests for faecal occult blood

The results of a screening programme for colorectal neoplasia in a high risk group using an immunochemical test for blood has been reported recently. This test is known as the faecal human haemoglobin (FHH) test. This paper reports the results of rescreening this group after an interval of 1-2 years. The FHH test was compared with a paper disc method. All individuals with positive tests were investigated and those with negative tests were offered investigation. The results confirm the value of the FHH test in screening a high risk group: 19 individuals in 1,153 participants were found to have a significant neoplasm (1.6%). The predictive value of the test for a significant neoplasm was 42%. A false negative rate of 2.6% was found, all lesions being benign. It appears to be more reliable than the paper disc method but the differences do not reach statistical significance. The FHH test is recommended for screening the general population over the age of 40 years, with rescreening annually.